User talk:Norden1990/Archive 11
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Norden1990. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
Orphaned non-free image File:Unity Hungary 2014.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Unity Hungary 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Volner Party
You recently redirected Volner Party to János Volner saying "not a reliable party". What does that mean? Charles Essie (talk) 00:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Charles Essie:, uh, sorry, I used wrong word. The Volner Party is not a "notable" party. There are no known party members other than the "party leader", does not have support according to polls and Volner even announced some days ago that the "party" (=he) will not participate in the upcoming 2022 national election. --Norden1990 (talk) 11:43, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. Charles Essie (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Stalking
Did you seriously started stalking me? I know that you're watching like a hawk the page on Magyarization. But after you reverted my edit on that article, you suddenly reverted my over a week old edit to Euroasian wolf, which you could have noticed only by looking at the list of my contributions. --Azure94 (talk) 17:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Calm down. --Norden1990 (talk) 17:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'm just asking. --Azure94 (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- what are you talking about Gibby01 (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Mizse page
Hi! I took an interest in your Mizse edits recently. I've been scratching my head a lot on the etymologies of "Mizse", his brother "Eyza" and "Eyzech". I'm working on a list of medieval names and I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me more about these people.
King regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibby01 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Dear @Gibby01:, unfortunately I am not aware of the origin of these names. Both Mizse and Eyza (or Heyza) were of Muslim origin. It is plausible that Mizse (Misse) is a Cuman name. Maybe this source will be useful, if you speak Hungarian. --Norden1990 (talk) 08:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it doesn't mention any etymologies of Mizse :( I hope to continue my search, but it has not been fruitful so far. Gibby01 (talk) 03:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hey again, I think I have found something. Eyza, Ajza might be related to the Arabic ajzāʼ (part in Quran) considering their Muslim origins. If we look at Eyzech, I believe it is the same name with the diminutive -cs or -ch added to it. However, I have not found any sources to back this up. The "Encyclopaedia of Islam by Sir Hamilton Alexander Rosskeen Gibb" seems to believe similar (not very orthodox/pious Muslim if we consider Arab writings on Islam on the Pontic steppe) nomad Muslims had unusual names. The aforementioned book reconstructs Mogd, name of the palatine of Hungary to Madjūs (pagan? a name used for Zoroastrians and Norse pagans) and Magiug (Arabic Madjūdj, Magog; often identified with Steppe nomads in Middle ages). I would love to hear your opinion on this. Gibby01 (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- I am not an expert of linguistics and philology. I recommend this work to you for analyzing Hungarian medieval given names, a good starting point for subsequent researches: Fehértói Katalin: Árpád-kori személynévtár. Akadémiai Kiadó, 2004. --Norden1990 (talk) 18:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply. I have tried to find a copy online and asked friends if they had one but alas. I'll have to try and find a place where I can find a hard copy. I've taken an interest in onomatology and I'm working on a mod for a video game that adds more medieval names, hence the sudden influx of name etymology edits. Gibby01 (talk) 16:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- I am not an expert of linguistics and philology. I recommend this work to you for analyzing Hungarian medieval given names, a good starting point for subsequent researches: Fehértói Katalin: Árpád-kori személynévtár. Akadémiai Kiadó, 2004. --Norden1990 (talk) 18:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Legit edit?
Hello. Just wanted to see what you thought about these edits. Regarding the amendment to the first sentence, I viewed the Borhi source, and it does not seem to say anything about up to 300,000 fradulent votes (although I can only see one page of it). Re the addition, the quote is an accurate reflection of the source, the source (book) is highly biased, but the newspapers it is quoting are not. All in all, the edit sort of looks like POV pushing (although the number of fraudulent votes was increased), but I thought it would be best if someone with a better understanding of Hungarian politics reviews it. Cheers, Number 57 12:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Stop reverting the number of registered voters
You as a Hungarian should be able to read and add together the correct number:
https://vtr.valasztas.hu/ogy2022/orszagos-listak
The 7.7 million is only registered voters IN Hungary.
