Jump to content

User talk:Jonel/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: Opinions on the success of the revival of the Olympic Games in 1859, 1870, 1875

[edit]

Opinions about the success or a failure of any revival have no place in an encyclopaedia. Besides how can anybody consider the Olympic Games that were held in Athens in 1859, and 1870 as a failure.

Firstly, the 1859 Olympic Games was the first modern international Olympic Games. It had Greek athletes. It had athletes from the Ottoman Empire. It had athletic events comparable to those held in ancient times. It had medals. It had Olympians. It was a success.

Secondly, the 1870 Olympic Games was the first modern international Olympic Games to be held in a stadium. The only country in the world to have an athletics stadium in the 19th Century was Greece. I'll say that again for the hard of hearing. The only country in the world to have a bonafide, refurbished ancient Olympic Games stadium in the 19th Century was Greece. Greece was the first country in the world to host a bonafide Olympic Games in a stadium in the 19th Century. And guess what? Greece was also the second and the third country in the world to host a bonafide Olympic Games in a stadium.

What is even more interesting is that there was no stadium at the Paris 1900 side-show that was called an Olympic Games. To be be perfectly honest, if the International Olympic Committee did not recognise them as Olympic Games they would not be worthy of the name by anybody elses standards.

Then ofcourse they build a temporary stadium for St Louis in 1904.

And guess what? The first Olympic Games to have a proper bonafide Olympic stadium in the 20th Century once again was Greece at Athens in 1906.

Is that so hard to accept. Does it hurt the pride of the rest of the world to accept that. That small country called Greece had the first modern international Olympic Games and it had the first bonafide purpose-built Olympic stadium.

Please elaborate what success or failure means when you use those words. When David C. Young uses them he is referring to the fact that the Olympiad was not maintained. He is not saying that the Games themselves were not a success. Don't take quotations out of context. Don't quote opinions. Surely, that is common sense.

Also, take a closer look at this: 1859, 1870, 1875, 1896, 1906, 2004

Years in which the Olympic Games were hosted in Athens. Does that make every other city that has hosted the Olympic Games a failure?

Evangelos Zappas firmly planted the foundations, the roots, of the modern Olympic Games and those that say otherwise are in denial. That's not an opinion. That is a fact. Nipsonanomhmata 20:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

"Fully revived" means nothing. It is an opinion. Nipsonanomhmata 00:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's an opinion. One might even say a point of view. In fact, it represents a significant point of view that has been published in *numerous* reliable source. Which is exactly what we want to include in our articles. Go read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view again. Your own personal views on what it means to have fully revived the Olympics don't dictate how the rest of the world understands it.
And, yes, with this edit, you did screw up the grammar. You deleted part of a sentence, leaving the fragment "White City Stadium, (originally know as The Great Stadium) built in White City, London, England, for the 1908 Summer Olympics." -- Jonel (Speak to me) 02:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Numerous reliable sources" repeating significantly incorrect points of view. Yes, that's par for the course. That's exactly what has been happening. Nipsonanomhmata 19:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job

[edit]

Nice work on Olympic Games, trying to incorporate that "new" material yet keeping the blatant POV overtones out of it. Andrwsc 21:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm trying hard to work with Nipsonanomhmata. He does have some good points about Zappas not getting much credit for his Olympic revival efforts, but his preferred method of working (that is to say, blasting everyone who isn't Zappas with belittlements and ridicule) isn't much fun. Trying to keep things to the generally-accepted consensus (which even Young, Nipsonanomhmata's favorite author, agrees with) is tough. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 22:12, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Generally-accepted consensus on opinions means nothing. Only facts count. History is not made by the people who talk about it. History is made by the people who do it. Zappas spent a fortune making the revival of the Olympic Games happen. Brookes sent a trophy to the 1859 Games in Athens and listed one of the international participants on the honor roll of the Wenlock Olympian Society. What did Baron Pierre de Coubertin pay for? Some vacations to England and to Greece. Some stationery and some postage stamps. Zappas paid for the refurbishment of the Panathenian stadium. He bought all the land that the stadium stood on and all the surrounding land. Zappas paid for the building of the first purpose-built indoor Olympic arena. Give credit to Brookes as a Founder of the Modern Olympic Movement for 1866. But let's not pussy-foot. Zappas made the first modern international Olympic Games happen. Zappas made it happen in 1859, 1870, and 1875 with a solid foundation for the future and with a stadium that would last for thousands of years. Dr Brookes made things happen in 1866. But there is no legacy stadium from Brookes' efforts. Coubertin never paid for a stadium and the stadiums that the IOC has had built for them, by others, will never last as long as the Panathenian stadium.
What I have contributed has got nothing to do with POV. It's all about the doers and the talkers. Nipsonanomhmata 19:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We aim to present a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view here. Generally-accepted consensus on the importance of historical details does matter. You continually push the point of view that Zappas was the be-all and end-all of reviving the Olympic Games, and that Brookes and De Coubertin are unimportant. Your view is out of step with basically every Olympic historian who has ever published anything, including Young, whom you are so fond of. Zappas should be recognized, yes, and we do recognize his efforts. But you constantly try to unbalance every article you touch, and include snide attacks (which do, yes, represent your point of view, rather than "facts") on everyone who isn't Zappas. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 19:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's not true. Brookes was important (even though the IOC formally doesn't say so). He was the founder of the modern Olympic Movement and preceded Coubertin in this role since Coubertin used many of Brookes ideas without giving him credit. Coubertin was important because he was the founder of the International Olympic Committee. But Coubertin is not as important as the IOC makes him out to be (they stretch the truth at the IOC). The IOC claims that Coubertin was the founder of the modern Olympic Games, they also claim he was the founder of the modern Olympic Movement. Meanwhile, the Wenlock Olympian Society (WOS) claims that Brookes was the founder of the modern Olympic Games. The WOS used to claim that he was the founder of the Olympic Games (isn't that ludicrous?).
No. I am not out of step with David C. Young. I agree with all the facts that he has published and to be perfectly honest absolutely nobody else has done the indepth research that he has done and I respect him deeply for that. But I don't have to agree with all of his opinions because opinions are not facts. History should be based on facts and not opinions. Except by those who try to manipulate history. For example, to take Young's opinions and quote them out of context is a manipulation of history.
My view is purely based on the facts. Opinions are worth nothing unless there are no facts [opinion]. What actually happened is what counts. Events make history. Opinions are usually there to misrepresent history. Also there are too many people who quote opinions that are not based on facts. Too many people repeat what they hear and do not research the source or even consider why that was said in the first place.
You reinstated a secondary source that I deleted today. There is no original information on that page. The person that wrote that page has slightly adapted the information and the information is not accurate. i.e. the source is based on hearsay. Someone else did the original research and published it ... and this source has not even adapted what was in the original article ... they are likely to have adapted from another secondary article ... The source that was quoted is corrupt. It is not a useful source to quote or to recommend. All the other sources have original information.
You didn't like my "eat your heart out Baron Pierre" joke! He was born 1863, 1st Jan. Meanwhile, building works for the Olympic Games, including the refurbishment of the stadium, were planned back in the 1850s and the Greek government made them law in the 1860s. How the IOC has the arrogance to claim that the Baron founded the Olympic Games is beyond belief. Also, the Baron had his heart buried under a statue in Olympia. Ofcourse, everybody conveniently forgets that Zappas asked for his head to be buried at the Zappeion well before the Baron died. Nobody mentions that fact. Why? Is Zappas less important than the Baron? Zappas refurbished a stadium that was used for five Olympic Games: 1870, 1875, 1896, 1906, 2004. The IOC conveniently doesn't recognise three of those Games.
So what did Baron Pierre de Coubertin pay for when he founded the International Olympic Committee? He didn't pay for the building of any stadiums. Not even at Paris in 1900. Nipsonanomhmata 00:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeu de Paume bracket

