User talk:Cbh/Archive 1
Contacting me
As noted on my main page, I have retired from Wikipedia*, and although I may be coaxed back to fix stuff I've submitted I'm unlikely to see stuff on my talk page for quite some time. If in doubt, email me!!!1!eleven!! Thank you for your attention, or if you haven't read this, thank you for your inattention and "phfffft!"
* actually no I haven't, but email me anyway as I may only pop in now and then.
|
Christine's talk page |
|
|
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]Hello Cbh/Archive 1, welcome to Wikipedia!
I noticed nobody had said hi yet... Hi!
If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.
You might like some of these links and tips:
- some General guidance.
- Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
- Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
- Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
- Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
- Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
- Use the Show preview button
- Provide an Edit summary
- Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
- Take a look at Consensus of standards
- Create a User page
If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing! -- Alf melmac 22:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Late welcome apologies
[edit]Around Oxford! Well I would have said hello earlier had I known, but didn't have pages on my watchlist you edited until The Young Ones so apologies for the delay. Welcome. --Alf melmac 22:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Late reply apologies
[edit]Thanks for dropping by to say "hello", and my apologies, in reply to your apologies for the delay, for being so late. I think that's suitably obfuscated, anyway. I've remained only an occasional contributor where I shall try to keep an eye out for stray apostrophes. It's amazing how prolific they are once they escape. Chri's(!) Wed 14 Jun 2006 21:10 BST
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Reichhart
[edit]Hi Chris,
I'm Traugott from Germany. I noticed that you created the entry Johann Reichhart, a character I'm interested in as well. I own a copy of the only existing German book about him, and edited the (previously existing) German article de:Johann Reichhart and your English article accordingly.
- I might have to get hold of a copy of that. My German is at present far too poor for me to have any hope of reading it but I intend to rectify that soon. Which may be somewhat ambitious for a person with my poor aptitude for languages (including my own, given some of my recent grammatical gaffes) as well as being lazy and having no concentration! Chris 21:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Some problems: My sources never give his second Christian name "Baptist". Where did you get that from? It's not uncommon for a Bavarian named Johann to have a second name specifying whether he was named for John the Baptist or John the Evangelist, but I nowhere found that Reichhart was one of them.
What do your sources say about the Reichhart/Woods/Nuremberg complex? What I found (and I give a "quick and dirty" translation here, so don't quote me. It's from Dachs, p. 120) is:
- On 1 April 1946 Reichhart hanged, at Landsberg, two SS members, and 14 more in the night of 28 to 29 May. After that, he declined to execute more death sentences. He had heard through the grapevine that two of the executees were innocent - victims of a mixing up of names, because of the sloppy work of American investigators. After that, Reichhart had to be afraid to be imprisoned again. 'I'd rather be in the slammer than murder one more innocent', he said to a warder at Landsberg prison.
- But Reichhart was so proficient with the rope that he, the Nazi executioner, very nearly was picked to execute the death sentences of the Nazi high brass convicted in the Nuremberg War Criminals Trial. But the Military Government thought twice. Reichhart had to teach Master Sergeant Hazel Woods the 'art of killing fast on the gallows'. The gallows, too, where the Nuremberg convicts were hanged were erected under the supervision of Reichhart. On 16 October 1946, Woods put the ropes round the necks of ten death candidates: Ribbentrop ..." (follows the well-know list of names)
This citation seems to indicate that Reichhart did not help Woods in the executions (from other sources I know that one of the executioner's assistents was Joseph Malta, and a *German* executioner's assistent is nowhere mentioned in the Nuremberg literature I'm aware of), but rather that it was he who "showed the ropes" to Woods, and then left him to do the job.
Two questions are opening here: How did Reichhart know what to do with the rope? He was a headsman, basically. Answer: (a) At the time he trained Woods (IF he did...), he had already a total of 156 "long drop" hangings under his belt - at Landsberg. (b) In 1942, the Third Reich introduced hanging as an alternate (more ignominous) method of execution. Reichhart promptly submitted construction details for a British style ("long drop") gallows (so he *knew* about that method). The ministry of justice however declined to have such a device built; the Nazi leaders preferred the (more painful) Austrian method of strangulation without any drop at all.
