User talk:Tide rolls/Archive 24

Archive 20

←

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

→

Archive 30

Block messages

Do you use twinkle? Twinkle is a lot better at issuing block messages. It is part of the same warning system that you probably have used before. That being said, when leaving a block message, it's generally considered "standard" to use the "sig" parameter instead of signing at the end. This would look like {{uw-block|reason=being a troll|sig=~~~~}}. This puts your signature in the message instead. Not a big deal, but just thought I'd let you know. Regards, Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 23:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I use IE, so TW is a non-starter for me (as I understand it). I'll just have to copy the template into my toolbox and take it from there. See ya 'round Tiderolls 03:40, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

what did you dislike about the edit to History of Cleveland?

Thanks for letting me know that you reverted my edit. What specifically did you consider unconstructive? 24.44.14.186 (talk) 00:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reconsidering and reverting the reversion. 24.44.14.186 (talk) 01:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Huggle does not give one a view of the complete article, so I had no idea that the spelling of the city evolved. I still don't think the older spelling belongs but that's a discussion for the article's talk page. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Tiderolls 01:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Moses Cleaveland did spell his name different from the city that now bears his family name. I have started a new section at Talk:History of Cleveland to draw comment and consensus for a ruling on the appropiateness of the use of the old spelling in the timeline section. 24.44.14.186 (talk) 02:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I'll stop by and take a look. Tiderolls 02:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Revoke talk page access

User talk:109.154.234.206 Abuse of talk page while blocked. Tommy2010 [message] 01:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind. Tommy2010 [message] 01:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm too slow on the draw. That Explicit is too good :) Tiderolls 01:23, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

it's quite alright my friend. (: Tommy2010 [message] 01:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

Heh, it's great working with you. Sometimes I revert the vandal and sometimes you do. But we are doing our part. kcylsnavS{^screech_harrass} 00:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes, teamwork is our strength. Thanks for all your help. Tiderolls 00:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

RfA

Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson#Your Request for Adminship which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:13, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Question

Hello, why is it that you are reverting my edits over and over again? This is my information that somehow came on wikipedia and I do not tolerate this unrightful posting. Please leave my edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bravo31 (talk • contribs) 01:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I am not a vandalizer I am a human with his rights. I do demand some respect as you will be given the same. Bravo31 (talk) 01:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

You are adding graffiti to the article. please stop before you are blocked. Tiderolls 01:06, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I am sorry if I am adding graffiti, but please remove those parts of that information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bravo31 (talk • contribs) 01:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

If you have concerns regarding article content or ideas on article improvement, I suggest you engage the editors on the article talk page. Your edits are removing sourced and pertinent content. Tiderolls 01:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Is it possible that it could be paraphrased instead? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bravo31 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

It? What? Tiderolls 01:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Pending Changes

I have removed the pages you protected with pending changes as they were not listed in the queue. For more information on the pending changes trial, please see the guidelines at Wikipedia:Pending_changes#Deployment_and_requests_for_inclusion. Nakon 02:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the help, Nakon. Tiderolls 02:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for reverting 24.6.44.118. I wonder why they blanked my page. I don't think I've ever talked to them ... well thanks anyways! ~ QwerpQwertus · Contact Me  · 03:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Mamoru Kobayakawa

{{helpme}}

Please delete this profile!!!!!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamoru_Kobayakawa

I don't want it up, this my profile and IT IS WRONG !!!

Do something please !!!

This is truly annoying that you revert it without addressing my request in the least !!!

MK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.131.57.91 (talk) 16:05, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) If you are the subject of the article and are not happy with it, see WP:Biographies of living persons/Help for advice on what to do. (This advice also given on IP's talk page). JohnCD (talk) 16:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

66.131.57.91....but, I have addressed your request. Click here. I would be more than happy to answer any questions you may have. Please understand...you are not being ignored, but there are processes to accomplish what you are requesting. Regards Tiderolls 16:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the reversion

It look like it was done by a third party, not logged in, on my work PC. Thanks for the reversion, and I'm sorry it happened. We have worked out the offender and it won't happen again. Swirling eddy (talk) 02:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

my "hooters" edit

You took away "boobs" from products that are 'sold' by Hooters; I wholeheartedly disagree with this. I believe that female anatomy is part of the sales pitch for eating at a Hooters: part of the gimmick is that you eat and gawk at attractive women. If you would prefer, I could put "breasts" instead of "boobs," but again, I feel that breasts are a legitimate part of what Hooters is all about. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.58.26 (talk) 02:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Locate a source, cite it properly, and then we'll see what other editors think. Regards Tiderolls 02:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Uh, what? Unarguably that just made my night. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:11, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Which part, Kevin? Tiderolls 04:12, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

The entire thing, but this summary capped it off. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Yeah...that escaped my attention. I just love imaginative edit summaries. Breaks up the boredom. Tiderolls 04:25, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I couldn't agree more. I do enjoy messing around with them from time to time because otherwise I would probably shoot myself. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:07, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.58.26 (talk) 02:27, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

And fixed here. They do not "sell" breasts literally, whilst your point is valid. {{Sonia|ping|enlist}} 04:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for weighing in, Sonia. The "valid point" aspect kept me from further action. Very nicely done on the edit. Watch out...you may develop a reputation as a content editor :) Tiderolls 04:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

No probs. A content editor? I wish... all I do is stalk talk pages (which explains this.) I would like to get into content work, but I wouldn't know where to start. Cheers, {{Sonia|ping|enlist}} 04:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I mention "content" and it brings forth the wiki gnome :) Tiderolls 04:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

