User talk:Jonathan Harold Koszeghi/Archive 16
Reminder
[edit]Hi, Jonathan. Just a reminder that you never responded to the above message. Do you want to be the designer? I listed further information above. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have given this matter significant attention. However, I have come to the realization that I am content of my current position in the project, without possessing a title. Therefore, I am going to pass, thanking you for the opportunity and apologizing if my decision has made you feel uncomfortable in a certain way. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 11:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- I understand your decision, but I urge you to reconsider. You always update the project page anyways (recent happenings, new GAs, etc.), so it wouldn't really be adding much. I can't think of another member of the project who could do this without messing up the formatting. The title is just there as recognition of the duties you would help with. You are one of the longest members, as well as one of the most prominent, so it would really be beneficial to the project if you agreed to help out with updating the project page. I will respect your decision either way, but I hope you will reconsider. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- I see your point, and I believe that Designer really fits me. Thank you, Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:39, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks for being a help to the project. Also, I just created an "impact" section at Grey's Anatomy, analyzing the show's impact on culture. Feedback would be appreciated! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- I see your point, and I believe that Designer really fits me. Thank you, Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:39, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- I understand your decision, but I urge you to reconsider. You always update the project page anyways (recent happenings, new GAs, etc.), so it wouldn't really be adding much. I can't think of another member of the project who could do this without messing up the formatting. The title is just there as recognition of the duties you would help with. You are one of the longest members, as well as one of the most prominent, so it would really be beneficial to the project if you agreed to help out with updating the project page. I will respect your decision either way, but I hope you will reconsider. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 18:34, 5 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:34, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Regarding your new position as designer of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy
[edit]Hi Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, thank you for agreeing to serve as designer of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy, and better help out the community. This message is to inform you of the duties associated with the position. As designer, you are in charge of maintaining the WikiProject Grey's Anatomy page. You have to update the 'Recent happenings' section at least once every two weeks. Also, you have to update the 'Announcements' section periodically. To easily find which of our articles are nominees, follow these instructions: Go to each page (WP:FAC, WP:FLC, WP:GAN, WP:AFD, WP:IFD, T:TDYK, WP:PR, WP:FAR), and scan through the page; looking for articles within the scope of WP:Grey's. If you find something, add it to the 'Announcements' section. Preferably, scans should be done at least every two days. Another duty is updating the 'Recognized content' section. To find new recognized content, go to the category page (i.e. for FAs go to Category:FA-Class Grey's Anatomy articles), and scan for new pages in the category. You do not have to update the DYK section as it would be too hard for you to find DYKs; that section should be updated by the DYK nominator. As with the 'Announcements' section, you should scan the categories at least every two days. Your final duty is updating the participant list. The project's secretary (Sofffie7 (talk · contribs)) will post on your talk page if a member becomes semi-active or inactive, or if we get a new member. If a user becomes semi-active, you must place an asterisk (*) next to their name. If they become inactive, remove them from the list. If a user joins the project, add them to the bottom of the list. To notify other board members of your position, please place {{User ABoard Grey's}} somewhere on your user page, which will automatically add you to Category:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy administrative board members
.
Thanks again for joining! Please confirm that you understand all of your duties; and do not hesitate to ask questions. Also, I noticed {{User WP Grey's}} is not on your user page, meaning you are not a member of the project! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I see. I will get started right away. However, there is something I don't agree with. Once a user develops and article and nominates it for e.g. GA, wouldn't it be easier if that user would post the nomination in the "Announcements" section? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 09:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Question: KaDee Strickland is a FA within the project. Why does it not appear in the Statistics table? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough. You will not be responsible for nominations of article content (FLs, FAs, PRs, and GAs), but you will be in charge of AFDs and IFDs nominations, because the user doesn't usually nominate their own content for deletion. The statistics table has a major lag, and takes a very long time to get things up to date. For example, we have I think 26 GAs, and the table only shows 22. Also, would you be willing to vote at Talk:Give Peace a Chance (Grey's Anatomy)/A-class nomination? Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Question: KaDee Strickland is a FA within the project. Why does it not appear in the Statistics table? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Weekly Newsletter: August 6, 2012
[edit]Hello members of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! We are sending out our weekly newsletter with updates about the project and tasks. First of all, we would like to welcome three new members to the project: M.Mario, Tvlover96, and Mattom123; we look forward to collaborating with them. We have several new achievements and updates to be announced! List of Grey's Anatomy episodes, developed by TRLIJC19 and Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, is now a featured list candidate! If promoted, it will be our first piece of "in-house" featured content! Feel free to leave comments or voice your opinions here. Grey's Anatomy, Grey's Anatomy (season 3), and "Give Peace a Chance" are in the preparations for FAC. An administrative board has been added to the project, to make sure the internal processes run smoothly. Any member has the chance to join, and further information is given at the project page. Currently, however, all the positions are filled, so if you are interested, please contact the coordinator and you will be placed on a waiting list. There are many things to be done for the project, in an attempt to exemplify its best work. Below is a list of tasks, and guidelines:
Tasks and Gudelines |
---|
Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them.
