Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Uttar Pradesh/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Uttar Pradesh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Why is this categorised under Assam and Wikiproject Assam?
I just noticed that this (Wikiproject Uttar Pradesh) is showing up in the category Assam and WikiProject Assam. I will remove these two categories from this project and am leaving this note behind for explanation-Deepraj | Talk 22:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
WP:INDIA Tagging with TinucherianBot
TinucherianBot can automatically tag articles with {{WP India}} Banner as {{WP India|class=|importance=}} to the talk page of articles without the project banner. It can also add the workgroup paramaters like "|kerala=yes|kerala-importance=" etc ,if needed. The currently supported workgroups are Kerala, Maharashtra, Andhra pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Bengal, Goa, Himachal Pradesh , Karnataka , Punjab,cities, Cinema, Literature, Protected Areas of India, History, Politics, states, Geography,Maps,Districts and Tamil.
If you need so, you need to provide me with the Categories to run the Bot. Due to some technical issues, the Bot will not run recursively to sub-categories. The requester should kindly verify that there are NO non-related articles in the category.
You may request for the bot run on my talk page... Thanks -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 06:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Watchlists
To help this workgroup patrol existing articles for vandalism/recent changes, Ganeshbot has created the Wikipedia:WikiProject Uttar Pradesh/Articles page. This page will be updated on a regular basis. Please do remind me if I forget. :) It contains articles that were tagged with the India banner and fall under the scope of this workgroup. Please let me know in case of any questions. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 11:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Uttar Pradesh
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Uttar Pradesh articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Uttar Pradesh articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Ballia
Somebody keeps adding 'notable personalities' to Ballia. I think that more activity on that article would add an air of sanity to that page. Anniepoo (talk) 20:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
I just declined to delete this as an attack page. I gutted the negative content. Maybe too much, better to be safe in BLP case. I leave it to you to separate the subtle from the gross. And to balance the good with the not so good. Dlohcierekim 23:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Azamgarh
When I recently rediscovered the article on Azamgarh, it was (in my opinion) a terrible mess. (Here, judge for yourselves.) I have since then attempted to remove plagiarism, boosterism, trivia, promotion, and the totally incomprehensible, and tried to improve the rest. What remains is almost completely unsourced, and still contains apparent trivia. Somebody who (unlike me) is knowledgable about where to find reliable sources on towns in UP should have a go at it.
But beyond its unsourcedness and trivia, the article puzzles me. It's ostensibly about a "municipality", whose population was 116,165 (note the Wikipedia-typical bogus precision) in 2011. Its area is unspecified. It's not about a district or division of the same name: the hatnote points the reader to articles on these. Yet almost all the (unsourced) content is about either (A) distant history or (B) villages. Photographs are of rural, not urban scenes. (Well, true, I did remove a photo of the station -- the photo was just uninformative.)
I don't know anything about Indian municipalities. Maybe the system is like the Japanese one: purely for administrative convenience, and only tenuously related to the existence of a "town" in any normal sense of the word. (In Japan, this leads to results that are hilarious in Wikipedia's solemn recycling of conventional Japanese mistranslation; e.g. that the island of Sado is a city.) With this possibility in mind, I'm reluctant to tinker more with Azamgarh. But I do wonder whether much of the article's meagre content would belong there even if it were sourced.
And I also wonder about the town itself. Does this "municipality" have a town? If so, we read next to nothing about it. -- Hoary (talk) 06:10, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- Nobody has responded here; nobody has responded there; addition of semi-comprehensible stuff continues (example -- so I suppose it's time for me to give up on Indian places. -- Hoary (talk) 13:43, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Belthara Road
Perhaps one of you could make sense of the recent additions to this article Belthara Road? Thanks tetraedycal 13:41, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Ajrara gharana
I can't even begin to tell what is nonsense and what is real in Ajrara gharana. Would someone be able to translate it into English? Thanks. - Gorthian (talk) 02:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Say No To Vandalism
I suggest all of participants and coordinators to keep Lucknow and other project related pages completely vandalism free. Constantly check pages and history for new edits and revert if you think the article/section was vandalized with wrong or uncited information. If the content is right but uncited, try to provide sources. Thank you. Wikiboy2364 (talk) 07:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject X is live!
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Please please please help me for pasi(caste) they have updated wrong information....for better information kindly visit # www.pasi.in and update correct and true thing.
Please please please help me for pasi(caste) they have updated wrong information....for better information kindly visit www.pasi.in and update correct and true thing. In this website you will get picture and so many proof...please do needful.--Sachin8p (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Kindly update in wikipedia about pasi after study everything.
Paswan (pasi) are indian civilian and belong to majestic ancestors, Its very clear with live evidence in modern history they are primitive caste.
they lived in Faizabad, Barababki, Bahraich, Lucknow, Raibareli, Sita, Hardoi, Lakhimpurkhiri, Shahjahapur, Varanasi, Gazipur, Allahabad, Mirjapur, Kanpur, Jaunpur, Gorakhpur, Pratapgargh, Sultanpur, Hardoi, Deoria Fatehpur, Azamgargh, Unnao like Dalera, Kajand, Nut, Mahre, Chamar and Pasi.
