Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennessee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tennessee Women in Red

[edit]
WikiProject Women in Red wants your biographies

Might I draw your attention to a new redlist of notable Tennessee women who lack a wikipedia biography, in the form of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by dictionary/Tennessee Encyclopedia - drawn from the "The Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture". Nashville, Tennessee: Tennessee Historical Society.

Right now, there are more than five times as many biographies of men as there are of women on wikipedia - see the Wikidata Human Gender Indicators page. I hope this project will lend its support to addressing this imbalance by creating biographies for women within your project's scope, and perhaps by adopting the Encyclopedia of Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture redlist. More generally, WikiProject Women in Red has more than 300 redlists covering perhaps 100,000 notable women for whom we have no biography. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tagishsimon (talkcontribs) 18:55, March 9, 2017 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Quonset Hut Studio#Requested move 24 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans 19:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Rivergate Mall#Requested move 26 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1997–98 Tennessee Lady Volunteers basketball team has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Overhill Cherokee

[edit]

Overhill Cherokee has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]