User talk:Rockets120

Welcome!

Hello, Rockets120, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! →Enock4seth ^(talk) 22:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm Enock4seth. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Kkavyanjali because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! →Enock4seth ^(talk) 22:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Baadshaho have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BOVINEBOY2008 10:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Baadshaho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 23:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted an edit you made. I saw you added a few genres to The Equalizer 2. The problem is that MOS:FILM tells us to just stick to the primary genre in the opening sentence. Adding a lot of extra genres just turns the opening sentence into something akin to word salad. Other genres can be added to categories (if sourced in the body) or mentioned elsewhere, but it's not really necessary to have more than one or two genres in the opening sentence. One way to keep genres under control is cite them to a reliable source, which is what we've done in this article for thriller film. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Former cast"

Hi there, re: this, please don't move cast members into "Former cast" sections. We do not discard cast members just because they've left the series. We still have an academic interest in the people who were on the series and knowing how prominent their roles were. Consider also that if a series ended, you'd have to put everybody into the Former cast section, which would just be silly. See WP:TVCAST for more guidance on TV cast sections. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you have previously been told, "Former" is not a valid subsection. We still care about cast members, even after they have left the series, so this edit is not constructive. If you want to run a fan website where you catalog all of the current people in the cast, feel free, but at Wikipedia, we present the entire history of the cast preserving their prominence in the series. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pyaar Ko Ho Jaane Do, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romance and Thriller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raqeeb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romantic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Slightlymad. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Drive (2011 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Underworld (film series) edits

Hello, Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Underworld (film series) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions please post on the article's talk page].

The date listed in Underworld (film series) is the initial release date, which was international not US. There no restriction to the US release date as far as I can tell. Try to provide an edit summary with your reason(s) for the change also. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ghayal: Once Again have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Diff: This edit is indistinguishable from vandalism. You remove actual useful information like the language the film was produced in, and replace it with the ridiculously repetitive "action drama" genre. Action films are typically dramas. Don't waste space in the lead with this redundant language, and don't add any more unsourced genres, as they will result in your editing privileges being revoked. Nobody cares what you personally consider a film's genre to be. We only care what *most* sources think the film's primary genre is. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:17, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. As a courtesy, I am only blocking you for 31 hours since some of your edits have been constructive. But if the unsourced, interpretive genre additions continue, the next block will be for much longer. A genre is what most sources consider the film to be, and you need to demonstrate that with references. Some examples of your problematic edits: Here you change historical drama to political thriller with no reference or explanation. Here you again add the repetitive language "action drama" and disruptively delete important information about the film's production language. Here you add "neo-noir" again, unsourced. What majority of sources consider that film a "neo-noir crime thriller"? Stick to primary genre, per MOS:FILM. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Long Kiss Goodnight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ghayal (1990 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not remove the information on the language of the film Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:45, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits, like continuing your repeated insistence to use the redundant "action drama" genre to articles and your unexplained removal of very important language content here. Since you don't seem interested in talking, I have extended this block to 2 weeks to perhaps encourage you to respond to this message. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions, but if the disruptive changes continue, the next block will be far longer.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:39, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]