View source for User:Mz7/Attack ideas, not people

{{DISPLAYTITLE:User:Mz7/Attack ''ideas'', not ''people''}}
{{Civility essay}}

Here on the English Wikipedia, and across all Wikimedia projects, we have thousands upon thousands of editors who come from diverse backgrounds. In such a community, [[WP:Wikipedia is stressful|conflict and dissent is going to be inevitable]]. The question before us is whether, despite our differences, we will be able to respect each other as ''people'', even if we do not agree with each other's ''ideas''. For an illustration of—and, indeed, the inspiration for—this principle, one has to look no further than the friendship between [[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]] and [[Antonin Scalia]].

== Background ==
{{multiple image
 | width = 150
 | image1 = Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2016 portrait.jpg
 | image2 = Antonin Scalia Official SCOTUS Portrait.jpg
 | footer = [[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]] and [[Antonin Scalia]] shared a remarkable friendship despite their at-times vehement disagreement as associate justices of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]].
}}

On March 1, 2016, [[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]], an [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] of the [[Supreme Court of the United States]], delivered a [[eulogy]] for her late colleague, [[Antonin Scalia]], who was also a member of the same Court.<ref name="nyt-liptak">{{cite news |last1=Liptak |first1=Adam |title=At Memorial, Scalia Remembered as Happy Combatant |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/02/us/politics/at-memorial-scalia-remembered-as-happy-combatant.html |work=The New York Times |date=March 1, 2016 |accessdate=July 11, 2020}}</ref> Ginsburg and Scalia had a remarkable relationship. On matters of the law, they were on diametrical opposite sides of the ideological spectrum: whereas Ginsburg is generally viewed as one of the most liberal justices on the Supreme Court, Scalia was generally viewed as one of the most conservative.<ref name="nprbestbuddies">{{cite web |author1=NPR Staff |title=Ginsburg And Scalia: 'Best Buddies' |url=https://www.npr.org/2016/02/15/466848775/scalia-ginsburg-opera-commemorates-sparring-supreme-court-friendship |website=All Things Considered |publisher=NPR |accessdate=July 11, 2020 |date=February 15, 2016}}</ref>

Nevertheless, outside of the courtroom, the two were close friends. They both enjoyed opera, they both hailed from the outer boroughs of New York City, and they had both previously worked together as judges of the [[U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]].<ref name="wapo-carmon">{{cite web |last1=Carmon |first1=Irin |title=What made the friendship between Scalia and Ginsburg work |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/02/13/what-made-scalia-and-ginsburgs-friendship-work/ |url-access=limited |website=The Washington Post |accessdate=July 11, 2020 |date=February 13, 2016}}</ref> As a tradition, every [[New Year's Eve]], their families would spend time together, and they once rode an elephant together in India.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Lind |first1=Dara |title=Read Justice Ginsburg’s moving tribute to her "best buddy" Justice Scalia |url=https://www.vox.com/2016/2/14/10990156/scalia-ginsburg-friends |website=Vox |accessdate=July 11, 2020 |language=en |date=February 14, 2016}}</ref>

== Attack ''ideas'', not ''people'' ==

When eulogizing her friend, Ginsburg stated that Scalia was "once asked how we could be friends, given our disagreements on lots of things. Justice Scalia answered: 'I attack ideas. I don’t attack people. Some very good people have some very bad ideas. And if you can't separate the two, you've got to get another day job. You don't want to be a judge, at least not a judge on a multi-member panel.'"<ref name="eulogy-txt">{{cite web |last1=Ginsburg |first1=Ruth Bader |title=Eulogy for Justice Antonin Scalia |url=https://awpc.cattcenter.iastate.edu/2017/03/21/eulogy-for-justice-antonin-scalia-march-1-2016/ |website=Archives of Women's Political Communication |publisher=Iowa State University |accessdate=July 11, 2020 |date=March 1, 2016}}</ref> As an example, Ginsburg noted that Justice Scalia "was very fond of" Justice [[William J. Brennan Jr.]], who was considered to be one of the most influential members of the Court's liberal wing, "as Justice Brennan was of Justice Scalia".<ref name="eulogy-txt" />
{{Cquote|quote=I attack ideas. I don’t attack people. Some very good people have some very bad ideas.|author=Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]|source=quoted by Justice [[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]] in her [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb_2GgE564A eulogy] of Justice Scalia}}

Notwithstanding their friendship, Justice Scalia and Justice Ginsburg were not necessarily ''nice'' to each other in their [[dissenting opinions]]. In ''[[United States v. Virginia]]'' (1996), the Supreme Court invalidated the [[Men's college|male-only admission policy]] of the [[Virginia Military Institute]] (VMI), holding that it violated the [[Equal Protection Clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution]]. Justice Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion, and the only justice who filed a dissenting opinion was Justice Scalia. Scalia lambasted the Court's opinion, writing that it "sweeps aside the precedents of this Court" and "ignores the history of our people".<ref>''United States v. Virginia'', [https://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep518/usrep518515/usrep518515.pdf 518 U.S. 515] at 566 (Scalia, J., dissenting).</ref> Scalia described the Court's opinion as "not the interpretation of a Constitution, but the creation of one".<ref>''United States v. Virginia'', [https://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep518/usrep518515/usrep518515.pdf 518 U.S. 515] at 570 (Scalia, J., dissenting).</ref>

According to Ginsburg, Scalia provided her a rough draft of this dissent as soon as possible, saying, "'Ruth, this is the penultimate draft of my dissent in the VMI case. It's not yet in shape to circulate to the Court, but I want to give you as much time as I can to answer it.'"<ref name="eulogy-txt" /> Recalling the case, Ginsburg stated, "He absolutely ruined my weekend, but my opinion is ever so much better because of his stinging dissent".<ref name="wapo-carmon" /> In a statement released after news of Scalia's death was announced, Ginsburg wrote: <blockquote>We disagreed now and then, but when I wrote for the Court and received a Scalia dissent, the opinion ultimately released was notably better than my initial circulation. Justice Scalia nailed all the weak spots — the "applesauce" and "argle bargle" — and gave me just what I needed to strengthen the majority opinion. [...] He was eminently quotable, his pungent opinions so clearly stated that his words never slipped from the reader's grasp.<ref name="nprbestbuddies" /></blockquote>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

== External links ==
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb_2GgE564A Recording of Ginsburg's eulogy of Scalia] by [[C-SPAN]] on [[YouTube]]
* [https://awpc.cattcenter.iastate.edu/2017/03/21/eulogy-for-justice-antonin-scalia-march-1-2016/ Text transcript of Ginsburg's eulogy of Scalia]