View source for Casco-class monitor

{{Short description | American Civil War ironclad monitor class}}
{|{{Infobox ship begin}}
{{Infobox ship image
|Ship image=USS Casco.jpg
|Ship caption=USS ''Casco'' on the [[James River, Virginia|James River]], 1865
}}
{{Infobox ship class overview
|Name=''Casco'' class
|Builders=Various
|Operators=[[United States Navy]]
|Class before={{sclass|Passaic|monitor|4}}
|Class after=
|Subclasses=
|Cost=
|Built range=
|In service range=
|In commission range=
|Total ships building=
|Total ships planned=
|Total ships completed=20
|Total ships cancelled=
|Total ships active=
|Total ships laid up=
|Total ships lost=
|Total ships retired=20
|Total ships preserved=
}}
{{Infobox ship characteristics
|Hide header=
|Header caption=
|Ship class=
|Ship type=[[draft (hull)|Light draft]] [[monitor (warship)|monitor]]
|Ship tonnage= 
|Ship displacement=1,175 tons
|Ship tons burthen=
|Ship length={{convert|225|ft|abbr=on}}
|Ship beam={{convert|45|ft|abbr=on}}
|Ship height=
|Ship draft={{convert|6|ft|abbr=on}} (designed)
|Ship depth=
|Ship hold depth=
|Ship decks=
|Ship deck clearance=
|Ship ramps=
|Ship ice class=
|Ship power=
|Ship propulsion=[[Steam engine]], twin [[propeller|screws]]
|Ship sail plan=
|Ship speed={{convert|8|kn}} (designed)
|Ship range=
|Ship endurance=
|Ship test depth=
|Ship boats=
|Ship capacity=
|Ship troops=
|Ship complement=
|Ship crew=
|Ship time to activate=
|Ship sensors=
|Ship EW=
|Ship armament=2 × {{convert|11|in|mm|abbr=on}} guns
|Ship armour=
|Ship armor=
|Ship aircraft=
|Ship aircraft facilities=
|Ship notes=
}}
|}

The '''''Casco''-class monitor''' was a unique class of [[draft (hull)|light draft]] [[monitor (warship)|monitor]] built on behalf of the [[United States Navy]] for the [[Mississippi River|Mississippi]] [[theater (warfare)|theatre]] during the [[American Civil War]]. The largest and most ambitious [[ironclad]] program of the war, the project was dogged by delays caused by bureaucratic meddling. Twenty ships of the class were eventually built at great expense, but proved so unseaworthy when trialed that they were quickly sidelined, causing a public scandal.

==History==

After the success of the [[US Navy]]'s first monitor, {{USS|Monitor}}, in preventing the [[Confederate States of America|Confederate]] ironclad {{ship|CSS|Virginia}} from breaking the [[Union (American Civil War)|Union]] blockade at [[Hampton Roads]] in the spring of 1862, the navy became enthused with the monitor concept (at the expense of the larger [[broadside ironclad]] type), and ordered a number of new classes of monitor, one of which was the ''Casco'' class.<ref>Heinrich, pp. 42–43.</ref> The ''Casco''s were a unique "light draft" class designed specifically for operating in the shallow bays, rivers, and inlets of the Confederacy.<ref>[http://www.hazegray.org/danfs/monitors/umpqua.htm USS ''Umpqua''], DANFS Online.</ref>

The specifications for the ''Casco'' class originally called for a vessel with a light [[draft (hull)|draft]], not exceeding six feet, and a low [[Freeboard (nautical)|freeboard]] to present the smallest possible target to Confederate guns. For the design of the new class, the Navy turned once again to [[John Ericsson]], designer of USS ''Monitor''. [[File:USS Nausett 1865.jpg|thumb|upright|Diagram of USS ''Nausett'', showing the large wooden "raft" surrounding the iron hull]]Ericsson came up with a design for a {{convert|225|ft|m|adj=on}}-long vessel with a single revolving turret containing two {{convert|11|in|mm|adj=on}} guns, an armored upper deck, and twin screw propellers giving a top speed of around eight knots. Around the hull of the vessel, a large wooden "raft" was to be constructed, which would help increase buoyancy. Ericsson kept the design deliberately simple in keeping with the inexperience of the private shipyards which would be called upon to build them.<ref name="Roberts, p. 110">Roberts, p. 110.</ref> He anticipated that each ship would take no more than forty days to complete.<ref name="Heinrich44">Heinrich, p. 44.</ref>

