View source for Opinion polling for the 2019 Canadian federal election

{{Short description|none}}
{{Use Canadian English|date=September 2019}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2019}}
{{row hover highlight}}
{{Canadian federal election opinion polling|2008|2011|2015|2019|2021|byCon2=yes|byCon3=yes|byCon4=yes|byCon5=yes}}

This page provides a list of scientific, nationwide public [[opinion poll]]s that were conducted from the [[2015 Canadian federal election]] leading up to the [[2019 Canadian federal election]], which was held on October 21. For riding-specific polls see [[Opinion polling for the 2019 Canadian federal election, by constituency|2019 constituency polls]].

==National polls==

===Campaign period===
[[File:Opinion polling during the campaign period of 2019 Canadian federal election.svg|800px|thumb|left|Evolution of voting intentions according to polls conducted during the 2019 Canadian federal election campaign, graphed from the data in the table below. Trendlines are [[local regression]]s, with polls weighted by proximity in time and a [[Logarithmic growth|logarithmic function]] of sample size. 95% confidence ribbons represent uncertainty about the trendlines, not the likelihood that actual election results would fall within the intervals.]]
{{clear}}

{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Polling firm
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Last date<br />of polling{{ref label|order|1|1}}
! rowspan="2"| Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]
! rowspan="2"| Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2"| Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2"| Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2"| Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number"|
|-
| style="background:#ffd;"| ''[[2019 Canadian federal election|2019 election]]'' || style="background:#ffd;"| {{dts|October 21, 2019}} || style="background:#ffd;"| ''[https://www.elections.ca/res/rep/off/ovr2019app/51/table9E.html HTML]'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''33.1'' || style="background:#ffd;" {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''''34.3''''' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''16.0'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''7.6'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''6.5'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''1.6'' || style="background:#ffd;"| N/A|| style="background:#ffd;"| 18,170,880|| style="background:#ffd;"| N/A|| {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''''1.2''''' 
|-
! colspan="13"|
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 20, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-20191020.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 20, 2019 |access-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-date=November 12, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112024017/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-20191020.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 31.7 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.5''' || 20.8 || 7.2 || 6.0 || 1.5 || ±3.6 pp || 800 || telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.8'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 20, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/minority-government-most-likely-scenario-cpc-32-lpc-32-ndp-18-green-6/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 20, 2019 |access-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191021004055/https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/minority-government-most-likely-scenario-cpc-32-lpc-32-ndp-18-green-6/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31.6 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.2''' || 18.3 || 7.9 || 6.1 || 2.8 || ±2.17 pp || 2,032 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.6'''
|-
| Research Co. || {{dts|October 20, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://researchco.ca/2019/10/20/elxn43-canada-final-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=Research Co. |date=October 20, 2019 |access-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191021210303/https://researchco.ca/2019/10/20/elxn43-canada-final-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32''' || 31 || 19 || 7 || 8 || 2 || ±3.1 pp || 957 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|October 20, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_october_20_2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=October 20, 2019 |access-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191021014037/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_october_20_2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.2''' || 30.0 || 18.3 || 5.0 || 8.1|| 3.5 || ±2.2 pp || 1,994 || telephone/IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.2'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|October 20, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Canadians-will-choose-a-Minority-Government |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=October 20, 2019 |access-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191020230932/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Canadians-will-choose-a-Minority-Government |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31.4''' || 31.3 || 17.8 || 6.6 || 9.1 || 2.7 || ±1.4 pp || 1,498 || online (rolling) ||≤ {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.1'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|October 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/With-Election-Close-and-Country-Divided-Who-Will-Get-Out-Their-Vote |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=October 19, 2019 |access-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-date=December 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205190042/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/With-Election-Close-and-Country-Divided-Who-Will-Get-Out-Their-Vote |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 18 || 7 || 6 || 3 || ±2 pp || 3,108 || online/telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|October 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/final-abacus-2019-canada-election-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=October 19, 2019 |access-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-date=October 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191024202505/https://abacusdata.ca/final-abacus-2019-canada-election-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || 32 || 16 || 8 || 8 || 2 || ±2.1 pp || 2,000|| online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-19.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 19, 2019 |access-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-date=November 11, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111162549/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-19.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 31.0 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''31.5''' || 18.8 || 7.0 || 9.5 || 1.8 || ±2.4 pp || 1,600 (1/2) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.5'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|October 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Too-Close-To-Call-Both-Parties-in-deadlock |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=October 19, 2019 |access-date=October 19, 2019 |archive-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191020115317/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Too-Close-To-Call-Both-Parties-in-deadlock |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31.7''' || 31.4 || 17.4 || 6.6 || 9.1 || 2.7 || ±1.6 pp || 1,554 || online (rolling) ||≤ {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.3'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|October 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/6fb7bbcf-bdb3-479c-9e2e-0ccb6e11e75aFed%20Final%20Oct%2020%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=October 18, 2019 |access-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-date=October 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191024203504/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/6fb7bbcf-bdb3-479c-9e2e-0ccb6e11e75aFed%20Final%20Oct%2020%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31.7''' || 29.9 || 17.5 || 9.0 || 8.3 || 3.0 || ±3 pp || 1,206 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.8'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|October 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Federal-Politics-Oct-20-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=October 18, 2019 |access-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191020160233/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Federal-Politics-Oct-20-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 18 || 8 || 6 || 2 || ±2.13 pp || 2,117 || online || '''0'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/19/federal-race-still-tied-two-days-out-from-election-suggests-new-mainstreet-polling-numbers/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 18, 2019 |access-date=October 19, 2019 |archive-date=October 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191019233652/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/19/federal-race-still-tied-two-days-out-from-election-suggests-new-mainstreet-polling-numbers/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32.8''' || 31.9 || 18.3 || 7.2 || 5.5 || 3.3 || ±2.11 pp || 2,134 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-18.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 18, 2019 |access-date=October 19, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210412/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-18.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32.6''' || 30.3 || 18.4 || 7.1 || 9.3 || 1.9 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.3'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|October 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Final-stretch-CPC-and-LPC-are-dead-even-Either-party-headed-for-a-plurality-of-seats-but-no-majority |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=October 18, 2019 |access-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018212032/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Final-stretch-CPC-and-LPC-are-dead-even-Either-party-headed-for-a-plurality-of-seats-but-no-majority |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''31''' || 18 || 7 || 9 || 3 || ±2.2 pp || 1,987 || online || '''0'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|October 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Seat-Cluster-2019-10-18.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=October 17, 2019 |access-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018211244/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Seat-Cluster-2019-10-18.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || 31 || 14 || 9 || 8 || 4 || N/A || 1,964 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|October 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Political-Landscape-Tracking-2019-10-18.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=October 17, 2019 |access-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018211241/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Political-Landscape-Tracking-2019-10-18.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || 30 || 19 || 6 || 8 || 2 || N/A || 3,094 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|October 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_october_18_2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=October 17, 2019 |access-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018183203/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_october_18_2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31.0 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.5''' || 17.6 || 5.5 || 7.9 || 3.6 || ±2.3 pp || 1,881 || telephone/IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.5'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/18/liberals-conservatives-deadlocked-three-days-out-from-election-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 17, 2019 |access-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018234439/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/18/liberals-conservatives-deadlocked-three-days-out-from-election-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32.1''' || 31.9 || 18.8 || 7.6 || 5.8 || 3.0 || ±2.11 pp || 2,163 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-17.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 17, 2019 |access-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210424/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-17.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 31.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''31.6''' || 19.0 || 6.2 || 9.5 || 1.8 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.1'''
|-
| DART/Maru || {{dts|October 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-DTs-F-Oct-18-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=DART/Maru |date=October 16, 2019 |access-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018110906/https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-DTs-F-Oct-18-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 29 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 21 || 8 || 7 || 2 || ±2.9 pp || 1,518 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|October 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/f1c7c50b-509a-41eb-944a-b1c402041adaFed%20Horserace%20Oct%2017%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=October 16, 2019 |access-date=October 17, 2019 |archive-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018004804/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/f1c7c50b-509a-41eb-944a-b1c402041adaFed%20Horserace%20Oct%2017%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''30''' || 29 || 20 || 7 || 8 || 4 || ±3 pp || 1,028 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/17/mainstreet-tracking-poll-has-liberals-conservatives-deadlocked-ndp-cresting-over-18/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 16, 2019 |access-date=October 17, 2019 |archive-date=October 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191017235839/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/17/mainstreet-tracking-poll-has-liberals-conservatives-deadlocked-ndp-cresting-over-18/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31.9''' || 30.9 || 18.6 || 7.6 || 7.0 || 3.2 || ±2.12 pp || 2,128 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-16.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 16, 2019 |access-date=October 17, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210426/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-16.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 31.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.5''' || 18.9 || 6.0 || 9.2 || 1.6 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.0'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 15, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/16/liberals-conservatives-still-tied-for-first-while-ndp-jumps-over-18-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 15, 2019 |access-date=October 16, 2019 |archive-date=October 16, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191016234252/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/16/liberals-conservatives-still-tied-for-first-while-ndp-jumps-over-18-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''30.9''' || 30.6 || 18.3 || 7.9 || 7.7 || 3.6 || ±2.15 pp || 2,070 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 15, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-15.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 15, 2019 |access-date=October 16, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210432/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-15.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 31.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.5''' || 18.8 || 5.9 || 9.4 || 1.1 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.6'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|October 15, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019.10.15_federal_Vote-1.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=October 15, 2019 |access-date=October 15, 2019 |archive-date=October 15, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191015210224/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019.10.15_federal_Vote-1.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 29 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 19 || 8 || 8 || 3 || ±2.0 pp || 2,100 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|October 15, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_october_16_2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=October 15, 2019 |access-date=October 16, 2019 |archive-date=October 16, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191016214321/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_october_16_2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31.2 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''31.8''' || 18.4 || 6.4 || 6.8 || 3.4 || ±2.3 pp || 1,904 || telephone/IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.6'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 14, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/15/liberals-conservatives-leading-among-early-voters-suggests-mainstreet-research-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 14, 2019 |access-date=October 15, 2019 |archive-date=October 15, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191015233735/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/15/liberals-conservatives-leading-among-early-voters-suggests-mainstreet-research-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30.7 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''31.1''' || 17.2 || 8.1 || 8.5 || 3.6 || ±2.15 pp || 2,076 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.4'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|October 13, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Outcome-Remains-Uncertain-as-Campaign-Enters-Home-Stretch |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=October 13, 2019 |access-date=October 15, 2019 |archive-date=December 6, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201206014846/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Outcome-Remains-Uncertain-as-Campaign-Enters-Home-Stretch |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32''' || 20 || 7 || 8 || 2 || ±2.4 pp || 2,204 || online/telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 13, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/14/liberals-conservatives-once-again-in-statistical-tie-in-latest-mainstreet-polling/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 13, 2019 |access-date=October 14, 2019 |archive-date=October 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191014205002/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/14/liberals-conservatives-once-again-in-statistical-tie-in-latest-mainstreet-polling/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30.7 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.3''' || 16.6 || 7.8 || 8.3 || 3.4 || ±2.11 pp || 2,150 || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 13, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-13.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 13, 2019 |access-date=October 14, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210435/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-13.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32.3''' || 32.1 || 19.2 || 5.9 || 9.3 || 1.0 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 12, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-12.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 12, 2019 |access-date=October 13, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210440/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-12.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 31.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.3''' || 19.7 || 6.2 || 9.0 || 1.1 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 11, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-11.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 11, 2019 |access-date=October 12, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210444/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-11.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.2''' || 32.1 || 18.1 || 5.9 || 8.9 || 1.4 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.1'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|October 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/election-poll-ndp-and-bq-rise-as-liberals-and-conservatives-remain-deadlocked/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=October 10, 2019 |access-date=October 13, 2019 |archive-date=October 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191017202337/https://abacusdata.ca/election-poll-ndp-and-bq-rise-as-liberals-and-conservatives-remain-deadlocked/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32''' || 18 || 6 || 9 || 2 || ±1.9 pp || 3,000|| online || '''0'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|October 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/NDP-is-on-the-rise-and-could-win-much-of-British-Columbia-Atlantic-Canada-and-Ontario |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=October 10, 2019 |access-date=October 12, 2019 |archive-date=October 12, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191012213523/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/NDP-is-on-the-rise-and-could-win-much-of-British-Columbia-Atlantic-Canada-and-Ontario |url-status=live }}</ref> || 29 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''31''' || 19 || 7 || 10 || 3 || ±1.54 pp || 4,037 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/11/ndp-gaining-in-latest-mainstreet-research-numbers/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 10, 2019 |access-date=October 11, 2019 |archive-date=October 11, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191011223754/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/11/ndp-gaining-in-latest-mainstreet-research-numbers/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 28.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''31.7''' || 16.6 || 7.6 || 9.4 || 4.2 || ±2 pp || 2,274 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-20191010.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 10, 2019 |access-date=October 11, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210450/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-20191010.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.4''' || 33.2 || 15.3 || 5.3 || 8.8 || 1.4 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.2'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|October 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Political-Landscape-Tracking.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=October 10, 2019 |access-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191010235247/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Political-Landscape-Tracking.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 31 || 15 || 6 || 10 || 3 || N/A || 2,394 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|October 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019.10.10_Federal_release.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=October 10, 2019 |access-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191010232559/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019.10.10_Federal_release.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 29 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 17 || 7 || 9 || 3 || ±1.8 pp || 3,031 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|October 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_october_11_2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=October 10, 2019 |access-date=October 11, 2019 |archive-date=October 11, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191011180627/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_october_11_2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''31.7''' || 13.1 || 5.4 || 12.8 || 4.7 || ±2.2 pp || 1,947 || telephone/IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.2'''
|-
| DART/Maru || {{dts|October 9, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-DTs-F2-Oct-12-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=DART/Maru |date=October 9, 2019 |access-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018000939/https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-DTs-F2-Oct-12-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 28 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 20 || 9 || 7 || 2 || ±3.1 pp || 1,510 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 9, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/ndp-get-post-debate-bounce-cpc-32-lpc-30-ndp-15-green-10/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 9, 2019 |access-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191010202227/https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/ndp-get-post-debate-bounce-cpc-32-lpc-30-ndp-15-green-10/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30.2 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.2''' || 15.1 || 7.2 || 9.8 || 4.0 || ±2.04 pp || 2,309 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 9, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-09.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 9, 2019 |access-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210456/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-09.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.9''' || 33.2 || 14.1 || 5.1 || 8.2 || 1.6 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.7'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|October 8, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Federal-Politics-Oct-9-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=October 8, 2019 |access-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191010013252/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Federal-Politics-Oct-9-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''31''' || 18 || 7 || 11 || 3 || ±2.11 pp || 2,150 || online || '''0'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|October 8, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/7a76cc7a-9916-426e-9614-542cb25708a3Fed%20Horserace%20Oct%208%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=October 8, 2019 |access-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191010205647/https://poll.forumresearch.com/data/7a76cc7a-9916-426e-9614-542cb25708a3Fed%20Horserace%20Oct%208%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 28 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 13 || 7 || 12 || 3 || ±3 pp || 1,013 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 8, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/09/liberals-tories-remain-deadlocked-as-ndp-gains-mainstreet-daily-tracking-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 8, 2019 |access-date=October 9, 2019 |archive-date=October 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191009222115/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/09/liberals-tories-remain-deadlocked-as-ndp-gains-mainstreet-daily-tracking-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31.7 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.0''' || 14.3 || 6.1 || 10.3 || 4.2 || ±2 pp || 2,445 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 8, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-08.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 8, 2019 |access-date=October 9, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210459/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-08.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.6''' || 34.8 || 13.4 || 5.2 || 9.1 || 1.2 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.8'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 7, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/08/conservatives-liberals-remain-tied-in-mainstreet-polling/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 7, 2019 |access-date=October 8, 2019 |archive-date=October 8, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191008225739/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/08/conservatives-liberals-remain-tied-in-mainstreet-polling/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32.6 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33.1''' || 13.2 || 6.5 || 10.1 || 3.4 || ±2.11 pp || 2,108 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 7, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-07.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 7, 2019 |access-date=October 8, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210513/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-07.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 34.6 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.8''' || 13.5 || 5.1 || 9.8 || 1.1 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.2'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|October 7, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Conservatives-Stumble-Tied-with-Liberals-Ahead-of-Critical-English-Language-Debate |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=October 7, 2019 |access-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-date=December 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205033022/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Conservatives-Stumble-Tied-with-Liberals-Ahead-of-Critical-English-Language-Debate |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 34 || 15 || 7 || 7 || 2 || ±2.9 pp || 1,502 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|October 7, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Ad-Testing-Tracking.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=October 7, 2019 |access-date=October 8, 2019 |archive-date=October 8, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191008202332/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Ad-Testing-Tracking.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 33 || 13 || 5 || 10 || 4 || N/A || 2,835 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/07/liberals-and-conservatives-tied-ndp-rising-in-latest-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 6, 2019 |access-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191007232251/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/07/liberals-and-conservatives-tied-ndp-rising-in-latest-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33.1 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33.3''' || 13.3 || 6.3 || 9.7 || 2.9 || ±2.13 pp || 2,108 || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-06.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 6, 2019 |access-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210521/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-06.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.3''' || 33.4 || 15.0 || 5.1 || 9.6 || 1.5 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.9'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|October 5, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/tight-race-two-weeks-to-go-abacus-data-poll-election-43/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=October 5, 2019 |access-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-date=October 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191010203527/https://abacusdata.ca/tight-race-two-weeks-to-go-abacus-data-poll-election-43/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 33 || 16 || 5 || 8 || 1 || ±2 pp || 1,556 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 5, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-05.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 5, 2019 |access-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205726/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-05.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.7''' || 32.7 || 15.0 || 4.9 || 8.0 || 1.8 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 4, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-04.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 4, 2019 |access-date=October 5, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205727/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-04.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.2''' || 32.6 || 15.6 || 5.8 || 7.4 || 1.8 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.6'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 3, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/04/liberals-tories-deadlocked-again-in-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 3, 2019 |access-date=October 4, 2019 |archive-date=October 4, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191004232820/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/04/liberals-tories-deadlocked-again-in-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34.3 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.8''' || 11.4 || 5.8 || 9.1 || 3.2 || ±2.07 pp || 2,207 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 3, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-03.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 3, 2019 |access-date=October 4, 2019 |archive-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191021005529/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-03.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.3''' || 34.3 || 13.8 || 5.9 || 8.2 || 1.2 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.0'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|October 2, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Largest-Poll-in-43rd-General-Election-finds-CPC-LPC-continue-to-battle-across-Canadas-vote-rich-regions |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=October 2, 2019 |access-date=October 4, 2019 |archive-date=October 4, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191004001752/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Largest-Poll-in-43rd-General-Election-finds-CPC-LPC-continue-to-battle-across-Canadas-vote-rich-regions |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 14 || 5 || 11 || 3 || ±1.4 pp || 4,755 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 2, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/03/tories-open-up-3-point-lead-over-liberals-mainstreet-tracking-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 2, 2019 |access-date=October 3, 2019 |archive-date=October 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191003232708/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/03/tories-open-up-3-point-lead-over-liberals-mainstreet-tracking-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33.4 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36.4''' || 11.9 || 5.7 || 9.0 || 2.5 || ±2.07 pp || 2,234 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 2, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-02.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 2, 2019 |access-date=October 3, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205728/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-02.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 32.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.2''' || 14.9 || 5.5 || 9.9 || 1.4 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.3'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|October 1, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/ea72fd23-d71b-474e-a84f-3fb0698d4a3bFed%20Horserace%20Oct%202%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=October 1, 2019 |access-date=October 3, 2019 |archive-date=October 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191003205659/https://poll.forumresearch.com/data/ea72fd23-d71b-474e-a84f-3fb0698d4a3bFed%20Horserace%20Oct%202%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || 31 || 12 || 6 || 12 || 4 || ±3 pp || 1,853 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 1, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/02/tories-hold-2-5-point-lead-over-liberals-in-latest-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 1, 2019 |access-date=October 2, 2019 |archive-date=October 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191002232552/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/02/tories-hold-2-5-point-lead-over-liberals-in-latest-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36.0''' || 11.6 || 5.3 || 10.0 || 2.8 || ±2.06 pp || 2,259 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 1, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-01.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 1, 2019 |access-date=October 2, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205734/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-10-01.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.2''' || 33.9 || 15.2 || 4.5 || 10.2 || 1.8 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.3'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/01/conservatives-open-up-nearly-3-point-lead-in-latest-mainstreet-numbers/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 30, 2019 |access-date=October 1, 2019 |archive-date=October 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001193207/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/01/conservatives-open-up-nearly-3-point-lead-in-latest-mainstreet-numbers/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33.3 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36.1''' || 11.6 || 5.3 || 10.0 || 2.9 || ±2.1 pp || 2,183 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-30.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 30, 2019 |access-date=October 1, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205735/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-30.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 32.2 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.5''' || 14.3 || 4.4 || 11.1 || 3.0 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.3'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|September 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Federal-Politics-Oct-2-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=September 30, 2019 |access-date=October 2, 2019 |archive-date=October 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191002165704/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Federal-Politics-Oct-2-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 14 || 5 || 11 || 2 || ±2.48 pp || 1,558 || online || '''0'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|September 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019.10.1_Vote_October.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=September 30, 2019 |access-date=October 2, 2019 |archive-date=October 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191002012331/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019.10.1_Vote_October.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 14 || 7 || 8 || 3 || ±3 pp || 1,522 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|September 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Conservatives-Hold-Narrow-Lead-with-Liberals-Close-Behind |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=September 30, 2019 |access-date=October 1, 2019 |archive-date=December 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205110157/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Conservatives-Hold-Narrow-Lead-with-Liberals-Close-Behind |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 15 || 5 || 7 || 2 || ±2.9 pp || 1,489 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 29, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/30/liberals-conservatives-remain-in-extremely-close-race-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 29, 2019 |access-date=September 30, 2019 |archive-date=September 30, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190930232506/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/30/liberals-conservatives-remain-in-extremely-close-race-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.4''' || 34.1 || 10.9 || 5.6 || 10.5 || 3.4 || ±2.12 pp || 2,140 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 29, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-29.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 29, 2019 |access-date=September 30, 2019 |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210632/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-29.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 32.7 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.0''' || 13.2 || 4.1 || 12.6 || 2.5 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.3'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|September 29, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_september_30_2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=September 29, 2019 |access-date=September 30, 2019 |archive-date=September 30, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190930203631/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_september_30_2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.4''' || 31.1 || 11.4 || 3.0 || 13.4 || 5.1 || ±2.5 pp || 1,492 || telephone/IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.3'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 28, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/29/federal-horserace-continues-to-tighten-with-liberals-and-tories-deadlocked/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 28, 2019 |access-date=September 30, 2019 |archive-date=September 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190929233039/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/29/federal-horserace-continues-to-tighten-with-liberals-and-tories-deadlocked/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.0''' || 33.7 || 11.7 || 5.8 || 10.1 || 3.7 || ±2.06 pp || 2,270 (2/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 28, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-28.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 28, 2019 |access-date=September 29, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205740/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-28.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 32.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.2''' || 13.0 || 4.6 || 12.6 || 2.1 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 27, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-27.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 27, 2019 |access-date=September 28, 2019 |archive-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191020055042/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-27.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 32.6 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.1''' || 14.4 || 3.8 || 13.2 || 1.3 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.5'''
|-
| Research Co. || {{dts|September 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://researchco.ca/2019/09/27/you-know-the-way-to-stop-me-but-you-dont-have-the-discipline/ |title=poll |publisher=Research Co. |date=September 26, 2019 |access-date=September 28, 2019 |archive-date=September 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190928002651/https://researchco.ca/2019/09/27/you-know-the-way-to-stop-me-but-you-dont-have-the-discipline/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 33 || 15 || 5 || 9 || 2 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/27/tories-regain-2-point-lead-as-liberals-decline-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 26, 2019 |access-date=September 27, 2019 |archive-date=September 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190927232736/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/27/tories-regain-2-point-lead-as-liberals-decline-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33.4 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.6''' || 10.7 || 5.6 || 9.7 || 3.7 || ±1.98 pp || 2,436 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-26.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 26, 2019 |access-date=September 27, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205747/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-26.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.4''' || 33.7 || 15.0 || 4.4 || 10.5 || 1.8 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.7'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|September 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/a-better-week-for-trudeau-liberals/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=September 26, 2019 |access-date=September 27, 2019 |archive-date=September 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190927104955/https://abacusdata.ca/a-better-week-for-trudeau-liberals/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 33 || 15 || 5 || 10 || 2 || ±2.3 pp || 1,975 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 25, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/26/conservatives-open-up-larger-but-still-modest-lead-over-liberals-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 25, 2019 |access-date=September 26, 2019 |archive-date=September 26, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190926232337/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/26/conservatives-open-up-larger-but-still-modest-lead-over-liberals-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34.4 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.8''' || 10.7 || 5.5 || 9.2 || 3.4 || ±2.1 pp || 2,425 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 25, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-20190925.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 25, 2019 |access-date=September 26, 2019 |archive-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191021005529/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-20190925.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.5''' || 33.6 || 14.5 || 4.7 || 9.5 || 2.0 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.9'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|September 25, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Seat-Clusters.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=September 25, 2019 |access-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191007210917/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Seat-Clusters.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 31 || 14 || 5 || 10 || 5 || N/A || 2,302 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/25/liberals-gain-on-tories-to-return-national-race-to-virtual-tie-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 24, 2019 |access-date=September 25, 2019 |archive-date=September 25, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190925232245/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/25/liberals-gain-on-tories-to-return-national-race-to-virtual-tie-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 35.2 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.5''' || 10.8 || 5.2 || 9.3 || 2.9 || ±2.1 pp || 2,389 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-24.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 24, 2019 |access-date=September 25, 2019 |archive-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191021005529/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-2019-09-24.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 35.3 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.4''' || 12.7 || 5.5 || 8.8 || 2.1 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.1'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|September 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Federal-Politics-Sept-25-2019-COMPLETE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=September 24, 2019 |access-date=October 2, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006210124/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Federal-Politics-Sept-25-2019-COMPLETE.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || 33 || 13 || 5 || 11 || 4 || ±2.11 pp || 2,153 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|September 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Seat-Clusters.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=September 24, 2019 |access-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191007210917/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Seat-Clusters.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 34 || 12 || 5 || 10 || 4 || N/A || 2,496 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 23, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/24/tories-still-lead-though-liberals-regain-some-lost-ground-in-latest-mainstreet-numbers/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 23, 2019 |access-date=September 24, 2019 |archive-date=September 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190924232159/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/24/tories-still-lead-though-liberals-regain-some-lost-ground-in-latest-mainstreet-numbers/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34.4 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.9''' || 11.2 || 4.8 || 9.6 || || ±2.03 pp || 2,333 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 23, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-September-23-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 23, 2019 |access-date=September 24, 2019 |archive-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191021210320/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-September-23-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.1''' || 33.5 || 12.9 || 5.7 || 10.1 || 2.4 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.6'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|September 23, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019.09.23_post_trudeau_blackface.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=September 23, 2019 |access-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190923223245/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019.09.23_post_trudeau_blackface.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 15 || 6 || 11 || 3 || ±2.5 pp || 1,523 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|September 23, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Liberals-Stumble-Tories-Now-Ahead-Amid-Trudeau-Controversy-Over-Racially-Insensitive-Photo |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=September 23, 2019 |access-date=September 24, 2019 |archive-date=December 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205121218/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Liberals-Stumble-Tories-Now-Ahead-Amid-Trudeau-Controversy-Over-Racially-Insensitive-Photo |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 15 || 4 || 11 || 2 || ±2.9 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 22, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/23/conservatives-jump-to-2-point-lead-in-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 22, 2019 |access-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190923235210/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/23/conservatives-jump-to-2-point-lead-in-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33.7 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.8''' || || || || || ±2.1 pp || 2,168 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 22, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-September-22-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 22, 2019 |access-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205803/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-September-22-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 33.1 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.3''' || 12.8 || 5.8 || 10.6 || 2.9 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.2'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|September 22, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_september_23_2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=September 22, 2019 |access-date=September 24, 2019 |archive-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190923233803/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_september_23_2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32.0 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.3''' || 10.9 || 4.9 || 10.3 || 4.1 || ±2.8 pp || 1,272 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3.3'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|September 22, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/a-sensational-week-yet-a-tight-race-remains/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=September 22, 2019 |access-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-date=September 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190924005840/https://abacusdata.ca/a-sensational-week-yet-a-tight-race-remains/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 15 || 4 || 10 || 3 || ±2.3 pp || 1,929 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 21, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/22/liberals-fall-to-second-in-mainstreet-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 21, 2019 |access-date=September 22, 2019 |archive-date=September 22, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190922165636/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/22/liberals-fall-to-second-in-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.8''' || 11.4 || 4.9 || 10.7 || 3.6 || ±2.13 pp || 2,124 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.9'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|September 21, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/315e5a61-ccf8-4b8b-9fe7-aa29e29fd5d9Fed%20Horserace%20Sept%2021%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=September 21, 2019 |access-date=September 22, 2019 |archive-date=September 26, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190926205622/https://poll.forumresearch.com/data/315e5a61-ccf8-4b8b-9fe7-aa29e29fd5d9Fed%20Horserace%20Sept%2021%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 11 || 6 || 11 || 5 || ±3 pp || 2,449 || IVR || '''0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 21, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-COMBINED-September-21-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 21, 2019 |access-date=September 22, 2019 |archive-date=September 22, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190922113606/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-COMBINED-September-21-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 32.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.5''' || 14.0 || 5.3 || 9.5 || 2.2 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.6'''
|-
| DART/Maru || {{dts|September 20, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-Sept-23-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=DART/Maru |date=September 20, 2019 |access-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190923221647/https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-Sept-23-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 15 || 6 || 8 || 3 || ±2.9 pp || 1,520 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 20, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/21/liberals-slip-in-new-mainstreet-polling-numbers/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 20, 2019 |access-date=September 21, 2019 |archive-date=September 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190921232100/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/21/liberals-slip-in-new-mainstreet-polling-numbers/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.9''' || 34.2 || 10.9 || 4.8 || 10.4 || 3.1 || ±2.14 pp || 2,087 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 20, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ending-September-20-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 20, 2019 |access-date=September 21, 2019 |archive-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191020055042/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ending-September-20-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 32.0 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36.8''' || 13.7 || 5.4 || 9.0 || 2.4 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4.8'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/20/liberals-drop-marginally-in-new-mainstreet-polling-results/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 19, 2019 |access-date=September 20, 2019 |archive-date=September 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190920184034/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/20/liberals-drop-marginally-in-new-mainstreet-polling-results/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.8'''|| 34.2 || 10.1 || 4.7 || 9.8 || 3.7 || ±2.14 pp || 2,087 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-19-2019-MORNING-PACKAGE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 19, 2019 |access-date=September 20, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205833/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-19-2019-MORNING-PACKAGE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 34.2 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37.4''' || 12.8 || 3.5 || 9.3 || 2.4 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3.2'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/19/liberals-up-slightly-in-new-mainstreet-national-numbers/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 18, 2019 |access-date=September 19, 2019 |archive-date=September 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190919233222/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/19/liberals-up-slightly-in-new-mainstreet-national-numbers/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.2'''|| 34.4 || 9.8 || 4.4 || 10.1 || 3.3 || ±2.21 pp || 1,935 (2/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-18-2019-MORNING-PACKAGE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 18, 2019 |access-date=September 19, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205839/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-18-2019-MORNING-PACKAGE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 35.0 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37.8''' || 11.8 || 4.0 || 7.7 || 2.8 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-17-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 17, 2019 |access-date=September 18, 2019 |archive-date=October 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191021210317/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-17-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 35.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37.2''' || 13.6 || 4.0 || 7.0 || 1.7 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.7'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|September 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Federal-Politics-Sept-18-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=September 17, 2019 |access-date=September 20, 2019 |archive-date=September 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190920143229/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Federal-Politics-Sept-18-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || 33 || 12 || 5 || 11 || 4 || ±2.45 pp || 1,598 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/18/liberals-leading-tories-by-2-points-in-latest-mainstreet-national-numbers/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 16, 2019 |access-date=September 18, 2019 |archive-date=September 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190918233209/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/18/liberals-leading-tories-by-2-points-in-latest-mainstreet-national-numbers/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.8'''|| 34.8 || 9.7 || 4.5 || 9.4 || 3.8 || ±2.23 pp || 1,935 (1/3) || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-16-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 16, 2019 |access-date=September 17, 2019 |archive-date=November 11, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111192241/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-16-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.9''' || 15.4 || 4.7 || 6.5 || 1.8 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.0'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|September 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019.09.17_Leadership_Personality_Vote.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=September 16, 2019 |access-date=September 19, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006211055/https://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019.09.17_Leadership_Personality_Vote.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 13 || 5 || 9 || 4 || ±2.0 pp || 2,154 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 15, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/quito_maggi/status/1174137358666674176 |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 15, 2019 |access-date=September 18, 2019 |archive-date=September 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190918020114/https://twitter.com/quito_maggi/status/1174137358666674176 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/17/liberals-tories-deadlocked-as-first-week-of-campaign-comes-to-a-close-mainstreet-poll/ |title= poll |publisher=  |access-date= September 28, 2019 |archive-date= September 28, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190928070647/https://ipolitics.ca/2019/09/17/liberals-tories-deadlocked-as-first-week-of-campaign-comes-to-a-close-mainstreet-poll/ |url-status= live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.5'''|| 35.0 || 9.6 || 4.3 || 9.9 || 3.5 || ±2.23 pp || 1,935 || IVR (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 15, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-15-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 15, 2019 |access-date=September 16, 2019 |archive-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191020055042/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-15-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34.0 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.4''' || 16.4 || 4.4 || 7.8 || 2.3 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.4'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|September 15, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Seat-Clusters.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=September 15, 2019 |access-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-date=October 7, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191007210917/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Federal-Election-Seat-Clusters.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 32 || 14 || 4 || 11 || 4 || N/A || 1,622 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 14, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-14-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 14, 2019 |access-date=September 15, 2019 |archive-date=October 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191020055042/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-14-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.2''' || 32.3 || 16.6 || 3.8 || 9.6 || 2.0 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 (1/3) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.9'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|September 13, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Liberals-Conservatives-Dead-Heat-Election-Officially-Underway |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=September 13, 2019 |access-date=September 17, 2019 |archive-date=December 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205031040/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Liberals-Conservatives-Dead-Heat-Election-Officially-Underway |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 14 || 4 || 9 || 2 || ±2.2 pp || 2,562 || online/telephone|| '''0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 13, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-13-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 13, 2019 |access-date=September 14, 2019 |archive-date=November 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191127071646/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-ELXN-Ballot-Ending-September-13-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.4''' || 32.8 || 15.7 || 3.6 || 9.5 || 2.4 || ±2.8 pp || 1,200 || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.6'''
|-
| DART/Maru || {{dts|September 11, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-DTs-Sept-13-2019-DTs.pdf |title=poll |publisher=DART/Maru |date=September 11, 2019 |access-date=September 14, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205552/https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-DTs-Sept-13-2019-DTs.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 15 || 6 || 8 || 2 || ±2.9 pp || 1,517 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|September 11, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://poll.forumresearch.com/data/1d9659c0-79fa-4e7c-8246-45e0f565c42bFed%20Horserace%20Day%201%202019_final.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=September 11, 2019 |access-date=September 12, 2019 |archive-date=September 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190917170019/https://poll.forumresearch.com/data/1d9659c0-79fa-4e7c-8246-45e0f565c42bFed%20Horserace%20Day%201%202019_final.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32.4 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36.3''' || 8.6 || 4.1 || 11.6 || 4.9 || ±3 pp || 1,001 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3.9'''
|}