Second question: Was John C. "Hazel" Woods in need to receive such training?
I don't know, and I am still puzzled at the claim that Reichhart "taught" him anything.
So far, I have in vain tried to find any relevant material on Wood's activities pre-1946. There are rumours that he had been an executioner in civilian life already before becoming U.S. Army Executioner. Could it be that he had so far never worked with a rope? Unlikely, if you ask me. Hanging was a wide-spread method in the U.S. states at that time, and the Army had even a manual about the choice of rope, manner to prepare it, and a table of "drops". Woods was most certainly unfamiliar with the British style, and at Nuremberg used the American-style "hangman's knot" with about 8 coils rather than the British noose running through a brass eyelet.
Well - can you shed any light on that?
Have a nice time, --Traugott 12:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Traugott, thanks for updating the page!
- I became curious about Reichhart myself when my curiousity about capital punishment, and also the story of Die Weiße Rose, coincided with him in the middle. Upon finding that there was so little was written about him, my interest was piqued. Most of my information comes from the Gerould book and a few facts cribbed from the German language Wikipedia page about him; I've seen odd bits and pieces when searching the Internet but I'm rather unwilling to use them without sources or some other form of corroborating evidence and consequently haven't made notes of where I might have seen the odd interesting snippet, I'm afraid.
- Unfortunately Gerould has little to say about him, only a few paragraphs, which contain:
- Reichhart's full name (repeatedly spelt incorrectly with one "h") in the index and main text, but with no clear citation.
- that he had an assistant called Donderer, who quickly became an ex-assistant after being dismissed for repeatedly demonstrating his skills at a chamber of horrors.
- the number of executions during WWII, and the usual nature of the convictions.
- the trial and execution White Rose.
- the following: "... the Allies used the services of Reichart [sic] after the defeat of Germany and had him prepare the gallows for the Nuremberg war criminals and give instructions to Sergeant John Woods, the hangman for the American forces."
- That last bit looks like you're correct in that Reichhart didn't directly assist Woods with the executions themselves, but was responsible for arranging the long-drop and explaining to Woods how to use it. That does leave the question as to why the decision was made to appoint Woods as executioner if he either had no experience at all or no experience with the method employed (perhaps Woods had used the somewhat unreliable standard-drop previously); if these details are correct, it seems a strange decision considering executioners with knowledge or experience of that method such as Reichhart and Albert Pierrepoint were already available.
- My theorie is that it had to be an AMERICAN, period, and the two you mentioned weren't.--Traugott 18:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- You're right, of course; I just don't really understand that line of reasoning, although the same could be said of the British doing exactly the same thing. Chris 21:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've read about the short-drop method using very thin cords that was used to execute particularly unfavourable prisoners at Plötzensee, but I'm assuming (perhaps incorrectly) that Reichhart had only used the guillotine (and perhaps the axe) prior to the Nuremberg trials.
- Reichhart used the guillotine (NEVER the axe), and hanged some people by strangulation during the Nazi reign. His experience with the long drop method stems from Landsberg, i.e. from the time after the war up to May of 1946. Remember: When he resigned the Nuremberg Trial was not yet over. The Nuremberg hangings were almost half a year later. --Traugott 18:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- I think I've been confusing the events of Landsberg with those of Nuremberg. I need to read up on my history a bit more! I suppose I'm surprised that Reichhart used short-drop hanging, given the type of character I've assumed him to be (which may be incorrect; I think I'm in danger of drawing too many parallels with Pierrepoint, largely because as I mentioned, I'm currently reading the autobiography of the latter, but from odd things I've heard, Reichhart seemed to be a man of high standards), although if that's what he was instructed to do by the likes of Roland Freisler then I imagine that he probably wasn't in much of a position to argue. Chris 21:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- "if that's what he was instructed to do" - That's it, precisely. I don't know whether it was him who had to hang the people who tried to kill Hitler on 20 July 1944, but I do know that Hitler ordered them to be "hung like slaughtered cattle", with piano strings for ropes, fastened to butcher's hooks. I've been in that execution shed at Plötzensee, and have seen old photos: No trap doors, the crossbeam was at perhaps 7'6" above floor level.
- "man of high standards" - depends on what you mean by that. He certainly did his best to be fast, and he endeavoured to minimize pain. However, he was not a very discreet man and was reprimanded by the authorities for talking too much about his occupation.--Traugott 09:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think I've been confusing the events of Landsberg with those of Nuremberg. I need to read up on my history a bit more! I suppose I'm surprised that Reichhart used short-drop hanging, given the type of character I've assumed him to be (which may be incorrect; I think I'm in danger of drawing too many parallels with Pierrepoint, largely because as I mentioned, I'm currently reading the autobiography of the latter, but from odd things I've heard, Reichhart seemed to be a man of high standards), although if that's what he was instructed to do by the likes of Roland Freisler then I imagine that he probably wasn't in much of a position to argue. Chris 21:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've seen some photos of it, nasty looking place when it was still in use.
- Regarding the high standards, I was thinking of him minimising the suffering of his "clients" by being as quick and efficient as possible. I didn't realise he was of the indiscreet persuasion, although given the amount of work sent his way it is perhaps the only way he remained sane. Some of the others in his position didn't, Desfourneaux for example.
- Have you encountered the Berthold book, Der Letzte Deutsche Henker? I noticed it when I did a search for Reichhart on Amazon. Which leads me to thinking, I don't know what their copyright status is, but it has a picture of him on its cover which could be swiped for the Wikipedia page; alternatively maybe a still from the Die letzten Tage film since the actor who plays him is a not entirely unreasonable likeness. I seem to have gone off on a bit of a tangent... Chris 16:23, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't have any further reliable information I can offer besides what little is written in Gerould's book. If and when I come across anything else I'll let you know, though! I'm currently reading Pierrepoint's autobiography; I don't think he mentions Reichhart but I haven't finished it yet...
- Sorry I haven't been of more help. Cheers, Chris 13:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well - there's still another day for research.
- Re John C. Woods: I just came across the following: "The executioner was U.S. Master Sergeant John C. Woods, 43, of San Antonio, a short, chunky man who in his 15 years as U.S. Army executioner has hanged 347 people." Says who? Says TIME magazine in an article on the Nuremberg hangings, dated October 28, 1946. See [1].
- Interesting write-up, that. It creates a certain impression of the man. I've just read what Pierrepoint said about him, which was somewhat less than flattering. He asserts that Woods in fact used the standard drop for the Nuremberg executions rather than the long drop that Reichhart had promoted, and I have seen other uncorroborated claims that Woods' executions weren't all that slick. Chris 21:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Cheers, --Traugott 14:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
My uncle knew well both Woods and Malta as well as the other executioners and has some very interesting stories of both them and the ones who followed them.
In his book, Captor Captive, he describes their activities and how he fired Malta for demanding a heated sedan be sent for him for executions. He said he was talking to Malta on the phone and told him that even the Captain did not have a heated sedan. He then asked the Captain and was told to "fire the bastard', which he did. My uncle is still alive and I talked to him this morning about Woods and Malta. I can send a text of his book as an attachment to anyone interested. tomjax at yahoo dot com—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.153.248.242 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC).
- Well, John C. Woods is still waiting to have a page created for him if you want to make a start! It'd be interesting to see what else you can find out.