About this. I was trying to change setting of the blocked user User talk:Jeanne Ried and I don't know how I blocked you instead x.x 山本一郎 (会話) 04:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for letting me know...otherwise I may not have ever been aware :) Tiderolls 04:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Good Work

Noticed you around....And your counter Vandalism Work - Good Job Tide Rolls :D James'ööders 04:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Jamesooders has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks, James. I know you meant well, but I'm starving right now and that cookie image is pure torture :) Thanks for all your help on recent changes as well. Keep up the good work Tiderolls 04:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Jamesooders has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Did that help? :D James'ööders 05:38, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision deletion for User:Marek69‎

Could you please perform revision deletion for User:Marek69‎. TIA ----moreno oso (talk) 03:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I'm checking with the user presently. See ya 'round Tiderolls 03:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

re: your message

Hi Tide rolls, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 03:50, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting pre-adolescent vandalism to my talk page. JNW (talk) 04:47, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

I've replied to your message on my talk page. Thanks for the welcome.--Nickm93 (talk) 06:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

RE: user:Ozgurcan

Thanks, That user was annoying and Im not sure what that user was doing but I think there were two of him them, just adding huge amounts of a differnt languages into quite alot of articles. Im not even sure if they were ALL reverted but it may be a case of sock puppetry just to be on the safe side. James'ööders 14:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

No worries. I'm still going over their contributions. It's a short list so I shan't be long :) Keep up the good work. Tiderolls 14:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Tides James'ööders 14:44, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Air Hockey

Thanks for helping with the Air Hockey page edits! Much appreciated... Baylorgoalie (talk) 15:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

2008 Detroit Lions season vandals

Please block 208.54.7.135 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and 208.54.7.134 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) too. Its obviously the same person as the IP you just blocked for vandalizing the same article. TomCat4680 (talk) 02:47, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

It appears your final warning has worked. I'll keep an eye out, though. Thanks Tiderolls 03:17, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Your message to Acroterion

Saw your note on Acroterion's talk, and I'd like to offer input — in my mind, there's no reason for your deletion to be undone. G10 applies to all namespaces; you have no less reason to delete an attack page in userspace than you do in mainspace. Moreover, in my mind, all of the revisions to the userpage are deletion-worthy, so it wouldn't help to undelete any of them. Nyttend (talk) 11:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your input, Nyttend. That was essentially my take as well. I was just taken aback when I realized it was a user page and not an srticle. It appears the user in question is blocked and their contribs rev/del'd so matters have taken the usual route. Tiderolls 13:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Need for Speed Underground 2 Info

Hey, the name of Caleb's gang is "The Wraiths" and is specifically mentioned as such during gameplay. How do we combat vandals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SnakeEyesNinja (talk • contribs) 00:06, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

I'll stop being silly now. 86.147.153.141 (talk) 01:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Zhanzhao

Wanted to point out that Zhanzhao (talk · contribs) is not the same as Zhannzhao (talk · contribs). The latter (with 2 'n's) is spoofing the former. Check out the contribution history of both. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 01:27, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah...I finally figured that out...took me a minute. Thanks for the heads up. That's one of the reasons I find find some subpages less than useful. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:29, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

You may want to redact your post to the former's talk page, if you haven't already. Poor guy's probably wondering what the frak's going on. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 01:31, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

I left an explanation of sorts. The whole thing is making my head hurt. Tiderolls 01:32, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

No worries, no offense taken. The person at fault here is the spoofer/vandal. Unfortunately I was required to create a subpage as my main talk page was protected from the same person, so that guy's finding means and ways of getting around it :P Zhanzhao (talk) 02:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

In the event I wasn't clear, I do apologize. Thanks for your patience. Tiderolls 02:15, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Soyluismofo2

Hi Tide rolls; this is a hoaxter/vandalism only account. Received a final warning for this business back in February. Thanks, JNW (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete my messages to other users.

As an administrator you should know better than to disrupt communication on the wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.28.253.224 (talk) 17:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Question regarding "List of Mario series characters"

I see that you're an administrator and that you've revert some edits on the List of Mario series characters article. I was curious about the possibility of getting it added to the pending changes trial. Considering the frequency and type of vandalism that occurs, it seems like it might be a good fit, but I don't know if it's a high-profile enough article to be of concern. I don't understand (or at least can't find any information) on how to request such protection, so I thought I'd just ask you; I'm only looking for push in the right direction. Thanks. DKqwerty (talk) 23:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Apologies for my late post as I've been AFK. I did a bit of looking around (I haven't been active in the pending changes discussion) and found that requests are being handled at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. I hope that helps. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

A favor

If you are an administrator please help me; this jerks are merged an important article, the article of the Batman Forever character Dr. Chase Meridian. Had no right to merge the article to another definition that has a very very short character and this is the deal; I leave alone the user pages if you delete this stupid proposal of merge and do again the article, as it was before. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.84.30.52 (talk) 03:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Being an administrator does not give me any special power to edit against consensus. The best advice I can offer is that you approach the editors that participated in the discussion and convey your views/ideas. I apologize for not being able to be of more help. Regards Tiderolls 03:54, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page! Seaphoto^Talk 05:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

As you know, it was just a button click. Thanks for letting me know I wasn't butting in. Keep up the good work on recent changes. See ya 'round Tiderolls 05:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I hereby award you this barnstar for being an all-around amazing vandal fighter. Keep up the great excellent work! :) --Meaghan :) ≈ 22:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Why waste a new section when that's exactly what I was here for?

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your great, fast work. Keep it up! –dffgd 20:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Dffgd and Meaghan. I would not be nearly as effective without the help you both bring to the project. As long as Wikipedia has dedicated contributors it will remain effective. See y'all 'round Tiderolls 20:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)