===Pre-campaign period===

[[File:Opinion polling during the pre-campaign period of 43rd Canadian federal election.svg|800px|thumb|left|Evolution of voting intentions according to polls conducted during the pre-campaign period of the 2019 Canadian federal election, graphed from the data in the table below. Trendlines are [[local regression]]s, with polls weighted by proximity in time and a [[Logarithmic growth|logarithmic function]] of sample size. 95% confidence ribbons represent uncertainty about the trendlines, not the likelihood that actual election results would fall within the intervals.]]
{{clear}}

{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Polling firm
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Last date<br />of polling{{ref label|order|1|1}}
! rowspan="2"| Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|5|5}}
! rowspan="2"| Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2"| Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2"| Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2"| Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number"|
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|September 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/elections-begins-with-a-tie-but-high-potential-for-shifts-during-the-campaign/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=September 10, 2019 |access-date=September 14, 2019 |archive-date=September 15, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190915220429/https://abacusdata.ca/elections-begins-with-a-tie-but-high-potential-for-shifts-during-the-campaign/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 15 || 4 || 10 || 3 || ±2.2 pp || 2,000 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|September 9, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Federal-Politics-Sept-11-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=September 9, 2019 |access-date=September 11, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006210130/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Federal-Politics-Sept-11-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 11 || 5 || 11 || 3 || ±2.49 pp || 1,546 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 8, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-open-up-lead-lpc-38-cpc-34-ndp-8-green-11/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 8, 2019 |access-date=September 10, 2019 |archive-date=September 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190910171401/https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-open-up-lead-lpc-38-cpc-34-ndp-8-green-11/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.5''' || 34.0 || 8.4 || 3.6 || 10.8 || 4.6 || ±2.26 pp || 1,876 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1775886&playlistId=1.4586558&binId=1.810401&playlistPageNum=1&binPageNum=1 |work=[[CTV News]] |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 6, 2019 |access-date=September 11, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205550/https://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1775886&playlistId=1.4586558&binId=1.810401&playlistPageNum=1&binPageNum=1 |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.6''' || 30.7 || 16.5 || 4.0 || 11.0 || 2.0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.9'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|September 5, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Tied-Overall-Tied-in-Ontario |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=September 5, 2019 |access-date=September 7, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205909/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Tied-Overall-Tied-in-Ontario |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 12 || 4 || 12 || 2 || ±2.14 pp || 2,094 || online || '''0'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|September 5, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-Federal-Election-Seat-Clusters.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=September 5, 2019 |access-date=September 9, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205629/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-Federal-Election-Seat-Clusters.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 13 || 5 || 11 || 5 || N/A || 3,236 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.hilltimes.com/2019/09/09/choose-your-poison-ballot-question-for-canadians-in-oct-21-federal-election-says-pollster-nanos/213988 |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 30, 2019 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20191209165123/https://www.hilltimes.com/2019/09/09/choose-your-poison-ballot-question-for-canadians-in-oct-21-federal-election-says-pollster-nanos/213988 |archive-date=9 December 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.4''' || 31.3 || 15.7 || 4.4 || 10.3 || 1.6 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.1'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|August 29, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_august_27_29_2019a.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=August 29, 2019 |access-date=September 9, 2019 |archive-date=September 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190910165153/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_august_27_29_2019a.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.2''' || 32.9 || 7.2 || 5.5 || 10.4 || 4.3 || ±3.3 pp || 902 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.3'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|August 29, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Federal-Politics-August-31-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=August 29, 2019 |access-date=September 3, 2019 |archive-date=September 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190903132755/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Federal-Politics-August-31-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || 33 || 12 || 5 || 12 || 3 || ±2.14 pp || 2,102 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|August 29, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/a-tale-of-two-or-more-races/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=August 29, 2019 |access-date=September 5, 2019 |archive-date=September 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190906205814/https://abacusdata.ca/a-tale-of-two-or-more-races/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 17 || 4 || 9 || 3 || ±1.5 pp || 4,549 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|August 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/2019.08.28_Federal_Vote_August.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=August 26, 2019 |access-date=August 29, 2019 |archive-date=August 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190829133426/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/2019.08.28_Federal_Vote_August.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 14 || 4 || 9 || 4 || ±2.5 pp || 1,534 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 23, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiMzliMWFiZGYtYmY4MS00OTM3LWFkZmMtNWM2M2MxNWJmNjhiIiwidCI6IjJmMmY5NDEyLWY5YjktNDE0ZC1iMDBmLTc4NjJhMzk1YjQxOCIsImMiOjN9 |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 23, 2019 |access-date=September 13, 2019 |archive-date=September 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190920230930/https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiMzliMWFiZGYtYmY4MS00OTM3LWFkZmMtNWM2M2MxNWJmNjhiIiwidCI6IjJmMmY5NDEyLWY5YjktNDE0ZC1iMDBmLTc4NjJhMzk1YjQxOCIsImMiOjN9 |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.66''' || 33.65 || 14.87 || 4.17 || 9.41 || 2.09
| ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.01'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|August 22, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_august_20_22_2019a.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=August 22, 2019 |access-date=September 9, 2019 |archive-date=September 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190910165152/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_august_20_22_2019a.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33.1 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.1''' || 10.4 || 5.1 || 11.2 || 3.7 || ±2.9 pp || 1,182 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.0'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|August 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Federal-Politics-August-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=August 19, 2019 |access-date=August 21, 2019 |archive-date=August 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190821135815/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Federal-Politics-August-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 11 || 4 || 13 || 4 || ±2.5 pp || 1,535 || online || '''0'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|August 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Conservatives-Liberals-Dead-Heat-Ethics-Review-Fails-to-Move-Voters |title= poll |publisher=  |access-date= August 20, 2019 |archive-date= August 20, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190820121858/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Conservatives-Liberals-Dead-Heat-Ethics-Review-Fails-to-Move-Voters |url-status= live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 18 || 3 || 9 || 1 || ±3.5 pp || 1,001 || online|| {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|August 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/what-impact-did-the-ethics-commissioners-report-have-on-the-political-landscape-not-much-it-seems/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=August 19, 2019 |access-date=August 21, 2019 |archive-date=August 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190821144856/https://abacusdata.ca/what-impact-did-the-ethics-commissioners-report-have-on-the-political-landscape-not-much-it-seems/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32''' || 17 || 4 || 10 || 3 || ±2.2 pp || 2,152 || online || '''0'''
|-
| DART/Maru || {{dts|August 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-August-21-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=DART/Maru |date=August 17, 2019 |access-date=August 21, 2019 |archive-date=August 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190821134408/https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-August-21-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''39''' || 15 || 5 || 7 || 1 || ±2.9 pp || 1,512 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiMzliMWFiZGYtYmY4MS00OTM3LWFkZmMtNWM2M2MxNWJmNjhiIiwidCI6IjJmMmY5NDEyLWY5YjktNDE0ZC1iMDBmLTc4NjJhMzk1YjQxOCIsImMiOjN9 |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 16, 2019 |access-date=September 13, 2019 |archive-date=September 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190920230930/https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiMzliMWFiZGYtYmY4MS00OTM3LWFkZmMtNWM2M2MxNWJmNjhiIiwidCI6IjJmMmY5NDEyLWY5YjktNDE0ZC1iMDBmLTc4NjJhMzk1YjQxOCIsImMiOjN9 |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.61''' || 31.41 || 14.58 || 4.16 || 10.00 || 1.68
| ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.20'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|August 13, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Conservatives-and-Liberals-battling-for-lead-in-run-up-to-election |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=August 13, 2019 |access-date=August 15, 2019 |archive-date=August 15, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190815114549/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Conservatives-and-Liberals-battling-for-lead-in-run-up-to-election |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 13 || 4 || 12 || 3 || ±2 pp || 2,365 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 9, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiMzliMWFiZGYtYmY4MS00OTM3LWFkZmMtNWM2M2MxNWJmNjhiIiwidCI6IjJmMmY5NDEyLWY5YjktNDE0ZC1iMDBmLTc4NjJhMzk1YjQxOCIsImMiOjN9 |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 9, 2019 |access-date=September 13, 2019 |archive-date=September 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190920230930/https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiMzliMWFiZGYtYmY4MS00OTM3LWFkZmMtNWM2M2MxNWJmNjhiIiwidCI6IjJmMmY5NDEyLWY5YjktNDE0ZC1iMDBmLTc4NjJhMzk1YjQxOCIsImMiOjN9 |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.00''' || 32.46 || 14.75 || 3.69 || 9.80 || 1.33
| ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.54'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|August 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite news |url=https://abacusdata.ca/dead-heat-in-national-support-as-the-federal-election-approaches/ |title=poll |newspaper=[[Abacus Data]] |date=August 6, 2019 |access-date=August 10, 2019 |archive-date=August 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190810134738/https://abacusdata.ca/dead-heat-in-national-support-as-the-federal-election-approaches/ |url-status=live |last1=Anderson |first1=David Coletto }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 17 || 4 || 10 || 3 || ±2.7 pp || 1,422 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 2, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/CTV_PowerPlay/status/1168996936822722562 |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 2, 2019 |access-date=September 3, 2019 |archive-date=September 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190906205910/https://twitter.com/CTV_PowerPlay/status/1168996936822722562 |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.7''' || 30.8 || 16.1 || 3.7 || 9.3 || 1.4 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/2) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.9'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|July 31, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/liberals-and-conservatives-in-dead-heat-lpc-35-cpc-34-ndp-11-green11/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=July 31, 2019 |access-date=August 7, 2019 |archive-date=August 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190809200933/https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/liberals-and-conservatives-in-dead-heat-lpc-35-cpc-34-ndp-11-green11/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.5''' || 34.1 || 11.1 || 4.4 || 11.1 || 3.3 || ±1.97 pp || 2,463 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.4'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|July 31, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CanadaThisMonth_Political-Landscape-July-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=July 31, 2019 |access-date=August 9, 2019 |archive-date=August 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190809195006/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CanadaThisMonth_Political-Landscape-July-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 32 || 14 || 4 || 10 || 4 || N/A || 1,804 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|July 28, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.forumpoll.com/data/24962dea-4d88-45f8-840b-34f32aef44feFed%20Horserace%20July%2030%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=July 28, 2019 |access-date=July 30, 2019 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827161914/http://www.forumpoll.com/data/24962dea-4d88-45f8-840b-34f32aef44feFed%20Horserace%20July%2030%202019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 12 || 5 || 12 || 5 || ±3 pp || 1,733 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|July 25, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_july_23_25_2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=July 25, 2019 |access-date=September 10, 2019 |archive-date=September 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190910232540/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_july_23_25_2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30.6 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36.0''' || 9.9 || 4.6 || 12.9 || 3.8 || ±2.9 pp || 1,115 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5.4'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|July 23, 2019}} || <ref name="auto109">{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Federal-Politics-July-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=July 23, 2019 |access-date=July 26, 2019 |archive-date=July 26, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190726133420/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Federal-Politics-July-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 11 || 4 || 12 || 3 || ±2.5 pp || 1,536 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|July 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_july_16_18_2019a.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=July 18, 2019 |access-date=September 9, 2019 |archive-date=September 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190910165151/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_july_16_18_2019a.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.6''' || 31.3 || 12.5 || 3.1 || 12.5 || 4.8 || ±2.9 pp || 1,186 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/CanadianPolling/status/1153677390482149378 |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 19, 2019 |access-date=July 23, 2019 |archive-date=August 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190806071334/https://twitter.com/CanadianPolling/status/1153677390482149378 |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.6''' || 30.0 || 18.6 || 4.0 || 9.0 || 1.4 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.6'''
|-
| Research Co. || {{dts|July 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://researchco.ca/2019/07/24/no-tears-party-time-is-here-again/ |title=poll |publisher=Research Co. |date=July 17, 2019 |access-date=July 23, 2019 |archive-date=August 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190801133824/https://researchco.ca/2019/07/24/no-tears-party-time-is-here-again/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || 31 || 17 || 4 || 10 || 3 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|July 17, 2019}} || <ref name="auto97">{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/liberals-and-conservatives-deadlocked-at-32/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=July 17, 2019 |access-date=July 22, 2019 |archive-date=August 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190802233650/https://abacusdata.ca/liberals-and-conservatives-deadlocked-at-32/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32''' || 16 || 4 || 11 || 3 || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || '''0'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|July 15, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Federal-Conservatives-Liberals-Locked-in-Holding-Pattern |title= poll |publisher=  |access-date= July 18, 2019 |archive-date= July 17, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190717182747/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Federal-Conservatives-Liberals-Locked-in-Holding-Pattern |url-status= live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 18 || 5 || 7 || 1 || ±3.5 pp || 1,000 || online|| {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''6'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|July 12, 2019}} || <ref name="auto70">{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Liberals-take-a-slim-lead-as-the-Greens-and-NDP-battle-for-third |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=July 12, 2019 |access-date=July 15, 2019 |archive-date=July 15, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190715200552/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Liberals-take-a-slim-lead-as-the-Greens-and-NDP-battle-for-third |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || 32 || 14 || 4 || 14 || 3 || ±2.3 pp || 1,896 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|July 12, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019.07.15_Federal-Vote-Intention.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=July 12, 2019 |access-date=July 16, 2019 |archive-date=July 16, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190716114222/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019.07.15_Federal-Vote-Intention.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 14 || 4 || 10 || 2 || ±2.0 pp || 2,361 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 12, 2019}} || <ref name="auto114">{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Political-Package-2019-07-12.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 12, 2019 |access-date=July 16, 2019 |archive-date=July 16, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190716113853/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Political-Package-2019-07-12.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.9''' || 29.7 || 18.5 || 4.8 || 8.3 || 1.5 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.2'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|July 8, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_july_6_8_2019a.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=July 8, 2019 |access-date=September 9, 2019 |archive-date=September 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190910165150/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_july_6_8_2019a.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30.7 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.3''' || 10.8|| 5.0 || 14.9 || 4.2 || ±3.2 pp || 948 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1.6'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|July 8, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CanadaThisMonth_Political-Landscape-July-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=July 8, 2019 |access-date=August 9, 2019 |archive-date=August 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190809195006/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CanadaThisMonth_Political-Landscape-July-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 32 || 12 || 4 || 11 || 5 || N/A || 2,515 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 5, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Political-Package-2019-07-05-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 5, 2019 |access-date=July 9, 2019 |archive-date=July 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709151936/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Political-Package-2019-07-05-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.6''' || 30.4 || 17.9 || 4.9 || 8.8 || 1.6 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.2'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|July 2, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/tight-race-between-conservatives-and-liberals-continues-as-voter-fluidity-remains-high/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=July 2, 2019 |access-date=July 6, 2019 |archive-date=July 8, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190708203804/https://abacusdata.ca/tight-race-between-conservatives-and-liberals-continues-as-voter-fluidity-remains-high/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 16 || 4 || 11 || 3 || ±1.8 pp || 3,092 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|July 2, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-regain-lead-lpc-35-cpc-33-ndp-10-green-10/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=July 2, 2019 |access-date=July 10, 2019 |archive-date=July 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190710150754/https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-regain-lead-lpc-35-cpc-33-ndp-10-green-10/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.0''' || 33.2 || 10.4 || 4.5 || 10.3 || 4.6 || ±1.9 pp || 2,651 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.8'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|June 29, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://blog.338canada.com/2019/06/338canada-battleground-ontario-is.html |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=June 29, 2019 |access-date=July 1, 2019 |archive-date=July 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190701022304/https://blog.338canada.com/2019/06/338canada-battleground-ontario-is.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 31.6 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.1''' || 9.7 || 3.8 || 12.6 || 5.7 || N/A || 1,194 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 28, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/20190628-Political-Package.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 28, 2019 |access-date=July 9, 2019 |archive-date=July 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709112356/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/20190628-Political-Package.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.5''' || 31.7 || 16.5 || 4.6 || 9.8 || | 0.9 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.8'''
|-
| DART/Maru || {{dts|June 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-July-2-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=DART/Maru |date=June 26, 2019 |access-date=July 17, 2019 |archive-date=July 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190717131250/https://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/SunPostMedia-Fed-Vote-July-2-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 17 || 5 || 7 || 1 || ±2.9 pp || 1,512 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|June 23, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/9fdd6cd9-5a73-49c6-b617-5ab1257a7f3dHorserace%20release%20June%2024%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=June 23, 2019 |access-date=June 26, 2019 |archive-date=July 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190719173016/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/9fdd6cd9-5a73-49c6-b617-5ab1257a7f3dHorserace%20release%20June%2024%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 29 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 13 || 5 || 12 || 4 || ±3 pp || 1,539 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 21, 2019}} || <ref name="auto93">{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Political-Package-2019-06-21-FR3.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 21, 2019 |access-date=July 2, 2019 |archive-date=July 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190702041549/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Political-Package-2019-06-21-FR3.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''32.8''' || 16.9 || 4.9 || 10.2 || 0.7|| ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.3'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|June 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_june_17_2019a.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=June 17, 2019 |access-date=June 18, 2019 |archive-date=June 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190618110226/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_june_17_2019a.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30.1 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.2''' || 12.0 || 4.3 || 13.2 || 3.6 || ±2.0 pp || 2,491 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 14, 2019}} || <ref name="auto52">{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Political-Package-2019-06-14-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 14, 2019 |access-date=June 18, 2019 |archive-date=June 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190618110227/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Political-Package-2019-06-14-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30.3 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.0''' || 16.8 || 4.6 || 11.4 || 0.7 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3.7'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|June 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Federal-Politics-June-2019-Voting-Intention.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=June 10, 2019 |access-date=June 14, 2019 |archive-date=June 15, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190615064139/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Federal-Politics-June-2019-Voting-Intention.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 29 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 13 || 4 || 11 || 3 || ±2.5 pp || 1,528 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|June 7, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Summer-Pre-Campaign-Looms-Liberals-Trail-Conservatives |title= poll |publisher=  |access-date= June 14, 2019 |archive-date= July 7, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190707131119/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Summer-Pre-Campaign-Looms-Liberals-Trail-Conservatives |url-status= live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 18 || 5 || 6 || || ±3.5 pp || 1,003 || online|| {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 7, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Political-Package-2019-06-07-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 7, 2019 |access-date=June 11, 2019 |archive-date=June 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190614134105/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Political-Package-2019-06-07-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.2''' || 16.9 || 4.0 || 11.3 || 0.8 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3.3'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|June 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Deadlock-continues-as-the-Green-Party-closes-in-on-the-NDP |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=June 6, 2019 |access-date=June 9, 2019 |archive-date=July 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709050418/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Deadlock-continues-as-the-Green-Party-closes-in-on-the-NDP |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 14 || 4 || 12 || 2 || ±1.9 pp || 2,735 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|June 4, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2019.06.09_Federal-Vote-Intention.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=June 4, 2019 |access-date=June 10, 2019 |archive-date=July 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190719173714/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2019.06.09_Federal-Vote-Intention.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 26 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 15 || 5 || 12 || 4 || ±2 pp || 4,698 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''11'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|June 2, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/cf5f57b7-9591-4d11-bb10-db56138287d3Horserace%20News%20Release%20June%2011th%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=June 2, 2019 |access-date=June 12, 2019 |archive-date=July 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190719173143/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/cf5f57b7-9591-4d11-bb10-db56138287d3Horserace%20News%20Release%20June%2011th%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 13 || 6 || 13 || 4 || ±3 pp || 1,633 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 31, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Political-Package-2019-05-31-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 31, 2019 |access-date=June 4, 2019 |archive-date=June 4, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190604123543/https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Political-Package-2019-05-31-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 29.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.3''' || 16.4 || 4.4 || 11.5 || 0.8 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4.8'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|May 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CanadaThisMonth_Political-Landscape-July-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=May 30, 2019 |access-date=August 9, 2019 |archive-date=August 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190809195006/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CanadaThisMonth_Political-Landscape-July-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 12 || 5 || 13 || || N/A || 1,691 || online || '''0'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|May 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/liberals-and-conservatives-neck-and-neck-as-greens-rise-to-12/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=May 30, 2019 |access-date=June 1, 2019 |archive-date=June 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190601223023/https://abacusdata.ca/liberals-and-conservatives-neck-and-neck-as-greens-rise-to-12/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || 32 || 16 || 3 || 12 || 3|| ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Political-Package-2019-05-24-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 24, 2019 |access-date=May 27, 2019 |archive-date=May 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190527225319/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Political-Package-2019-05-24-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 29.2 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.8''' || 15.6 || 4.7 || 11.5 || 1.6 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 17, 2019}} || <ref name="auto4">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Political-Package-2019-05-17-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 17, 2019 |access-date=May 21, 2019 |archive-date=May 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190528133006/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Political-Package-2019-05-17-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30.6 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.9''' || 14.2 || 4.0 || 11.1 || 1.1 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Political-Package-2019-05-10-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 10, 2019 |access-date=May 13, 2019 |archive-date=May 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190513160933/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Political-Package-2019-05-10-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 29.7 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.4''' || 15.0 || 4.4 || 11.3 || 0.9 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 3, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Political-Package-2019-05-03-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 3, 2019 |access-date=May 6, 2019 |archive-date=May 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190506233031/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Political-Package-2019-05-03-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31.8 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.5''' || 15.9 || 4.6 || 9.7 || 0.9 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.7'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|May 1, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2019/05/03/Conservatives-maintain-their-lead |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=May 1, 2019 |access-date=May 6, 2019 |archive-date=May 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190506111751/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2019/05/03/Conservatives-maintain-their-lead |url-status=live }}</ref>
