User talk:FULBERT/Archive 153
This is an archive of past discussions with User:FULBERT. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 150 | Archive 151 | Archive 152 | Archive 153 | Archive 154 | Archive 155 | → | Archive 160 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi FULBERT, I undid your patrol because per WP:NPPDEL BLP PRODed pages should not be marked as reviewed. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 21:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Voorts Thank you for your message and clarification with this. FULBERT (talk) 13:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2024)
An antacid is a substance which neutralizes stomach acidity and is used to relieve heartburn, indigestion or an upset stomach.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Fish slice • Carbon source (biology) Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
Question new label
Hi Fulbert, hope all is well and you will have a great 2024. I noticed your comment on the site of Hoek and wanted to understand better what you still needs to be amended? E.g. she is the most mentioned author in the book that won Maurice Swirc the Brusseprijs but I haven’t even added that yet as it is a fine balance between overdoing it and proving notability (initially I listed far less). Also there are several articles about her in Indonesia and e.g. by internationally well known authors like David van Reybrouck and Adriaan van Dis that praise her work, the latter even states there is no person from which he learnt more in his new book and mentions her many times in De kolonie mept terug that is also published as a book next week but already available. What type of things are you looking for? I believe the comment that others do ‘a mere mention’ is not representative for the underlying information. Did you go trough everything? I actually thought she already been vetted in this respect (see full history), as someone else already removed a similar comment after reassessment in as many sources and publications haven been added. I am her partner by the way and only add reliable third party sources for everyone to check. Hope to hear from you what else I can add, I am happy to provide! Ewout12345 (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi.
- I have added several JSTOR sources, and several books that reference her multiple times, like this;
- De Indische Doofpot. Waarom Nederlandse oorlogsmisdaden in Indonesie nooit zijn vervolgd, Maurice Swirc, E-Book, p.14-15,71-74,98-101,115-116,189-190,432-433,435-436,438,455-456,460
- Will add more in the coming days unless it is okay like this? Hope to hear from you.
- Kind regards. Ewout12345 (talk) 22:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Ewout12345 Thanks for the additional information. Please know that you have a WP:COI with the article you created, Anne-Lot_Hoek, and given all of your Wikipedia edits have centered on this article, your account is also considered a WP:SPA. I am particularly interested in aspects here of Notability WP:N, and in the section on Importance of research, which I think is most needed, some of the sources do not really feel credible as listed (an ebook was cited, as was a radio intereview, along with uncited claims from a dissertation committee). The DOI to the text in that section seems solid, and I am wondering if there are other secondary or tertiary citations that can be added to establish academic notability? FULBERT (talk) 13:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Fulbert, thanks for the feedback. One question I have; may I ask why it matters if it is a normal book or an e-book? For the Libris prize I can add the jury report to the radio feedback and the promotion committee is generally not published (eg proof can be found on social media from Jan Bart gewald), we have approval by mail (hence it is also on her website), video etc. but YouTube won’t work in the UK etc. Hope you just trust us here as 98% of the article is cited. Will get back in the coming week.
- cheers,
- ewout Ewout12345 (talk) 15:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also will be back home within the next two weeks to my hard copies of the books mentioned, can/will then replace ebooks with those hard copies, though the content of this books is exactly the same. Only the pagenumbers differ to my best knowledge. Ewout12345 (talk) 15:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Ewout12345 When I read the word "e-book" I read it as a self-published and thus not reviewed work. Otherwise, if it were from a respectable publishing organization, then it would not need to be intentionally referred to as an e-book as it would be a book as any other would with an ISBN. FULBERT (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- I understand now, thank you. We are for half a year in Southern Africa for research on her new book, hence we did not carry our hard copies of Indonesia related books :-). I will add the ISBN of the e-book for now and replace it with the ISBN of the hard copy once home and settled okay? Regarding the Libris Geschiedenis Prijs Jury, I remember now they don’t publish a jury report, they announce their views on the radio. That is why I used that as a source. I have added a few more DOIs and statements. Could you let me know of that is okay in combination with the rest of the text? Kind regards. Ewout12345 (talk) 20:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Ewout12345 I think it is improved now. I will remove the WP:BIO. Thank you for your edits. FULBERT (talk) 14:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your patience, I also learned a lot along the way. Do you think at a certain point it could be sufficient to have the COI on the talk page and not the additional comment on the front page? Ewout12345 (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Ewout12345 This should be possible; I would give it a few more days to ensure no other comments; ping me again in a week and I will move it. FULBERT (talk) 07:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. I will also ask the women’s writers on Wiki to review the class C, as initially I had not included all these statements by other notable persons about her work, only references. Thanks for the tip. Ewout12345 (talk) 09:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Think I’m done with the main comments and sources, will ping you in a week or so. Kind regards. Ewout12345 (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Fulbert, hope all is well. Can you maybe see who has removed the DOIs that I added for all sources + one WorldCat within Scientific books and publications and help restore them in the proper way? Strange isn’t it? Ewout12345 (talk) 07:11, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Ewout12345 No idea; I just ran two scripts on it and hoping that may have helped a bit. FULBERT (talk) 07:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for trying! Will place the DOIs back in due course.