|
Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week, an extent of last week's, is to develop a Grey's Anatomy-related stub or start-class article, using the relevant guidelines above! Model your article off of a Grey's Anatomy page with GA status. Use your Wikipedia skills to fix MOS inconsistencies, copyedit, add more information by researching, and remove unreferenced claims! Barnstars will be awarded to users who destub/de-start their articles, and get the quality level promoted to at least 'C' class! You can determine if an article meets the 'C' class criteria by asking a member of the project's administrative board to review the article. Please do not change the article's quality rating yourself; you must have it reviewed by a member of the committee. A list of stub and start class Grey's Anatomy articles can be found at the project's main page. Take part in this initiative, have fun destubbing/starting articles, feel proud after the article you cleaned up looks better, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!
Have fun, and don't forget to cite everything you write! We hope to see several expanded articles soon!
--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)
List of GA episodes
[edit]Hi, Jonathan. Do you want to be listed as co-nominator of the above list? You did a lot of work for the list, and you should be recognized. Also, it's helpful, because I would like to develop List of GA cast members to FLC soon, and you can only be the sole nominator of one list. That said, if you co-nommed the episode list with me, I could nominate the cast member list when done. I hope you say yes, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 7 August 2012 (UTC) (moved to bottom as it appears you may have missed it), TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, definitely. It would be great if I were listed as the co-nominator for List of Grey's Anatomy episodes. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 17:57, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Great, I have listed you as co-nominator, so don't be shy when helping out with addressing issues! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
April's specialty
[edit]I was watching the S8 finale of GA yesterday, and I noticed I did not know what April's specialty was. Meredith is general, Alex is peds, Cristina is cardio, and Jackson is plastics. So...what is April, neuro? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Well, didn't April fail her boards? Therefore, she won't become an attending. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but I'm saying what was she hoping to specialize in? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Trauma surgery. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh yes, I forgot! Do you know what episode that was mentioned in? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know for sure, but I think she decided in "Suddenly", and then continuously focused on it. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:26, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh yes, I forgot! Do you know what episode that was mentioned in? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Trauma surgery. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but I'm saying what was she hoping to specialize in? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Grey's WikiProject
[edit]Hi, Jonathan. An IP, 109.99.65.78, changed the start date of your membership with WP:Grey's to January 2011, with this edit summary: "I have been editing articles within the project since January 2011. May 2012 is when I wrote my name here, even if, I have already become a member." I assumed it was you editing from an IP, but the IP scanner on my computer said the IP was located in Romania. I thought I remembered you saying you resided in NYC, so I'm not sure why this IP changed the membership date. Maybe it's vandalism, so just let me know. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, that is such a misunderstanding. I am the IP, maybe I just forgot to log on. I am visiting Romania at the moment, an have been staying here for almost a week. That might explain it. I would appreciate if you leave the date as January 2011. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 08:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- I completely get it! I just wanted to make sure it wasn't some random IP vandalizing. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 13:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sofffie7 (talk) 13:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Weekly Newsletter: August 13, 2012
[edit]Hello members of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! We are sending out our weekly newsletter with updates about the project and tasks. We have several new achievements and updates to be announced! List of Grey's Anatomy episodes, developed by TRLIJC19 and Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, is still a featured list candidate! If promoted, it will be our first piece of "in-house" featured content! If uninvolved with the list, we urge you to leave comments, review the article, and support or oppose it here. Grey's Anatomy, Grey's Anatomy (season 3), and "Give Peace a Chance" are also still in the preparations for FAC, while List of Grey's Anatomy cast members is being developed by TRLIJC19. "Losing My Religion" is now a GAN; it was developed by Sofffie7 and copyedited by TRLIJC19. There is currently a discussion awaiting feedback here; please provide your input there. There are many things to be done for the project, in an attempt to exemplify its best work. Below is a list of tasks, and guidelines:
Tasks and Gudelines |
---|
Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them.
|
Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week is to create a non-existent/redirect Grey's Anatomy episode article, using the relevant guidelines above! Model your article off of a Grey's Anatomy episode article with GA status. Use your Wikipedia skills to research information, copyedit, remove unreferenced claims, and add pictures! Barnstars will be awarded to any user who creates a well-sourced article, that has a quality of at least 'start'! To determine the quality, ask a member of the administrative board to review your article; please do not change the article's quality yourself. Take part in this initiative, have fun creating an article, feel proud after the article you created is existent, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!