|| 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 17 || 3 || 10 || 2 || ±2.6 pp || 1,471 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|April 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/2019.05.02_Federal_May_2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=April 30, 2019 |access-date=May 3, 2019 |archive-date=May 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190503133917/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/2019.05.02_Federal_May_2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 25 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 18 || 5 || 11 || 3 || ±2.5 pp || 1,525 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''13'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|April 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/conservatives-lead-as-2015-liberal-coalition-splinters/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=April 30, 2019 |access-date=May 7, 2019 |archive-date=May 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190509222108/https://abacusdata.ca/conservatives-lead-as-2015-liberal-coalition-splinters/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 17 || 4 || 9 || 3|| ±1.5 pp || 4,015 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Political-Package-2019-04-26.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 26, 2019 |access-date=April 30, 2019 |archive-date=April 30, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190430112312/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Political-Package-2019-04-26.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 32.0 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.9''' || 16.5 || 4.1 || 9.0 || 0.5 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.9'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|April 25, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Liberals-Regain-some-Ground-Against-Conservatives |title= poll |publisher=  |access-date= April 27, 2019 |archive-date= April 27, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190427114854/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Liberals-Regain-some-Ground-Against-Conservatives |url-status= live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 19 || 5 || || || ±3.5 pp || 1,000 || online|| {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|April 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/b28ad49a-2038-4e13-bbd6-11e56c8a4008Horserace%20April%2029%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=April 24, 2019 |access-date=May 1, 2019 |archive-date=May 7, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190507022459/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/b28ad49a-2038-4e13-bbd6-11e56c8a4008Horserace%20April%2029%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 14 || 6 || 9 || 2 || ±3 pp || 1,595 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|April 22, 2019}} || <ref name="auto22">{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Federal-Politics-April-28-2019-Voting-Intention.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=April 22, 2019 |access-date=April 29, 2019 |archive-date=May 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502111712/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Federal-Politics-April-28-2019-Voting-Intention.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 27 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''40''' || 12 || 5 || 11 || 3 || ±2.5 pp || 1,522 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''13'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Political-Package-2019-04-18-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 18, 2019 |access-date=April 23, 2019 |archive-date=April 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190423133255/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Political-Package-2019-04-18-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33.0 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.5''' || 15.2 || 4.7 || 8.4 || 0.8 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 12, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Political-Package-2019-04-12-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 12, 2019 |access-date=April 15, 2019 |archive-date=April 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429190008/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Political-Package-2019-04-12-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34.1 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.0''' || 14.9 || 4.5 || 8.8 || 0.7 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.9'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|April 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/CanadaThisMonth_SNCLavalin-April-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=April 10, 2019 |access-date=April 15, 2019 |archive-date=April 15, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190415220804/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/CanadaThisMonth_SNCLavalin-April-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 32 || 13 || 4 || 10 || || N/A || 2,527 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|April 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/63c60d6a-b688-48df-9b68-9f4b343e55a2HORSERACE%20April%2011%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=April 6, 2019 |access-date=April 15, 2019 |archive-date=April 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429190034/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/63c60d6a-b688-48df-9b68-9f4b343e55a2HORSERACE%20April%2011%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 29 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''42''' || 12 || 6 || 9 || 2 || ±3 pp || 1,634 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''13'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|April 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2019/04/08/62-of-Canadians-will-not-consider-voting-for-the-Federal-Liberals |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=April 6, 2019 |access-date=April 12, 2019 |archive-date=April 12, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412160035/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2019/04/08/62-of-Canadians-will-not-consider-voting-for-the-Federal-Liberals |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 15 || 5 || 10 || 3 || ±2.2 pp || 2,035 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 5, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Political-Package-2019-04-05-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 5, 2019 |access-date=April 10, 2019 |archive-date=April 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429190106/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Political-Package-2019-04-05-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32.8 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.9''' || 16.6 || 4.0 || 9.5 || 0.5 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 29, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Political-Package-2019-03-29.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 29, 2019 |access-date=April 2, 2019 |archive-date=April 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402110611/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Political-Package-2019-03-29.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34.6 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.1''' || 16.6 || 4.4 || 8.1 || 0.5 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.5'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|March 27, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/conservatives-hold-lead-over-liberals-snc-lavalin |title= poll |publisher=  |access-date= March 29, 2019 |archive-date= March 29, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190329173125/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/conservatives-hold-lead-over-liberals-snc-lavalin |url-status= live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''40''' || 21 || 5 || || || ±3.5 pp || 1,002 || online|| {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''10'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|March 25, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/scheer-conservatives-take-lead-cpc-37-lpc-35-ndp-12-green-8/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=March 25, 2019 |access-date=March 31, 2019 |archive-date=March 31, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190331130619/https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/scheer-conservatives-take-lead-cpc-37-lpc-35-ndp-12-green-8/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 35.0 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37.4''' || 11.6 || 3.1 || 7.9 || 3.8 || ±1.06 pp || 8,501 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.4'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|March 25, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/2019.03.26-federal-release.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=March 25, 2019 |access-date=March 28, 2019 |archive-date=March 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328132415/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/2019.03.26-federal-release.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 28 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 17 || 5 || 8 || 4 || ±2 pp || 5,807 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 22, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Political-Package-2019-03-22-Slides.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 22, 2019 |access-date=March 26, 2019 |archive-date=March 26, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190326131601/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Political-Package-2019-03-22-Slides.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 32.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.6''' || 19.4 || 3.9 || 8.3 || 0.6 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.1'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|March 20, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/31630b1e-c146-45d5-8929-caa6cdcd7bd7Federal%20Horserace%20March%2021%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=March 20, 2019 |access-date=March 25, 2019 |archive-date=April 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190401022052/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/31630b1e-c146-45d5-8929-caa6cdcd7bd7Federal%20Horserace%20March%2021%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 35 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''41''' || 14 || 1 || 6 || 2 || ±3 pp || 1,490 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|March 20, 2019}} || <ref name="auto37">{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Federal-Politics-March-21-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=March 20, 2019 |access-date=March 21, 2019 |archive-date=March 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190321233621/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Federal-Politics-March-21-2019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 14 || 4 || 10 || 3 || ±2.51 pp || 1,513 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 15, 2019}} || <ref name="auto61">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Political-Package-2019-03-15-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 15, 2019 |access-date=March 22, 2019 |archive-date=March 22, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190322021813/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Political-Package-2019-03-15-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32.6 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.5''' || 19.9 || 3.2 || 7.7 || 0.5 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2.9'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/Colettod/status/1105106279154966529 |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 10, 2019 |access-date=March 11, 2019 |archive-date=July 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190719172516/https://twitter.com/Colettod/status/1105106279154966529 |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 16 || 4 || 11 || || ±3.3 pp || 900 (1/3) || online (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|March 10, 2019}} || <ref name="auto63">{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2019/03/13/Prime-Ministers-approval-rating-plunges-in-wake-of-SNC-Lavalin-Affair |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=March 10, 2019 |access-date=March 14, 2019 |archive-date=March 16, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190316195139/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2019/03/13/Prime-Ministers-approval-rating-plunges-in-wake-of-SNC-Lavalin-Affair |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 16 || 4 || 10 || 2 || ±2.5 pp || 1,893 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 9, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 9, 2019 |access-date=March 10, 2019 |archive-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190313050519/https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 16 || 4 || 11 || || ±3.3 pp || 900 (1/3) || online (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 8, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 8, 2019 |access-date=March 10, 2019 |archive-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190313050519/https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 15 || 5 || 10 || || ±3.3 pp || 900 (1/3) || online (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 8, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Political-Package-2019-03-08-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 8, 2019 |access-date=March 12, 2019 |archive-date=April 30, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190430005104/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Political-Package-2019-03-08-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36.1''' || 17.9 || 3.6 || 8.3 || 0.5 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3.2'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 7, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 7, 2019 |access-date=March 10, 2019 |archive-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190313050519/https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 16 || 4 || 10 || || ±3.3 pp || 900 (1/3) || online (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 6, 2019 |access-date=March 10, 2019 |archive-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190313050519/https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 18 || 4 || 9 || || ±3.3 pp || 900 (1/3) || online (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 5, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 5, 2019 |access-date=March 10, 2019 |archive-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190313050519/https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 17 || 4 || 9 || || ±3.3 pp || 900 (1/3) || online (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|March 4, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CanadaThisMonth_SNCLavalin.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=March 4, 2019 |access-date=March 6, 2019 |archive-date=March 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190306111555/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CanadaThisMonth_SNCLavalin.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 32 || 13 || 5 || 9 || 5 || N/A || 2,122 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|March 4, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Liberals-Shed-Support-Tories-Capitalize-in-Wake-of-Jody-Wilson-Raybould-Testimony |title= poll |publisher=  |access-date= March 5, 2019 |archive-date= March 6, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190306043025/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Liberals-Shed-Support-Tories-Capitalize-in-Wake-of-Jody-Wilson-Raybould-Testimony |url-status= live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''40''' || 20 || 4 || 4 || 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,000 || online|| {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 4, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/has-the-snc-lavalin-wilson-raybould-controversy-impacted-public-opinion/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 4, 2019 |access-date=March 6, 2019 |archive-date=July 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190719173110/https://abacusdata.ca/has-the-snc-lavalin-wilson-raybould-controversy-impacted-public-opinion/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 17 || 5 || 9 || || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 1, 2019}} || <ref name="auto44">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Political-Package-2019-03-01-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 1, 2019 |access-date=March 22, 2019 |archive-date=March 22, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190322024640/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Political-Package-2019-03-01-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34.2 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.7''' || 15.5 || 3.6 || 9.1 || 0.7 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.5'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|February 28, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/947bc454-04dc-4398-a96e-b49657d834acHorserace%20Fed%20March%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=February 28, 2019 |access-date=March 6, 2019 |archive-date=March 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190306235120/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/947bc454-04dc-4398-a96e-b49657d834acHorserace%20Fed%20March%202019.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''42''' || 12 || 3 || 5 || 4 || ±3 pp || 1,301 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|February 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/has-the-snc-lavalin-wilson-raybould-controversy-impacted-public-opinion/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=February 26, 2019 |access-date=March 6, 2019 |archive-date=July 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190719173110/https://abacusdata.ca/has-the-snc-lavalin-wilson-raybould-controversy-impacted-public-opinion/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 17 || 4 || 9 || || ±2.1 pp || 2,374 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|February 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019.02.25-SNC-vote-intention.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=February 24, 2019 |access-date=February 26, 2019 |archive-date=February 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227060130/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019.02.25-SNC-vote-intention.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 14 || 5 || 8 || || ±3.1 pp || 1,009 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 22, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Political-Package-2019-02-22.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 22, 2019 |access-date=February 26, 2019 |archive-date=February 26, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190226234115/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Political-Package-2019-02-22.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.7''' || 33.6 || 15.0 || 3.7 || 8.4 || 1.2 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.1'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|February 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Federal-Politics-February-2019-FINAL.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=February 19, 2019 |access-date=February 20, 2019 |archive-date=February 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190221112106/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Federal-Politics-February-2019-FINAL.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 12 || 5 || 8 || 4 || ±2.51 pp || 1,529 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|February 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Liberal-Re-Election-Chances-in-Jeopardy |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=February 18, 2019 |access-date=February 20, 2019 |archive-date=February 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190220235858/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Liberal-Re-Election-Chances-in-Jeopardy |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 17 || 6 || || || ±3.5 pp || 1,002 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 15, 2019}} || <ref name="auto16">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Political-Package-2019-02-15-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 15, 2019 |access-date=February 19, 2019 |archive-date=February 20, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190220003112/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Political-Package-2019-02-15-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.9''' || 31.8 || 13.7 || 4.1 || 7.8 || 1.5 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.1'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|February 11, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/has-the-snc-lavalin-wilson-raybould-controversy-impacted-public-opinion/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=February 11, 2019 |access-date=March 6, 2019 |archive-date=July 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190719173110/https://abacusdata.ca/has-the-snc-lavalin-wilson-raybould-controversy-impacted-public-opinion/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 15 || 4 || 9 || || ±2.0 pp || 2,500 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|February 11, 2019}} || <ref name="auto55">{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2019/02/13/Conservative-Party-has-a-clear-lead-over-the-Liberal-Party-just-8-months-out-from-the-election |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=February 11, 2019 |access-date=February 15, 2019 |archive-date=February 16, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190216153306/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2019/02/13/Conservative-Party-has-a-clear-lead-over-the-Liberal-Party-just-8-months-out-from-the-election |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 14 || 5 || 7 || 3 || ±2.5 pp || 1,590 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 8, 2019}} || <ref name="auto53">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Political-Package-2019-02-08-FR-Slides.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 8, 2019 |access-date=February 12, 2019 |archive-date=February 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190213005644/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Political-Package-2019-02-08-FR-Slides.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.5''' || 34.4 || 13.0 || 3.8 || 7.4 || 1.7 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.1'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|February 5, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/has-the-snc-lavalin-wilson-raybould-controversy-impacted-public-opinion/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=February 5, 2019 |access-date=March 6, 2019 |archive-date=July 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190719173110/https://abacusdata.ca/has-the-snc-lavalin-wilson-raybould-controversy-impacted-public-opinion/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 17 || 4 || 8 || || ±2.0 pp || 2,500 || online || '''0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 1, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019-02-01-Political-Package-Slides.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 1, 2019 |access-date=February 5, 2019 |archive-date=February 7, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190207015215/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019-02-01-Political-Package-Slides.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.6''' || 35.9 || 13.2 || 3.1 || 7.9 || 1.7 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 25, 2019}} || <ref name="auto51">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Political-Package-2019-01-25-FR-Slides.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 25, 2019 |access-date=January 29, 2019 |archive-date=January 30, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190130000245/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Political-Package-2019-01-25-FR-Slides.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.6''' || 36.6 || 12.8 || 3.0 || 8.1 || 1.2 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.0'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|January 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/No-Margin-for-Error-PAAC-Forum-Presentation.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=January 24, 2019 |access-date=February 13, 2019 |archive-date=February 12, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190212130818/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/No-Margin-for-Error-PAAC-Forum-Presentation.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 32 || 12 || 5 || 8 || 4 || N/A || 2,451 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|January 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-hold-a-narrow-lead-over-scheer-conservatives/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=January 18, 2019 |access-date=January 31, 2019 |archive-date=February 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190201013303/https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-hold-a-narrow-lead-over-scheer-conservatives/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.2''' || 35.1 || 11.5 || 3.2 || 7.2 || 4.2 || ±1.1 pp || 7,941 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 18, 2019}} || <ref name="auto100">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Political-Package-2019-01-18-Slides.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 18, 2019 |access-date=January 22, 2019 |archive-date=January 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190123010234/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Political-Package-2019-01-18-Slides.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.2''' || 36.1 || 14.2 || 3.2 || 7.4 || 1.5 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.1'''
|-
| colspan="13" style="text-align:center;" |'''Yves-François Blanchet is acclaimed leader of the Bloc Québécois (January 17, 2019)'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 11, 2019}} || <ref name="auto85">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2019-01-11-Political-Package-Slides.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 11, 2019 |access-date=January 14, 2019 |archive-date=January 15, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190115023627/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2019-01-11-Political-Package-Slides.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.1''' || 33.9 || 15.4 || 3.3 || 6.9 || 1.6 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.2'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|January 7, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/No-Margin-for-Error-PAAC-Forum-Presentation.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=January 7, 2019 |access-date=February 13, 2019 |archive-date=February 12, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190212130818/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/No-Margin-for-Error-PAAC-Forum-Presentation.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 33 || 15 || 5 || 8 || 4 || N/A || 2,700 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 4, 2019}} || <ref name="auto91">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2019-01-04-Political-Package-Slides.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 4, 2019 |access-date=January 8, 2019 |archive-date=January 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190109011850/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2019-01-04-Political-Package-Slides.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.7''' || 33.3 || 16.7 || 3.0 || 6.0 || 1.4 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 28, 2018}} || <ref name="auto34">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Political-Package-2018-12-28.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 28, 2018 |access-date=January 2, 2019 |archive-date=January 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190102193441/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Political-Package-2018-12-28.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.8''' || 34.4 || 16.1 || 3.4 || 6.4 || 1.2 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 21, 2018}} || <ref name="auto8">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Political-Package-2018-12-21-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 21, 2018 |access-date=December 29, 2018 |archive-date=December 28, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181228015450/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Political-Package-2018-12-21-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.2''' || 34.1 || 16.0 || 3.8 || 7.0 || 1.5 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.1'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|December 18, 2018}} || <ref name="auto113">{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/canadas-political-mood-as-2018-comes-to-an-end/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=December 18, 2018 |access-date=December 21, 2018 |archive-date=December 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181221150611/http://abacusdata.ca/canadas-political-mood-as-2018-comes-to-an-end/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 34 || 17 || 4 || 7 || || ±2.5 pp || 2,000 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 14, 2018}} || <ref name="auto89">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Political-Package-2018-12-14-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 14, 2018 |access-date=January 2, 2019 |archive-date=January 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190102095132/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Political-Package-2018-12-14-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.0''' || 33.9 || 16.6 || 3.4 || 6.6 || 0.7 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.1'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|December 13, 2018}} || <ref name="auto79">{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/12/14/With-less-than-a-year-to-the-election-no-party-holds-a-clear-lead |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=December 13, 2018 |access-date=December 18, 2018 |archive-date=December 19, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181219043959/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/12/14/With-less-than-a-year-to-the-election-no-party-holds-a-clear-lead |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 16 || 4 || 8 || 2 || ±2.5 pp || 1,494 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|December 12, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/liberals-enter-election-year-in-the-drivers-seat-but-tories-within-striking-distance |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=December 12, 2018 |access-date=December 20, 2018 |archive-date=February 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190203060035/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/liberals-enter-election-year-in-the-drivers-seat-but-tories-within-striking-distance |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 33 || 18 || 4 || || || ±2.5 pp || 2,001 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 7, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/11062026/2018-12-07-Political-Report-Slides.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 7, 2018 |access-date=December 11, 2018 |archive-date=December 15, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215173908/https://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/11062026/2018-12-07-Political-Report-Slides.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34.1 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34.8''' || 15.8 || 3.1 || 8.2 || 0.8 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 30, 2018}} || <ref name="auto33">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Political-Package-2018-11-30-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 30, 2018 |access-date=December 10, 2018 |archive-date=December 11, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181211052701/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Political-Package-2018-11-30-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.9''' || 32.2 || 14.3 || 3.0 || 7.6 || 0.8 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.7'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|November 29, 2018}} || <ref name="auto21">{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/35e870e5-6501-448c-ba53-ef90f19a2c2eFed%20December%202018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=November 29, 2018 |access-date=December 9, 2018 |archive-date=December 9, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181209213034/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/35e870e5-6501-448c-ba53-ef90f19a2c2eFed%20December%202018.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''43''' || 11 || 4 || 6 || || ±3 pp || 1,541 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 23, 2018}} || <ref name="auto81">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Political-Package-2018-11-23-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 23, 2018 |access-date=November 27, 2018 |archive-date=November 28, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181128075204/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Political-Package-2018-11-23-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.6''' || 31.5 || 14.5 || 2.4 || 6.9 || 1.1 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.1'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|November 20, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Politique-federale-final-novembre-2018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=November 20, 2018 |access-date=December 13, 2018 |archive-date=December 16, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181216073754/http://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Politique-federale-final-novembre-2018.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 33 || 14 || 4 || 5 || 4 || ±2.51 pp || 1,521 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 16, 2018}} || <ref name="auto7">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Political-Package-2018-11-16-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 16, 2018 |access-date=November 20, 2018 |archive-date=November 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181121021800/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Political-Package-2018-11-16-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.4''' || 28.7 || 17.2 || 2.5 || 7.3 || 1.1 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.7'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|November 15, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/No-Margin-for-Error-PAAC-Forum-Presentation.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=November 15, 2018 |access-date=February 13, 2019 |archive-date=February 12, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190212130818/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/No-Margin-for-Error-PAAC-Forum-Presentation.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 32 || 14 || 4 || 8 || 3 || N/A || 2,490 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|November 13, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/liberals-see-an-uptick-conservative-growth-stalls/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=November 13, 2018 |access-date=November 17, 2018 |archive-date=November 17, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181117143759/http://abacusdata.ca/liberals-see-an-uptick-conservative-growth-stalls/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 31 || 16 || 4 || 9 || || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|November 9, 2018}} || <ref name="auto82">{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/11/13/Liberals-and-Conservatives-deadlocked-at-35-nationally-in-most-recent-Campaign-Research-poll-pitched-battle-in-Ontario-awaits |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=November 9, 2018 |access-date=November 14, 2018 |archive-date=November 15, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181115071158/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/11/13/Liberals-and-Conservatives-deadlocked-at-35-nationally-in-most-recent-Campaign-Research-poll-pitched-battle-in-Ontario-awaits |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 17 || 4 || 7 || || ±2.5 pp || 2,512 || online || '''0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 9, 2018}} || <ref name="auto107">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Political-Package-2018-11-09-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 9, 2018 |access-date=December 11, 2018 |archive-date=December 15, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215171754/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Political-Package-2018-11-09-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.4''' || 27.5 || 19.8 || 2.0 || 6.1 || 1.4 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.9'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|November 7, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-would-win-big-majority-if-election-were-held-today/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=November 7, 2018 |access-date=November 17, 2018 |archive-date=November 17, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181117233555/https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-would-win-big-majority-if-election-were-held-today/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.3''' || 34.6 || 10.8 || 3.4 || 6.8 || 3.8 || ±1.09 pp || 7,961 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 2, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018-11-02-Politcal-Report-Slides.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 2, 2018 |access-date=November 7, 2018 |archive-date=November 7, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181107185311/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018-11-02-Politcal-Report-Slides.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.6''' || 28.1 || 19.3 || 1.9 || 6.9 || 1.2 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 26, 2018}} || <ref name="auto6">{{cite web |url=https://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/30063801/2018-10-26-Political-Report-Slides.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 26, 2018 |access-date=January 2, 2019 |archive-date=January 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190103005242/https://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/30063801/2018-10-26-Political-Report-Slides.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.4''' || 28.2 || 19.3 || 2.8 || 6.5 || 1.0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 19, 2018}} || <ref name="auto115">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Political-Package-2018-10-19-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 19, 2018 |access-date=October 22, 2018 |archive-date=April 30, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190430005814/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Political-Package-2018-10-19-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.5''' || 29.4 || 16.9 || 3.6 || 7.0 || 1.4 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 12, 2018}} || <ref name="auto3">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Political-Package-2018-10-12-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 12, 2018 |access-date=October 16, 2018 |archive-date=October 17, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181017001814/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Political-Package-2018-10-12-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.1''' || 31.4 || 16.1 || 3.7 || 7.2 || 1.3 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.7'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|October 10, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/2a982b32-a55a-4965-838f-0ceafbb8f338Federal%20Horserace%20Oct%2016%202018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=October 10, 2018 |access-date=October 21, 2018 |archive-date=October 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181021111805/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/2a982b32-a55a-4965-838f-0ceafbb8f338Federal%20Horserace%20Oct%2016%202018.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''41''' || 15 || 4 || 7 || || ±3 pp || 1,226 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|October 9, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2018-10/detailed_report_0.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=October 9, 2018 |access-date=October 24, 2018 |archive-date=October 25, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181025070937/https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2018-10/detailed_report_0.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 35 || 20 || 4 || || || ±2.5 pp || 2,001 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 5, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Political-Package-2018-10-05.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 5, 2018 |access-date=October 10, 2018 |archive-date=October 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181010213515/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Political-Package-2018-10-05.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.3''' || 31.1 || 16.2 || 3.8 || 6.7 || || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.2'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|October 1, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/PAAC-Presentation_September-2018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=October 1, 2018 |access-date=October 5, 2018 |archive-date=October 6, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181006000655/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/PAAC-Presentation_September-2018.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 31 || 15 || 5 || 7 || 3 || N/A || 2,410 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 28, 2018}} || <ref name="auto50">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Political-Package-2018-09-28-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 28, 2018 |access-date=October 1, 2018 |archive-date=October 2, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181002064537/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Political-Package-2018-09-28-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.0''' || 31.7 || 16.7 || 2.6 || 6.0 || || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 21, 2018}} || <ref name="auto30">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Political-Package-2018-09-21-eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 21, 2018 |access-date=September 25, 2018 |archive-date=September 25, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180925180720/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Political-Package-2018-09-21-eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.0''' || 31.2 || 17.0 || 2.4 || 5.5 || || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.8'''
