User talk:MarcGarver/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:MarcGarver. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
You're a very good writer
Not only are you a good writer, but you're a good researcher also. I just read through Control self-assessment and found it very informative. The article is very comprehensive and laid out well. It's also well referenced, which I find very helpful and it makes good use of images too. I rated it a "C" class article by today's tough standards, but really it's a "B" class article. I noticed it's had a couple thousand page views just in the last 30 days, so readers must find it useful. Thanks very much for contributing such a quality article. You really are a good content creator and I sincerely appreciate you supporting our project here. Kind regards. 64.40.54.232 (talk) 20:02, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind words, appreciated. QU TalkQu 22:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Why are you warning me? My edits are factual and useful. Deen is obese, this is a fact. Also, if you saw the Oui pictoral on Demi Moore you would clearly see that she had an extremely hairy pussy. I don't understand why you are deleting these entries. Thanks for your understanding.
- You are not permitted to add your personal opinion nor are you permitted to state "facts" about living people without a reliable reference. A "hairy pussy" is your opinion it is not a fact and therefore is not allowed. Thank you for your understanding that your edits appear to be vandalism and you are likely to be blocked if you continue this way. QU TalkQu 20:18, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your response, I appreciate it. I think that the photoshoot speaks for itself. Her pussy is really, really hairy. This is a fact and is not my personal opinion. I would like for my contribution to stand and I appreciate your understanding.
- It is irrelevant what you think is a "fact". Read WP:RS and WP:OR so that you understand. Unless you can find a reliable source that states "her pussy is hairy" then it is original research and NOT permitted in Wikipedia. QU TalkQu 20:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the timely reply. I think an actual photo of Moore clearly featuring her pussy constitutes a source. If the picture is viewed, there is an image of Moore. Her legs are spread and there is clearly evident thick black hair covering her entire pussy. This seems reliable and verifiable.
- It is neither. You have not proved the photo exists and is of her, and even if you do it is still your opinion that the amount of hair justifies the phrase "hairy". You need a reference in a reliable source - a written reference - that actually states the words that you are using. A picture is not a reference on its own because it is open to interpretation - in this case yours. Can you take the time to read the policies instead of responding to me. A five minute read of WP:BLP will show you that you are wrong. QU TalkQu 20:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again for taking the time to instruct me on these rules. I really appreciate it and your valuable contributions to Wikipedia. That said, I think we are going to have to agree to disagree. The fact of the matter is that a pictorial in Oui magazine featured Demi Moore in 1980. Demi Moore (in this pictorial) featured a hairy pussy. A pussy that has hair on it is "hairy." The edit should stand as is.
- Doesn't matter if you agree with me or not. What matters is do your edits comply with Wikipedia policies. If you keep adding material to articles about living people without quoting a reference then they will keep getting removed. QU TalkQu 20:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you QU TalkQu 13:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
?
But hes in violation of WP:PROMOTION and WP:NEUTRAL , hes promoting a political purpose/movement.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.180.197.105 (talk) 21:57, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- No, he isn't. And more to the point, it is hard to assume good faith on your part given your personal attacks on a number of editors, offensive edit summaries, etc. I suggest you take your "case" to WP:AN/I instead as you are likely to just keep getting reverted as an apparent vandal if you try and change the user page yourself. QU TalkQu 21:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Help on resolving issues on the Planetary Consciousness article
Hi, after reviewing my article on Planetary Consciousness, you pointed out some issues on it, like " parameters POV, copy edit and essay-like tag to article". I've reworked on the article keeping in mind your pointers, would really appreciate if you could review the article once more. Will be really helpful if you could point out where exactly I need to work on the article. Any help on the article will be highly appreciated. Thank you. 59.177.41.55 (talk) 19:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Stop erasing my contributions
I feel as though i am a valuable member of wikipedia and have a lot to offer if you just give me a chance. I feel victimised, bullied and racially discriminated against. If you continue to harass me i wil be forced to take further action.
I look forward to hearing back from you.
Many thanks Shy ronnie69 Shyronnie69 (talk) 20:51, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- In what context can you feel "racially discriminated against" when I don't know what race you are, and you don't know what race I am? In any case, let me make it clear - adding this kind of content to the biography of a living person WILL get you blocked if you continue. Read and understand WP:BLP and it will give you guidance on what is acceptable at Wikipedia. If you add more content like this I will revert it - feel free to "take further action". Thanks. QU TalkQu 20:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
On my edits to Dynamo (magican) page - why've you reverted them? Do you think it's normal to use the word "magic" like something that exists in our reality? Please correct the sentence "He first learned magic from his grandfather" to something less confusing like: "He first learned to perform illusion tricks from his grandfather" or give me some proof that magic exists! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.252.70.14 (talk) 16:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- I reverted your edit because I didn't think it was helpful to tag it as requiring clarification when I felt the meaning was already clear to the reader. As an aside I should apologise as I didn't actually mean to "revert" it with the standard edit summary as this implies I thought it was non-constructive, which wasn't my intention. Now I've read the suggestion you've made here ("...to perform illusion tricks...") I can see your point. It's a good change and I think it is worth making. Thanks (and apologies again for the daft edit summary). QU TalkQu 17:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hopefully this is better. QU TalkQu 17:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Downtown Missoula
Hello QuiteUnusual,
the user ATOTHEJPiano that you warned not to edit war on the Downtown Missoula page is still at it.
Thank you for your help Missoulianette (talk) 22:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Never mind, they seem to have deleted their user page for some reason and a user by the Missoulian not to be mistaken for me Missoulianette, has reverted it to your last edit. Missoulianette (talk) 00:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
RVV thanks
Thanks for your intervention on my talk page, I appreciate it. --Old Moonraker (talk) 21:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Duly noted
Thanks for catching my failure to "Move" an article properly. Maybe an automatic warning could be generated in that situation? And thanks for calling for administrator help. (I also did that at the Teahouse before noticing your second message.) This is the right way to respond to a message on my Talk page, right? (It's not very efficient having to click over to the other person's talk page and scroll to the end, especially if I've forgotten to click on "Edit.") HarZim (talk) 22:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, the easiest way is just to reply to the original message underneath it like this! Most editors watch talk pages they have modified for a while. If you want to notify the editor you can add
{{tb|HarZim}}to their page QU TalkQu 22:57, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of St. Valupis College Prep for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Valupis College Prep is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Valupis College Prep until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ubelowme U Me 15:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:52, 14 July 2012 (UTC)