User talk:NotARabbit/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions with User:NotARabbit. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
A barnstar for you!
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thanks for the tip! :) Jupwrk (talk) 20:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC) |
Chess
Good try. No cigar. I conclude Listeria really does not like chess players. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:27, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Tagishsimon: Grrr. I see what you were knocking your head against yesterday. There seems to be something fundamentally flawed. I wonder if it’s somewhere in the Wikidata, or in the bot itself? Or the template? I don’t see how it’s in the code, since what seems to be identical code (except for the P106) runs just fine on other lists. And why would that first run come up with so many Japanese critics?! NotARabbit (talk) 23:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Critics were copied from whichever list I stole the page from, so they're a red herring. But yes, the code works fine if you stick it into the wikidata query thingie, and both you and I have tried endless variations. Oh well. I live in hope it'll burst into life one day. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Tagishsimon: I tried this query, adding one line at a time. It ran fine until I put in the FILTER NOT EXISTS line. It timed out on that one, and gave me this code box:
- Critics were copied from whichever list I stole the page from, so they're a red herring. But yes, the code works fine if you stick it into the wikidata query thingie, and both you and I have tried endless variations. Oh well. I live in hope it'll burst into life one day. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
SPARQL-QUERY: queryStr=SELECT ?chess_player ?chess_playerLabel WHERE { SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en,en". } ?chess_player wdt:P106 wd:Q10873124. ?chess_player wdt:P21 wd:Q6581072. ?chess_player wdt:P31 wd:Q5. FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?wfr schema:about ?item . ?wfr schema:isPartOf <https://en.wikipedia.org/>.}} LIMIT 1000 java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:205) at com.bigdata.rdf.sail.webapp.BigdataServlet.submitApiTask(BigdataServlet.java:293) at com.bigdata.rdf.sail.webapp.QueryServlet.doSparqlQuery(QueryServlet.java:654) at com.bigdata.rdf.sail.webapp.QueryServlet.doGet(QueryServlet.java:288) at com.bigdata.rdf.sail.webapp.RESTServlet.doGet(RESTServlet.java:240) at com.bigdata.rdf.sail.webapp.MultiTenancyServlet.doGet(MultiTenancyServlet.java:271) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:687) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:769) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1667) at org.wikidata.query.rdf.blazegraph.throttling.ThrottlingFilter.doFilter(ThrottlingFilter.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1650) at ch.qos.logback.classic.helpers.MDCInsertingServletFilter.doFilter(MDCInsertingServletFilter.java:49) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1650) at org.wikidata.query.rdf.blazegraph.filters.ClientIPFilter.doFilter(ClientIPFilter.java:43) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1650) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:583) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:143) at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:577) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:223) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1125) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:515) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:185) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1059) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:215) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:110) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:97) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:497) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:311) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:248) at org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$2.run(AbstractConnection.java:540) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:610) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:539) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) |
Does this help shed any light on the problem? (I’m unfamiliar with java.) NotARabbit (talk) 02:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- It doesn't, I'm afraid. That's a timeout. But if you follow the SPARQL link from the top of the Chess page and run the code, it returns values in a few second. So SPARQL thru the Wikidata Query Service works fine, same SPARQL thru Listeria is failing in this one instance.
- Meanwhile I'm now starting to add a count of sitelinks to all of our WiR pages; my technique is to grab the whole of the top of the Activists list (including the couple of paragraphs of text at the top), insert it into the top of another list; move the occupation values from the existing list code into the newly inserted code, and then delete the existing code ... [comme ça]. No reason you should join me in this endeavour, not least since we could have done it as a single operation last week. But if you do, I guess we'll need a tracking list. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- I've fiddled with your earth scientists ... new wording & explicit declaration of contents. Sentence 1 does not include the word 'women' or 'female', which seems an absense to me. Is "female earth scientsts" better or worse? Site links now wrap. See also Classicists and Illustrators for the same pattern. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Tagishsimon: I added the word “female” in the paragraph; that bothered me, too. I like declaring the list right out there in the open; I’ll add to it when/if I can get others to work.