|-
| [[Pollara]] || {{dts|September 20, 2018}} || <ref name="auto96">{{cite web |url=https://www.pollara.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Pollara-FedPoli_Fall2018-RptF1.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Pollara]] |date=September 20, 2018 |access-date=October 13, 2018 |archive-date=October 14, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181014053045/https://www.pollara.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Pollara-FedPoli_Fall2018-RptF1.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40''' || 34 || 12 || 3 || 7 || 2 || ±3.1 pp || 1,002 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|September 19, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/election-2015-started-as-a-three-party-race-countdown-to-2019-begins-with-the-ndp-well-back/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=September 19, 2018 |access-date=September 20, 2018 |archive-date=September 20, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180920195440/http://abacusdata.ca/election-2015-started-as-a-three-party-race-countdown-to-2019-begins-with-the-ndp-well-back/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 34 || 17 || 3 || 7 || || ±2.2 pp || 2,000 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| DART/Maru || {{dts|September 19, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Sun-National-Post-Fed-Politics-Tables-Oct-2018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=DART/Maru |date=September 19, 2018 |access-date=October 20, 2018 |archive-date=October 20, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181020182037/http://dartincom.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Sun-National-Post-Fed-Politics-Tables-Oct-2018.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 17 || 5 || 8 || || ±2.1 pp || 5,769 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''8'''
|-
| colspan="13" style="text-align:center;" |'''Maxime Bernier forms the People's Party of Canada following his resignation from the Conservative Party caucus (September 14, 2018)'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|September 14, 2018}} || <ref name="auto102">{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/09/18/Justin-Trudeaus-net-approval-down-24-from-last-September |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=September 14, 2018 |access-date=September 21, 2018 |archive-date=September 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180921230144/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/09/18/Justin-Trudeaus-net-approval-down-24-from-last-September |url-status=live }}</ref> || 36 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 15 || 5 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.5 pp || 1,486 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 14, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Political-Package-2018-09-14.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 14, 2018 |access-date=September 18, 2018 |archive-date=September 18, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180918193659/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Political-Package-2018-09-14.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.1''' || 31.4 || 14.9 || 2.0 || 5.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 7, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Political-Package-2018-09-07-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 7, 2018 |access-date=September 10, 2018 |archive-date=September 11, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180911044524/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Political-Package-2018-09-07-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.9''' || 32.8 || 14.9 || 2.5 || 6.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 31, 2018}} || <ref name="auto17">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Political-Package-2018-08-31-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 31, 2018 |access-date=September 4, 2018 |archive-date=September 4, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904192119/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Political-Package-2018-08-31-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.9''' || 32.4 || 15.8 || 3.4 || 6.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.5'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|August 25, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/will-max-bernier-be-a-spoiler-for-the-conservative-party/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=August 25, 2018 |access-date=August 26, 2018 |archive-date=August 26, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180826214427/http://abacusdata.ca/will-max-bernier-be-a-spoiler-for-the-conservative-party/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37''' || 34 || 18 || 3 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 24, 2018}} || <ref name="auto77">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Political-Package-2018-08-24.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 24, 2018 |access-date=August 27, 2018 |archive-date=August 28, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180828035700/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Political-Package-2018-08-24.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.8''' || 34.4 || 16.5 || 2.9 || 6.3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.4'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|August 20, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/2019-race-may-feature-many-issues-from-climate-change-debt-housing-to-borders-and-gun-violence-and-always-trump/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=August 20, 2018 |access-date=August 24, 2018 |archive-date=August 24, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180824183453/http://abacusdata.ca/2019-race-may-feature-many-issues-from-climate-change-debt-housing-to-borders-and-gun-violence-and-always-trump/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37''' || 33 || 18 || 3 || 8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.5 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 17, 2018}} || <ref name="auto66">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Political-Package-2018-08-17-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 17, 2018 |access-date=August 21, 2018 |archive-date=August 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180821191922/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Political-Package-2018-08-17-FR.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.5''' || 33.9 || 19.0 || 3.2 || 5.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.6'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|August 12, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/735a1317-46c5-4f9e-8cee-add477f2abfaSaudi%20Arabia%20August%2014%202018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=August 12, 2018 |access-date=August 15, 2018 |archive-date=August 16, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180816025808/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/735a1317-46c5-4f9e-8cee-add477f2abfaSaudi%20Arabia%20August%2014%202018.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 36 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''42''' || 15 || 2 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,777 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 10, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Political-Package-2018-08-10.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 10, 2018 |access-date=August 20, 2018 |archive-date=August 20, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180820234807/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Political-Package-2018-08-10.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.8''' || 35.1 || 20.1 || 3.2 || 4.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 3, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Political-Package-2018-08-03.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 3, 2018 |access-date=August 7, 2018 |archive-date=August 7, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180807190117/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Political-Package-2018-08-03.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.9''' || 36.6 || 17.8 || 2.3 || 5.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 27, 2018}} || <ref name="auto11">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Political-Package-2018-07-27-1.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 27, 2018 |access-date=July 31, 2018 |archive-date=July 31, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180731183329/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Political-Package-2018-07-27-1.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.8''' || 35.2 || 19.1 || 2.2 || 6.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.6'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|July 26, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://mobile.twitter.com/voiceoffranky/status/1023051625777295360 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=July 26, 2018 |access-date=July 28, 2018 |archive-date=July 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190719172441/https://mobile.twitter.com/VoiceOfFranky/status/1023051625777295360 |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.9''' || 32.1 || 17.3 || 4.0 || 9.3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.7 pp || 1,302 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.8'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|July 22, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/liberals-and-conservatives-neck-and-neck-as-the-race-to-2019-takes-shape/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=July 22, 2018 |access-date=July 31, 2018 |archive-date=August 1, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180801003915/http://abacusdata.ca/liberals-and-conservatives-neck-and-neck-as-the-race-to-2019-takes-shape/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 34 || 19 || 3 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 2,000 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 20, 2018}} || <ref name="auto80">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Political-Package-2018-07-20-R.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 20, 2018 |access-date=July 26, 2018 |archive-date=July 26, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180726233928/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Political-Package-2018-07-20-R.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 35.8 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.9''' || 19.0 || 2.0 || 6.1 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.1'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|July 17, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-hold-significant-leads-in-seat-rich-regions-despite-being-close-to-conservatives/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=July 17, 2018 |access-date=July 26, 2018 |archive-date=August 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180821165927/https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-hold-significant-leads-in-seat-rich-regions-despite-being-close-to-conservatives/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.4''' || 36.9 || 11.8 || 2.4 || 7.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.01 pp || 9,384 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.5'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|July 16, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Global-News-Fed-Vote-July-20-2018 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=July 16, 2018 |access-date=July 21, 2018 |archive-date=July 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180721221904/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Global-News-Fed-Vote-July-20-2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 32 || 21 || 2 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,000 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 13, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Political-Package-2018-07-13.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 13, 2018 |access-date=July 17, 2018 |archive-date=July 17, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180717183734/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Political-Package-2018-07-13.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.3''' || 34.5 || 18.4 || 1.8 || 7.1 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 6, 2018}} || <ref name="auto116">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Political-Package-2018-07-06.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 6, 2018 |access-date=July 10, 2018 |archive-date=July 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180710164905/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Political-Package-2018-07-06.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.7''' || 33.4 || 20.3 || 2.4 || 6.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.3'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|June 29, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Global-News-Fed-Vote-July-3-2018 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=June 29, 2018 |access-date=July 4, 2018 |archive-date=July 4, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180704035024/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Global-News-Fed-Vote-July-3-2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''37''' || 21 || 3 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,002 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 29, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Political-Package-2018-06-29.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 29, 2018 |access-date=July 3, 2018 |archive-date=July 4, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180704034642/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Political-Package-2018-06-29.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.5''' || 33.1 || 20.8 || 2.7 || 5.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 22, 2018}} || <ref name="auto28">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Political-Package-2018-06-22.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 22, 2018 |access-date=June 25, 2018 |archive-date=June 26, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180626030219/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Political-Package-2018-06-22.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.7''' || 32.0 || 20.6 || 3.6 || 5.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.7'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|June 18, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/06/20/Federal-Conservative-Party-Regains-Lead-in-Voter-Intent |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=June 18, 2018 |access-date=June 21, 2018 |archive-date=June 22, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180622004913/https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/06/20/Federal-Conservative-Party-Regains-Lead-in-Voter-Intent |url-status=live }}</ref> || 34 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 18 || 3 || 8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.5 pp || 1,579 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|June 15, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Global-News-Fed-Vote-June-19-2018 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=June 15, 2018 |access-date=June 20, 2018 |archive-date=June 20, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180620153238/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Global-News-Fed-Vote-June-19-2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 20 || 5 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,001 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 15, 2018}} || <ref name="auto49">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Political-Package-2018-06-15.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 15, 2018 |access-date=June 18, 2018 |archive-date=June 18, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180618230627/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Political-Package-2018-06-15.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.9''' || 32.5 || 19.9 || 4.1 || 5.1 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.4'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|June 14, 2018}} || <ref name="auto46">{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2018.06.14_Trump_Trudeau.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=June 14, 2018 |access-date=June 15, 2018 |archive-date=June 15, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180615135301/http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2018.06.14_Trump_Trudeau.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 32 || 16 || 4 || 9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,023 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| colspan="13" style="text-align:center;" |'''Mario Beaulieu is named interim leader of the Bloc Québécois (June 13, 2018)'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 8, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Political-Package-2018-06-08.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 8, 2018 |access-date=June 11, 2018 |archive-date=June 12, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612140739/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Political-Package-2018-06-08.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.3''' || 33.0 || 22.0 || 4.1 || 4.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 1, 2018}} || <ref name="auto71">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Political-Package-2018-06-01.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 1, 2018 |access-date=June 5, 2018 |archive-date=June 12, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612140848/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Political-Package-2018-06-01.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.1''' || 34.0 || 21.2 || 4.4 || 5.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''0.1'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|May 31, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/36c45513-2157-4ae7-8db9-14bc80b6b94bNAFTA%20and%20Transmountain.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=May 31, 2018 |access-date=June 12, 2018 |archive-date=June 12, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612233258/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/36c45513-2157-4ae7-8db9-14bc80b6b94bNAFTA%20and%20Transmountain.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''44''' || 17 || 2 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 969 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''13'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 25, 2018}} || <ref name="auto117">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Political-Package-2018-05-25.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 25, 2018 |access-date=May 29, 2018 |archive-date=May 29, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180529204441/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Political-Package-2018-05-25.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || 33.0 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36.0''' || 19.8 || 4.0 || 6.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 18, 2018}} || <ref name="auto14">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Political-Package-2018-05-18.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 18, 2018 |access-date=May 22, 2018 |archive-date=May 23, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180523172619/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Political-Package-2018-05-18.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.1''' || 34.0 || 20.1 || 3.6 || 5.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.1'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|May 16, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/f7f99127-b329-4932-a06b-2a69f5973458Fed%20Horserace.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=May 16, 2018 |access-date=May 22, 2018 |archive-date=May 23, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180523011632/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/f7f99127-b329-4932-a06b-2a69f5973458Fed%20Horserace.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''46''' || 18 || 2 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,484 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''16'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|May 14, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/CanadaThisMonth-Federal-Politics-Backgrounder.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=May 14, 2018 |access-date=May 28, 2018 |archive-date=May 29, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180529130331/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/CanadaThisMonth-Federal-Politics-Backgrounder.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 35 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 15 || 4 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || N/A || 2,327 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 11, 2018}} || <ref name="auto58">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Political-Package-2018-05-11.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 11, 2018 |access-date=May 15, 2018 |archive-date=May 23, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180523172616/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Political-Package-2018-05-11.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.1''' || 34.4 || 18.5 || 3.7 || 6.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.7'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|May 10, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-tories-on-the-rise-in-quebec-as-scheer-woos-former-bloc-voters-poll/ |work=[[The Globe and Mail]] |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=May 10, 2018 |access-date=May 15, 2018 |archive-date=May 15, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180515110803/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-tories-on-the-rise-in-quebec-as-scheer-woos-former-bloc-voters-poll/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 36|| 15 || 2 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.1 pp || 2,103 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 4, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Political-Package-2018-05-04.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 4, 2018 |access-date=May 8, 2018 |archive-date=May 8, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508121738/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Political-Package-2018-05-04.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.0''' || 33.2 || 17.6 || 4.2 || 5.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.8'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|May 2, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/CanadaThisMonth-Federal-Politics-Backgrounder.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=May 2, 2018 |access-date=May 28, 2018 |archive-date=May 29, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180529130331/https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/CanadaThisMonth-Federal-Politics-Backgrounder.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 35 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 16 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 || telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|April 30, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Global-News-Fed-Vote-Poll-May-4-2018 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=April 30, 2018 |access-date=May 6, 2018 |archive-date=May 7, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180507085604/https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/Global-News-Fed-Vote-Poll-May-4-2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 35 || 20 || 3 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,907 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 27, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Political-Package-2018-04-27.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 27, 2018 |access-date=May 1, 2018 |archive-date=May 1, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180501225533/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Political-Package-2018-04-27.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.2''' || 30.6 || 18.2 || 4.4 || 5.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.6'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|April 20, 2018}} || <ref name="auto78">{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/7a9d71a9-dea8-4d5a-b76f-9c3d84e3fbacHorserace.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=April 20, 2018 |access-date=April 27, 2018 |archive-date=April 28, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180428094347/http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/7a9d71a9-dea8-4d5a-b76f-9c3d84e3fbacHorserace.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''43''' || 14 || 4 || 8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2 pp || 1,585 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''13'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 20, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Political-Package-2018-04-20.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 20, 2018 |access-date=April 24, 2018 |archive-date=April 25, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180425114841/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Political-Package-2018-04-20.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.2''' || 31.6 || 17.9 || 3.7 || 7.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.6'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|April 18, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-maintain-narrow-lead-over-conservatives/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=April 18, 2018}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.4''' || 37.1 || 11.9 || 2.6 || 5.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.01 pp || 9,401 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 13, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Political-Package-2018-04-13.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 13, 2018 |access-date=April 17, 2018 |archive-date=April 17, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417191901/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Political-Package-2018-04-13.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.1''' || 29.2 || 15.8 || 3.8 || 8.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 6, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Political-Package-2018-04-06.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 6, 2018 |access-date=April 10, 2018 |archive-date=April 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180410201815/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Political-Package-2018-04-06.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.2''' || 32.9 || 17.2 || 3.0 || 7.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 29, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Political-Package-2018-03-29.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 29, 2018 |access-date=April 3, 2018 |archive-date=April 3, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180403234757/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Political-Package-2018-03-29.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.1''' || 33.7 || 16.4 || 2.4 || 6.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.4'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|March 23, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/global-news-fed-vote-march-26-2018 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=March 23, 2018}}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 23 || 3 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,003 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 23, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-20180323.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 23, 2018 |access-date=March 27, 2018 |archive-date=March 28, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180328102609/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-20180323.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.1''' || 34.7 || 16.8 || 3.1 || 5.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 16, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-2018-03-161.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 16, 2018 |access-date=April 4, 2018 |archive-date=April 5, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180405024432/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-2018-03-161.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.9''' || 34.8 || 18.5 || 3.5 || 6.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.1'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|March 15, 2018}} || <ref name="auto27">{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2018.03.19_Federal_Scheer_Trudeau.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=March 15, 2018}}</ref> || 30 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''40''' || 19 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2 pp || 5,423 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''10'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 9, 2018}} || <ref name="auto19">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-2018-03-09.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 9, 2018 |access-date=March 13, 2018 |archive-date=March 13, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180313214328/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-2018-03-09.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.8''' || 33.1 || 19.3 || 4.5 || 6.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.7'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|March 8, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/RapportPolitiqueF%C3%A9d%C3%A9ralMars2018_FINAL.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=March 8, 2018 |access-date=March 12, 2018 |archive-date=March 30, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180330085455/http://leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/RapportPolitiqueF%C3%A9d%C3%A9ralMars2018_FINAL.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 14 || 3 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.5 pp || 1,536 || online || | '''0'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 4, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Abacus-Release-Politics-March-2018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 4, 2018 |access-date=March 7, 2018 |archive-date=March 8, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180308041726/http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Abacus-Release-Politics-March-2018.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 33 || 18 || 3 || 8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 4,023 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 2, 2018}} || <ref name="auto62">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-2018-03-02.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 2, 2018 |access-date=March 6, 2018 |archive-date=March 6, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180306202906/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-2018-03-02.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.5''' || 32.7 || 19.0 || 4.0 || 7.1 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.8'''
|-