[edit]

Oops, I missed that four set match. Sorry! Andrwsc 16:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry. Easily fixed! -- Jonel (Speak to me) 16:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Crow

[edit]

Hi, I'm curious why you re-added the Category:American anarchists to the Scott Crow article after I removed it yesterday? Was this just a mistake, or do you know something I don't? Anyway, I have removed it again. Silly rabbit 19:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely did not mean to do that. Must've somehow edited DGG's version by mistake--I really did just want to take out the empty section header. Thanks for taking it back out, and sorry for the confusion! -- Jonel (Speak to me) 19:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I thought so. No worries. Silly rabbit 19:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism"

[edit]

I see that you have n o regard to the assume good faith guideline linked from the talk page of sylvia browne. I am trying tol report on what EVERY SCIENTIST IN THE WORLD says - that she is a quack. Vandalism? More like fact checking.

Ah well, new agers can only rely on insults anyway —Preceding unsigned comment added by Science Soldier (talk • contribs)

Changing a person's biography so that the first sentence calls them a fraud and a quack is, yes, vandalism. Don't do it again. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 02:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Munich

[edit]

Dear Jonel, I have replied to your query on my talk page. RegardsNishidani 11:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Munich

[edit]

(2) Idem, RegardsNishidani 14:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Munich

[edit]

(3)Jonel, in response, closing the issue.

It is not that I have little faith in sourcing, but rather little faith in pseudo-sourcing. I could source the statement of analogy I made (Noam Chomsky, “Pirates and Emperors, Old and New: International Terrorism in the Real World,” South End Press, Cambridge Mass. rev.edition 2002 p.99 footnote 8) but I don't think it necessary, because an analogy of this kind does not need sourcing since the given, uncontrovertible facts speak for themselves. I.e. you do not need to, but may of course, source the obvious, put a link under 'is' and refer us to Parmenides, or 'fact' and refer us to the dictionary, as any academic knows. The Reeve quote was sourced, but was a misleading item in that page in so far as it was one of any number of subjective opinions immaterial to the article in question. Wiki cruisers should have spotted that before my intervention. In erasing both Reeve's exaggerated and strategically placed 'quote' I have also eliminated my counter-example. And I think the article's first paragraph gains in lucidity.

Regards Nishidani 19:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishidani"

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for your help with Jared Taylor. Steve Dufour 16:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BLP Noticeboard

[edit]

I've been trying to work with User:piledoggie for a while (who has had one of his/her anonymous usernames blocked for vandalizing my talk page), but that user really doesn't seem to understand WP:BLP. I've discussed this on the talk page of Church of Christ (Temple Lot), as well as on some of his/her various talk pages (that user has edited the Temple Lot article under 4 separate usernames, which complicates things), but I can't seem to get this user to understand what WP:BLP is about, evidenced by the fact that said user feels that they are following WP:BLP guidelines in removing my comments (which contain little or no biographical material at all, and certainly no names or references to names) from a talk page. I would have commented over at the Noticeboard, but the requests have already been archived. The Jade Knight 09:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

brackets

[edit]

