User talk:Rereiw82wi2j

December 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pbritti (talk) 12:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or alter legitimate talk page comments from other editors. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Pbritti (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because my name showing. are u bot Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 01:18, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removals

Hello Rereiw82wi2j. If you continue to make unexplained removals, as you did at Control (management), you are risking a block from editing. I also notice some removals of other people's talk commants. EdJohnston (talk) 02:18, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i thought its practice not showing other people because its say fix grammar spelling Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 12:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 02:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rereiw82wi2j (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason that i delete my writings in discussion section is because my name is showing and account is deleted. But ok i dont delete it again unlock ban pleas Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 06:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked for post below. PhilKnight (talk) 14:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you vanished your prior account, why did you create a new account and then draw attention to your prior account by removing discussions you were involved in? Technically this means that the vanishing should be reversed. (per WP:VANISH: "If the user returns, the vanishing will likely be fully reversed, the old and new accounts will be linked, and any prior sanctions or restrictions reinstated.") 331dot (talk) 09:21, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account meant to reverse vanished account because my name and surname cannot changed not for vandalism Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not every comment needs to be an unblock request. Please place new posts at the bottom, this may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". What I'm saying is that you are drawing more attention to your name by trying to remove it and it can now be associated with this account. In addition, as you have returned, that technically means the vanishing should be reversed. Vanishing is only done for people who intend to never return. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a privacy issue, you could have exclusively removed your name rather than deleting the entirety of your comments and the comments of others. Instead, this has had something of a Streisand effect. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i never delete again this ban is meaningless please unlock Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving aside the vanishing issue for the moment, what edits do you intend to make? 331dot (talk) 19:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article named Hephthalites-Gokturk raid 616-618 adding information and source Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 20:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've brought this to other admins for discussion. If you have any comment, you may make it here. 331dot (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks bro Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 21:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so reason is what Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so whats the result Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

PhilKnight (talk) 14:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PhilKnight Probably we should reverse the vanishing of their original account? 331dot (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

331dot Yes, do you know the name of the vanished account? PhilKnight (talk) 15:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

im sorry for cursing i thought you ignored the comment Human82 (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't just curse; you used racist/bigoted language because nobody replied to you quickly enough for your taste. There is no justification for this kind of behavior, and it simply proves that at this time, you have no business being involved in this project. And now you're sockpuppeting. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The vanished account is currently named Renamed_user_ed9b3d52b500c55827632a909cddb002. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually Right Just Because i sweared but apologized its now revoked ResearchAbility (talk) 16:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

vanished account name ArxhentiVirzi Human82 (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have reverted the vanishing. PhilKnight (talk) 16:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Vagrdyuy9 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vagrdyuy9. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]