User talk:Jamiehayn

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Christian Peoples Alliance have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Christian Peoples Alliance was changed by Jamiehayn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852536 on 2021-08-15T17:28:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:28, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Those edits were not "unconstructive" or "disruptive", I was removing inaccurate labels from a page. If you would like to discuss further I would be glad. Jamiehayn (talk) 21:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The labels are based on the topics' own pages. It's not our place as editors to decide if we agree or think they are accurate. But instead WP:V is the rule. And given these have often been edit-warred, the article's talkpage is the place to propose a change and discuss. DMacks (talk) 23:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamiehayn I'm trying to decide whether to block you now or the next time you delete something because you think it's biassed but is sourced. I came here from a response you made to an old thread at Talk:Britain First. An editor's definition is immaterial, it's what reliably published sources say. And please remember the meaning of words changes over time. Doug Weller talk 08:04, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my mistake about not using the talk page properly, i was not aware of the proper proceedings Jamiehayn (talk) 15:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamiehayn! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 22:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

which would that be? Jamiehayn (talk) 23:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all of your edits to articles. Doug Weller talk 08:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my mistake, I will bear that in mind Jamiehayn (talk) 15:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]