| [[Ipsos]] || {{dts|March 1, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2018-03/fedvote_factum_mar_2.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ipsos]] |date=March 1, 2018}}</ref> || 33 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 21 || 3 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,001 || online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|March 1, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/e7a58f7e-8b11-42ea-8ced-9f111cf868f6Budget%202018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=March 1, 2018}}</ref> || 34 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''46''' || 14 || 2 || 3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 941 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''12'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 23, 2018}} || <ref name="auto60">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Political-Package-2018-02-23.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 23, 2018 |access-date=February 27, 2018 |archive-date=February 28, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180228041228/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Political-Package-2018-02-23.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.7''' || 31.5 || 19.2 || 3.8 || 6.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 16, 2018}} || <ref name="auto">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Political-Package-2018-02-16.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 16, 2018 |access-date=February 20, 2018 |archive-date=February 20, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180220212514/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Political-Package-2018-02-16.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.6''' || 30.8 || 20.3 || 3.3 || 8.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.8'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|February 10, 2018}} || <ref name="auto92">{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/02/26/Voter-Intent-Up-For-Liberal-Party |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=February 10, 2018}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 32 || 16 || 4 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.1 pp || 2,227 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 9, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Political-Package-2018-02-09.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 9, 2018 |access-date=February 13, 2018 |archive-date=February 14, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180214202646/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Political-Package-2018-02-09.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.1''' || 30.4 || 18.5 || 3.1 || 8.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 2, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Political-Package-2018-02-02.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 2, 2018 |access-date=February 6, 2018 |archive-date=February 6, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180206190321/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Political-Package-2018-02-02.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.1''' || 30.3 || 19.7 || 3.0 || 7.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.8'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|January 28, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Abacus-Release-Politics-January-2018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=January 28, 2018 |access-date=January 30, 2018 |archive-date=January 31, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180131023205/http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Abacus-Release-Politics-January-2018.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 32 || 18 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.7 pp || 1,411 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 26, 2018}} || <ref name="auto59">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Political-Package-2018-01-26.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 26, 2018 |access-date=January 30, 2018 |archive-date=January 31, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180131023508/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Political-Package-2018-01-26.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.8''' || 30.6 || 19.9 || 3.5 || 7.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.2'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|January 24, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/03d96978-f208-4a69-aec4-6faaf1b570e2federal%20horserace%20january%202018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=January 24, 2018}}</ref> || 38 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''43''' || 12 || 3 || 3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,408 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 19, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20180119%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 19, 2018 |access-date=January 23, 2018 |archive-date=January 24, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180124070743/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20180119%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.9''' || 34.4 || 17.3 || 3.7 || 6.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 12, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20180112%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 12, 2018 |access-date=January 16, 2018 |archive-date=January 16, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180116193333/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20180112%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.0''' || 33.8 || 20.0 || 3.8 || 4.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.2'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|January 11, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/01/22/Voter-intent-up-for-Liberal-Party |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=January 11, 2018}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42''' || 29 || 16 || 4 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.3 pp || 1,887 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|January 6, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/trudeau-liberals-good-position/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=January 6, 2018}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.3''' || 34.5 || 13.1 || 4.4 || 7.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±0.99 pp || 9,830 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 5, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20180105%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 5, 2018 |access-date=January 9, 2018 |archive-date=January 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180110054711/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20180105%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.9''' || 30.7 || 19.5 || 3.7 || 4.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 29, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171229%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 29, 2017 |access-date=January 3, 2018 |archive-date=January 3, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180103193539/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171229%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.6''' || 30.1 || 20.1 || 3.5 || 4.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 22, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171222%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 22, 2017 |access-date=December 28, 2017 |archive-date=December 28, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171228112330/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171222%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.8''' || 29.1 || 20.0 || 3.3 || 4.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 15, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171215%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 15, 2017 |access-date=December 19, 2017 |archive-date=December 22, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171222051029/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171215%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.9''' || 29.3 || 19.1 || 3.4 || 5.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12.6'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|December 14, 2017}} || <ref name="auto108">{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/ecd8cf00-3941-4483-8607-33a0718e1e7eFed%20Horserace.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=December 14, 2017}}</ref> || 38 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''39''' || 12 || 5 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,284 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|December 14, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2017-12/ipsos-global-news-year-end-poll-federal-politics-report-12-23-2017.pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 31 || 20 || 5 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.4 pp || 2,098 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 8, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171208%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 8, 2017 |access-date=December 12, 2017 |archive-date=December 13, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171213010047/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171208%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.7''' || 30.3 || 17.5 || 3.8 || 6.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 1, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171201%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 1, 2017 |access-date=December 5, 2017 |archive-date=December 5, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171205194749/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171201%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.1''' || 30.7 || 16.5 || 4.2 || 6.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.4'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|November 30, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/La%20politique%20federale%20au%20Canada_20171202_EN.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=November 30, 2017 |access-date=December 4, 2017 |archive-date=December 15, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171215102218/http://leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/La%20politique%20federale%20au%20Canada_20171202_EN.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40''' || 34 || 13 || 4 || 8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.4 pp || 1,609 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 24, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171124%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 24, 2017 |access-date=November 28, 2017 |archive-date=December 1, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201030708/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171124%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.8''' || 30.6 || 17.2 || 4.4 || 6.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 17, 2017}} || <ref name="auto94">{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171117%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 17, 2017 |access-date=November 21, 2017 |archive-date=December 1, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201034308/http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171117%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.3''' || 30.7 || 16.6 || 5.0 || 7.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.6'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|November 14, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Abacus-Release-Politics-November-2017_FINAL.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=November 14, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40''' || 32 || 18 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 10, 2017}} || <ref name="auto112">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171110%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 10, 2017 |access-date=November 14, 2017 |archive-date=November 15, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171115014725/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171110%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.3''' || 30.9 || 17.5 || 5.3 || 6.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.4'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|November 9, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2017/11/23/Voting-intent-for-Liberals-off-from-high-for-second-straight-month |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=November 9, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 30 || 19 || 5 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.9 pp || 2,616 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|November 6, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/f6183b5c-adce-4f57-a238-e66efd96ea76Federal%20Horserace%20November.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=November 6, 2017}}</ref> || 36 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 14 || 6 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,281 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 3, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171103%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 3, 2017 |access-date=November 7, 2017 |archive-date=November 7, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171107165800/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171103%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.6''' || 29.6 || 19.0 || 5.9 || 6.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 27, 2017}} || <ref name="auto29">{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171027%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 27, 2017 |access-date=October 31, 2017 |archive-date=November 7, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171107003013/http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171027%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.1''' || 29.6 || 18.5 || 6.1 || 6.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.5'''
|-
| [[Insights West]] || {{dts|October 26, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://insightswest.com/news/canadians-give-trudeau-high-marks-for-foreign-affairs-and-environment/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Insights West]] |date=October 26, 2017 |access-date=October 30, 2017 |archive-date=November 7, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171107002702/https://insightswest.com/news/canadians-give-trudeau-high-marks-for-foreign-affairs-and-environment/ |url-status=usurped }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 33 || 20 || 4 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,005 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|October 25, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2017-10/Fed-Approval-Gov-TaxChanges-Factum-2017-10-29_0.pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 30 || 23 || 4 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,001 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|October 25, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/Politics%20in%20Canada_October%202017_EN.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=October 25, 2017 |access-date=October 28, 2017 |archive-date=October 29, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171029064832/http://leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/Politics%20in%20Canada_October%202017_EN.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42''' || 30 || 15 || 4 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.5 pp || 1,534 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|October 23, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Abacus-Release-October-2017_Politics.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=October 23, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 35 || 15 || 5 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 20, 2017}} || <ref name="auto41">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171020%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 20, 2017 |access-date=October 24, 2017 |archive-date=October 25, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171025073259/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171020%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.0''' || 30.8 || 17.7 || 6.3 || 6.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.2'''
|-
| [[Environics]] || {{dts|October 16, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.unifor.org/sites/default/files/attachments/environics_unifor_poll_attitudes_towards_trade_nov2017.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Environics]] |date=October 16, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 30 || 20 || 5 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || || 2,000 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 13, 2017}} || <ref name="auto87">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171013%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 13, 2017 |access-date=October 17, 2017 |archive-date=October 17, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171017202725/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171013%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.6''' || 31.3 || 16.3 || 7.2 || 7.3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.3'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|October 12, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/2017.10.12-Trudeau-Midterm.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=October 12, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 18 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.5 pp || 1,492 || online || | '''0'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|October 11, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2017/10/19/Waning-Support-for-the-Liberal-Government-Leaves-Opposition-Parties-an-Opportunity-to-Capitalize |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=October 11, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 30 || 19 || 4 || 8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 2,002 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 6, 2017}} || <ref name="auto2">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171006%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 6, 2017 |access-date=October 10, 2017 |archive-date=October 10, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171010160115/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171006%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.9''' || 32.0 || 15.4 || 6.6 || 5.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4.9'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|October 4, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/new-ndp-leader-jagmeet-singh/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=October 4, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37''' || 36 || 14 || 4 || 8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.5 pp || 1,477 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| colspan="13" style="text-align:center;" |''' Jagmeet Singh is elected leader of the New Democratic Party (October 1, 2017)'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|October 1, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_october_3_2017a.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=October 1, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.4''' || 33.3 || 14.5 || 4.5 || 8.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.4 pp || 4,839 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 29, 2017}} || <ref name="auto65">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170929%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 29, 2017 |access-date=October 3, 2017 |archive-date=October 3, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171003174827/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170929%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.1''' || 31.2 || 15.2 || 6.3 || 6.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.9'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|September 27, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2017-09/tax-reform-PR-2017-9-29.pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 32 || 20 || 5 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,001 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 22, 2017}} || <ref name="auto69">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170922%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 22, 2017 |access-date=September 26, 2017 |archive-date=September 26, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170926191052/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170922%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.5''' || 32.5 || 14.6 || 6.1 || 5.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 15, 2017}} || <ref name="auto118">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170915%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 15, 2017 |access-date=September 19, 2017 |archive-date=September 22, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170922100819/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170915%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.9''' || 30.0 || 15.5 || 6.0 || 5.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.9'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|September 14, 2017}} || <ref name="auto38">{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/12df314f-eb51-46bb-9048-577d7da5cec9Fed%20Horserace%20Release%20Sept%20.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=September 14, 2017}}</ref> || 35 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''39''' || 15 || 5 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,350 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|September 11, 2017}} || <ref name="auto83">{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2017/09/18/Federal-liberals-with-12-point-lead-No-backlash-seen-from-corporation-tax-decision-Scheer-least-popular-leader |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=September 11, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42''' || 30 || 16 || 5 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.3 pp || 1,770 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 8, 2017}} || <ref name="auto36">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170908%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 8, 2017 |access-date=September 12, 2017 |archive-date=September 12, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170912192116/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170908%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.0''' || 30.1 || 15.9 || 4.6 || 5.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.9'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|September 3, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Abacus-Release-September_POLITICS.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=September 3, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43''' || 31 || 17 || 3 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,512 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 1, 2017}} || <ref name="auto10">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170901%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 1, 2017 |access-date=September 5, 2017 |archive-date=September 5, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170905231201/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170901%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.2''' || 32.0 || 15.7 || 4.9 || 4.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.2'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|August 31, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/tax-debate-comes-frame/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=August 31, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43''' || 32 || 15 || 4 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.19 pp || 2,000 || telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 25, 2017}} || <ref name="auto74">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170825%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 25, 2017 |access-date=August 29, 2017 |archive-date=August 30, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170830004127/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170825%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.9''' || 30.8 || 16.4 || 4.3 || 5.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 18, 2017}} || <ref name="auto67">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170818%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 18, 2017 |access-date=August 22, 2017 |archive-date=August 22, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170822180018/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170818%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.4''' || 31.0 || 18.2 || 5.1 || 4.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.4'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|August 17, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/85313aca-42e2-4feb-967d-7b77f804e683FOLM%20Fed%20Horserace%20Sep%201.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=August 17, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42''' || 35 || 14 || 4 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,150 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 11, 2017}} || <ref name="auto56">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170811%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 11, 2017 |access-date=August 15, 2017 |archive-date=August 15, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815184604/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170811%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.8''' || 31.1 || 19.2 || 5.2 || 5.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 4, 2017}} || <ref name="auto110">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170804%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 4, 2017 |access-date=August 8, 2017 |archive-date=August 8, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808193923/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170804%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.5''' || 29.3 || 20.2 || 6.4 || 5.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 28, 2017}} || <ref name="auto40">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170728%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 28, 2017 |access-date=August 1, 2017 |archive-date=August 1, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170801200052/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170728%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.7''' || 29.1 || 20.0 || 5.8 || 6.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 21, 2017}} || <ref name="auto99">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170721%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 21, 2017 |access-date=July 25, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162543/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170721%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.0''' || 30.3 || 18.4 || 4.2 || 6.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.7'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|July 18, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/liberal-support-holds-with-improving-economic-mood/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=July 18, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43''' || 31 || 16 || 3 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 2,036 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 14, 2017}} || <ref name="auto88">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170714%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 14, 2017 |access-date=July 18, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162556/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170714%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.3''' || 31.2 || 16.2 || 5.9 || 6.1 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.1'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|July 10, 2017}} || <ref name="auto103">{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2017/07/14/Party-standings-stable-no-Khadr-backlash-seen-as-Trudeau-Scheer-approvals-unchanged |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=July 10, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40''' || 31 || 19 || 4 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2 pp || 1,540 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 7, 2017}} || <ref name="auto43">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170707%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 7, 2017 |access-date=July 11, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162608/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170707%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.8''' || 33.0 || 13.6 || 5.3 || 6.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 30, 2017}} || <ref name="auto35">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170630%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 30, 2017 |access-date=July 4, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162619/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170630%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.9''' || 31.6 || 14.0 || 6.3 || 7.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 23, 2017}} || <ref name="auto48">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170623%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 23, 2017 |access-date=June 27, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162631/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170623%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.3''' || 31.1 || 15.7 || 6.8 || 6.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.2'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|June 19, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/index.php/2017/06/canada-150-the-national-mood-and-the-new-populism/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=June 19, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.3''' || 33.0 || 15.2 || 3.7 || 8.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.3 pp || 5,658 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 16, 2017}} || <ref name="auto13">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170616%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 16, 2017 |access-date=June 20, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162643/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170616%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.5''' || 30.9 || 16.5 || 6.7 || 6.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.6'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|June 12, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2017/06/20/Conservatives-close-gap-Liberal-lead-cut-in-half-from-16-to-9-points |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=June 12, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 30 || 19 || 5 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2 pp || 2,767 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|June 12, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2017.06.14-FederalJune.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=June 12, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37''' || 34 || 17 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2 pp || 5,406 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 9, 2017}} || <ref name="auto119">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170609%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 9, 2017 |access-date=June 13, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162656/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170609%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.8''' || 30.5 || 17.3 || 6.1 || 7.1 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.3'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|June 8, 2017}} || <ref name="auto54">{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/e0ebd7f8-0d4d-4747-8273-1e0d7944427aFED%20Horserace%20.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=June 8, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42''' || 34 || 12 || 5 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,483 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 2, 2017}} || <ref name="auto1">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170602%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 2, 2017 |access-date=June 6, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162708/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170602%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.0''' || 28.1 || 16.5 || 6.2 || 7.3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.9'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|May 31, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/new-conservative-leader-andrew-scheer/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=May 31, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40''' || 33 || 16 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 1,958 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|May 29, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/scheer-unknown-sees-small-bump-support/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=May 29, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41''' || 33 || 17 || 4 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.85 pp || 2,800 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| colspan="13" style="text-align:center;" |''' Andrew Scheer is elected leader of the Conservative Party of Canada (May 27, 2017)'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 26, 2017}} || <ref name="auto104">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170526%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 26, 2017 |access-date=May 30, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162721/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170526%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.3''' || 28.6 || 16.7 || 5.7 || 7.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 19, 2017}} || <ref name="auto26">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170519%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 19, 2017 |access-date=May 23, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162733/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170519%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.1''' || 27.9 || 16.2 || 5.2 || 7.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14.2'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|May 18, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/POL20170524_final.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=May 18, 2017 |access-date=May 25, 2017 |archive-date=September 15, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180915225940/http://leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/POL20170524_final.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46''' || 25 || 16 || 5 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.5 pp || 1,529 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''21'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|May 15, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/scheer-unknown-sees-small-bump-support/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=May 15, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41''' || 31 || 18 || 5 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.85 pp || 2,800 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|May 13, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2017/05/19/Federal-Liberals-retain-lead-over-Conservatives-rebound-from-April-slump |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=May 13, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43''' || 27 || 19 || 3 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2 pp || 1,969 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|May 12, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/as-conservatives-choose-and-the-ndp-race-heats-up-where-things-stand-in-canadian-politics/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=May 12, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43''' || 27 || 20 || 4 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.9 pp || 1,182 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 12, 2017}} || <ref name="auto32">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170512%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 12, 2017 |access-date=May 16, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162746/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170512%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.8''' || 28.1 || 15.9 || 6.0 || 5.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 5, 2017}} || <ref name="auto75">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170505%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 5, 2017 |access-date=May 9, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162758/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170505%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.8''' || 29.0 || 18.8 || 5.1 || 4.1 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 28, 2017}} || <ref name="auto25">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170428%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 28, 2017 |access-date=May 2, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827162809/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170428%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.0''' || 29.6 || 18.5 || 4.4 || 3.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13.4'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|April 24, 2017}} || <ref name="auto45">{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/3bf954c0-7812-4347-89a4-01417c624e6eFED%20Horserace%20.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=April 24, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35''' || 17 || 5 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,479 || IVR || '''0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 21, 2017}} || <ref name="auto111">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170421%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 21, 2017 |access-date=April 25, 2017 |archive-date=April 26, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170426055550/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170421%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.0''' || 30.4 || 19.0 || 4.0 || 2.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 14, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170413%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 14, 2017 |access-date=April 18, 2017 |archive-date=April 19, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170419101236/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170413%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.4''' || 32.4 || 18.7 || 3.4 || 3.1 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.0'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|April 11, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2017/04/12/Liberals-slip-from-16-to-9-point-lead-on-Conservatives-NDP-gains-ground |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=April 11, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 29 || 19 || 6 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2 pp || 1,970 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 7, 2017}} || <ref name="auto76">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170407%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 7, 2017 |access-date=April 11, 2017 |archive-date=April 11, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170411220745/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170407%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.3''' || 32.6 || 18.0 || 4.0 || 3.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 31, 2017}} || <ref name="auto98">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170331%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 31, 2017 |access-date=April 4, 2017 |archive-date=April 4, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170404221115/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170331%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.6''' || 29.6 || 18.4 || 5.2 || 4.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.0'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|March 30, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/2017-05/7622-dt1.pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 32 || 20 || 5 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,001 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 24, 2017}} || <ref name="auto101">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170324%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 24, 2017 |access-date=March 28, 2017 |archive-date=March 29, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170329051121/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170324%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.5''' || 29.2 || 16.1 || 4.8 || 5.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13.3'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|March 23, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/6cb8cad6-0a20-45ab-82f1-3b83292cf079FED%20horserace.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=March 23, 2017}}</ref> || 36 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''38''' || 15 || 6 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,029 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| colspan="13" style="text-align:center;" |'''Martine Ouellet is acclaimed leader of the Bloc Québécois (March 18, 2017)'''
