User talk:Doomguy427

This is Doomguy427's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Ganderbal Attack has been accepted

2024 Ganderbal Attack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Doomguy427 (talk) 17:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Baramulla attack has been accepted

2024 Baramulla attack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk) 16:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Doomguy427 (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Srinagar attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Srinagar attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Srinagar attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--Ratekreel (talk) 16:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2024 Srinagar attack. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Ratekreel (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but the result was shown as keep so I removed it Doomguy427 (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might have seen any other AfD discussion whose result was to "keep" the article. This one (about Srinagar attack) has just been started. --Ratekreel (talk) 16:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright my bad sir I'm kind of new too wikipidea Doomguy427 (talk) 17:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Goalhati. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 17:24, 8 November 2024 (UTC)==Disambiguation link notification for November 3 ==[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Goalhati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mortar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Picture of Squadron Leader Khusro.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Picture of Squadron Leader Khusro.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of terrorist incidents in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Doomguy427. Thank you for your work on 2024 Ganderbal attack. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Doomguy427 (talk) 19:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Picture of Mervyn Middlecoat.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Picture of Mervyn Middlecoat.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Picture of Nazir Latif.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Picture of Nazir Latif.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Rajasthan-gutaro-fort.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rajasthan-gutaro-fort.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Longewala post occupied by Pakistani soldiers.png

Thanks for uploading File:Longewala post occupied by Pakistani soldiers.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File uploads

Hi Doomguy427, you have uploaded a handful of files without specifying a proper license or source. I suggest for you to take a look at the image use policy to learn what is required when uploading media files. Please note that repeated offenses of said policy may result in a temporary block of your account. If assistance is needed, please post at the media copyright questions page. ✗plicit 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I am very sorry Doomguy427 (talk) 15:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:General Musa Khan visiting Khem Karan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:General Musa Khan visiting Khem Karan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pakistani Soldiers in Khemkaran.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pakistani Soldiers in Khemkaran.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wall Clock of the Railway Station of Khem Karan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wall Clock of the Railway Station of Khem Karan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Srinagar grenade attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Srinagar grenade attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Srinagar grenade attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:35, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Ganderbal attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Ganderbal attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Ganderbal attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:36, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Baramulla attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Baramulla attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Baramulla attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Botapathri ambush for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Botapathri ambush is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Botapathri ambush until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:38, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Akhnoor attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Akhnoor attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Akhnoor attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:39, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Bandipora attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Bandipora attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Bandipora attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 Kishtwar encounter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Kishtwar encounter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Kishtwar encounter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:42, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indo-Pakistani war of 1965. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 19:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Pr0pulsion 123 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pr0pulsion 123. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 22:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Doomguy427 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello,

I would like to appeal my ban and clarify that I have no connection with the person I am suspected to be a "sockpuppet" of. I am an independent editor deeply interested in my nation's history, particularly in documenting wars involving Pakistan. I joined Wikipedia recently with the intention of creating articles on this subject, as I am passionate about preserving and sharing this knowledge.

Unfortunately, all of my work has been deleted, and I am devastated by this. I have put countless hours into researching and writing these articles, and it is disheartening to see my efforts gone. While I understand that some similar articles may have been created by blocked users in the past, I want to assure you that I am not one of them. I have no relation to the user I am accused of being a sockpuppet of, and I work independently.

Additionally, I would like to mention that the reason I edited the *Rajasthan Campaign (1965)* article was because I found it extremely interesting. I researched extensively on the topic and wanted to share accurate and well-researched information with the community.

I kindly request a thorough investigation into this matter. I hope my account can be reinstated so I can continue contributing to Wikipedia and sharing knowledge about Pakistani history. Please consider my appeal.

Thank you.

Decline reason:

I have independently verified the checkuser result. In addition there is behavioral evidence against you. Your denials do not outweigh this evidence. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 11:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Doomguy427 (talk) 09:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Doomguy427 (talk) 09:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How so Doomguy427 (talk) 16:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]