Jump to content

Talk:Vince Offer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Vince Offer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Hyde podcast

[edit]

Are the Sam Hyde podcast sources in the early life reliable? 2600:100C:A211:7F18:C9B7:A8C5:FEE0:4AD6 (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per this line in the podcast's description, no, these absolutely fail WP:RS even if Youtube wasn't already considered a generally unreliable source by consensus. All comments made in this video are purely satirical and for comedic/entertainment purposes only. This is a comedy video. Do not take anything said in the video seriously. All people seen in this video are paid actors, this video was filmed on a film set with professionals. Comments made by actors are not to be confused with the real opinions of the actors. This is a staged comedic performance. I've gone ahead and removed them from the article. SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 04:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Granted the info is most likely true but the source isn’t the most reliable…btw undid part of the edit since it indiscriminately removed reliably sourced info. 2600:100C:A211:7F18:C9B7:A8C5:FEE0:4AD6 (talk) 11:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It did not "indiscriminately remove reliably sourced info." As I mentioned above, Youtube is considered a generally unreliable source, per consensus. I've once again removed that material. Please do not reinsert it without addressing the sourcing.SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 15:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, WP:ABOUTSELF would not apply for the podcast right? 2600:100C:A211:7F18:4573:3C78:3EF5:2CF5 (talk) 01:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd think it'd be a stretch argument, given that it's not really the subject's own podcast; but beyond that, in this case I think the disclaimer in the video description directly negates the reliability of the source regardless of whether it would have otherwise been acceptable. SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 01:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeahhh I can see why it’s not considered reliable 2600:100C:A211:7F18:4573:3C78:3EF5:2CF5 (talk) 02:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Smoking Gun source

[edit]

Since the birth date is on the arrest record, is it considered a reliable source? 2600:100C:A20C:6C0F:440C:5169:5AAC:E774 (talk) 20:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the source considered a primary source? 2600:100C:A218:9A7B:FD18:E2A9:2A2B:B5B0 (talk) 20:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]