|-
| Stratcom || {{dts|March 17, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/canadians-oppose-policies-that-would-align-canada-with-those-of-donald-trump-poll |title=poll |publisher=Stratcom |date=March 17, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44''' || 29 || 16 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 2,029 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 17, 2017}} || <ref name="auto105">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170317%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 17, 2017 |access-date=March 21, 2017 |archive-date=March 22, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170322111413/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170317%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.9''' || 28.5 || 17.1 || 4.7 || 5.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 10, 2017}} || <ref name="auto72">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170310%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 10, 2017 |access-date=March 14, 2017 |archive-date=March 15, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170315174824/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170310%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.4''' || 28.1 || 17.0 || 4.9 || 6.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13.3'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|March 7, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2017/03/11/Liberals-bounce-back-with-two-fifth-of-the-vote-Conservatives-see-7-point-drop-Trudeau-most-popular |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=March 7, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43''' || 27 || 16 || 6 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,886 || online/IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 3, 2017}} || <ref name="auto15">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170303%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 3, 2017 |access-date=March 7, 2017 |archive-date=March 7, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170307210609/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170303%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.6''' || 30.5 || 17.2 || 5.0 || 5.1 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.1'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|February 26, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/468a3f16-3363-4fde-b78c-334a963f5a22Federal%20Horserace%20Mar%209.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=February 26, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 35 || 15 || 7 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,340 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 24, 2017}} || <ref name="auto86">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170224%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 24, 2017 |access-date=February 28, 2017 |archive-date=March 1, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170301005631/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170224%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.9''' || 31.0 || 16.8 || 5.4 || 5.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.9'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|February 19, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Abacus-Data-Poll-Vote-Intention-Government-Approval-and-the-Trump-Trudeau-Meeting.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=February 19, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40''' || 33 || 16 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 17, 2017}} || <ref name="auto90">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170217%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 17, 2017 |access-date=February 21, 2017 |archive-date=February 22, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222110831/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170217%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.3''' || 29.6 || 16.9 || 6.3 || 5.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 10, 2017}} || <ref name="auto64">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170210%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 10, 2017 |access-date=February 14, 2017 |archive-date=February 15, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170215031415/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170210%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.9''' || 32.9 || 16.9 || 4.8 || 5.3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.0'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|February 6, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2017/02/08/All-tied-up-Federal-Liberals-and-Conservatives-tied-at-one-third-each-Justin-Trudeaus-favorable-below-4-in-10 |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=February 6, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''34''' || 16 || 6 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,457 || IVR || | '''0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 3, 2017}} || <ref name="auto68">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170203%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 3, 2017 |access-date=February 7, 2017 |archive-date=February 8, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170208035044/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170203%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.0''' || 32.5 || 16.4 || 4.9 || 5.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 27, 2017}} || <ref name="auto39">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170127%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 27, 2017 |access-date=January 31, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827163110/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170127%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.1''' || 32.1 || 16.3 || 5.1 || 5.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.0'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|January 25, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/2017-05/7554-CPC%20Leadership%20Tables%201.pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41''' || 30 || 19 || 5 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,000 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|January 21, 2017}} || <ref name="auto106">{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/4c699bf4-3920-4f99-b4da-15ccff9003f8FED_Horserace_News_Release%20(012217).pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42''' || 36 || 12 || 4 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,332 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 20, 2017}} || <ref name="auto57">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170120%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 20, 2017 |access-date=January 24, 2017 |archive-date=February 2, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170202031612/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170120%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.4''' || 31.2 || 16.3 || 5.1 || 5.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 13, 2017}} || <ref name="auto9">{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170113%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 13, 2017 |access-date=January 18, 2017 |archive-date=January 19, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170119051523/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170113%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.4''' || 28.4 || 16.2 || 6.1 || 6.1 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 6, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170106%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 6, 2017 |access-date=January 10, 2017 |archive-date=January 12, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170112185004/http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170106%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.0''' || 28.5 || 16.2 || 5.2 || 5.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 30, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/poll.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 30, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.0''' || 27.9 || 16.7 || 5.5 || 5.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 23, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170324%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 23, 2016 |access-date=March 28, 2017 |archive-date=March 29, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170329051121/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170324%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.0''' || 28.3 || 16.9 || 5.6 || 5.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 16, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170317%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 16, 2016 |access-date=March 21, 2017 |archive-date=March 22, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170322111413/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170317%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.6''' || 27.4 || 16.7 || 4.9 || 5.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16.2'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|December 14, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Abacus-Release-Politics-Dec-2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=December 14, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44''' || 30 || 16 || 4 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.3 pp || 1,848 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 9, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170310%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 9, 2016 |access-date=March 14, 2017 |archive-date=March 15, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170315174824/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170310%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.2''' || 26.7 || 16.5 || 5.4 || 6.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16.5'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|December 7, 2016}} || <ref name="auto5">{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/e11dd084-82dd-40c6-a969-5ef1c2207675Fed%20Horserace%20Release%202016%2012%2008(JC)_AM.pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42''' || 34 || 12 || 5 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,304 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 2, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170303%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 2, 2016 |access-date=March 7, 2017 |archive-date=March 7, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170307210609/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170303%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.9''' || 26.0 || 17.4 || 4.8 || 6.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 25, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170224%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 25, 2016 |access-date=February 28, 2017 |archive-date=March 1, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170301005631/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170224%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44.7''' || 25.1 || 17.9 || 4.4 || 6.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19.6'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|November 22, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_november_25_2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=November 22, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.2''' || 31.2 || 13.0 || 2.4 || 8.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 1,949 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 18, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170217%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 18, 2016 |access-date=February 21, 2017 |archive-date=February 22, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222110831/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170217%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.9''' || 28.7 || 16.0 || 5.6 || 5.6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14.2'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|November 13, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Abacus-Release-National-Politics-Nov-2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=November 13, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46''' || 25 || 17 || 5 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.1 pp || 2,200 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''21'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 11, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170210%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 11, 2016 |access-date=February 14, 2017 |archive-date=February 15, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170215031415/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170210%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.3''' || 26.2 || 15.4 || 4.3 || 6.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20.1'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|November 10, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/0099b3c9-cc1b-48c2-9b76-5da9b08ade3aFed%20Horserace%20Release%202016%2011%2011(JC).pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51''' || 28 || 11 || 4 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,474 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''23'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|November 6, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/canadas-donald-trump-leads-conservative-leadership-race/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=November 6, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49''' || 29 || 13 || 4 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.38 pp || 5,066 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 4, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170203%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 4, 2016 |access-date=February 7, 2017 |archive-date=February 8, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170208035044/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170203%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44.9''' || 29.6 || 13.8 || 5.5 || 5.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 28, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170127%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 28, 2016 |access-date=January 31, 2017 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827163110/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170127%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44.5''' || 29.6 || 13.3 || 5.3 || 6.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 21, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170120%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 21, 2016 |access-date=January 24, 2017 |archive-date=February 2, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170202031612/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170120%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.6''' || 27.5 || 13.9 || 4.0 || 6.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19.1'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|October 18, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_october_24_2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=October 18, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.6''' || 26.4 || 14.1 || 3.3 || 7.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.4 pp || 1,622 || online/telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 14, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170113%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 14, 2016 |access-date=January 18, 2017 |archive-date=January 19, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170119051523/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170113%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.3''' || 26.2 || 15.4 || 4.3 || 6.2 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20.1'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|October 12, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/72d588cd-f29a-4f75-a76f-7db5f7949bfcFED-%20Horserace%20Release%202016%2010%2012%20(JC).pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49''' || 30 || 12 || 5 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,437 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|October 12, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Abacus-Release-Politics.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=October 12, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45''' || 28 || 14 || 5 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,498 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 7, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170106%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 7, 2016 |access-date=January 10, 2017 |archive-date=January 12, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170112185004/http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170106%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.9''' || 25.9 || 16.2 || 4.3 || 5.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 (1/4) || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 30, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/poll.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 30, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.8''' || 26.2 || 16.7 || 4.5 || 5.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 || telephone (rolling) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19.6'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|September 21, 2016}} || <ref name="auto42">{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/39ec1e01-d1f2-407a-a7a4-9e3c3a7b69bfFED%20Horserace%20(2016%2009%2022)%20(JC).pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47''' || 34 || 9 || 6 || 3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,326 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 8, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/values/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 8, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51''' || 29 || 12 || 4 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.35 pp || 5,250 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''22'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|September 7, 2016}} || <ref name="auto18">{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/8d206e1d-ffdb-47e0-8de1-059e435edf15Federal%20Horserace%20News%20Release(JC).pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''48''' || 30 || 11 || 5 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,370 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|September 1, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/SOEN20160912.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=September 1, 2016 |access-date=September 13, 2016 |archive-date=September 16, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916022644/http://leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/SOEN20160912.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53''' || 25 || 12 || 4 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.5 pp || 1,535 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''28'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|August 25, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ABACUS-Release-Politics_August2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=August 25, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46''' || 28 || 16 || 4 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 2,010 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|August 6, 2016}} || <ref name="auto24">{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/c7415460-ce83-4044-b0ea-20a78154801dFederal%20Horserace%20News%20Release.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=August 6, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50''' || 31 || 10 || 4 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,345 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|July 14, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_july_21_2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=July 14, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.6''' || 28.5 || 15.5 || 2.8 || 5.9 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,003 || online/telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17.1'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|July 5, 2016}} || <ref name="auto47">{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/b6ee78a2-9e4e-439a-bf8d-92c1e83c32bbFederal%20Horserace%20News%20Release%20(2016%2007%2006)%20Forum%20Research%20(JC).pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52''' || 28 || 11 || 5 || 3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,429 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|June 16, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Abacus-Release-End-of-Session-June-2016-.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=June 16, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44''' || 28 || 16 || 5 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|June 7, 2016}} || <ref name="auto12">{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/6c10e12e-0a31-42c6-8777-3e4ac1c68c82FED%20Horserace%20Release%20(08%2006%202016)%20(JC).pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49''' || 32 || 10 || 4 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2 pp || 2,271 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|June 7, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_june_14_2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=June 7, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44.7''' || 26.9 || 12.4 || 4.1 || 7.8 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.0 pp || 2,371 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17.8'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|May 24, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= http://globalnews.ca/news/2718864/hes-teflon-trudeaus-approval-ratings-remain-high-as-canadians-shrug-off-elbowgate/ |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46''' || 30 || 15 || 4 || || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.5 pp || 1,002 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|May 20, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Political-Mood.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=May 20, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46''' || 27 || 15 || 4 || 7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 2,000 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|May 11, 2016}} || <ref name="auto73">{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/c5426a2b-eb89-401a-b0a4-ed87f1849dbdFederal%20Horserace%20News%20Release%20(2016%2005%2013)%20Forum%20Research_2.pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52''' || 29 || 11 || 4 || 3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,517 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''23'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|April 27, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/cpc-leader-april/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=April 27, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49''' || 30 || 14 || 3 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.39 pp || 4,998 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 22, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=859980 |work=[[CTV News]] |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 22, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.2''' || 25.8 || 19.3 || 4.2 || 5.5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 || telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17.4'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|April 15, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/cullen-someone-else-lead-ndp-leadership-race/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=April 15, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''48''' || 30 || 14 || 3 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.38 pp || 5,012 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|April 15, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_april_18_2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=April 15, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44.1''' || 28.5 || 12.0 || 4.4 || 6.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.9 pp || 1,176 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15.6'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|April 13, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/April-Politics-Release.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=April 13, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49''' || 26 || 13 || 5 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''23'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|April 5, 2016}} || <ref name="auto31">{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/75664dfc-6ce6-4ebb-a42f-1c1f0bc8a747Federal%20Horserace%20News%20Release%20%282016%2004%2006%29%20Forum%20Research.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=April 5, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51''' || 28 || 12 || 6 || 3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,455 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''23'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|March 30, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/160308_CTM1603_Federal_Budget_Deck.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=March 30, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46''' || 30 || 12 || 5 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || n/a || 2,456 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|March 29, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_march_31_2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=March 29, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.1''' || 31.7 || 11.7 || 4.8 || 6.4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 2,019 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.4'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 23, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/EY-Abacus-Budget-Release-Final.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 23, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47''' || 28 || 14 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 18, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/March-Politics-Release-1.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 18, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44''' || 29 || 16 || 4 || 6 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|March 15, 2016}} || <ref name="auto84">{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/4c0e5363-2f5a-460b-b467-fe6a2903287aFederal%20Horserace%20News%20Release%20%282016%2003%2016%29%20Forum%20Research.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=March 15, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46''' || 34 || 12 || 4 || 3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2 pp || 1,567 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|February 17, 2016}} || <ref name="auto23">{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/3e7df02f-83a0-419d-add4-af8659916024Federal%20Horserace%20News%20Release%20(2016%2002%2018)%20Forum%20Research.pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49''' || 32 || 10 || 3 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,406 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|February 4, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/soen20160211.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=February 4, 2016 |access-date=February 14, 2016 |archive-date=February 20, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160220171332/http://leger360.com/admin/upload/publi_pdf/soen20160211.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49''' || 27 || 15 || 3 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.1 pp || 1,524 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''22'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|January 18, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_january_26_2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=January 18, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.7''' || 25.3 || 15.9 || 3.9 || 7.0 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.9 pp || 2,598 || online/telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''21.4'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|January 15, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/make-canada-great-again-oleary-mckay-tied/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=January 15, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44''' || 32 || 16 || 3 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±1.39 pp || 4,937 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|January 12, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Abacus-Release-Economy-Politics-Jan-2016.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=January 12, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45''' || 28 || 17 || 5 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|December 10, 2015}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_december_11_2015.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=December 10, 2015}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.3''' || 27.2 || 15.3 || 3.4 || 6.7 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.2 pp || 1,956 || online/telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19.1'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|December 8, 2015}} || <ref name="auto20">{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/0dc9dad8-6e61-45eb-b58f-809f26cda21dFederal%20Horserace%20News%20Release%20(2015%2012%2009)%20Forum%20Research.pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46''' || 32 || 13 || 4 || 4 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,369 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|November 25, 2015}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Abacus-Release-Nov-Politics-.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=November 25, 2015}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49''' || 24 || 16 || 5 || 5 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±2.6 pp || 1,500 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''25'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|November 17, 2015}} || <ref name="auto20"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45''' || 37 || 10 || 4 || 3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 909 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|- 
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|November 7, 2015}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/95187c50-8143-4ff2-ab57-0af551fe3875Federal%20Political%20Issues%20News%20Release%20(2015%2011%2008)%20Forum%20Research.pdf |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''55'''|| 25 || 12 || 4 || 3 || style="color:#F8F9FA;"| 0 || ±3 pp || 1,256 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''30'''
|-
| colspan="13" style="text-align:center;" |'''Rona Ambrose is named interim leader of the Conservative Party of Canada (November 5, 2015)'''
|-
|-
! colspan="13"|
|-
| style="background:#ffd;"| ''[[Canadian federal election, 2015|2015 election]]'' || style="background:#ffd;"| {{dts|October 19, 2015}} || style="background:#ffd;"| ''<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.elections.ca/res/rep/off/ovr2015app/41/table9E.html |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref>'' || style="background:#ffd;" {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''''39.5''''' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''31.9'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''19.7'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''4.7'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''3.4'' || style="background:#ffd;"| || style="background:#ffd;"| || style="background:#ffd;"| || style="background:#ffd;"| || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''''7.6''''' 
|}

