User talk:Owikitopedia

January 2024

Hello, I'm Ternera. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Palace of Justice siege, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ternera (talk) 15:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Palace of Justice siege. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you very much. Next time i will try my best. Owikitopedia (talk) 20:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Next time I will be careful about disruptive edits. Owikitopedia (talk) 20:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, I am a new Wikipedia editor. My Wikipedia account is eight days old. I didn't know about the guidelines and policies for disruptive edits, and I had to learn these guidelines. I am here for contributions, and I want to contribute to Wikipedia; that is my dream because Wikipedia is a reliable and correct information source all over the world. I know there are edits which have citations. With citations, the Wikipedia article has become trusty, and it's so important.

As described above, some disruptive edits on the Palace of Justice siege, which is a sensitive topic, and one contributor named Ternera on Wikipedia has removed this edit. And I should only edit these types of edits with citations or reliable sources.

Next time, I will be careful and make constructive edits with reliable sources and citations.

Please unblock my Wikipedia edits authority.

I will become the best contributor to people like you, who will notice my edits to improve my disruption and many other types of edits.

Thanks for reading this reply. Owikitopedia (talk) 13:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin but I have been here for 17½ years. My advice to you is to demonstrate that you can create content using formal text, without being flowery or appearing to rely on a chatbot. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spicy

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Owikitopedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you very much for informing me. Next time, I will try my best and be careful about disruptive edits.

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS abuse

This user has abused UTRS multiple times (UTRS appeal #83755, UTRS appeal #83979, UTRS appeal #84087, UTRS appeal #84250), despite being told to make their request here. This raises serious WP:CIR concerns about this user. They risk losing access to UTRS if this abuse continues. --Yamla (talk) 12:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]