- I’ve been spending probably way too much time hunting down the earth scientists we don’t have a gender for and updating Wikidata with that information. (My working list) Unlike so much in these projects, if I can find a picture of the person (a very tall order most of the time), I can verify their gender. Or even if I find an [English-language] source that calls the person “he” or “her”. It’s so satisfying to actually dig up a 1879 biography on a French geologist when we had only his initials! And I have found many women, too. Out of the original 275, I’ve tracked down about 55 scientists, mostly men (of course). A lot of them are from Wikispecies, full of initials, and mostly labeled paleontologists, though they aren’t necessarily. NotARabbit (talk) 02:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- That's quite a task. (I've done one for you.) Good luck with row 206: Zang. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Quite addictive. I've snaffled some low-hanging fruit. But I have a radiator to detach from a wall, and this is not getting it done... --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ha! Yes, very addictive. My challenge for you: A. J. Hill. There’s a botanist, a contemporary fish paleontologist, and a nineteenth-century maybe paleontologist, and who knows who else. Hope your radiator was more cooperative. NotARabbit (talk) 19:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- You're familiar with the story of the boy with his finger in the dyke? That was me, earlier today. It all got a bit fraught when, after removing the radiator, the valve decided that it wasn't really connected to the copper pipe and proceeded to leak with abandon. I hope A. J. Hill proves easier to sort out, although I suspect from the distant sound of your cackling, that it will not be. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:10, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yikes! You have really tackled a major project, it sounds, and Murphy is moving in. (That’s Murphy you hear cackling, not me! Honest!) No luck with A. J. Hill but, if you’ll believe it, Zang turned out to be the easiest I’ve done to date. I went to the Wikispecies page, and there HE was: Richard Zang! With dates. Noticing how short a life he lived, I wondered what had happened, and followed enough leads to find that he died of appendicitis, poor guy. I don’t know if he had a chance to be notable enough for any of the Wikipedias, but I updated him in Wikidata anyway. NotARabbit (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- You're familiar with the story of the boy with his finger in the dyke? That was me, earlier today. It all got a bit fraught when, after removing the radiator, the valve decided that it wasn't really connected to the copper pipe and proceeded to leak with abandon. I hope A. J. Hill proves easier to sort out, although I suspect from the distant sound of your cackling, that it will not be. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:10, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ha! Yes, very addictive. My challenge for you: A. J. Hill. There’s a botanist, a contemporary fish paleontologist, and a nineteenth-century maybe paleontologist, and who knows who else. Hope your radiator was more cooperative. NotARabbit (talk) 19:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Quite addictive. I've snaffled some low-hanging fruit. But I have a radiator to detach from a wall, and this is not getting it done... --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- That's quite a task. (I've done one for you.) Good luck with row 206: Zang. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- I’ve been spending probably way too much time hunting down the earth scientists we don’t have a gender for and updating Wikidata with that information. (My working list) Unlike so much in these projects, if I can find a picture of the person (a very tall order most of the time), I can verify their gender. Or even if I find an [English-language] source that calls the person “he” or “her”. It’s so satisfying to actually dig up a 1879 biography on a French geologist when we had only his initials! And I have found many women, too. Out of the original 275, I’ve tracked down about 55 scientists, mostly men (of course). A lot of them are from Wikispecies, full of initials, and mostly labeled paleontologists, though they aren’t necessarily. NotARabbit (talk) 02:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Giants Challenge hoax..?
I noticed that you took an article hat was previously nominated for AfD and removed all labels nominating it, citing that it "almost certainly exists or at least existed". I say that that archived website link you put up might have simply been part of an elaborate hoax or something like that. Besides the fact that it doesn't look very official, but rather amateur-ish (like some high school kid made it), if this race really exists (or existed), then why on Earth are there literally zero other references to it on the internet except for that old site and this Wikipedia page? you'd think that at least some South Africans who ran in it would post SOMETHING about it on their blogs, etc. Please reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:3545:5C00:E861:C077:697D:A24A (talk) 00:57, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
(The article in question is at Giants Challenge.)
- The de-prodding in question is at here. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red tools and technical support
We are preparing a list of tools and techncial support for Women in Red. I have tentatively added your name as you have recently provided assistance in improving redlink listings and templates. Please let me know whether you agree to be listed. You are of course welcome to make any additions or corrections.--Ipigott (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red
Hello again from Women in Red!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
August and New Achievements at Women in Red
Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90
An exciting new month for Women in Red!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2018 at Women in Red
An exciting new month for Women in Red!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
September 2018 at Women in Red
September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
October 2018 at Women in Red
Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2018 at Women in Red
The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
January 2019 at Women in Red
January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108
January events:
|
February 2019 at Women in Red
February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111
February events:
|
March 2019 at Women in Red
March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113
Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
Women in Red April Events
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2019
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Broke the syntax
@NotARabbit: On the article Bishop of Raphoe you reverted a couple of links to articles about men who held the position with this comment "Reverted good faith edits by Bashereyre (talk): Not sure what you were trying to do, but it broke the syntax." Please may I know how to learn not make this same mistake myself. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 14:59, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
June events with WIR
June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July events from Women in Red!
July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2019 at Women in Red
August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red
September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red
October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019 at Women in Red
November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December events with WIR
December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February with Women in Red
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red
March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging