Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Correction and Detention Facilities (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

Should this article be merged with Dry Tortugas?

Seems like they should be merged. But which one should go, and which should stay? - Marc Averette 22:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that the two articles should be merged. One treats a national park, which is (in effect) the product of government and environmental policy on the part of a specific country, the United States. The other treats a geographical and natural feature, the islands themselves.

Even though the Dry Tortugas are a relatively minor geographic feature, I do think it's important to recognize them on their own terms. On the other hand, especially for an American audience, it is very important to promote the National Parks system as a means of ecological preservation and as an educational "device." Moreover, the park itself contains important historical features, such as the fort, which have little to do with the islands' scientific aspects.

Obviously the two topics are closely related and complement each other; but I'd be uncomfortable if they were merged - just as I would if (by way of example) the standalone article on Lake Baikal were to be reincorporated into "National Parks of Russia", or some such. Pufferfyshe (talk) 10:46, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe the articles should be merged. One article refers to a geographic feature (essentially the end of the Florida Keys), and the other describes the national park that resides there. I think it makes sense to keep them separate. 24.174.107.143 (talk) 05:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OpposeFor the same reasons as above, these are two distinctly different subjects, its like saying-"we should merge the Death Valley article with the Death Valley National Monument (now a Park) article. When can we de-tag this article or, when is a consensus reached?

Marcia Wright (talk) 04:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Marcia Wright. Also the park includes the waters around the islands. Or would you merge Manhattan into New York City? --Matthiasb (talk) 18:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per JB. As per above comments. However, there is a great deal of overlap between the Fort Jefferson article and this one. Perhaps the FJ content here could be summarized and a link made to that separate article? -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.65.34.246 (talk) 20:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update-Dec 5, 2008 -I have gone ahead and removed the merge tags from both articles. Marcia Wright (talk) 02:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse osmosis

Deleted this reference from discussion of the building construction. This process may be used in the park I don't know (reference?) but in any regard it wasn't used when soldiers were garrisoned here. Its large scale experimental test was in California in 1965. Perhaps someone could find a source for its present use and incorporate the statement back into discussion of the modern park? RegardsTrilobitealive (talk) 21:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

images

The appeal of the article could be enhanced by adding images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verbal.noun (talk • contribs) 13:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dry Tortugas National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150306020554/http://www.nps.gov/drto/planyourvisit/upload/Dry%20Tortugas%20National%20Park%20Bird%20Checklist.pdf to http://www.nps.gov/drto/planyourvisit/upload/Dry%20Tortugas%20National%20Park%20Bird%20Checklist.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]