User talk:Johndavies837

Kate De Remero / Kate Donnelly

{{subst:Thank you so much for your creation of the Kate De Remero page. She is definitely referred to by this name so that was a very good change. You are an incredible Wikapedian and I appreciate the work you put into the new page. However, I am requesting that you as a great and educated Wikapedian delete this redirect page for the following reasons: the last name of the individual is de Remero, and Donnelly is vastly different from that, which causes confusion; since, as you noted, she uses the last name De Remero, it makes her description much more complicated and difficult to understand; and also the presence of the redirect article makes it more difficult to find the actual Kate de Remero that people will look for.|Kate Donnelly}} 108.51.195.71 (talk) 23:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and thanks for your message. Are you another person called Kate Donnelly? I ask because your focus seems to be on her old name, and when I searched for Kate Donnelly on Google I noticed that it is showing incorrect information and the wrong photo in the infobox. Johndavies837 (talk) 00:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message back! Again I appreciate all of your contributions to Wikapedia.

No, I am not another person named Kate Donnelly.

I am just someone looking to become a possible member of Wikapedia. I preach that I am just trying to do what is best for Wikapedia. Since there are many other Kate Donnelly's and Kate de Remero does not go by Kate Donnelly anymore, I think the presence of the redirect page makes for extra confusion. In addition, you accurately noted that she was born as Katherine Donnelly. That is a great addition to have on the page! But the addition of the Kate Donnelly redirect page makes for more perplexion and confusion.

I commend you for the work you have done on Wikapedia and also on the Kate De Remero page. I have been praying that I can make a positive impact on Wikapedia, and I think the elimination of the redirect page is a way I can do that. For the betterment of Wikapedia, I ask that you delete the Kate Donnelly redirect page. From doing adequate research, I have learned that deleting a redirect page is extremely simple due to its small bandwith. If it makes for extra confusion, I think deletion of the redirect page will have a positive impact.

Thank you so much and I appreciate your time! 108.51.195.71 (talk) 11:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Quick info on Bob Collymore, sad.... congrats on the pace. Franklin mimi (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of weather records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Findel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 El Paso shooting

Are you capturing, editing and then pasting/replacing the entire article? Please don't do that, as exactly what just occurred will frequently be the outcome when other editors are also editing the same article. See WP:EDITCONFLICT to see how we normally protect against that when you use the Wikipedia editor. General Ization ^Talk 21:32, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I had multiple tabs open. I think I was accidentally editing an old revision and clicked save, which is why later edits were overwritten. When I saw what happened I copied the last revision by Octoberwoodland and restored it, minus the change I intended to make. Johndavies837 (talk) 21:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thoroughly understand; I've done the same. Just wanted to make sure you weren't using Copy to Notepad/scrabble scrabble scrabble/Copy All/Paste to edit articles, as I've seen editors do that as well with the same consequences. Thanks. General Ization ^Talk 01:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Redirect Page

Thank you for your message back! Again I appreciate all of your contributions to Wikapedia.

No, I am not another person named Kate Donnelly.

I am just someone looking to become a possible member of Wikapedia. I preach that I am just trying to do what is best for Wikapedia. Since there are many other Kate Donnelly's and Kate de Remero does not go by Kate Donnelly anymore, I think the presence of the redirect page makes for extra confusion. In addition, you accurately noted that she was born as Katherine Donnelly. That is a great addition to have on the page! But the addition of the Kate Donnelly redirect page makes for more perplexion and confusion.

I commend you for the work you have done on Wikapedia and also on the Kate De Remero page. I have been praying that I can make a positive impact on Wikapedia, and I think the elimination of the redirect page is a way I can do that. For the betterment of Wikapedia, I ask that you delete the Kate Donnelly redirect page. From doing adequate research, I have learned that deleting a redirect page is extremely simple due to its small bandwith. If it makes for extra confusion, I think deletion of the redirect page will have a positive impact.

Thank you so much and I appreciate your time! 108.51.195.71 (talk) 16:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Jack Edwards (American politician)

On 29 September 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jack Edwards (American politician), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Spencer^T•C 18:33, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

With this edit [1] you restored vandalism. Appears the IP is acting in good faith. Home Lander (talk) 00:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I hadn't noticed but I reverted the wrong edit. Thanks for letting me know. I had also posted a vandalism note on the IP user's talk page, which I have now removed. Johndavies837 (talk) 00:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned

What you said about my 'unconstructive changes' was unfair. I take you would like to repent and revert the changes. Otherwise I will block you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave32123432 (talk • contribs)

What you did was vandalism, simple. Johndavies837 (talk) 14:05, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true. It was based of fact. David Warner is my best mate and works with me at school. He is very upset that the information is unfair. In my kindness I changed it for him, simple.