—Chris (blather • contribs)
16:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
John C. Woods claimed to have attended a judicial hanging in Kansas years before Nuremberg and have been asked to assist the official Kansas executioner. He apparently enjoyed the experience so much that he then applied for a more permanent post. He seems to have been unaware that the knot (or British brass eyelet) is supposed to be placed so that in winds up directly under the chin when the noose tightens and thus throws the head backward delivering the 1200 foot-lbs. of force to the back of the vertebrae, which is the easiest direction from which to apply force to the spinal column so that the vertebrae separate and in so doing sever the spinal cord. Look at the post-mortem photos of the Nuremberg ten and you will see the know more toward the back of the head. The blood was probably caused by too small a trap-door opening. The U.S. Army manual still exists and is used in the States of Washington and Delaware. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.166.54 (talk) 21:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Good edit
[edit]http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Scotch_whisky&curid=28896&diff=68087944&oldid=67134392 --Guinnog 23:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I had a couple of "u"s going spare, so I thought I might as well put them to good use. :) Chris 23:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sure you've seen it already, but in case you haven't [2] made me laugh. Slainthe! --Guinnog 00:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Nice project! I think I'm getting a little too old to involve myself in potential "diplomatic incidents", though... Chris 13:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Recoil booster
[edit]The drawing you added is somewhat confusing, it actually looks like more of a muzzle brake than a booster. If the front and rear of the chamber aren't connected, then that would make sense, as the expanding gasses would push the ends apart, which may be what the Vickers booster does. If the drawing shows a single piece unit, then it looks just like the Volquartsen "stabilizer" I have on my 10/22, which traps the gasses and vents them radially. scot 16:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, you didn't draw the image, you just added it to the article. I'll move this to the correct user page... scot 16:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Not to worry; I'd be more than happy to draw a confusing picture if that would make things any easier. :)
- -- Chris (blather • contribs) 16:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, but no, anytime I wish to be confused I just look at a diagram of a Torsen differential, and that makes my head hurt. Every time I look at one, I almost get it, but not quite. Took me years as a child to finally understand normal differentials--my uncle had a radio controlled car with one, and when I turned a wheel and saw the opposite one spin backwards, but I just didn't get the "why" of it. Years later, it finally clicked, all at once. Same thing for planetary gears. One of these days the Torsen will click as well, and until then I'll just keep looking and confusing myself... scot 16:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, you'll enjoy this article about how tank transmissions work, then! That made my head hurt quite a bit. I'm afraid I can't find the link to the Chieftain's six-speed epicyclic semi-auto with integrated triple differential steering, which really made my head hurt quite a lot when I tried to figure that one out.
- -- Chris (blather • contribs) 16:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- I have seen that one before, and yes, those are confusing--all but the CVT one he proposes at the end, that one appeals to my sense of KISS. At least the tank steering mechanisms are all based on simple differentials, so I could, if forced to, trace the power flow. The Torsen differntial, however, uses the evil worm gear. If you've never messed with them, you might not realize that they are NOT reversible--you can power the wheel with the screw, but NOT the screw with the wheel; applying a load in excess of the screw's power will in fact tend to lock up the whole thing, a fact I discovered the hard way when tring to fix someone else's software on a force-feedback joystick. It worked fine under no load or no power; the motors would drive the joystick, and the strain gauges would measure the load on the stick, but the idiots who designed the gear train (it was a student project from a previous year) had used a worm gear to gear down the motors. I greatly simplified the software (Electrical Engineers shouldn't write software) and verified that all the I/O and the mathematical models were correct, but the damned thing just wouldn't work in practice, because as soon as you applied load to the stick the worm gear would lock up. Having had this experience, I'm not quite sure how the worm gears in the Torsen work. It sounds from some descriptions I've seen that with the driveshaft locked, turning the right wheel forward will cause the left to turn forward at a fraction of the right's speed, and that I just don't get. If it's a case of turning the right locks the differential if the left is not turning as well, then I might be getting it. Oh, well, I'm sure one day I'll find a description that will describe it in the right terms and it will click. scot 19:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- I last looked at a diagram of a Torsen over 20 years ago when I was still at school; the fact that I haven't felt the inclination to look at it since speaks for itself, I think. From what I remember, I have to wonder if perhaps its principle of operation is similar to that of the Blish lock: the higher the torque, the more resistance it will have to turning, whereas at low loads it will presumably move more freely. From what I remember of the diagram in question, the worm gears were at quite a steep angle so I'm guessing possible to turn in reverse if not particularly easy.
- As for the tanks, the Chieftain one really caused my brains to run out of my ears after following two separate gear trains from a common drive which met up in an epicyclic differential whose output turned in the opposite direction to what it should if it had any decency. I think I'll just try to put that out of my mind: I understand that the designer of one of its predecessors went insane trying to figure it out.
- -- Chris (blather • contribs) 19:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Shaun of the Dead
[edit]Hi Chris - received your message RE: the Shaun of the Dead synopsis. Just wanted to say cheers for the heads-up, and I'll keep an eye out on it. Thanks!--Joseph Q Publique 00:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
ISBN problem
[edit]Chris, thanks for letting me know, Rich Farmbrough 09:20 31 August 2006 (GMT).