Have fun, and don't forget to cite everything you write! We hope to see several expanded articles soon!
--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)
Hi, Jonathan! I started a discussion here, and would really appreciate your feedback/opinion on the matter. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I was looking for your opinion. One, do you think we should even cover the scope of PP articles? Two, do you think a task force needs to be existent for the topic, or no? Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think a task force would definitely be the right choice. The Private Practice task force, to fall within Grey's Anatomy WikiProject. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 20:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Inative user notification
[edit]Hey Jonathan! If I'm not mistaken, Creativity97 has been inactive for more than a month (his last last edit dates back to June 26th). You can thus change his status to semi-active at the project. Have a good evening. --Sofffie7 (talk) 21:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Jonathan, you never acted upon this. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Steve Mostow
[edit]Hi again. Do you think Mostow deserves a listing at the cast member list and the recurring section? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC) Also, what about Nurse Tyler Christian and Patricia (chief's assistant)? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think they should just be mentioned, with no other detail. They really do not change the plot in any way, but have been present in a significant number of episodes. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Losing My Religion
[edit]Hi Jonathan! I have a question: is it necessary to have the locations information in the article? I would like to erase the part you added because it's already present on the show's main page. Of course, it could apply to the episode, since it was not filmed in another area, but it's more general location information that doesn't target "Losing My Religion" in particular. I won't change it if you prefer it to remain the way it is, but I thought I would at least share my thoughts with you ;) In the case you you don't remove the information from the section, are you going to put it in the other episode's articles too? Anyway, thank you for rephrasing the reception; it looks much better now :) --Sofffie7 (talk) 12:32, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- I certainly see your point, I see the same way. But it seems to me there isn't really enough information to sustain the Production section. However, I will search for the episode on Grey Matter, to see if I can expand the Production section. I did so for Time Has Come Today (Grey's Anatomy). Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 16:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think the location information should be removed for two reasons. One, it is a total duplication of Grey's Anatomy, without even an attempt to reword it. As I've mentioned to you before, Jonathan, it looks bad for the exact same information to be copied across multiple articles. Second, as Sophie said, it is written to talk about the series in general, not particular episodes, which is why it's at the main page. The production section was large enough to be existent, without duplicating information from another article. Looking for Grey Matter info for the article is a good idea; replace the location info with that. Another problem added from your copyedit/expansion, is that you added featured music, but I don't see a citation to back it up. As for some of your season three episode articles, they are in need of serious condensing. I see lots of large quotes in the production sections, when paraphrasing would be the better option. As for the reception sections of those articles, a lot of them give an entire paragraph to one critic. Per WP:TVRECEPTION, each review "preferably should not exceed two or three sentences per critic, so as not to apply undue weight to any given reviewer." I think before creating more episode articles, or continuing the development of season three's article, you need to condense your already existent episode articles. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Is the matter settled? May we remove the location information from the prod'? I hope that you'll find more stuff on Grey Matter but since we already cite 2 posts (from May 17, 2006 and from June 6, 2006), you might not find a lot or even anything... Anyways, go and check, who knows?! :) --Sofffie7 (talk) 21:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh by the way Jonathan, my previous comment seemed like I was in a hurry to close the discussion and I'm sorry for that because I don't want you to think that I'm ungrateful for the work you did. Kind regards, Sofffie7 (talk) 08:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think it is reasonable to say that the miscellaneous location information should be promptly removed. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 08:06, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think the location information should be removed for two reasons. One, it is a total duplication of Grey's Anatomy, without even an attempt to reword it. As I've mentioned to you before, Jonathan, it looks bad for the exact same information to be copied across multiple articles. Second, as Sophie said, it is written to talk about the series in general, not particular episodes, which is why it's at the main page. The production section was large enough to be existent, without duplicating information from another article. Looking for Grey Matter info for the article is a good idea; replace the location info with that. Another problem added from your copyedit/expansion, is that you added featured music, but I don't see a citation to back it up. As for some of your season three episode articles, they are in need of serious condensing. I see lots of large quotes in the production sections, when paraphrasing would be the better option. As for the reception sections of those articles, a lot of them give an entire paragraph to one critic. Per WP:TVRECEPTION, each review "preferably should not exceed two or three sentences per critic, so as not to apply undue weight to any given reviewer." I think before creating more episode articles, or continuing the development of season three's article, you need to condense your already existent episode articles. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