- Kind regards. Ewout12345 (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Ewout12345 (talk) 16:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Fulbert, when I asked to revisit the rating it went to class B (however notability was kept at low to my surprise as that definition does not do her just to my opinion). I will go trough her suggestions to see where I can further improve but please expect some more changes in the coming period. Will ping you when done, and then leave it rest for another week as suggested and ping you again once that week lapsed.
- Kind regards. Ewout12345 (talk) 18:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Ewout12345 (talk) 16:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Ewout12345 No idea; I just ran two scripts on it and hoping that may have helped a bit. FULBERT (talk) 07:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Fulbert, hope all is well. Can you maybe see who has removed the DOIs that I added for all sources + one WorldCat within Scientific books and publications and help restore them in the proper way? Strange isn’t it? Ewout12345 (talk) 07:11, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Think I’m done with the main comments and sources, will ping you in a week or so. Kind regards. Ewout12345 (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. I will also ask the women’s writers on Wiki to review the class C, as initially I had not included all these statements by other notable persons about her work, only references. Thanks for the tip. Ewout12345 (talk) 09:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Ewout12345 This should be possible; I would give it a few more days to ensure no other comments; ping me again in a week and I will move it. FULBERT (talk) 07:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your patience, I also learned a lot along the way. Do you think at a certain point it could be sufficient to have the COI on the talk page and not the additional comment on the front page? Ewout12345 (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Ewout12345 I think it is improved now. I will remove the WP:BIO. Thank you for your edits. FULBERT (talk) 14:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- I understand now, thank you. We are for half a year in Southern Africa for research on her new book, hence we did not carry our hard copies of Indonesia related books :-). I will add the ISBN of the e-book for now and replace it with the ISBN of the hard copy once home and settled okay? Regarding the Libris Geschiedenis Prijs Jury, I remember now they don’t publish a jury report, they announce their views on the radio. That is why I used that as a source. I have added a few more DOIs and statements. Could you let me know of that is okay in combination with the rest of the text? Kind regards. Ewout12345 (talk) 20:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Ewout12345 Thanks for the additional information. Please know that you have a WP:COI with the article you created, Anne-Lot_Hoek, and given all of your Wikipedia edits have centered on this article, your account is also considered a WP:SPA. I am particularly interested in aspects here of Notability WP:N, and in the section on Importance of research, which I think is most needed, some of the sources do not really feel credible as listed (an ebook was cited, as was a radio intereview, along with uncited claims from a dissertation committee). The DOI to the text in that section seems solid, and I am wondering if there are other secondary or tertiary citations that can be added to establish academic notability? FULBERT (talk) 13:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
NPP Awards for 2023
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | ||
For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
Hi, and thanks for keeping an eye out for copyright violations! In case you come across it again, I just wanted to let you know that handwiki.org is a mirror of Wikipedia. This is stated on the bottom of handwiki.org articles. Thanks. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 03:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ARandomName123 Many thanks for the clarification; always more learning to do! FULBERT (talk) 13:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2023
|
This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2024)
Hello, FULBERT. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Antacid • Fish slice Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
Wikidata weekly summary #611
Discussions
- New request for comments: Community request for the development team to access inverse properties on client wikis. (Summary: We currently cannot access inverse property values on Wikipedia. This can be a data management issue on Wikipedia as we must always ask ourself if we must introduce an inverse property for cases where we need them. So I think it’s useful to gather the usecases community would want and draft a request for an API to the devteam to do that.)
