User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2013/August
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:ClueBot Commons. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Chopard Diamond award
Hello, As we can see there is a huge fancraft edits on this article from unregistered edits using their IP's so I do suggest to lock the article into semi - protected BUT HOW? lol Fidel 12:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
- User:Mark Arsten has semi-protected it. Next time: Wikipedia:Requests for page protection :-) Yngvadottir (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of 14597 Waynerichie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 14597 Waynerichie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/14597 Waynerichie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest355 Talk 15:10, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of 14598 Larrysmith for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 14598 Larrysmith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/14598 Larrysmith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest355 Talk 16:26, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Reversions
Please, I just wanted to congratulate you on beating me to every article. Your way too fast for me. Thanks Clue Bot! Monterey Bay (talk) 03:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Sorry!
Editing is definently in beta. Had trouble operating the editing controls. Won't do it again. 98.255.111.247 (talk) 06:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Giving warnings to user talk and reporting
As a suggestion, when a user gets warnings for vandalism and then removes the warning messages from the talk page, your bot would start from the lowest level warning again and would not report the user to the admin's noticeboard even if the user just deleted a level 4 warning. I suggest this be fixed. This is just a genuine suggestion. Cheers. :) 65.93.145.124 (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
uhg
So I got bot spammed here:http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Mosaica_Education&action=history and reverted it manually. I don't mean to be rude but don't really want to take the time to learn how to work the spambot false reporting system. Looks complicated. If anyone cares, have at it. 76.112.8.146 (talk) 00:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
you're wrong
Excuse me the last thing you reverted was incorrect. Lolicon is considered by many social circles to be disgusting, I was just stating a fact on the matter, not vandalizing. BigOnAnime (talk) 21:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
False Positive!
Excuse me, but I believe you are mistaken. I put that the German broadcasters for the 2013 World Championships in Athletics as ARD and ZDF, which is correct ( I know this as I live in Germany ) and it got reverted. I am now going to unreverse it if you don't mind. (91.43.126.24 (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC))
Ham and spam
Something to consider. Might be useful to allow people to confirm that reverts made by cluebot are sometimes very very good, pure "ham" not just marking the bad or spam/naive reverts. -- 109.76.238.157 (talk) 02:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- If you're interested in doing this you can review both ham and spam edits through the review interface Jebus989✰ 13:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Wiki Community Help
There are a number of people, one of whom has vandalized the Stalking page, as of th 24th, -removing perfectly referenced, material, which was in use on another page word-for word
This material was maliciously vandalized, removed - on the 24th of August, please check the log
- We need some help ~please
Dynomitedetails (talk) 23:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Revert
Hello,
Your revert of my edit to "Prism" was a mistake. The article was quite unneccesarily loaded and I was fixing that. Just thought I'd say so.