I did another copyedit to the lead, plot, and reception. For reception, I paraphrased and condensed reviews, making sure no critic got more than three lines. As for the lead and plot, I condensed them for readability. I have some tips, Jonathan: I originally did a copyedit on the article, eliminating lots of fluff and making it more concise, and you added a lot of that fluff back in directly after. Phrases such as "they blow up balloons, hire catering, and decorate" is not important to the overall plot, and therefore should not be written. For a full list of the fluff I removed, see the diff. Long unimportant phrases were also existent in the lead, such as "which puts a strain in his marriage to Dr. Addison Montgomery-Shepherd (Kate Walsh." The goal is for an article to be concise and to the point, not fluffy. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- If I'm not mistaken, the sentence "they blow up balloons etc" was not added or re-added by Jonathan. It was already there when I began developing the article in July and I don't think someone removed it before you did. But I do agree, that was an unimportant detail. Also, I re-added some elements to the recption that I believe are worth mentioning–but don't worry it's not that big– and named in the lead the reasons why there were mixed reviews. --Sofffie7 (talk) 20:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the clarification. I personally think BlueMoonset is going a bit overboard on the prose issues; some are very nit-picky. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh right! I haven't read her/his comments yet, I've just seen them, and it looks bad indeed haha... Constructive comments are always appreciated but here, it becomes too much I think, while she/he's not even the reviewer. --Sofffie7 (talk) 20:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Exactly. TBrandley may have added more comments once the initial were addressed (I've done that before), and it probably offends him that he/she just started conducting his review. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh right! I haven't read her/his comments yet, I've just seen them, and it looks bad indeed haha... Constructive comments are always appreciated but here, it becomes too much I think, while she/he's not even the reviewer. --Sofffie7 (talk) 20:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the clarification. I personally think BlueMoonset is going a bit overboard on the prose issues; some are very nit-picky. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 00:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Captions
[edit]Hi, I reverted your edits which removed the captions from the tables. The tables must follow MOS:DTT, and captions are a requirement. The FL director, The Rambling Man, said they needed to be there. The reason they are not in other lists are because the guideline wasn't enforced until recently, I believe. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- The examples given on the MOS:DTT page are irrelevant to our situation, as captions really are necessary in those situations, in order to avoid any ambuguity. However, on List of Grey's Anatomy episodes there are three mentions of what a table consists of -- example. Season Four (2007-08), Grey's Anatomy (season 4), Grey's Anatomy season 4 episodes. This is not needed. Another matter to back up my statements is your comments regarding my wanting to add seasonal information, which apply in this case undoubtedly. That is, however, my opinion, and I respect your, whatever it is. You should definitely ask the other members of the project. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Regardless of if you think it's necessary, it is a requirement of MOS:DTT, as pointed out by the FL director. It is not a matter of repetition; it exists for the visually impaired (something to do with text to speech). Your desire for seasonal information, which as you know no one else agrees with, has nothing to do with the required captions. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am aware that seasonal information is not necessary, but I your explanations for its not being necessary apply in this case, as well. Plus, irrelevant or not, it does not look good. No other episode list uses it, I don't see why it is compulsory the we do. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Seasonal information is not necessary, whereas captions are, so they're not related. The usage of captions are not my opinion. The goal of episode lists are to be functional for any reader. Also, I personally don't think they look bad. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Also, as you know, just because other projects don't follow all the style guidelines, doesn't mean we shouldn't. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am aware that seasonal information is not necessary, but I your explanations for its not being necessary apply in this case, as well. Plus, irrelevant or not, it does not look good. No other episode list uses it, I don't see why it is compulsory the we do. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Regardless of if you think it's necessary, it is a requirement of MOS:DTT, as pointed out by the FL director. It is not a matter of repetition; it exists for the visually impaired (something to do with text to speech). Your desire for seasonal information, which as you know no one else agrees with, has nothing to do with the required captions. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Reminder
[edit]Hey Jonathan! Could you change Creativity97's status to semi-active as I explained last week that the user hasn't been active for more than a month... Also, it appears that the 'recent happenings' section, which is one of the areas you have to cover, hasn't been updated since you agreed to become the designer of WP:Grey's so it would be great if you could update it more regularly like every week or so. Thanks, Sofffie7 (talk) 18:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm working on it right now. Thank you so much for your patience! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- No Problem :) Sofffie7 (talk) 11:18, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Designer task
[edit]Hey, I have a request. As you know, our good article count continues to grow, and the list at WP:Grey's is getting really long. Is there anything you could do so that it says "Good articles (26) [show]", where the show button would display the full list? Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think it's that long. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Lost. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 20:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- It would be easier for users to view the whole page if collapsed. WP:LOST is inactive and non-maintained, so that's really irrelevant. Can you figure out how to do it, or not? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Your sandbox
[edit]Hi, I removed the non-free photo from your sandbox again. I removed it on the 17th, you re-added it, TBrandley removed it on the 21st, and you re-added it today. I don't know if this is a deliberate attempt to go against WP:NFCC or a lack of reading the edit summaries. Regardless, do not add the non-free photo again, and please respond to this message, indicating you will not add it again. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- I will not add it again. But what other picture should I add? Other FA season articles like Supernatural (season 1), Supernatural (season 2), Smallville (season 1), Parks and Recreation (season 1) feature the DVD cover. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 21:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think you're misunderstanding. The picture is allowed in article namespace, but not in user namespace. So when you copy everything from your sandbox to the actual Grey's Anatomy (season 3) article, you can re-add the picture. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, lol. Sure thing! Thank you so much. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 21:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. How's your work on the article going? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Smoothly, I would say. I now copy editing the Writing and Filming section before moving to Reception, which is going to be the most difficult one. I have to shorten each review to three sentences, is that right ? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 21:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah. I mean no one would really make a big deal if it was 4 at most though. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks. Anyway, I still have a lot of work to do on Writing and Filming (found some new stuff). Cheers, Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 21:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah. I mean no one would really make a big deal if it was 4 at most though. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Smoothly, I would say. I now copy editing the Writing and Filming section before moving to Reception, which is going to be the most difficult one. I have to shorten each review to three sentences, is that right ? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 21:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. How's your work on the article going? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, lol. Sure thing! Thank you so much. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 21:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think you're misunderstanding. The picture is allowed in article namespace, but not in user namespace. So when you copy everything from your sandbox to the actual Grey's Anatomy (season 3) article, you can re-add the picture. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Active user notification
[edit]Hey Jonathan! Just to let you know that Creativity47 has made the 5 required edits (and even more) to become an active user again so you may change her status at WP:Grey's ;) --Sofffie7 (talk) 19:40, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Done Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Sofffie7 (talk) 19:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- No worries. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Sofffie7 (talk) 19:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]Hey! Did you see what I did at WP:Grey's? I set up a bot to change the 'announcements' section, so no one has to worry about it. :-) TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's awsome! Thank you! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 19:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Weekly Newsletter: August 27, 2012
[edit]Hello members of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! We are sending out our weekly newsletter with updates about the project and tasks. Big apologies for the lack of the newsletter last week! What a busy two weeks it's been! We have several new achievements and updates to be announced! List of Grey's Anatomy episodes, developed by TRLIJC19 and Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, is now a featured list! "Give Peace a Chance", written by TRLIJC19, was promoted to a featured article last night, after spending only 7 days in candidacy! "Losing My Religion" was listed as a good article last week, developed by Sofffie7, TRLIJC19, and Jonathan Harold Koszeghi. List of Grey's Anatomy cast members, developed by TRLIJC19, recently entered the process of featured list candidacy—we urge you to review the list here. Grey's Anatomy, developed by TRLIJC19, and Grey's Anatomy (season 3), developed by Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, are still in the preparations for featured article candidacy. There are many things to be done for the project, in an attempt to exemplify its best work. Below is a list of tasks, and guidelines:
Tasks and Gudelines |
---|
Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them.
|
Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week is to search the internet, and find season 6 reviews to add to Grey's Anatomy. Search through google archives, and news websites, to find reviews that talk about season 6 in entirety. Please make sure the reviews you find come from a highly reliable source such as a major news site, or a well-known magazine. If you find some reviews, please post them on the talk page of Grey's Anatomy, where they will be evaluated for quality. If you find a suitable review, that fits the criteria we are looking for, you will be awarded a barnstar! Take part in this initiative, have fun searching for reviews, feel proud after the review you find is added to the main article, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!
Have fun, and don't forget to only look at renowned sites! We hope to see several season 6 reviews posted on the talk page soon!
--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)