'''Notes'''
:{{note label|order|1|1}} Polls that share the same last date of polling are ordered from earliest (below) to latest (above) first date of polling. Polls that have identical field dates are placed in the order in which they were released/published (earliest below, latest above).
:{{note label|MOE|2|2}} In cases when linked poll details distinguish between the margin of error associated with the total sample of respondents (including undecided and non-voters) and that of the subsample of decided/leaning voters, the former is included in the table. Also not included is the margin of error created by rounding to the nearest whole number or any margin of error from methodological sources. Most online polls—because of their opt-in method of recruiting panellists which results in a non-random sample—cannot have a margin of error. In such cases, shown is what the margin of error would be for a survey using a random probability-based sample of equivalent size.
:{{note label|sample|3|3}} Refers to the total, "raw" sample size, including undecided and non-voters, and before demographic weighting is applied. Fractions in parentheses apply to rolling polls (see below) and indicate the proportion of the sample that is independent from the previous poll in the series.
:{{note label|method|4|4}} "Telephone" refers to traditional telephone polls conducted by live interviewers; "IVR" refers to automated [[Interactive Voice Response]] polls conducted by telephone; "online" refers to polls conducted exclusively over the internet; "telephone/online" refers to polls which combine results from both telephone and online surveys, or for which respondents are initially recruited by telephone and then asked to complete an online survey. "Rolling" polls contain overlapping data from one poll to the next.
:{{note label|PPC|5|5}} The People's Party of Canada was officially created on September 14, 2018 and voting intentions for the party were therefore not polled prior to this date.