===The monitor office===
At around the same time however, the Navy created a new "monitor office" to centralize oversight of the new monitor program. The new office, located across the hall from Ericsson's design bureau, was nominally headed by Rear Admiral [[Francis H. Gregory]], but was effectively run by [[Chief Engineer]] [[Alban C. Stimers]], to whom was entrusted the power of setting general plans and ship specifications. Stimers, an ambitious man, was keen to take credit for the design of the new monitors and frequently visited Ericsson's bureau to make changes to the specifications.<ref name="Roberts, p. 110"/><ref>Heinrich, p. 43.</ref>

The greatest single alteration to the design however, came not directly from Stimers but from Admiral Joseph Smith, chief of the [[Bureau of Yards and Docks]] in [[Washington, D.C.]], who suggested that the oval [[hull (ship)|hull]] of the ship be surrounded by large iron tanks which could be pumped full of water in order to lower the ship's freeboard still further when in combat to present an even smaller target, or drained for normal travel. Stimers liked the idea and ordered the changes, but when Ericsson saw the new plans he resigned from the project. The new plans greatly added to the design's complexity, requiring sophisticated pumping mechanisms, while the added weight would also reduce speed and buoyancy.<ref name="Heinrich44"/>

===More design changes===
In February 1863 the monitor office offered contracts for twenty of the new ''Casco''-class monitors, in spite of the fact that the original architect, Ericsson, had not approved the new design. Winning bidders included prominent firms like [[Reaney, Son & Archbold]] in [[Chester, Pennsylvania]], Wilcox & Whitney at Camden, [[Harlan & Hollingsworth]] in [[Wilmington, Delaware]] and Merrick & Sons of Philadelphia (the latter of whom subcontracted much of the work to [[William Cramp & Sons]]). A number of smaller firms were also contracted. The cost was estimated at $395,000 per ship, or approximately $8 million in total. Some shipyards, such as Cramp, were forced to substantially upgrade their ironworking facilities for the production of the new vessels.<ref>Heinrich, pp. 44–45.</ref>
[[File:Wassuc shot lifter drawing.jpg|thumb|upright|Detail drawing by Stimers for one of the ''Casco''-class monitors]]
By the end of 1863, frequent design changes were causing growing problems for the contractors. Stimers and his team of thirty draftsmen at the monitor office continued to submit changes even as the vessels were in the process of production, leading to long delays. One yard in [[Boston]] received a total of 83 drawings and 120 letters of explanation from Stimers, and the specification manual for the ships grew to 92 pages of small print.<ref>Roberts, p. 116.</ref> The final design called for a total of thirteen auxiliary engines and pumps per ship, fancy brasswork in place of cast iron, and a complex system of pipes for draining and filling the water tanks. The added weight to a ship designed with only a {{convert|15|in|mm|adj=on}} freeboard at the outset raised questions about the ships' eventual seaworthiness.<ref name="Heinrich47">Heinrich, p. 47.</ref>

===Scandal and inquiry===
By spring of 1864, the first of the ''Casco''-class vessels, {{USS|Chimo|1864|6}}, was ready for her initial trial. Putting to sea, waves washed across the deck, while the stern remained totally submerged by three or four inches (10&nbsp;cm).<ref>Roberts, p. 159.</ref> A second trial, of {{USS|Tunxis|1864|6}}, confirmed the disaster, with waves washing over the deck and the ship only able to make a speed of 3½ knots as opposed to the original specification of eight. Moreover, the trials were conducted "light", without the normal operational loads of coal, ammunition and stores. The ships were unseaworthy and virtually useless.<ref name="Heinrich47"/><ref>Roberts, p. 160.</ref><ref>[http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/pers-us/uspers-s/a-stimrs.htm Alban C. Stimers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080515035704/http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/pers-us/uspers-s/a-stimrs.htm |date=2008-05-15 }}, [[Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships|DANFS]]</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=P91VDwAAQBAJ&dq=%22the+construction+of+a+dozen+light-draft+monitors+was+undertaken+late+in+the+war%22&pg=PT174 Millers Photographic History  of the Civil War Vol 6 "The Navies"]. "In order to furnish efficient fighting-vessels that could thread the shallow streams and bayous along the shore, the construction of a dozen light-draft monitors was undertaken late in the war. They were to draw only seven feet of water, and to be a small edition of the original monitor, mounting one gun only. Through a miscalculation in the engineer's office, their displacement was wrongly estimated. They proved utter failures. All or nearly all of them were on the ways at the same time. When the first was launched, she proved not sufficiently buoyant to sustain her armor and guns, giving a very good imitation of a submarine when striking the water. To meet the demand for light-drafts–three on the James River–these monitors were lightened by removing their turrets, as has been done in the case of the one in the picture. The naval reports record every form of disparagement of these vessels, except the profanity they evoked from officers and men."</ref>