These are round brackets () and these are square brackets [], parentheses are {}. --Lucy-marie 10:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first are commonly known as parentheses. "Brackets" alone tends to refer to the second in many parts of the world. I've never seen anyone anywhere refer to the third as "parentheses" before; they're curly brackets or braces. "Parentheses" is, to almost everyone in the world, unambiguous and refers to round brackets. "Brackets", on the other hand, is an ambiguous term which could mean any of the above or even <>. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 13:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In English English which I use the word parentheses is not used at all except to describe {} I see that the cultural divide between the variations of english has struck again. FInally <> these are greater than and less than signs and I have personally never heard them referred to as brackets. I guess we shall just have to live with the difference.--Lucy-marie 19:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Lewis

[edit]

OK, sorry. Jimfbleak 05:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP Noticeboard Richard Lindzen

[edit]

You closed the entry, saying it was inactive after no one commented on it for a month. [1] Yet the blog info still get readded all the time. Couldn't you just wait until a neutral person looked at it or have done it yourself? --Theblog 05:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I closed the entry on 5 August; there had been no edits to either the article or the noticeboard entry since 21 July. That's a pretty good indication that the noticeboard entry isn't doing much good at that point. The best thing for you to do in such a case if problems continue with the article is to file a fresh noticeboard entry--it's more likely to bring fresh eyes to the article than an entry that has sat for a few weeks and has scrolled away from the part of the noticeboard where most of the attention is going. Please do file a new entry if there are still problems. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 14:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lizel Moore

[edit]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Lizel Moore, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Denis Murray (athlete)

[edit]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Denis Murray (athlete), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 12:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Craig Mason

[edit]

I have nominated Craig Mason, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Mason. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Blueboy96 14:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of colonial governors in 1659

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of colonial governors in 1659, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of colonial governors in 1659. MarSch (talk) 17:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rowing at the 1920 Summer Olympics

[edit]

Having patroled your new articles in Category:Rowing events at the 1920 Summer Olympics I'm wondering if it wasn't better to merge them all into one article as most of them seem fairly short due to limited amount of competitiors. Just a thought.EA210269 (talk) 03:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The general idea from the Olympics WikiProject is that each event have its own page; reasons include a hope that eventually the event pages will get more information, avoidance of excessive detail on the more general page, and consistency of navigation. That being said, I'm not particularly attached to any method of display for the information. So if you want to be bold and merge them onto Rowing at the 1920 Summer Olympics, or ask at the WikiProject for more opinions, please do! -- Jonel (Speak to me) 16:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thats fine, just wondering why its a separate page for each event. Your explanation is quite sufficent. Nice work, by the way. I like colorful tables and statistics with country flags in it! I use it a lot in some of my articles too.EA210269 (talk) 22:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCookie

[edit]
Just stopping by with cookies for those editors who started new articles today. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bracket templates and their usage

[edit]

Nice work on those, Jonel! Those results pages look great—simplicity and effectiveness of presentation. Good to see you back — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 15:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've gotta say, monkeying around with templates is so much more fun than studying for exams. I'm glad you like the results, though I didn't do much original work—I grabbed most of the coding from {{3RoundBracket-Byes}}, with smatterings from other tournament brackets. I'd like to eventually be able to replace most of Category:Tournament bracket templates with a much smaller number of templates. I've got the byes down pretty well, and third-place matches for the brackets big enough to display them nicely (the 8-team bracket is probably going to have to be non-compact to do that). My next goal is probably to make the brackets capable of displaying seeds if desired, while seemlessly hiding them if not. Doing something with byes in rounds after the first might be useful for some of the early Olympic brackets too. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 16:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at the code I added to Template:4TeamBracket over a year ago to make the seeds optional, if that helps. My approach was to allow the template user to write RD1-seed1= (or omit the parameter altogether) to remove the little box, or write RD1-seed1=  to insert a blank box, allowing for combinations of seeded and unseeded entries. I have long thought that that category of templates was in dire need of a simplification overhaul, so I would support you in that endeavour! — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 16:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Testing:
Semifinals Final
1  Johannes Eriksen (DEN) W
 Jan Sint (NED) L 1  Johannes Eriksen (DEN) L
   Edil Rosenqvist (FIN) W  Edil Rosenqvist (FIN) W
2  Axel Tetens (DEN) L
Beautiful. Thanks for the pointer to that existing template; I was afraid I was going to have to reinvent the wheel there. Ok, so now the 4TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds-Byes is capable of showing seeds or not, and showing byes. It's too small for a third place option underneath the final; maybe I'll try one off to the right... -- Jonel (Speak to me) 17:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Carol Cassady

[edit]

I have nominated Carol Cassady, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Cassady. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Blueboy96 01:54, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've got no problem with that article being deleted. It was one of a bunch I created quite a while ago, with a different conception of Wikipedia's inclusiveness on political candidates. My guess is that Carl Cassady isn't the only one left that suffers from the same problems. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 03:02, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eremia about Panamerican Games !

[edit]

Why did you canceled my contributions ! I prefer write Panamerican ! I have said " Panamerican Games " , and you have canceled for Pan American Games ! I think , this is more just to write " 2007 Panamerican Games " ! I do not disagree with you , please , could you give an explanation ! You can write me a message Eremia (talk) 22:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Eremia[reply]

You have already been told the problem with your edits, and have been asked to discuss changes at Talk:Pan American Games. The correct name of the Pan American Games uses two words for Pan American. Our preferences don't really matter much in the issue. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 23:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monica/Eremia/etc

[edit]

Monica/Eremia/etc. is now blocked indef. Sorry my attempt at reforming them prolonged the agony. Report any more of these obvious vandals to AIV, and in your report, link to: User:Barneca/watch/bvr, and hopefully whoever is dealing with AIV will deal with them quickly. --barneca --barneca (talk) 13:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't beat yourself up over it. Some people can be convinced to be helpful, some can't. This one couldn't; oh well. You still get points in my book for trying. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 17:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh De Lacy

[edit]

1896 Summer Olympics FAR

[edit]

1896 Summer Olympics has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Giants2008 (talk) 20:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

[edit]

hi, there isnt any template for wrestling (finals and Repechages) for this page Wrestling at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's Greco-Roman 55 kg, i want to create it but i cant, can you help me ? --Mohsen1248 (talk) 18:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should just be able to use {{32TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds-Byes}} and {{8TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds-Byes}} for the main bracket and repechage (I think those are the right numbers of rounds), respectively.
no, current wrestling format is similar to Tennis, they wrestle 3 periods and winner must win 2 of them. --Mohsen1248 (talk) 19:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've tried fiddling with modifying them, but I'm having trouble getting them to come out right. What you've got on that page looks good, though, so for now I'd recommend using that. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 18:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for your attention, i tried to create it too (for repechage round) but couldn't. --Mohsen1248 (talk) 02:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archers

[edit]

Dear Jonel, I address you because in the past you contributed to the article of a Russian Olympic archer Balzhinima Tsyrempilov. Recently, I started 2 new articles about Russian Olympic archers, Natalia Erdyniyeva and Bair Badënov. I have but a minor experience with the English edition of Wikipedia, I am not a native speaker of English and totally lack sports terminology. Would you please review and correct these articles when/if you find it possible (taking in account their current participation in the Archery at the 2008 Summer Olympics events). Thanks in advance, --Tar-ba-gan (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They look great so far--good work. I'll try to keep them updated along with the rest of this year's Olympians. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 18:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your corrections! And, also as I cannot follow most Olympic events, your contribution on their progress is much appreciated also! --Tar-ba-gan (talk) 12:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Olympic Template

[edit]

As a leading editor at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Olympics, you should be aware that I think a rash template deletion decision is being made at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_August_18#Template:Nations_at_the_2008_Summer_Olympics. I have attempted to created the sidebar template Template:Nations at the 2008 Summer Olympics to complement Template:NOCin2008SummerOlympics as a navigational aid for some of the larger countries. Although the links are the same it is not redundant because it greatly improves the experience for the reader who wants to quickly visit different countries. When I visit a page like United States at the 2008 Summer Olympics, I often want to jump to another page and I don't think I am the only reader who would like to do so. Currently, the reader has to scroll down for pages and pages in hopes that the proper template is at the bottom. It would help the reader if there were a sidebar navbox like the one I created. It is not uncommon for a sidebar to include only duplicate links of a template at the bottom (See Barack Obama, which has a sidebar template that includes only redundant links).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Tony, but I agree with Parutakupiu on this one. Using the IOC codes makes it completely bewildering to the casual reader, and translating those codes into actual names is typically more inconvenient than going to the end of a page (pressing end or dragging the scroll bar to the end). That need for conversion is really what makes it less useful than the box on Barack Obama, rather than any redundancy. I'm not going to join the call for deletion, but I really don't think that this extra template is helpful enough to readers to justify putting it on even the long articles. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 18:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Botswana

[edit]

Thanks for taking care of the BMX article. Could you check on Botswana at the 2008 Summer Olympics when you get a chance? It lists only two competitors, both boxers; but I just watched the women's 400 metres, in which a Botswanan woman was a finalist. Nyttend (talk) 02:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Let me know if you find anything else that could use some work. Oddly enough, the official results site doesn't give a full listing for Botswana's team. I think SI has a full list; I'm going to start double-checking between that list and event pages. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 02:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work; I'm doing my best to spread my requests between active WP:OLY members, since it seems like all of you must be going crazy right now with requests and cleanup and everything else. We members of the Ohio and Photography projects just don't have the workload that you're coping with right now! Nyttend (talk) 03:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Think I've got Botswana to where they should be now. I'm kind of afraid of how many such omissions are present on the 2008 pages; they're going to need a pretty complete vetting after the Games are over. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 03:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WashingtonThirdCongressDistrict.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:WashingtonThirdCongressDistrict.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - AWeenieMan (talk) 20:27, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WashingtonSixthCongressDistrict.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:WashingtonSixthCongressDistrict.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - AWeenieMan (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by this?

[edit]

"No. We don't resort from the NOC codes the IOC uses. Use talk: if you want to change that."

The article speaks precisely that we use IOC country codes (for NOC's) and that we do not list each and every change of the IOC NOC code. HOL -> NED and simmilar cases.

What did you mean with your undoing of my editing.

Thnx

Imbris (talk) 23:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No response. -- Imbris (talk) 23:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know perfectly well what I mean. Andrwsc has already explained it to you. We follow the codes as currently used in the IOC medal database. That database reflects changes such as HOL and NED being the same. We do not do the rearranging for them. Also, you probably could wait more than an entire 8 minutes before declaring "no response"; I do have other things I am working on as well. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 23:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Olympic Games (again)

[edit]

Thank you for the heads up regarding the Olympic Games and Evangelos Zappas. I really want to bring the Olympic Games up to FA status and we all know that we need balanced and fair editors. I'll monitor them very closely. I also appreciate your comments. H1nkles (talk) 03:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • It appears to me from a look at the edit history of the Olympic Games page, that there is a debate going on with our friend, Nipsonanomhmata squarely in the middle, regarding how to term the predecessors to the first "official" Olympics. I've created a talking point on the discussion page for debate and asked editors to debate there rather than via edits. I'll keep a close eye on it and the Zappas page. Hopefully with the diligence of a couple of neutral editors we can maintain balance in these pages. H1nkles (talk) 14:54, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Hard Work is Noticed

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence

I wanted to tell you thank you, not only for your help with editing the Olympic Games page, but for all of your diligence and hard work on the plethora of pages (Olympics–related and otherwise) that you are involved in. Keep up the good work! H1nkles (talk) 22:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Larry Sheahan

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Larry Sheahan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lincolnite (talk) 19:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've got no objection. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 19:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spaces

[edit]

Hi! For the seventh (!) time you have reverted my edit here: Russia at the 1912 Summer Olympics, so maybe it is time to explain why I have added the spaces. :) The first extra space was for a reason - don't crowd navboxes into references and the second space was also for a reason - according to WP:Stub "It is usually desirable to leave two blank lines between the first stub template and whatever precedes it." Kind regards Doma-w (talk) 22:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[2] -- Jonel (Speak to me) 14:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Heidi Behrens-Benedict

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Heidi Behrens-Benedict, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Behrens-Benedict. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --DerRichter (talk) 08:07, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, no objection here. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 14:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

template:CGBY1

[edit]

Hi Jonel, I see it was you who created this template 3 years ago. Please can you consider deleting or changing it as unfortunately it currently renders badly in articles using template:CGBY. here's an example of bad rendering with the 'see also box' overlapping with the section line: List_of_colonial_governors_in_1695, thanks Tom B (talk) 19:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!!

[edit]
The Invisible Barnstar
For making a special trip to the library to find one page number, not finding it and then taking the extra step of finding a substitute citation. Thank you for going above and beyond in the background in order to help make the Olympic Games article pass FAC. H1nkles (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of CIA attribution templates

[edit]

Nine CIA attribution templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 22:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like excellent work on your part. Completely agree, and have mentioned as much on the TfD page. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 23:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darwin Correa

[edit]

Greetings! I've been going through Wikipedia:Biographical pages with several incompatible dates of birth, and one of the entries on the list is Darwin Correa, an article which you started. While I was able to find some Olympics web pages confirming his results, I have been unable to find any source indicating the correct year of his birth. Is there any way you could help solve this enigma? Thanks, mate! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 00:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My source was the Athens2004 website, now with the results archived at LA84. This PDF has the participants list for flatwater canoeing. Correa is at the 10th page of the PDF, with the date of birth given as 1977. I seem to have simply made an error in the category; I'll go fix that. Sorry for any confusion. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 00:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Woot, thanks! +1 point in my contest. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 01:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WashingtonFirstCongressDistrict.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:WashingtonFirstCongressDistrict.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic announcements archive

[edit]

Hey, Jonel. I saw you update the announcements template with a new featured list, removing older announcements as a consequence. You probably haven't noticed but this template has an archive for older items. This way, we can remove them from the main template to save space but we never lose them. Parutakupiu (talk) 15:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't noticed the archive. I've added the February items to the archive, and have gone through the announcements template history to pick up the older stuff as well. Thanks for letting me know about that. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 16:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, you edit-conflicted me. :) Thanks for doing the "dirty work". Parutakupiu (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic Games back up for FAC

[edit]

I may be a glutton for punishment but I wanted to let you know that I've renominated the Olympic Games article for FA candidacy. Since you contributed so much to the previous effort I thought you might like to know that I'm making another go of it. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. H1nkles (talk) 01:47, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see it. I'll definitely keep an eye on the nomination, and help in any way I can. Good luck! -- Jonel (Speak to me) 13:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Olympic Games work

[edit]

I wanted to say thank you for your work on the Olympic Games article recently in response to critiques during the FAC. I've been besieged by real life and haven't been able to do much these last few days. If the article passes it will be because of your help and I thank you. H1nkles (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're certainly welcome; I'm glad to be of assistance (though I think you give me too much credit—I really haven't done that much). You've done great work with that article. It deserves to be a Featured Article, and I hope that it'll finally get there this time! -- Jonel (Speak to me) 20:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes it's nice as an editor to have someone else to carry the load and take on some of the work, just to feel supported I guess. I feel like most of the suggestions are opinions on how to make the article better, which is fine but it would be nice to see them support the article once their suggestions have been implemented. Thanks again. H1nkles (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World Cricket League

[edit]

Hi. Please see the structure of the World Cricket League at the official site for Division Seven here. Eight is correct. Andrew nixon (talk) 17:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm convinced. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 17:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For your help...

[edit]
Raise a glass high
In trying to think of an appropriate way to say thanks not only for your help on the Olympic Games article but in various other places I was hitting a brick wall. Until I found this, and felt it would be supremely appropriate for me to share with you my absolute favorite beverage. Thanks again and Cheers! H1nkles (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Glad to be of service. I'm still a bit bummed about Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Women's road race not getting promoted to FA. Tone did a lot of good work there, and I thought that one deserved the star as well.