- Upcoming: The next Wikidata+Wikibase office hours will take place on Wednesday, 16:00 UTC on Wednesday, 17th January 2024 (18:00 Berlin time) in the Wikidata Telegram group. The Wikidata and Wikibase office hours are online events where the development team presents what they have been working on over the past quarter, and the community is welcome to ask questions and discuss important issues related to the development of Wikidata and Wikibase.
- Past
- Provenance Loves Wiki (PLW24), Jan 12th - 14th, research and data on the origin of artworks and cultural heritage and how Wikibase and Wikidata can support this.
- WikiLovesWomen #SheSaid campaign wrapped up the 2023 campaign by visiting Kinshasha and Kisangani, where local Wikimedians improved quotes from women on FR Wikipedia and Wikidata.
Press, articles, blog posts, videos
- Blogs
- Building Connected Libraries in Nigeria: --> Reflections from the Wikibase Journey on collaboration and resouce sharing between Nigerian Libraries.
- Wikidata and ChatGPT integration failure --> read about Finn Årup Nielsen's attempts to integrate LLM's with Wikidata.
- QLever: a new way to query OpenStreetMap --> Discussion of the new opportunities offered by QLever to query OpenStreetMap and to run federated queries with Wikidata
- Wikidata for authority control: 3 years of work --> The three-year Wikidata for authority control project, a collaboration between Wikimedia Sverige and Swedish museums, concluded in December 2023. It equipped museum staff with tools and skills to integrate their authority databases with Wikidata, resulting in added identifiers, SPARQL query proficiency, and enhanced knowledge sharing within the GLAM sector.
- Go-ahead for Wikidata Project of GLAM institutions from Baden-Württemberg --> The GLAM-BW project, under "GLAM goes OpenData," connects major collections in Baden-Württemberg, focusing on the württembergische Kunstkammer. With over 3,000 objects, the project integrates information on collectors, histories, and objects into a knowledge graph for semantic searches, contributing to the broader realm of linked open data, akin to Wikidata.
- Swiss GLAM Programme --> Wikimedia CH imported the Museum of Natural History of Neuchâtel's urchin fossil casts to Wikimedia Commons, connecting structured data on Wikidata. The project involved data cleaning, adding missing elements, and file imports via OpenRefine, highlighting seamless integration between Wikidata and Commons.
- Papers
- Reflections on the PCC Wikidata Pilot at UCLA Library: --> Undertaking the PCC Learning Objectives. Discusses the 14-month Pilot programme for cooperative cataloguing of UCLA Library and Museum Collections. By E. Zhang, P. Biswas & I. Dagher.
- Few-Shot Event Classification in Images using Knowledge Graphs for Prompting --> How can Wikidata and Wikipedia help Vision-Language Models improve their classification of images. Tahmasebzadeh et al., 2024.
- Videos
- SMWCon 2023: Semantics, Wikis, and AI --> Day 1, Keynote by Prof. Markus Krötzsch who explores origins and principles of semantic wikis and key challenges that lie ahead in managing knowledge.
- GLAM on Tour 2023 im Museum Barberini (German) --> find out what Museums have got to do with Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata. More Info Here.
- Interactive notebooks: GLAM : Geolocated and Labelled Articles Map - explore Featured and Good Wikipedia articles through a map, powered by Wikidata.
Tool of the week
- Brian M Sperlongano released US boundary QA checker, a quality assurance tool for finding issues with boundary data in the United States by using Wikidata, OpenStreetMap, and US Census Bureau data.
- The Surrounding Ocean (available at vrandezo.github.io/TheSurroundingOcean) - is a tool that allows you to browse lexicographical data. You can use the tool to explore words and their meanings, translations, and synonyms. The tool is currently under development, and the developer, Danny, would appreciate feedback to fix any issues with the tool. More info: Wikidata:The Surrounding Ocean.