By this stage, the twenty vessels, in various stages of completion, had cost half a million dollars apiece. Amid public scandal, the Navy set up an inquiry. Stimers was found responsible and removed from his post, and the Navy appointed experienced administrators in his place. The vessels were redesigned and refitted in order to improve buoyancy, but few of them saw active service before the end of the war and those that did were decommissioned and laid up within months, while the majority were never commissioned at all. Within a few years, all the ships of the ''Casco'' class had been retired and scrapped or otherwise disposed of.<ref>Heinrich, p. 48. See also DANFS entries for the individual ships below.</ref>

==Ships==
{|class="wikitable plainrowheaders"
|+ Construction data
|-
!scope="col"|Ship name 
!scope="col"|Builder 
!scope="col"|Contracted
!scope="col"|[[Ceremonial ship launching|Launched]]
!scope="col"|*[[Ship commissioning|Commissioned]]<br/>**Completed
!scope="col"|Turret<br/> removed? 
!scope="col"|Renamed
!scope="col"|Fate
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Casco|1864|6}}
|[[Atlantic Iron Works]], [[Boston]]
|align=center|14 April 1863
|align=center|7 May 1864
|align=center|*4 December 1864
|align=center|Yes
|''Hero'', 15 June 1869
|[[ship breaking|Scrapped]], 1875
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Chimo|1864|6}}
|[[Aquilla Adams]], [[South Boston]]
|align=center|17 May 1863
|align=center|5 May 1864
|align=center|*20 January 1865
|align=center|Yes
|''Orion'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Piscataqua'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Cohoes|1867|6}}
|[[Continental Iron Works]], [[Greenpoint, Brooklyn]]
|align=center|17 April 1863
|align=center|31 May 1865
|align=center|**19 January 1866
|align=center|No
|''Charybdis'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Cohoes'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, July 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Etlah|1864|6}}
|[[Charles W. McCord]], [[St. Louis]]
|align=center|24 June 1863
|align=center|3 July 1865
|align=center|**12 March 1866
|align=center|No
|''Hecate'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Etlah'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 12 September 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Klamath|1865|6}}
|[[Alexander Swift]], [[Cincinnati]]
|align=center|26 March 1863
|align=center|20 April 1865
|align=center|**6 May 1866
|align=center|No
|''Harpy'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Klamath'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 12 September 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Koka|1865|6}}
|[[Wilcox & Whiting]], [[Camden, New Jersey]]
|align=center|24 April 1863
|align=center|18 May 1865
|align=center|**28 November 1865
|align=center|No
|''Argos'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Koka'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 2 October 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Modoc|1865|6}}
|[[J.H. Underbill]], Brooklyn
|align=center|4 June 1863
|align=center|21 March 1865
|align=center|**23 June 1865
|align=center|Yes
|''Achilles'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Modoc'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, August 1875
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Napa|1864|6}}
|[[Harlan & Hollingsworth]], [[Wilmington, Delaware]]
|align=center|2 March 1863
|align=center|26 November 1864
|align=center|**4 May 1865
|align=center|Yes
|''Nemesis'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Napa'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 1875
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Naubuc|1864|6}}
|[[Union Iron Works (New York)|Union Iron Works]], Brooklyn
|align=center|2 April 1863
|align=center|19 October 1864
|align=center|*27 March 1865
|align=center|Yes
|''Gorgon'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Minnetonka'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 1875
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Nausett|1865|6}}
|[[Donald McKay]], Boston
|align=center|10 June 1863
|align=center|26 April 1865
|align=center|*10 August 1865
|align=center|No
|''Aetna'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Nausett'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, August 1875
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Shawnee|1865|6}}
|[[Curtis & Tilden]], Boston
|align=center|2 April 1863
|align=center|13 March 1865
|align=center|*18 August 1865
|align=center|No
|''Eolus'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Shawnee'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 9 September 1875
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Shiloh|1865|6}}
|[[Charles W. McCordat]], St. Louis
|align=center|24 June 1863
|align=center|14 July 1865
|align=center|**12 March 1866
|align=center|No
|''Iris'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Shiloh'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Squando|1865|6}}
|Donald McKay, Boston
|align=center|4 May 1863
|align=center|31 December 1864
|align=center|*6 June 1865
|align=center|No
|''Erebus'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Algoma'', 10 August 1869
|Scrapped, 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Suncook|1865|6}}
|[[Globe Works (Boston)|Globe Works]], South Boston
|align=center|17 March 1863
|align=center|1 February 1865
|align=center|*27 July 1865
|align=center|No
|''Spitfire'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Suncook'', 10 August 1869
|Scrapped, July 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Tunxis|1864|6}}
|[[Reaney, Son & Archbold]], [[Chester, Pennsylvania]]
|align=center|9 March 1863
|align=center|4 June 1864
|align=center|*12 July 1864
|align=center|No
|''Hydra'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Otsego'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Umpqua|1865|6}} 
|[[Snowden & Mason]], [[Brownsville, Pennsylvania]]
|align=center|4 March 1863
|align=center|21 December 1865
|align=center|**7 May 1866
|align=center|No
|''Fury'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Umpqua'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 12 September 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Wassuc|1865|6}}
|[[George W. Lawrence]], [[Portland, Maine]]
|align=center|2 June 1863
|align=center|25 July 1865
|align=center|**28 October 1865
|align=center|No
|''Stromboli'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Wassuc'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 9 September 1875
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Waxsaw|1865|6}}
|[[A. & W. Denmead & Son]], [[Baltimore]]
|align=center|13 March 1863
|align=center|4 May 1865
|align=center|**21 October 1866
|align=center|No
|''Niobe'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Waxsaw'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 25 August 1875
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Yazoo|1865|6}}
|[[Merrick & Sons]], [[Philadelphia]]
|align=center|2 March 1863
|align=center|8 May 1865
|align=center|**15 December 1865
|align=center|No
|''Tartar'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Yazoo'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 5 September 1874
|-
|scope="row"|{{USS|Yuma|1865|6}}
|Alexander Swift, Cincinnati
|align=center|26 March 1863
|align=center|30 May 1865
|align=center|**6 May 1866
|align=center|No
|''Tempest'', 15 June 1869<br/>''Yuma'', 10 August 1869
|Sold for scrap, 12 September 1874 
|}