Also, you have excellent taste! -- Jonel (Speak to me) 20:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, I didn't get a chance to weigh in on that article. I hope Tone doesn't throw in the towel, it's tempting. Guinness is one of those watershed events that people either hate or love, glad to see you fall on the correct side.  :) H1nkles (talk) 20:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ice hockey at the Olympics

[edit]

Hello, as I'm sure you're aware of by now, I am working on the article and am aiming to get it as a TFA during the Vancouver Olympics. It still needs some prose work, and I was wondering if you could take a look at it. Thanks, Scorpion0422 21:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I've taken a pass through it. Good luck with the FA review—I'll keep an eye on it and pitch in if I can. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 20:32, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for copyediting it. One final question, I wanted to have a bolded title, but could not think of any that didn't sound extremely forced. Do you have any suggestions? -- Scorpion0422 00:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Boxing

[edit]

Please allow me a comment about your changes to the boxing articles. E.g. Boxing at the 1924 Summer Olympics - Men's light heavyweight or Boxing at the 1924 Summer Olympics - Men's heavyweight. It looks awful! Particularly on small screens. And I remember that there was a discussion on the talk page of WP:Olympics that it is to prefer to show every athlete in the first column, therefore I show the byes. Also I edited all boxing pages up to 1936 in the same style... But it's up to you, I will not edit the Olympics pages anymore. Kind regards Doma-w (talk) 19:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you prefer the original bracket styles, I'll put the 1924 ones back as they were. I thought this way looked better, but I'm not set on it. I do hope you continue editing the Olympic boxing pages—there's a lot of work left to do on all things Olympics! -- Jonel (Speak to me) 19:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. I know that you have done a lot of work for all the Olympics pages and that you have been engaged with wiki for a long time. But sorry no I will not continue editing the Olympic boxing pages nor any other Olympic pages. The main reasons are the "infobox" and the wrong historical country codes. The "infobox" in the top right corner destroys the style of all Olympic pages! It is nonsens to create a template for exactly the same place were we have already a template! For the top right corner we have the "SportsAtXXXXSummerOlympics"! The easiest way would be to create an "infobox" for the place were we had the "medalists" uptonow? The WP:Olympics defacto do not exist, so there is no way to work together... Kind regards Doma-w (talk) 06:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you linked a date or two at 2009 FINA Men's Water Polo World League. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Ohconfucius (talk) 09:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I copied some of the formatting from earlier years, didn't even think about the date links. I'll try to keep a closer eye on that. Thanks for the heads-up. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 14:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Summer Olympic Games to FA

[edit]

If you guys (Geraldk and Jonel) are interested in making a push on the 2008 Summer Olympics to FA then I'm up for it. I'll lay out the various sections on the article's talk page and then you can claim the ones you'd like to edit. I've seen these collaborative efforts move articles pretty fast. I'd recommend using the GA process first as a peer review and then moving up to FAC after is passes GA. I'm open to thoughts on that if you have any concerns. Since the GA review process takes so long due to the backlog I may just nominate the article as it currently stands and we can work on it while it waits for a reviewer. I'll propose this on the article's talk page and solicit any thoughts there. Let's get crackin'. H1nkles (talk) 17:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Conrad Lee

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Conrad Lee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable - does not meet WP:POLITICIAN

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lincolnite (talk) 12:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to that deletion. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 05:17, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nation section from Olympic sports section

[edit]

I don't understand why you want to have 5000 cells to each page? Nearly every single link will be blank unless someone undertakes the task of naming every single Olympian for all Olympics. And even then, it would be better to place this information in the pre-existing (Nation, Olympics) pages. 128.122.91.47 (talk) 23:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See (and comment at) Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Olympics#Nations tables in some Olympic sport articles. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 23:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

[edit]

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 10:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 31 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 17:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eurobasket

[edit]

Cheers for creating a qualification/competition format section as I requested! Take care. Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)Join WikiProject Athletics! 17:55, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

[edit]

Proposed deletion of List of colonial governors in 1872

[edit]

The article List of colonial governors in 1872 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

In the five years since this page was created, the only name that has been here is a redlink.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DarkAudit (talk) 14:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of colonial governors in 1872

[edit]

I have nominated List of colonial governors in 1872, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of colonial governors in 1872. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DarkAudit (talk) 00:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

[edit]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Jonel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 170 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Karl Offmann - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Abdul Karim al-Iryani - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Faraj Said Bin Ghanem - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Abdul Aziz Abdul Ghani - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Muhammad Said al-Attar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Haidar Abu Bakr al-Attas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Ali Salim al-Beidh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Yasin Said Numan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Mohsin Ahmad al-Aini - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Abdul Latif Dayfallah - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
More...

11. Hassan Muhammad Makki 12. Abdul Salam Sabrah 13. Abdullah Kurshumi 14. Hamoud al-Gayifi 15. Dawn Courtney 16. Heidi Behrens-Benedict 17. Yehya Bundhun 18. Alexandros Karageorgiou 19. Tarundeep Rai 20. May Mansour 21. Jo-Ann Galbraith 22. Stephanie Arnold 23. Aurore Trayan 24. Lamia Bahnasawy 25. Olga Pilipova 26. Helen Palmer (archer) 27. Chen Li-Ju 28. Natalia Nasaridze 29. Wiebke Nulle 30. Elena Dostay 31. Nargis Nabieva 32. Maydenia Sarduy 33. Deonne Bridger 34. Thin Thin Khaing 35. Damla Günay 36. Hanna Karasiova 37. Fotini Vavatsi 38. Alexandra Fouace 39. Kateryna Palekha 40. Tshering Chhoden 41. Mari Piuva 42. Sumangala Sharma 43. Viktoriya Beloslydtseva 44. Reena Kumari 45. Margarita Galinovskaya 46. He Ying 47. Lee Sung-Jin 48. Ismail Essam 49. Franck Fisseux 50. Lockoneco Lockoneco 51. Apostolos Nanos 52. Yong Fujun 53. Thomas Naglieri 54. Jocelyn de Grandis 55. Rob Elder 56. Sifa Taumoepeau 57. Eduardo Avelino Magaña 58. Mattias Eriksson 59. Ricardo Merlos 60. Ken Uprichard 61. Majhi Sawaiyan 62. Jorge Pablo Chapoy 63. Georgios Kalogiannidis 64. David Barnes (archer) 65. Jeff Henckels 66. John Magera 67. Hasse Pavia Lind 68. Michael Frankenberg 69. Dmytro Hrachov 70. Yavor Hristov 71. Satyadev Prasad 72. Anton Prylepau 73. Tim Cuddihy 74. Hiroshi Yamamoto (archer) 75. Ling Yun-ting 76. Nigella Saunders 77. Michelle Edwards 78. Jiang Yanmei 79. Kelly Morgan 80. Seo Yoon-hee 81. Wang Chen (badminton player) 82. Cheng Shao-Chieh 83. Patapol Ngernsrisuk 84. Theodoros Velkos 85. George Patis 86. José Antonio Crespo 87. Dorian James 88. Stewart Carson 89. Pramote Teerawiwatana 90. Kevin Qi Han 91. Yim Bang-eun 92. Kim Yong-hyun 93. Sang Yang 94. Flandy Limpele 95. Ha Tae-kwon 96. Kate Wilson-Smith 97. Jane Crabtree 98. Neli Boteva 99. Helen Nichol 100. Koon Wai Chee 101. Li Wing Mui 102. Chantal Botts 103. Jo Novita 104. Lita Nurlita 105. Ella Tripp 106. Cheng Wen-Hsing 107. Chien Yu-Chin 108. Saralee Thungthongkam 109. Sathinee Chankrachangwong 110. Lotte Bruil-Jonathans 111. Hwang Yu-mi 112. Zhao Tingting 113. Philippe Bourret 114. Nikolai Zuyev (badminton) 115. Marina Yakusheva 116. Victoria Wright 117. Antoinette Uys 118. Nicol Pitro 119. Tsai Chia-Hsin 120. Nova Widianto 121. Norway at the 1984 Summer Olympics 122. Michellie Jones 123. Stephan Vuckovic 124. Loretta Harrop 125. Christine Hocq 126. Nicole Hackett 127. Jennifer Gutierrez 128. Akiko Hirao 129. Evelyn Williamson 130. Maribel Blanco 131. Silvia Pepels 132. Edith Cigana 133. Iona Wynter 134. Haruna Hosoya 135. Iván Raña 136. Reto Hug 137. Andriy Glushchenko 138. Craig Watson (triathlete) 139. Carl Blasco 140. Takumi Obara 141. Juraci Moreira 142. Jean-Christophe Guinchard 143. Johannes Enzenhofer 144. Stéphan Bignet 145. Alessandro Bottoni 146. Joachim Willen 147. Hideo Fukui 148. Ben Bright 149. Eric van der Linden 150. Hiroyuki Nishiuchi 151. José María Merchán 152. Susan Williams 153. Lucie Zelenková 154. Greg Bennett (triathlete) 155. Frédéric Belaubre 156. Hirokatsu Tayama 157. Stéphane Poulat 158. Igor Sysoyev 159. Daniil Sapunov 160. Maik Petzold 161. Vladimir Polikarpenko 162. Nathan Richmond 163. Paulo Miyashiro 164. Norbert Domnik 165. Brent McMahon 166. Daniel Lee Chi Wo 167. Felipe López (archer) 168. Stephanie Forrester (triathlete) 169. Lee Dong-soo 170. Lee Kyung-won

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

[edit]

Speedy deletion of Ling Yun-ting

[edit]

Hello Jonel, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Ling Yun-ting, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Tavatar. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Tavatar. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Tavatar (talk · contribs) 00:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

[edit]

I B Wright – what's up with that guy?

[edit]

Hi. After a rather unpleasant, grueling experience with I B Wright (and what currently seems to be his alter ego, 86.182.66.217) on my talk page and elsewhere, I decided to take a look at the history of his talk page and and wasn't too surprised to find that he clashed with many other users in the past, you among them.

And while I think it was wrong of some of you to threaten him with being blocked (for tendentious editing, personal attacks, harassment or whatever), he's really damaging Wikipedia, putting falsehoods in article after article (I'm still not sure as to why he does what he does: Is he really serious, or is this all some kind of a very bad joke? Or maybe he's got some, um, "other issues" to deal with?). Isn't there anything that can be done short of revoking his editing rights (which already had been tried once before)? Couldn't it be arranged that his changes must be approved by someone higher up before they are applied? Oh, well, that's probably not feasible, still, it's comforting to see that I'm not the only one who's had a close encounter of the third kind with this unnerving guy... Thanks!

By the way, did you ever read the self-description on his user page?

"[...]he has a wide ranging knowledge on some often surprising subjects.

Note: I B Wright is not his real name, but an apposite if modest description."

It doesn't get much more disconnected from reality than that.

Regards – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

[edit]

Proposed deletion of Iván Raña

[edit]

The article Iván Raña has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, August 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of José Antonio Crespo

[edit]

The article José Antonio Crespo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, August 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:27, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 September 2011

[edit]


The Signpost: 3 October 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

[edit]

16TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds-Byes Bracket (template)

[edit]

Question about brackets, Jonel: Can you tell me if there is a way to add an additional game to a bracket? The West Coast Conference and the MAC will have a different format for their basketball tournaments for the 2011-12 college basketball season. With the addition of a ninth school, the WCC has changed its tournament format to a five-day tournament with an opening round between the #8 and #9 seed, here's a sample 2012 bracket: 2012 bracket after that everything else is the same. Here's the 2011 bracket. I'm asking, since you created the bracket template the WCC used. Thanks, Bearcats fan (talk) 20:30, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 7 November2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

[edit]

File source problem with File:AGPrentiss.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:AGPrentiss.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

[edit]

Nomination of Harrison Smith for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harrison Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rockchalk717 03:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