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Yet another editor joins the anti-vandal brigade! Glad to have you with us! Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 17:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Johndavies837 (talk) 17:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	stop beating me to the draw so much ._. you is too good Dibbydib ^💬/_✏ 02:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yo what section did i supposedly vandalise???

yo what section did i supposedly vandalise for you to put that stupid warning on my page like a piece of shit graffiti. idiot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.201.226 (talk) 12:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You (or someone using your IP address) vandalized Thailand national handball team by calling someone "gay" and describing a player as "mentally handicapped". Also, engaging in personal attacks does not make you look any better. Johndavies837 (talk) 15:57, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Yasuhiro Nakasone

On 30 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Yasuhiro Nakasone, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:54, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Johndavies837!

Happy New Year!

Hello Johndavies837:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 23:28, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Category:2020 births has been nominated for discussion

Category:2020 births, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for David Stern

On 2 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article David Stern, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 12:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Sam Wyche

On 5 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sam Wyche, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:08, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

apology

Cull island - might have accidentally wiped out part of your editing during an edit conflict... JarrahTree 04:13, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Johndavies837 (talk) 04:16, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Current foreign minister of Oman

Haitham bin Tariq al Said was sworn in only as sultan not as prime minster or foreign minister. The new government will probably be formed after the end of the mourning period. Until then these functions are vacant. Bogdan Uleia (talk) 14:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the source I linked to? It says he's also foreign minister. Johndavies837 (talk) 15:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Al Jazeera is wrong. It is not mandatory for the sultan to be simultaneously s ultan, prime minister and foreign minister. Although he was sultan since 1970 Quaboos bin Said became prime minister and foreign minister only in 1972. So it is possible that the current sultan will appoint other people for these positions. Bogdan Uleia (talk) 17:02, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2019–20 outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

On 20 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019–20 outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Zanhe (talk) 08:27, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Amadou Gon Coulibaly

On 9 July 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Amadou Gon Coulibaly, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 09:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dixon High School (California)

Please don't revert edits because of simple typos. That should only be done for vandalism ,which this clearly wasn't. That was an abuse of rollback. And when someone makes a typo and is in the process of fixing things, just leave it alone. Meters (talk) 20:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters The first edit was flagged because an IP user changed the principal and there was no source, which is a common type of vandalism on high school pages. The next edit minutes was not just a typo, it made the page completely unreadable. In hindsight, it obviously wasn't your intention to do that, but to call it an abuse of rollback is absurd. Johndavies837 (talk) 20:30, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was not vandalism. You agree. Therefore it was an abuse of the rollback. Period. If you can't be bothered to actually look at what the edit was supposed to be that's your problem. Don't do it again.

And as for the IP's edit, it removed a dead link and an incorrect claim, and replaced it with a correct claim. You obviously didn't bother to look at the original reference that you restored, or check the school's webpage to see if the principal had indeed changed. The IP's edit was not vandalism either. You need to be much more careful about what you call vandalism. Meters (talk) 20:37, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to re-read WP:ROLLBACK "Standard rollback may only be used in certain situations – editors who misuse standard rollback (for example, by using it to reverse good-faith edits in situations where an explanatory edit summary would normally be expected) may have their rollback rights removed. "

You might also want to read WP:GOODFAITH. It was rolled back because it appeared to be vandalism at the time and I explained why. I'm not sure why you are taking this personally. Johndavies837 (talk) 20:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You incorrectly reverted an edit of mine as vandalism, while I was in the process of fixing the typos. I pointed out that that that is an abuse of the roll back feature. You argued. I pointed you to WP:ROLLBACK. There's no assumption of bad faith. If I thought that you had acted in bad faith I would have templated you. And no, you didn't explain why you reverted me in your edit summary. You did so after I called you out on your use of roll back. This was clearly an inappropriate use of rollback. If you don't understand when you are allowed to use rollback and when you are not, you should not be using at all. Meters (talk) 20:54, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first edit was flagged on recent changes, it's a common type of vandalism on high school pages. I left a message on the IP user's page and asked to add a citation. When I stepped away for a few minutes and came back, the whole page was unreadable, at which point I concluded someone was vandalizing the page. In hindsight, I don't think you were vandalizing, no, but that's just how it appeared at the time. There's no need to argue about it when neither of us were acting in bad faith. Johndavies837 (talk) 21:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Joe Williams (Cook Islands politician)

On 5 September 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Joe Williams (Cook Islands politician), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 23:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for George Bizos

On 10 September 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article George Bizos, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Amakuru (talk) 20:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for John Fahey (politician)

On 13 September 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Fahey (politician), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 20:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Conchata Ferrell

On 14 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Conchata Ferrell, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Shoal is not an Island?