Glasperlenspieler (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep this tone home next time. --Norden1990 (talk) 18:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I’m just always annoyed if someone reverts my stuff. Glasperlenspieler (talk) 18:07, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Hungarian political parties
Hi! In my opinion, UK and ÚVNP should be included in the "Not represented" category in the Template:Hungarian political parties. UK had two candidates in the 2022 parliamentary election (Krisztina Hohn and Szilárd Gyenes), and was an associate in the United for Hungary alliance just like MLP, which is included on the list. With ÚVNP, the situation is a little more complicated. If I am not mistaken, their only winning candidate in the 2021 opposition primary was Péter Márki-Zay, who then had to resort to run under the banner of PM, at least officially. Nevertheless, they did take part in the primaries last year, and were also an associate of United for Hungary, so I do not see why they should be left out. What do you think? Zsovar3 (talk) 20:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. --Norden1990 (talk) 21:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Implemented Zsovar3 (talk) 00:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Antal Vetter
Szia, ki akartam a (kis)hegyesi ütközet oldalán Battle of Hegyes a pontatlanságokat javítani, amelyeket előző szerkesztők beírtak. Ezek között ott volt az, hogy a csata magyar vezérei közé beírták Perczel Mórt, aki nem vett részt benne, viszont kihagyták Vetter Antalt, aki, és nem Guyon Richárd, a valódi vezére volt a magyar seregnek ebben az üzközetben. Be akartam írni a csata ismertető táblázatába is a nevét, de a 48-as magyar zászlócska helyett ez jelenik meg "Error in Error in {{Hungarian Revolution of 1848 participant}}
: Bad or missing parameter {{{1}}}: Bad or missing parameter Vetter". Próbáltam beírni a nevét Vetternek a "Template:Hungarian Revolution of 1848 participant"-ba, a szabadságharc infóboxába is, de mindhiába. Ugyanez a szöveg jelenik meg a zászlócska és Vetter helyett. Tudnál ebben segíteni? Köszi.
--Sylvain1975 (talk) 17:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Köszi szépen. A harmadik komáromi csatát befejeztem. Le lehet szedni a figyelmeztető szöveget róla, amelyet akkor raktak rá, amikor még nem volt kész? Third Battle of Komárom (1849) Azonkívül a tegnap draftban befejeztem a kátyi ütközetet, és beküldtem ellenőrzésre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Battle_of_K%C3%A1ty#Background. Szerinted ez jó megoldás, hogy draftban megírjam, majd beküldjem, vagy van könnyebb, rövidebb módszere is ennek? Tehát hogy a cikket el tudjam készíteni, ha kell hónapokig dolgozva rajta, anélkül, hogy ráírogassanak figyelmeztető szövegeket, de ne kelljen beküldeni ellenőrzésre, mert, ahogy mondják, fél évig is várhat az ellenőrzésre.
--Sylvain1975 (talk) 17:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Atyusz
Hi again, why did you reverse my source on Buzad, Atyusz's father? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibby01 (talk • contribs) 14:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Because the source does not contains that info. Otherwise, I already provide a source in the main text. --Norden1990 (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
László Lóránt Keresztes
Hi! While editing today I realized that there are two pages about the same politician: Lóránt Keresztes and László Lóránt Keresztes. I have never requested the deletion of an article before, so I thouht it would be better to ask for your help before I make a mistake. I hope I did not disturb you! – Zsovar3 (talk) 22:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Fixed, I redirected the page. I realized this editor (User:Jamiebuba) began to create articles on Hungarian politicians for weeks, but with many factual and translation errors. --Norden1990 (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Norden1990,
- Thanks for fixing the redirect. I would please like you to point out the errors which i have made to enable me work on the articles better? Hope to hear from you soon. Jamiebuba (talk) 09:23, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! :) – Zsovar3 (talk) 22:28, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gábor Zombor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baja.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hungarian far-right
Please stop reverting by accusing others of POV-pushing when it is your and Kahlores' edits that actually constitute POV-pushing. In fact, the template should be in accordance with what the concerned articles say, but currently Fidesz and Fidesz–KDNP have both right-wing to far-right in the infobox and in the lede summary, on the contrary the current Jobbik has centre-right in the infobox (it was far-right historically but this is no longer the case for some years). The template should reflect the current situation and what the concerned articles say. --Martopa (talk) 17:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Lázár Mészáros
Szia, ugyanaz a gondom itt is, mint Vetter Antal esetén: Be akartam írni a Battle of Tura ismertető táblázatába Mészáros Lázár nevét, de a 48-as magyar zászlócska helyett ez jelenik meg "Error in Error in {{Hungarian Revolution of 1848 participant}}
: Bad or missing parameter {{{1}}}: Bad or missing parameter Mészáros". Próbáltam beírni a nevét Mészárosnak a "Template:Hungarian Revolution of 1848 participant"-ba, a szabadságharc infóboxába is, de mindhiába. Ugyanez a szöveg jelenik meg. Tudnál ebben segíteni? Köszi.
--Sylvain1975 (talk) 16:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Sylvain1975:, manuálisan beillesztettem az infoboxba, a sablont valamiért én sem tudom szerkeszteni új nevek hozzáadásával. Vetter nevét visszatettem a Battle of Tura cikkbe, az valamiért eltűnt egy szerkesztési hiba következtében. --Norden1990 (talk) 21:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Köszi szépen. Én ehhez nem értek.
- Sylvain1975 (talk) 10:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Norden1990
Thank you for creating Simon II Nagymartoni.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you!--Norden1990 (talk) 21:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Archiving notice
Hey! During your moving of Talk:Miklós Zrínyi, you forgot to update the archive location. All you need to do is adjust the |archive=
parameter in the {{User:MizaBot/Config}}
template to the new page name. Don't worry, I've fixed this for you. Just keep this in mind if you move a page in the future. Thanks! Aidan9382 (talk) 04:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Battle of W.l.n.d.r
Szia, te változtattad meg a csata kimenetelét győzelemről döntetlenre?
- @Sylvain1975:, nem, hanem ez a szerkesztő volt, még 2022 januárjában. Visszaállítottam az eredetire, de elhagyva a "decisive" jelzőt, mert egy új wikipédia-irányelv szerint ezek használata már nem ildomos. --Norden1990 (talk) 21:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Köszi.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Norden1990
Thank you for creating Bertrand Nagymartoni.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 01:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Norden1990
Thank you for creating Simon I Nagymartoni.
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denis, Palatine of Hungary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diocese of Zagreb.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Isaszeg Battlefield map
Szia, már napok óta az isaszegi csatáról szóló térképet egy sokkal nagyobb felbontású, kiszélesített térképpel cseréltem fel, de ennek ellenére ugyancsak a régi, gyenge minőségű jelenik meg a csatáról szóló szócikk alatt. A kép wikimédia adatlapján az utolsó (második) frissítést amikor kinyítom, a 11,362 × 8,626 pixeles kép helyett, az eredeti, 1,692 × 1,588 pixeles, rossz minőségű kép jelenik meg. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Isaszegi_csata_sz%C3%ADnhelye.jpg Tudnál segíteni, hogy a probléma megoldódjon? Köszi.
@Sylvain1975:, szia, szerintem egy ctrl+f5 megoldja a problémát, a böngészős cookie-k miatt van. --Norden1990 (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Nyomkodtam eleget, de semmi sem változott meg. Sylvain1975 (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ja, OK, kinyitottam a Microsoft Edge-ben, és most OK. Köszi. Sylvain1975 (talk) 17:37, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Five years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:52, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LazarAndor.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LazarAndor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SzendePal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SzendePal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Táblázat
Szia! A komáromi ütközet harcrendjét táblázatba foglaltam, de az osztrák erőket tartalmazó táblázatban képtelen voltam három vonalat eltüntetni. A "Pott independent brigade Major General Gustav Pott" alatti három cellát képtelen vagyok eltüntetni. Mind a "Civalart uhlans", mind a "11. six-pounder battery", mind az alatta levő "Total" a Pott dandárhoz tartozik, azonban sehogyan sem tudom az alatta levő három üres cellát eltüntetni. Úgy kellene kinéznie, mint a felette levő "Liebler brigade Major General Karl Liebler" esetében. Ha tudnál segíteni, nagyon megköszönném. :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Battle_of_Kom%C3%A1rom_(1849)#Opposing_forces Sylvain1975 (talk) 18:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Sylvain1975:, Hm. Időközben megoldottad? Nem látom a problémát. --Norden1990 (talk) 16:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Igen. Épp most sikerült. Másfél napja kínlódom rajta. :D
- Köszi mindenképpen. Sylvain1975 (talk) 17:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Archontology page
You have an impressive set of resources! I ran into your archontology page by accident, is there a way I could view it manually through your user page? Kind regards Gibby01 (talk) 16:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- User:Norden1990/Archontology. This is a test sheet made for myself, where I gather resources for articles to be written later, if I happen to find one. --Norden1990 (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Norden1990. Thank you for your work on Aynard Smaragd. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Norden1990. Thank you for your work on Gilét Smaragd. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Norden1990. Thank you for your work on Bás Mezőpilis. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:44, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Joachim Türje
Hello, it's Gibby again.
I was reading Vásáry's book "Cumans and Tatars", I saw that a document from 1250 was mentioned in relation to a military expedition to Vidin: "Regesta regum stirpis Arpadianae critico-diplomaticano", since you made the wiki page on Joachim Türje I wondered if you know if this is accessible by non-academics at all? Gibby01 (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, you can find here (charter no. 926). --Norden1990 (talk) 18:13, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Correction of List of Hungarian monarchs
Thank you so much. You were an editor who joined my view, that there were only two queens regnant in Hungary, Mary and Maria Theresa. I am glad that you are attentive and protecting the original versions which are well-sourced and undoubtable. Of course there can be found multiple female claimants, but they were surely not MONARCHS, except of these two women. Super20020917 (talk) 21:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)