User talk:Vierzehn
Welcome!
Hello, Vierzehn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Thanks for welcoming me on board! --Vierzehn (talk) 20:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Markus Feyerabend
[edit]In the article on Markus Feyerabend there is a sentence which needs some clarification. I left alone until I had the time to disentangle it. It currently says "Annotations: Presently, the Salzmann-Cup plays a similar role as state championships in Germany, which usually take place as central championships in one federal state."
State championships in Germany would appear to be the same as our regional competitions. In the UK each comp. takes place in the region itself. However you seem to say that all the state championships in Germany take place in one federal state. Is this what you wanted to say? Do they all happen at once? If so, what is the difference between these and the national championships?
I guess that the Salzmann Cup (no hyphen would normally be needed in English) is not the main German aerobatic competition, otherwise it would probably be called the German Glider Aerobatic Championships. By analogy you seem to imply that all the regional aerobatic championships are also held in one place. Is this correct? Is the competition between German gliding clubs or between individuals? JMcC (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- You have understood what I wanted to express. Maybe the name Landesmeisterschaften has historical reasons. The results of the Landesmeisterschaften would be used as qualification for the Deutsche Meisterschaften, if more people than the maximum number of participants wanted to take part in the Deutsche Meisterschaften. I do not know, if that has ever happend. The Salzmann Cup is a competition between individuals and between teams at the same time. - Maybe it would be better to delete the confusing information. --Vierzehn (talk) 09:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject
[edit]
Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics. |
You might like to take an extra interest in our Gliding subproject |
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 20:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much for your kind invitation. However, I will probably participate in Wikipedia only temporary. --Vierzehn (talk) 22:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I have tidied up the article slightly. However I must query your assertion that Ingo won the Australian Sportsman of the Year Award twice. Australians are passionate about sport and they excel at it. Every year at least one person from Australia does enough in one of the major sports (or even in Australian Rules Football) to attract more votes than the greatest glider pilot. Have a look at the following link: [1] and see if you agree. JMcC (talk) 21:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for correcting this. I just took the information from the cited source but was not able to verify nor disprove it. I believed in it, because Ingo Renner's collegue seemed to be very proud on that. Maybe things got mixed by translation. I will try to do a better research in the future. --Vierzehn (talk) 22:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I added some more pieces of information to this article. Unfortunately it is now a little bit chaotic again. I hope I did not write something wrong. I am not planning to add anything else to it. --Vierzehn (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Ingo Renner
[edit]--howcheng {chat} 06:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Your English
[edit]Many thanks for the barnstar. Your English is quite good and needed little correction. Most of my edits just made your words flow a little better. One minor hint: the word is "nowadays". JMcC (talk) 11:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- The barnstar is not just for improving the language in Akaflieg and several articles created by me. It is also for improving contents (correcting mistakes, deleting paragraphs which do not match the topic like the space shuttle in gliding), and for not deleting information just because it is not complete, or might not be presented or explained perfectly, and for explaining changes instead of just stating documented or not documented rules. I believe, that you do not only improve this wikipedia by your own edits: Indirectly you improve it by encouraging other wikipedians by copy-editing in a very constructive way. --Vierzehn (talk) 15:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
If more than maybe 5-10 of the items in Category:Glider aircraft are what would be considered completion sailplanes/gliders, then Category:Competition sailplanes or Category:Competition gliders may be prudent. But is it needed? Maybe. I don't know. --Emesee (talk) 00:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- What would you consider to be a competition sailplane/glider? The term is not self-explanatory (competition sailplane = sailplane used in competitions), or your idea how many types of competion sailplanes exist seems to be completely wrong. Except for the space ships and some of the military gliders used in the 2nd World War, there are probably less than 5 gliders which have never been suitable for some kind of competition. Do we need a category containing almost(?) all sports gliders additional to the list of gliders? (See also Rlandmann's comment!) What was your intention when creating this category and putting only a single glider into it? Are you familiar with gliding? I think, improving the list of gliders would be much more useful. However, it is much easier to create a new category that might be useful or not, and might be filled with articles by other wikipedians or not. That you do not know, if the category is needed by anyone is not a very convincing argument for keeping it.--Vierzehn (talk) 13:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Wolf Lemke
[edit]Do you have any information on Wolf Lemke? I cannot find anything in English that would improve this article. At present there are no sources and no date of birth. Is there anything in the German- speaking world? JMcC (talk) 08:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- There seem to be only a few information in the internet and I do not have access to any other sources of information on him. I have not even found references for most information in the article. Wolf Lemke was involved in designing the Akaflieg Köln LS11. So maybe you can get further information or at least a hint where to search for it from the Akaflieg Köln, or from the owner of DG-Flugzeugbau.--Vierzehn (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
PZL Bielsko SZD-59 DYK
[edit]--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 00:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
CAFE Foundation
[edit]--BorgQueen (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- I just proposed it for DYK. --Vierzehn (talk) 09:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
An exciting opportunity to get involved!
[edit]As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 05:57, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
The article Olaf Schmidt (ski jumper) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:ATHLETE, WP:ANYBIO. Once finished third in a single world cup ski jumping event.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 04:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Georgij Kaminski has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC)