User talk:Luigi-San

Image copyright problem with Image:BUF_bvdfxg5cxcnl4dznr72f.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:BUF_bvdfxg5cxcnl4dznr72f.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Brainsurge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brainsurge.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RPM

If you continue to add unverified information concerning Power Rangers: R.P.M. to Wikipedia, you will be blocked.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of PokeCommunity

A tag has been placed on PokeCommunity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. KuroiShiroi (contribs) 02:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:PokeCommuntiy Banner.png

Thanks for uploading File:PokeCommuntiy Banner.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tubelogo.png

A tag has been placed on File:Tubelogo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip [i.e. a Word document or PDF file] that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to YouTube, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Ewing

The thread you contributed to at Talk:Power Rangers: RPM is six months old. It has long been resolved now that the show is on the air. When it was made, the show was not out yet.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Just Pizza

A tag has been placed on Just Pizza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja _talk 21:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Jplogo.gif

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Jplogo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Istcol (talk) 03:02, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Carrey/Notable roles

the Bruce Nolan link does not point to the film, which is what I think you meant to do. try Bruce Almighty. ƒoאŁoɠicƙ^talk 02:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Goodluckcharlielogo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Goodluckcharlielogo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:10, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Nickasc.png

Thank you for uploading File:Nickasc.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tubelogo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tubelogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PR 2011

There is nothing concrete about anything from actoraccess.com. The names may change between then and filming or filming may never take place. Do not use anything from that site as a source for information on Wikipedia.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:59, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking my user page is not how you get your way on this project.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:Ryulong has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Torchwood Who? (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User:Ryulong constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. みんな空の下 (トーク) 20:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to User:Ryulong. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. みんな空の下 (トーク) 20:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We all like a good rick roll, but I wasn't sure if your recent userpage edit was appropriate. Sorry if I ruined an inside joke. Judging by the other warnings you should probably stop.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What inside joke? This idiot should get an indef block for this shit.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Samurai

Unless you have a reliable source, do not reveal the cast members' names.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:06, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do. It's called the IMDB.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Luigi-San (talk • contribs)

IMDB is not a reliable source.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luigi-San (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In retrospect, what I did was not only stupid, but completely uncalled for. I guess I was just caught up in the moment and it clouded my better judgement. Luigi-San (talk) 03:27, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First, see WP:EBUR. Second, re-read WP:GAB. What comes third should then be obvious (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request 2.0

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luigi-San (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Let's see, where to start... Well, I guess the only place to start is the article that happened to be the "scene of the crime", if you will: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Billy_Cundiff&diff=504994587&oldid=472700705 Basically, after he missed a potential game-tying kick near the end of the 2011 AFC Championship Game, I thought it would be funny to replace his biography with a line from Ace Ventura: Pet Detective ("Soccer style kicker, graduated from Collier High June 1976..."). Now that's clear-cut vandalism if I ever saw it. Needless to say, it was a bonehead mistake doing so (although I'm fairly certain there were others vandalizing the page around that time, but that's beside the point) and I'm ashamed that I actually went through with doing such a thing. I guess I was just caught up in the moment in the wake of what happened, but there's still no reason for my actions. This isn't something I rarely, if at all, do, so I assure you thank if you unblock me, it will never happen again. And I intend to help contribute to to wiki in whatever way I possibly can, mostly on the video game and sports fronts. Once again, I regrets this past action considerably, and I thank you for taking the time to read this over. Sincerely, Luigi-San 74.77.75.227 (talk) 02:47, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Perhaps you didn't mean to, but you requested this unblock without logging in. This, of course, revealed your IP, and based on comparing the contributions of that IP after the time of this account's block to those of this account prior to the block, it seems apparent that you been evading the block on this account by editing from this IP while blocked. Considering some of the shenanigans from this account, I fail to see how this is a request that you can reasonably expect an administrator to grant. Kinu ^t/_c 03:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.