User talk:Sofiasbsilva

October 2017

Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bixby (virtual assistant) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Cortana has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Digital Revolution has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sofiasbsilva. I am glad to see that your last couple of edits were not obviously copied and pasted from other sources but in both cases I have reverted them for other reasons. They seem a bit, well, random. They are jargon heavy, hard to understand, and plonked down in a position in the article that makes little sense. They seem to duplicate existing content in parts and lack relevance in others. Rather than focus on a fragment of text that you want to add, please think about what this does to the flow and coherence of the overall article. Does it belong? Does it add additional information over what is already in the article? Where in the article does it belong? Is it written in terms that readers can understand? Is the tone appropriate to an encyclopaedia? Is it well referenced? You might find it works better if you integrate additional content with what is there already instead of adding a separate chunk. Anyway, please don't be too discouraged. I'm sure that you will get the hang of it. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]