Hello! Thanks for your work on Metis Shoal. In this edit [2] you called the shoal an island. In my mind, there's a bit of a problem there. A shoal is an underwater bank. An island is a piece of land surrounded by water that isn't a continent. I would think that the article should say that Metis Shoal is (or was?) a shoal and the new island is an island on that (former?) shoal. Let me know if I'm making any sense. Thanks again for your work. Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Mohsen Fakhrizadeh

On 2 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 01:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Valéry Giscard d'Estaing

On 3 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Barbara Windsor

On 14 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Barbara Windsor, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Ambrose Mandvulo Dlamini

On 14 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ambrose Mandvulo Dlamini, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:49, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho Ho

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

ITN recognition for 2021 Myanmar protests

On 15 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Myanmar protests, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 00:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Hamed Bakayoko

On 12 March 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hamed Bakayoko, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. TJMSmith (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Voltswagen" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Voltswagen. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 12#Voltswagen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Mario Meoni

On 24 April 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mario Meoni, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Mantfombi Dlamini

On 4 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mantfombi Dlamini, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 18:34, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Colt Brennan

On 18 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Colt Brennan, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 06:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Ei-ichi Negishi

On 12 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ei-ichi Negishi, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 11:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Benigno Aquino III

On 25 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Benigno Aquino III, which you updated and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 00:11, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Christiansen (disambiguation)

Hi, I've done the move that you requested. The politician is now at the base name. To do this, one of the things I had to do was move the disambiguation page out of the way. Please consider filling in the usual data at the disambiguation page, and perhaps adding hatnotes at the politician and the rower's page. Dr. Vogel (talk) 12:13, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:19th-century executions by Pennsylvania

A tag has been placed on Category:19th-century executions by Pennsylvania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. 1857a (talk) 20:23, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for September 2022 Burkina Faso coup d'état

On 1 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article September 2022 Burkina Faso coup d'état, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:39, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Uganda Ebola outbreak

Claims that are referenced only with a url, also called raw links, are subject to WP:link rot. To learn what a full reference is, please check WP:CITEHOW and provide the missing information, including the date of publication.

I dont understand why you didnt add a full reference here. Do you care about adding this info? Or do you not really care? A reference only consisting of a url is subject to WP:link rot, because the link moves or becomes dead, sometimes within weeks. so a claim referenced with a raw link will be unverifiable in a relatively short time, and your edit becomes useless. Adding a raw linkref makes no sense. Use provelt and it does the job automatically! Besides url and title, please add at an absolute minimum:

the date of publication,
name of the author(s), or
best: a full and archived reference

Wuerzele (talk) 18:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Heather Armstrong

On 14 May 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Heather Armstrong, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of disaster films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 01:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago I'll assume good faith, but the link I added literally includes a description and references in case you had any real doubts about the content. I don't think you should be removing links to other pages in this manner. Johndavies837 (talk) 13:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:LISTVERIFY, list items must include their own citations, not rely on linked articles. Also, every other item on the list is (or should be) sourced, so it's not a stretch to assume that items being added must also be sourced. DonIago (talk) 13:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Joe the Plumber

On 30 August 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Joe the Plumber, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 12:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Gaston Glock

On 29 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gaston Glock, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Kabosu (dog)

On 24 May 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kabosu (dog), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, I’ve seen that you reverted my decision and proposed a merge, and unredirected the page I redirected. The reason I redirected that page is because the article I made had more information than that article, and If you felt like that page name was wrong you could rename it don’t just do stuff without talking to me to see why I did it. Thank you. PopularGames (talk) 04:40, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PopularGames You removed another editor's page in favor of your own, when both pages had similar information. Just now you removed it again when there's been no discussion at all. I'm also confused why you insist on using a title which you know is factually incorrect? No one has confirmed the disease as flu. There's a merge proposal because there are 2 pages. Please continue the discussion on the talk page. Thanks. Johndavies837 (talk) 20:55, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]