==Footnotes==
{{reflist|30em}}

==References==
*{{cite book|last=Canney|first=Donald L.|title=The Old Steam Navy|publisher=Naval Institute Press|location=Annapolis, Maryland|date=1993|volume=2: The Ironclads, 1842–1885|isbn=0-87021-586-8}}
*{{cite book|title=Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905|editor1-last=Chesneau|editor1-first=Roger|editor2-last=Kolesnik|editor2-first=Eugene M.|publisher=Conway Maritime Press|location=Greenwich, UK|date=1979|isbn=0-8317-0302-4|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/conwaysallworlds0000unse_l2e2}}
*Heinrich, Thomas R. (1997): ''Ships for the Seven Seas: Philadelphia Shipbuilding in the Age of Industrial Capitalism'', Johns Hopkins University Press, {{ISBN|0-8018-5387-7}}, pp.&nbsp;42–48.
* {{cite book|last1=Olmstead|first1=Edwin|last2=Stark|first2=Wayne E.|last3=Tucker|first3=Spencer C.|title=The Big Guns: Civil War Siege, Seacoast, and Naval Cannon|publisher=Museum Restoration Service|location=Alexandria Bay, New York|isbn=0-88855-012-X|year=1997}}
*Roberts, William H. (2002): ''Civil War Ironclads: Industrial Mobilization for the US Navy 1861–1865'', Johns Hopkins University Press, {{ISBN|0-8018-6830-0}}
*{{cite journal |last1=Roberts |first1=William H. |title="A Small Margin to Go to Sea With": Alban Stimers and the Union Navy's Light-Draft Monitors, Part 1 |journal=Warship International |date=September 2021 |volume=LVIII |issue=3 |pages=223–247 |issn=0043-0374}}
*{{cite journal |last1=Roberts |first1=William H. |title="A Small Margin to Go to Sea With": Alban Stimers and the Union Navy's Light-Draft Monitors, Part 2 |journal=Warship International |date=December 2021 |volume=LVIII |issue=4 |pages= |issn=0043-0374}}
*{{cite journal |last1=Roberts |first1=William H. |title="A Small Margin to Go to Sea With": Alban Stimers and the Union Navy's Light-Draft Monitors, Part 3 |journal=Warship International |date=March 2022 |volume=LIX |issue=1 |pages=66–82 |issn=0043-0374}}
*{{cite book|last=Silverstone|first=Paul H.|title=Directory of the World's Capital Ships|year=1984|publisher=Hippocrene Books|location=New York|isbn=0-88254-979-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Silverstone|first=Paul H.|title=Civil War Navies 1855–1883|publisher=Routledge|location=New York|year=2006|series=The U.S. Navy Warship Series|isbn=0-415-97870-X}}
*[http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/pers-us/uspers-s/a-stimrs.htm Alban C. Stimers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080515035704/http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/pers-us/uspers-s/a-stimrs.htm |date=2008-05-15 }}, [[Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships|DANFS]]. See also the individual ship entries for the class.

{{Casco class light draft monitor}}
{{Union ironclads}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Casco class monitor}}
[[Category:Monitor classes]]
[[Category:Casco-class monitors| ]]
[[Category:Engineering failures]]