In validation in world famous book Gazetteer of the province of Oudh.VOL. 2, till H to N, year 1877, Imperial Gazetteer of india vol. ii 1908, District Gazetteer Khiri-1979, Unnao District Gazetteer, UP District Gazetteer Volume 10101053.
It wrote on page 4 in Gazetteer Rampur 1974 k, pasi are posterity of Ahar, Ahir, Barmar, Beria, Bhuihar, Chauhan(except rajput who is not rajput) Dalera, Khaujar, Nut, They cleaned forest and maked useful for human.
In 1996, famous English scholar " R.V. Russell " wrote in his book, "The tribes and cast of the central princes of the India " Pasi is a dravid cast.
they ruled large part of awadh, after some time rajput they had destroyed to their dominate and they establish to rajput dominate.
R.V. Russell Belived, "Pasi are brave kaum" all details of R.V. Russell in book "Tribes and cast of the north western privinces and awadh". wriiten by William Crooke.
Mr.William Crooke wrote they were Price or King and praised to their social, political, and economical power. they ruled in District Hardoi and Unnao, Khiri, Lucknow.
Their fort were in Ramkot Near (Bagarmau Kasba). last pasi king of ramgargh maharaja santhar (King of SatanKot) did not present any brush aside that's why they had finished relationship with contemporary king jaychand. After some time King Jaychand and alha udal combined force had finished to satan state.
In validation, in present available is "Satan Kot k kile"
U.P Govt reserved land for fort of Satan Kot Kila.
U.P Govt & Indian Central Govt has assigned three acre land for King Satan Pasi.
Sandila tehsil is located just near of Satan kote, earlier it was state which has been established by king Sandila and his another brother he has established to malihabad.
King Sandila state was around Sai River to Gomati River, last of 18th Century king of Delhi sultan Nasiruddin shah, he had attacked on Sandila and in this war sadila was filer.
King bijli pasi he was one of the greatest king of biggest part of awadh.
famous English connoisseur sir C Iliyat and R.V. Russell agreed with evidence ancient ruin, fortress, fort, primitive coin and primitive uninstalls, vestige after study to another thing Its clear that distric lakhimpur and arround it on all state till 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th pasies they had established so many state, In 12th & 13th century, pasi king they had faced some critical situation with their contemporary king. contemporary king had burnt to pasi sankriti and historical legacy.
"" may not be a fo far fetched theory to identify this period with the times in which pasis and other aboriginal tribes are said to have held this part of the country.No sign of pasi dominion have however survived which need not surprised us their possession have long been held by the descendants of rajput and muslim invaders.""
It has been describe on page of 20 in Gazetteer in year of 1979.
North east of dharhara lakhimpur khiri headquarter, pasi strength is higher in dhaurhara.
It was fort of vintage pasi king, In present you will get fort and so many thing which is saved by gov.
It wrote in district Gazetteer khiri publication 1979 on page 258 that dharhaura was capital of pasi.--Sachin8p (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I would be grateful if anyone could look this over and see if they can improve it. I'm struggling to get reliable sources in English, but mainly there are some omre in other languages? It is at AfD. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Does this school have senior high/sixth form?
This IBT article describes a school in Kanpur, UP: http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kanpur-protests-erupt-after-st-marys-convent-school-girls-punished-wearing-rakhi-mehndi-645170
Does this include a senior high/sixth form level? WhisperToMe (talk) 10:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
International Chandramauli Charitable Trust at at AfD. Can any editors assist in providing sources in Hindi, Urdu and indeed any Indian languages other than English? AusLondonder (talk) 20:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
GA Reassessment of Deogarh, Uttar Pradesh
Deogarh, Uttar Pradesh, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you. — The Transhumanist 08:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Portal:Uttar Pradesh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Uttar Pradesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Uttar Pradesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 02:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Help to identify this Picture
This picture has a conflicting description and yet appear in various articles which both names. --Aryan ( है?) 09:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
New Page Patrol
- New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers
- New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles, including Uttar Pradesh related articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
- If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. --John B123 (talk) 13:50, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Lakhimpur Kheri violence RfC needs input
Please see Talk:Lakhimpur Kheri violence#RfC about this incident being termed a 'mass shooting'
This is primarily a two-editor "pissing match" that has now turned into an RfC, with presently very low input, so it's turning into the same two-editor pissing match again. This needs to be settled, by uninvolved editors. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 01:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Banaras Hindu University has an RFC
Banaras Hindu University, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. User4edits (talk) 13:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian politics § Proposal : Wikipedia:Naming conventions Indian constituencies
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian politics § Proposal : Wikipedia:Naming conventions Indian constituencies. --Venkat TL (talk) 13:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)