Other Noteworthy Stuff
- OS-Wikidata Map Framework List of tools and maps which combines OSM and Wikidata.
- Call for Projects and Mentors for Google Summer of Code 2024 and Outreachy Round 28 is OPEN!
- Got an idea for a project to reclaim the public nature of the internet? With Wikidata? NLNet has a new fund you could apply to.
Newest properties and property proposals to review
- Newest General datatypes: none
- Newest External identifiers: Walk Score ID, HistoriaGames game ID, Deutsche Bahn station number, Legends Tour player ID, Moscow Cultural Heritage ID, USOPC Hall of Fame ID, Cathopedia article ID, TouchArcade game ID, DoblajeVideojuegos game ID, Adventure-Treff game ID, Biota of New Zealand ID, Consortium of Bryophyte Herbaria taxon ID, Consortium of Lichen Herbaria taxon ID, Native Plants Hawaii ID, SERNEC taxon ID, TORCH taxon ID, Penstemon Database ID, Digicarmel ID, Retskrivningsordbogen ID, MAMCS artwork ID, Sofascore player ID, Mod.io game ID, Sina Chinese Basketball player ID, turismo.marche.it place ID
- New General datatypes property proposals to review:
- describes (Data objects that are described by this entity (e.g. an encyclopedia or topic-related book; intended for input of several data objects.))
- memory type (specifies the type of working memory of this data object)
- filial church (church which acts as the less important temple of a parish)
- TOPO id (unique code to identify topographical features of France (department, city, thoroughfare...))
- New External identifier property proposals to review: Bluesky handle, Merkur author ID, Bavarian school ID, Rugby Database ID, Playstation Store Concept ID, ArchDaily Architecture Office ID, Il Nuovo De Mauro ID, Bluesky DID
Did you know?
- Query examples:
- Newest WikiProjects: WikiProject Decolonise Wiki --> intends to focus on decolonising text, depictions and media within all relevant Wikipedia articles.
- WikiProject Highlights: Ontology Cleaning Task Force: A group of people have started a task force to discuss problems with the Wikidata ontology and how to clean them up. Anyone interested in participating is welcome. The task force maintains Wikidata:WikiProject Ontology/Cleaning Task Force as a record of its activities. You can add yourself to the participants list there and find out how to join group meetings or otherwise participate in the group. (Got something noteworthy happening in your WikiProject? Share it in the upcoming issue!)
- Newest database reports: Lexicographical data/Reports/Empty lexemes - Lexemes with no statements, no forms and no senses. (Do you see Lexemes from your language in the list that you can fix?)
- Showcase Items: January 15, 2018 (Q45919591) - Monday in January 2018
- Showcase Lexemes: در جنگ حلوا بخش نمیکنند (L1081423) - Persian with a meaning similar to "all's fair in love and war"
Development
- IP masking: We are working on adjusting Wikibase to handle the upcoming introduction of IP masking, which will give editors who are not logged in a temporary account name instead of using their IP to attribute edits to (phab:T351968)
- Lexicographical data: We are changing how empty Senses and Forms are represented in the dumps (phab:T305660)
- mul language code: We are doing user testing for the current implementation to see if it is understandable for people.
- Mismatch Finder: We are continuing the work on migrating it to the Codex design system.
- REST API:
- We improved the handling of lower-case statement IDs (phab:T354262)
- We are working on getting a sitelink for a given wiki (phab:T344039)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
Weekly Tasks
- Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.
- Comment on property proposals: all open proposals
- Contribute to the showcase Item and Lexeme above.
- Participate in this week's Lexeme challenge: Pigs
- Summarize your WikiProject's ongoing activities in one or two sentences.
- Help translate or proofread the interface and documentation pages, in your own language!
- Help merge identical items across Wikimedia projects.
- Help write the next summary!
Hello, I have reassessed this as Start. A class requires two impartial reviews. Schierbecker (talk) 06:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Schierbecker Thanks for the feedback and sharing the action here. Much appreciated. FULBERT (talk) 14:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)