Welcome to Esperanza!
[edit]
Welcome, Cbh, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.
Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.
In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.
If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!
- Thanks for the welcome! Much appreciated.
—Chris (blather • contribs • e) 20:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
VAX
[edit]Yes, I did wonder about that one. Thanks for reverting, and for letting me know. --Guinnog 22:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Kindness Barnstar
[edit]For kindness towards a random Wikipedian (i.e. me :-)) here is the Random Acts of Kindness barnstar! Bláthnaid 17:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| For fixing my talk page and nominating me for the userpage award, here is a Kindness Barnstar. Bláthnaid 17:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC) |
- Thanks very much! Really made my day, that did. Cheers,
—Chris (blather • contribs • e) 19:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Album review links
[edit]Hi Chris, well done wikifying song titles on the Ultravox! album article. However, the use of a footnote for the Allmusic review is not per WP:ALBUM; the way it was with the direct 'link' is still the standard as far as I'm aware... Cheers, Ian Rose 10:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oops! Thanks for letting me know. I'm still trying to remember all the various standards I should be observing...
—Chris (blather • contribs • e) 12:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
September Esperanza Newsletter
[edit]
|
|
|
Just in case anyone was wondering...
[edit]I've gone. Not sure whether or not it's for good, but my recent break made me realise it just wasn't fun anymore: when I got back I found a very long list of stuff that needed cleaning up because of poor edits, whether done through good faith or through malice, and it was just overwhelming. I don't think that the current model is sustainable: the signal to noise ratio is running out of control, and although it may be a relatively minor aspect, I don't think it helps morale when some admins seem more interested in things like badgering good editors about the length of their signatures than tackling more important issues. Sorry, it was good while it lasted but I've reached my limit now. Good luck to those with more stamina than me.
Signing off, —Chris (blather • contribs • e) .svg){kind=small}
21:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
November Esperanza Newsletter
[edit]
|
|
|
Fair use rationale for Image:The_Blue_Meaning.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The_Blue_Meaning.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 17:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- rationale added as per suggestions on guide.--—Chris (blather • contribs • e) 09:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Toyah_Anthem.jpg
[edit]I have tagged Image:Toyah_Anthem.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 04:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- fair use added to page--—Chris (blather • contribs • e) 09:55, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Toyah.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Toyah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Suggestion
[edit]Hi, and thanks for your message. I made a suggestion at Talk:Bogey which I hope you can live with. I'm sorry if it's not exactly what you would have wanted, but I think it's the best solution at the moment for our readers, who should be our primary consideration when editing. Best wishes, and thanks for asking me to help. --John (talk) 07:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey, suits me. Thanks for looking into it. Once I've checked out the MOS I'll put in a link. --—Chris (blather • contribs) 08:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Having had more time to think about it, I think it's best to leave it be unless anyone else wants to change it. I still think there's too much risk of further attempts at edit-warring given the history, and some of the comments were frankly unhelpful; at risk of sounding a bit melodramatic, I'm afraid this experience has left me feeling rather discouraged about editing, and from my own contributions on its talk-page, this sort of thing clearly isn't bringing out the best in me as an editor either, so time to bow out I guess.
- I am grateful for you trying to find a solution, though. --—Chris (blather • contribs) 12:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Toyah TOTP2.jpg - non-notification of deletion
[edit]
Thanks for informing me of your rationale and decision to delete this image.
Oh wait, you didn't bother. It would have been helpful, or at least considerate, you know. The fair-use rationale seemed reasonable enough given the guidelines I followed, but it's a bit late to question your decision a month after the event.
--—Chris (blather • contribs) 14:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- There is no requirement in any policy to notify users of pages being deleted.
- File:Toyah TOTP2.jpg was deleted because it was tagged as a screenshot from a music video but was actually from Top of the Pops, which qualifies it for deletion at WP:CSD, item 7 under Files.
- I will be happy to undelete the image if you will undertake to tag it correctly, but reserve the right to renominate it for deletion if it doesn't meet criteria for inclusion. Stifle (talk) 22:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- No thanks. I think I'll just leave this as a reminder to myself of why I no longer edit here. --—Chris (blather • contribs) 09:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)