[edit]

Fencing at the 1928 Summer Olympics

[edit]

Nice work on expanding the articles for the individual events. Lugnuts (talk) 08:33, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Got them done now, on to the next group! -- Jonel (Speak to me) 21:54, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Olympians at the Olympic Games

[edit]

Hello, Jonel, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Independent Olympians at the Olympic Games, appears to be directly copied from http://www.topendsports.com/events/summer/countries/independent.htm. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Independent Olympians at the Olympic Games if necessary. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That article appears to have copied from our article at Independent Olympic Participants at the 1992 Summer Olympics, which is where I got the text from. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 00:37, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Retrocopy.  :-) — Coren (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

[edit]

Wrestling at the 1924 Summer Olympics – Men's Greco-Roman heavyweight

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Wrestling at the 1924 Summer Olympics – Men's Greco-Roman heavyweight, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Wrestling at the 1924 Summer Olympics – Men's Greco-Roman heavyweight. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Those are... the same article? -- Jonel (Speak to me) 12:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

I'm sure some of the interactions you were referring to [3] were directed at me so on some level I'm sure I owe you my gratitude - Basement12 (T.C) 03:50, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

[edit]

You are the one that is not constructive

[edit]

There. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.11.126.236 (talk) 16:46, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTFORUM. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 03:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for taking care of this! Nice work! Location (talk) 02:51, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! -- Jonel (Speak to me) 03:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

[edit]

Navbox - infobox redudancy

[edit]

Navboxes are often redundant with infobox content. Also, many of these pages are quite long.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:27, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 02:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

USA vs Japan deletion

[edit]

I had actually considered deleting the section myself after my latest edit as I started thinking more about it. I was hesitant though only because I felt it may be notable in light of the controversy in the simifinal. Similar plays called opposite ways, but both calls favoring the US. I don't disagree with the deletion, but did you consider this aspect of its notability? --RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me 22:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did. The controversy over the semifinal, however, is more about the unusual six-second call; while there were some complaints about the handball call, that was much less controversial. Those are also far from the only missed handball calls made; I think there was another on a U.S. player in the Canada match that was missed as well. Numerous other (primarily non-)calls were also complained of, but don't seem to have generated much real controversy. If anything, the Andrade suspension should be in before any of those calls (and if we're going by similar calls all going one way, the Tancredi stomp also missed on-field should be mentioned). -- Jonel (Speak to me) 22:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Stepped out for a while. Understood and thanks for the explanation. --RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me 03:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

[edit]

Getting Wikimedians to the Olympic Games

[edit]

Hi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 04:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Finland at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to William Johnson, James Davis, George Gardiner, William Montgomery, Jean Dumont, Hans Hansson and Béla Varga
United States at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to William Johnson, James Davis, William Montgomery, Andrew McDonald, Otto Müller, Walter Wilson and Hans Hansson
Great Britain at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to William Johnson, James Davis, George Gardiner, George MacKenzie, Andrew McDonald and Walter Wilson
Sweden at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Walter Wilson, Nils Nilsson, Hans Hansson and Béla Varga
Switzerland at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to William Johnson, George Gardiner, Andrew McDonald and Otto Müller
Canada at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to William Montgomery, Otto Müller and Walter Wilson
Denmark at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to George MacKenzie, Jean Dumont and Hans Hansson
France at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to William Johnson, George Gardiner and Nils Nilsson
Hungary at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Hans Hansson and Béla Varga
Wrestling at the 1928 Summer Olympics – Men's freestyle welterweight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Thomas Morris and Richard Cook
Austria at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hans Hansson
Belgium at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jean Dumont
Italy at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Béla Varga
Japan at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hans Hansson
Netherlands at the 1924 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Béla Varga
Wrestling at the 1928 Summer Olympics – Men's freestyle featherweight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Daniel MacDonald
Wrestling at the 1928 Summer Olympics – Men's freestyle lightweight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to George MacKenzie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

[edit]

File source problem with File:Samuel Phillips Lee.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Samuel Phillips Lee.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 12:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

[edit]

Bohemia at the 1908 Summer Olympics

[edit]

Here's a question that you probably won't remember the answer two after six years, but I figured I'd ask anyways. When you created the fencing section for Bohemia at the 1908 Summer Olympics, you added a line for a competitor named František Šourek-Tuček but, in the sources that you used, he's only listed as "F. Tuček". I'm wondering where you got the full name, or if that he was accidentally mixed up with František Soucek the athlete? There's a Wikipedia page using his full name now, but that user created it based off of the entry at Bohemia at the 1908 Summer Olympics and the source used for the article, Sports Reference, still only has F. Tuček. Wondering if you can shed any light on this. Canadian Paul 13:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't recall. It's most likely from Wudarski or de Wael if SR doesn't have it. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 13:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for replying! De Wael doesn't have it, but Wudarski does, although the file was updated as recently October 2 of this year, so I'll have to ask him when he added that. The reason I'm interested is because SR is trying to find out where this information came from and the furthest back we can trace it thus far is the Bohemia at the 1908 Summer Olympics article... Canadian Paul 15:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

[edit]

Cycling at the 1900 Summer Olympics – Men's points race

[edit]

What do you think about this? --Kasper2006 (talk) 05:46, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All for having an article. It should mention the IOC nonrecognition status. Should be sure not to put the results in medal counts etc., however, as those should follow IOC (though S-R usually has it right on what should be considered Olympic). -- Jonel (Speak to me) 16:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

[edit]

File:USS-Tyler-1857.jpg missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 00:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jonel/Archive_5&oldid=1166514424"