Talk:Struggle Committee (Hong Kong)

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (296)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,067)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,513) • Stub-Class articles (6,679)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (378) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,337)

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Struggle Committee (Hong Kong) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a committee of Chinese compatriots of all circles from Hong Kong Island and Kowloon struggled against what they viewed as persecution by the British authorities in Hong Kong?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Struggle Committee (Hong Kong).

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 20:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Committee of Hong Kong–Kowloon Chinese Compatriots of All Circles for the Struggle Against Persecution by the British Authorities in Hong Kong was a committee in Hong Kong Island and Kowloon which aimed to unite Chinese people of all circles in a struggle against British colonialism in Hong Kong? Source: Lane, Kevin P. (11 July 2019). Sovereignty And The Status Quo: The Historical Roots Of China's Hong Kong Policy. Routledge. p. 113. ISBN 978-1-000-31238-6.
- Reviewed:
- Comment: I have not yet reviewed another DYK nomination, but this is only my fifth nomination. I will review two other DYK nominations before my next nomination. Yue🌙

Created by Yue (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Yue🌙 20:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Hook is slightly too long and should be shortened per WP:DYK200. A shortened version of the above - which I have not yet attempted to verify - is ALT1: ... that the Struggle Committee in Hong Kong Island and Kowloon aimed to unite Chinese people of all circles in a struggle against British colonialism in Hong Kong?--Laun chba ller 22:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I intended to have the long translated name of the organisation as the "hooky" part of my original hook. I think this is lost with the shortened name. Perhaps a better hook with a different focus is needed, but I have not thought of one yet. Yue🌙 23:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess if the hook is the name, then an alternate hook could be (the source remains the same):

ALT2: ... that the full name of Hong Kong's Struggle Committee was the "Committee of Hong Kong–Kowloon Chinese Compatriots of All Circles for the Struggle Against Persecution by the British Authorities in Hong Kong"?

Yue🌙 21:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, if the article title was the full thing, I might be inclined to AGF it. (For the record, "that the Committee of Hong Kong–Kowloon Chinese Compatriots of All Circles for the Struggle Against Persecution by the British Authorities in Hong Kong struggled against persecution by the British authorities in Hong Kong" came out at 221.) I'm on the fence with ALT2 as to its interestingness - what else have you got?--Laun chba ller 10:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know:

ALT3: ... that a committee of Chinese compatriots of all circles from Hong Kong Island and Kowloon struggled against what they viewed as persecution by the British authorities in Hong Kong?

ALT4: ... that the Struggle Committee was blamed for a series of bombings in Hong Kong in 1967, despite it only holding two meetings during its entire existence?

ALT3 is a play on the full name of the organisation, verified by the same source given for the original hook and ALT2. ALT4 is verified by: Cheung, Gary Ka-wai (1 October 2009). Hong Kong's Watershed: The 1967 Riots. Hong Kong University Press. pp. 38–39, 91. ISBN 978-962-209-089-7.

Apologies, I meant IAR, not AGF. (WP:ARG!) ALT3 checks out and AGF ALT4. Full review needed.--Laun chba ller 22:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing the nomination:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall:

A well-put together article on Hong Kong history. The article was 5x expanded within the appropriate time frame when it was nominated March 20, it is long enough, its paragraphs are all sourced, as is the sentence containing the hook fact. The tone is neutral, straightforwardly summarizing the events and circumstances. Plagiarism appears avoided, per Earwig (checked the hits, and they're just from repeating long titles of sources or orgnizations) and some spot checks. ALT3 is

approved with the reviewer having verified the sourcing for the name of the organization through the Heaton (1970) source. ALT4 is

approved with good faith as I am not able to read the language of the source that verifies the end of the Struggle Committee when the government banned it (which in turn grounds the information that the two meetings held during the riots were the only meetings of its existence). Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 21:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]