==Regional polls==
A number of polling firms survey federal voting intentions on a regional or provincial level:

===Atlantic Canada===

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Polling firm
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2"| Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| Other
! rowspan="2"| Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2"| Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2"| Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2"| Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number"|
|-
| Narrative Research || {{dts|August 22, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://narrativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/19-3-News-Release-Federal-Voting-Intentions.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Narrative Research |date=August 22, 2019 |access-date=August 28, 2019 |archive-date=August 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190828151151/https://narrativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/19-3-News-Release-Federal-Voting-Intentions.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43''' || 30 || 10 || - || 15 || - || 2 || ±2.5 pp || 1,500 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13'''
|-
| Narrative Research || {{dts|May 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://cra.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/June-5-19-News-Release-Atlantic-Federal-Voting-Intentions.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Narrative Research |date=May 24, 2019 |access-date=June 28, 2019 |archive-date=June 26, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190626182333/https://cra.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/June-5-19-News-Release-Atlantic-Federal-Voting-Intentions.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 36 || 9 || - || 14 || - || 2 || ±2.5 pp || 1,500 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|}

====Newfoundland and Labrador====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! rowspan="2" style="width:105px;" | Polling firm
! rowspan="2" style="width:105px;" | Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" | Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" | Other
! rowspan="2" | Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2" | Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2" | Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2" | Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number" |
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|July 31, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Atlantic-Matters-NL-Federal-Results-Q3-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=July 31, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46'''|| 38 || 11 || - || 2 || 2 || 1 || ±4.9 pp || 400 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|May 4, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Atlantic-Matters-NL-Federal-Results-Q2-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=May 4, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49'''|| 37 || 11 || - || 3 || 0 || || ±4 pp || 600 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12'''
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|January 28, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Atlantic-Matters-NL-Federal-Results-Q1-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=January 28, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''56'''|| 35 || 6 || - || 1 || 1 || || ±4 pp || 600 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''21'''
|}

==== Prince Edward Island ====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! rowspan="2" style="width:105px;" | Polling firm
! rowspan="2" style="width:105px;" | Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" | Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" | Other
! rowspan="2" | Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2" | Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2" | Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2" | Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number" |
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|August 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-poll-federal-mqo-aug-2019-1.5255710 |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=August 6, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40'''|| 34 || 4 || - || 21 || 1 || || ±5.7 pp || 400 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6'''
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|April 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Atlantic-Matters-PEI-Federal-Results-Q2-2019-Final.pdf |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=April 16, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40'''|| 32 || 8 || - || 18 || 1 || || ±4 pp || 400 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|January 27, 2019}} || [http://mqoresearch.com/federal-liberal-party-holds-strong-lead-on-pei/] || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52'''|| 30 || 7 || - || 10 || || || ±4 pp || 400 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''22'''
|}

==== Nova Scotia ====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! rowspan="2" style="width:105px;" | Polling firm
! rowspan="2" style="width:105px;" | Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" | Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" | Other
! rowspan="2" | Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2" | Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2" | Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2" | Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number" |
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|August 27, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Atlantic-Matters-NS-Federal-Results-Q3-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=August 27, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44'''|| 31 || 13 || - || 9 || 1 || || ±4.9 pp || 400 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13'''
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|May 13, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Atlantic-Matters-NS-Federal-Results-Q2-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=May 13, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42'''|| 35 || 11 || - || 10 || 0 || || ±4 pp || 600 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|February 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Atlantic-Matters-NS-Federal-Results-Q1-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=February 10, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50'''|| 30 || 12 || - || 7 || 1 || || ±4 pp || 600 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20'''
|}

==== New Brunswick ====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! rowspan="2" style="width:105px;" | Polling firm
! rowspan="2" style="width:105px;" | Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" | Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" |[[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;" | Other
! rowspan="2" | Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2" | Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2" | Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2" | Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number" |
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number" |
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|August 14, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Atlantic-Matters-NB-Federal-Results-Q3-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=August 14, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41''' || 40 || 6 || - || 9 || 4 || || ±4.9 pp || 400 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|May 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Atlantic-Matters-NB-Federal-Results-Q2-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=May 6, 2019}}</ref> || 36 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''39'''|| 7 || - || 16 || 1 || || ±4 pp || 600 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''3'''
|-
| MQO Research || {{dts|February 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Atlantic-Matters-NB-Federal-Results-Q1-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=MQO Research |date=February 10, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44'''|| 39|| 4 || - || 10 || 3 || || ±4 pp || 600 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5'''
|}

=== Central Canada ===

==== Quebec ====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Polling firm
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2"| Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| Other
! rowspan="2"| Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2"| Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2"| Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2"| Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number"|
|- 
| style="background:#ffd;"| ''[[2019 Canadian federal election|2019 election]]'' || style="background:#ffd;"| {{dts|October 21, 2019}} || style="background:#ffd;"| ''<ref>{{cite web |url= https://enr.elections.ca/Provinces.aspx?lang=e |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref>'' || style="background:#ffd;" {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''''34.2''''' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''16.0'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''10.7'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''32.5'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''4.4'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''1.5'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''0.5'' || {{N/A}} || style="background:#ffd;"| ''4,284,338'' || {{N/A}} || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''''1.7''''' 
|-
! colspan="14"|
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|October 15, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Politique-f%C3%A9d%C3%A9rale-au-Qu%C3%A9bec-17-oct-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=October 15, 2019 |access-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-date=November 11, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111181030/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Politique-f%C3%A9d%C3%A9rale-au-Qu%C3%A9bec-17-oct-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31''' || 16 || 14 || style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | '''31''' || 6 || 2 || - || ±1.79 || 3000 || Online || '''0'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|October 12, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/e51789a3-1ca0-4fd7-bfb2-9f15e4823d3aLeader%20Debate%20EN%20Oct%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=October 12, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || 15 || 10|| 31|| 7 || 2 || 2 || ±3 pp || 1001 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|October 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Politique-fe%CC%81de%CC%81rale-au-Que%CC%81bec-10-oct-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=October 10, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31''' || 16 || 13 || 29 || 7 || 3 || 1 || - || 1014 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|October 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.lesoleil.com/actualite/elections-2019/sondage-mainstreet-le-bloc-premier-chez-les-francos-98f1250bcf4fa5b3f0ab6396618a7b45 |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=October 6, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 17 || 11 || 27 || 7 || 3 || - || ±3.75 pp || 685 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.lenouvelliste.ca/actualites/sondage-mainstreet-la-balance-du-pouvoir-au-bloc-97b4bcdf029648ea7bf8f31f305b2648 |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 30, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37''' || 18 || 10|| 22 || 9 || 3 || - || ±3.7 pp || 694 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-Nanos-ELXN-Quebec-Ballot-Comparison-of-Weeks-1-and-2-Compiled.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 30, 2019 |access-date=October 2, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006205731/https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.47/823.910.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-1445-CTV-Globe-Nanos-ELXN-Quebec-Ballot-Comparison-of-Weeks-1-and-2-Compiled.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.3''' || 17.0 || 13.3 || 22.0 || 10.1 || 1.8 || 0.6 || ±3.6 pp || 828 || telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13.3'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|September 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://montrealgazette.com/news/national/election-2019/bloc-quebecois-edges-into-second-place-behind-liberals-in-quebec-poll |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=September 17, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 21 || 7 || 22 || 10 || 3 || 1 || ±3.9 pp || 837 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14'''
|-
| [[Mainstreet Research]] || {{dts|September 13, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.lequotidien.com/actualites/politique/la-laicite-fait-mal-aux-liberaux-au-quebec-selon-un-sondage-mainstreet-1403d1a58a79e92e698dffff188b5565 |title=poll |publisher=[[Mainstreet Research]] |date=September 13, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.0''' || 24.8 || 7.9 || 18.6 || 9.5 || - || - || unknown || unknown || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.2'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|August 29, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Politique-f%C3%A9d%C3%A9rale-31-Ao%C3%BBt-2019-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=August 29, 2019 |access-date=September 9, 2019 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006210159/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Politique-f%C3%A9d%C3%A9rale-31-Ao%C3%BBt-2019-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || 23 || 7 || 20 || 11 || 4 || 1 || ±3.39 pp || 837 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|August 28, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/quebec-skies-brighten-for-trudeau-cloud-over-for-conservatives-poll |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=August 28, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37''' || 21 || 8 || 18 || 9 || 4 || || ±3 pp|| 1219 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|July 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/b65180b5-21e2-4d4e-a421-a19f9496fa01Federal%20election%20in%20QC.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=July 24, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''30''' || 28 || 9 || 15 || 10 || 4 || 3 || ±3 pp|| 977 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|June 12, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/1c0d3d7d-a018-49bd-a55d-4e43cdeb2031Federal%20Politics%20in%20QC%20June%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=June 12, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32''' || 25 || 9 || 18 || 10 || 4 || 2 || ±3 pp|| 1,471 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|March 11, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.journaldemontreal.com/sondage-leger--limpact-de-laffaire-snc-lavalin-au-quebec |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=March 11, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 26 || 7 || 17 || 9 || 4 || || ±3.08 pp || 1,014 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|January 28, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Politique-QC-publication-le-2-f%C3%A9vrier-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=January 28, 2019 |access-date=June 28, 2019 |archive-date=November 7, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107230053/https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Politique-QC-publication-le-2-f%C3%A9vrier-2019.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 21 || 8 || 21 || 5 || 6 || || ±3.09 pp || 1,007 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18'''
|-
| CROP || {{dts|June 19, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://sondage.crop.ca/survey/start/CAWI/blogue/CROP-Politique%20Quebec%2018-9334.pdf |title=poll |publisher=CROP |date=June 19, 2018}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42''' || 27 || 10 || 12 || 8 || || 0 || {{N/A}} || 1,000 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|August 24, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Politics-in-Quebec_August-2017-EN-FED.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=August 24, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43''' || 16 || 19 || 16 || 6 || || 2 || ±3 pp || 1,002 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27'''
|-
! colspan="14"|
|-
| style="background:#ffd;"| ''[[2015 Canadian federal election|2015 election]]'' || style="background:#ffd;"| {{dts|October 19, 2015}} || style="background:#ffd;"| ''<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.elections.ca/res/rep/off/ovr2015app/41/table9E.html |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref>'' || style="background:#ffd;" {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''''35.7''''' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''16.7'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''25.4'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''19.4'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''2.2'' || ''{{N/A}}'' || style="background:#ffd;"| ''0.7'' || {{N/A}} || style="background:#ffd;"| ''4,241,487'' || {{N/A}} || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''''19''''' 
|}

==== Ontario ====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Polling firm
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2"| Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| Other
! rowspan="2"| Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2"| Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2"| Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2"| Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number"|
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|September 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Conservatives-continue-their-climb-in-Ontario-Liberals-slip-further |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=September 19, 2019}}</ref> || 35 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''39''' || 12 || - || 10 || 2 || 1 || ±2.17 pp || 2035|| Online/Telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|September 18, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019.09.19_Ford_Federal.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=September 18, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 35 || 15 || - || 9 || 5 || - || - || 722 || online || {{Party shading/Liberal }} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|September 5, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/ekos_data_tables_august_8_september_5_2019_ontario.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=September 5, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.8''' || 29.9 || 10.9 || - || 11.9 || 4.8 || 1.8 || ±2.0 pp || 2393|| IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.9'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|August 28, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/VoiceOfFranky/status/1167209586929131521 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=August 28, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.7''' || 29.2 || 7.6 || - || 9.4 || 5.7 || 1.3 || ±4.97 pp || 389|| IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17.5'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|August 27, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/VoiceOfFranky/status/1167976330274590720 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=August 27, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44''' || 30 || 10 || - || 10 || 4 || 2 || ±1.9 pp || 2601|| IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|August 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/VoiceOfFranky/status/1163644877818736640 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=August 19, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.9''' || 29.9 || 8.6 || - || 13.7 || 2.5 || 2.5 || ±5.39 pp || 301 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13'''
|-
| Corbett Communications || {{dts|August 13, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pasqBhfoGyi9fChANvCjkSOr9t30kf0m/view |title=poll |publisher=Corbett Communications |date=August 13, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 31 || 14 || - || 12 || 4 || 1 || ±3 pp || 1099 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|August 9, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/VoiceOfFranky/status/1160002278327300097 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=August 9, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.3''' || 28.9 || 11.9 || - || 12.2 || 5.2 || 1.5 || ±4.90 pp || 400 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.4'''
|-
| [[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] || {{dts|July 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/VoiceOfFranky/status/1154958474301911040 |title=poll |publisher=[[Ekos Research Associates|EKOS]] |date=July 26, 2019}}</ref> || 33.8 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''35.8''' || 9.5 || - || 13.2 || 4.5 || 3.2 || ±4.89 pp || 402 || IVR || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''2'''
|-
| Corbett Communications || {{dts|July 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HI_RZ7BawYex9C-EUTqu-AeGMgWXJ7gY/view |title=poll |publisher=Corbett Communications |date=July 10, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 33 || 14 || - || 13 || 1 || 0 || ±3 pp || 481 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|April 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/CanadaThisMonth_PhoneVSOnline.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=April 16, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40''' || 33 || 14 || - || 9 || - || 4 || || 945 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|April 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/CanadaThisMonth_PhoneVSOnline.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=April 10, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41''' || 34 || 13 || - || 9 || - || 4 || || 773 || Online || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|April 1, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/CanadaThisMonth_PhoneVSOnline.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=April 1, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 33 || 18 || - || 7 || - || 3 || ±4 pp || 605 || Telephone || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6'''
|}

===== Toronto =====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Polling firm
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2"| Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| Other
! rowspan="2"| Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2"| Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2"| Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2"| Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number"|
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|September 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/c32caace-947a-4b13-ae07-31663532e0b8Fed%20Horserace%20in%20Toronto%20Sept%2027%202019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=September 26, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50''' || 26 || 10 || - || 10 || 3 || 1 || ±3 pp || 1,059 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|July 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/48b57dfe-58c5-4b3d-b92e-4ab02842ff15Federal%20Politics%20in%20Toronto%20July%202019_New.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=July 6, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46''' || 26 || 12 || - || 10 || 4 || 2 || ±3 pp || 1,143 || IVR || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20'''
|}

=== Western Canada ===

==== Manitoba ====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Polling firm
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2"| Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| Other
! rowspan="2"| Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2"| Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2"| Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2"| Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number"|
|-
| Probe Research || {{dts|September 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://wfpquantum.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/2019/67934_Probe-poll-Manitoba-federal-voting-intentions-Sept-2019.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Probe Research |date=September 26, 2019}}</ref> || 27 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''41''' || 19 || - || 9 || 3 || 1 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 || telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''14'''
|-
| Probe Research || {{dts|June 17, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.probe-research.com/documents/190621%20June%202019%20MB%20Omni%20Fed%20Party%20Standings.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Probe Research |date=June 17, 2019}}</ref> || 24 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''43''' || 17 || - || 13 || 2 || 1 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 || telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''19'''
|-
| Probe Research || {{dts|March 24, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.probe-research.com/documents/190402%20March%202019%20MB%20Omni%20Fed%20Party%20Standings.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Probe Research |date=March 24, 2019}}</ref> || 31 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''42''' || 17 || - || 7 || 3 || 1 || ±3.1 pp || 1,000 || telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''11'''
|-
| Probe Research || {{dts|December 6, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.probe-research.com/documents/181217%20FINAL%20Dec%202018%20MB%20Omni%20Fed%20Party%20Standings.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Probe Research |date=December 6, 2018}}</ref> || 34 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''42''' || 16 || - || 5 || 2 || 1 || ±2.9 pp || 1,105 || telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''8'''
|}

==== Saskatchewan ====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Polling firm
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2"| Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| Other
! rowspan="2"| Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2"| Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2"| Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2"| Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number"|
|-
| U of Saskatchewan || {{dts|September, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/sask-election-poll-1.5288837 |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || 5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''41''' || 11 || - || 8 || 1 || - || ±4.9 pp || 400 || telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''30'''
|}

==== Alberta ====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Polling firm
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2"| Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| Other
! rowspan="2"| Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2"| Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2"| Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2"| Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number"|
|-
| Lethbridge College || {{dts|October 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://lethbridgecollege.ca/document-centre/publications/citizen-society-research-lab/alberta-federal-vote-intention |title=poll |publisher=Lethbridge College |date=October 10, 2019}}</ref> || 17.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''64.0''' || 9.7 || - || 4.1 || 1.9 || 2.4 || ±3.17 pp || 953 || telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''46.1'''
|-
| Lethbridge College || {{dts|February 5, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://lethbridgecollege.ca/document-centre/publications/citizen-society-research-lab/alberta-politics-federal-vote-intention-0/download?token=1Ld9rXa7 |title=poll |publisher=Lethbridge College |date=February 5, 2019}}</ref> || 12.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''71.4''' || 9.3 || - || 1.9 || 2.1 || 2.3 || ±3.0 pp || 1,055 || telephone || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''58.5'''
|}

==== British Columbia ====

{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
|- style="height:40px;"
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Polling firm
! style="width:105px;" rowspan="2"| Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2"| Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Liberal Party of Canada|LPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Conservative Party of Canada|CPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[New Democratic Party|NDP]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Bloc Québécois|BQ]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[Green Party of Canada|GPC]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| [[People's Party of Canada|PPC]]{{ref label|PPC|1|1}}
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"| Other
! rowspan="2"| Margin<br />of error{{ref label|MOE|2|2}}
! rowspan="2"| Sample<br />size{{ref label|sample|3|3}}
! rowspan="2"| Polling method{{ref label|method|4|4}}
! rowspan="2"| Lead
|-
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}};" data-sort-type="number"|
! style="background:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Other}};" data-sort-type="number"|
|-
| Insights West || {{dts|October 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://insightswest.com/news/bc-voters-poll-10-18-2019-federal-vote/ |title=poll |publisher=Insights West |date=October 16, 2019 |access-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-date=October 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018173648/https://insightswest.com/news/bc-voters-poll-10-18-2019-federal-vote/ |url-status=usurped }}</ref> || 20 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''27''' || 23 || - || 11 || - || 2 || ±2.4 pp || 1670 || Online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| Insights West || {{dts|September 23, 2019}} || <ref name="auto95">{{cite web |url= https://insightswest.com/news/bc-voters-poll-09-24-2019-federal-vote/?+Contacts+-+BC |title= poll |publisher=  |access-date= September 24, 2019 |archive-date= November 6, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20191106210407/https://insightswest.com/news/bc-voters-poll-09-24-2019-federal-vote/?+Contacts+-+BC |url-status= usurped }}</ref> || 19 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''29''' || 14 || - || 14 || - || 3 || ±3.3 pp || 867 || Online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''10'''
|-
| Insights West || {{dts|September 10, 2019}} || <ref name="auto95"/> || 17 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''29''' || 14 || - || 13 || - || 4 || ±3.4 pp || 869 || Online || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''12'''
|}

==Leadership polls==
Aside from conducting the usual opinion surveys on general party preferences, polling firms also survey public opinion on who would make the best prime minister:

=== February 2019–October 2019===
{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Andrew Scheer]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Jagmeet Singh]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Yves-François Blanchet]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Maxime Bernier]]
! rowspan="2" |Unsure
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}} | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Political-Package-2019-09-06-FR-with-tabs.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 6, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.6''' || 22.7 || 7.4 || 1.4 || 8.1 || 2.4 || 24.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 30, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Political-Package-2019-08-30-FR-with-tabs.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 30, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32.2''' || 23.2 || 7.2 || 1.3 || 8.3 || 2.8 || 25.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 23, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Political-Package-2019-08-23-FOR-WEBSITE-FR-With-tabs.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 23, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''30.9''' || 25.1 || 6.7 || 1.4 || 8.7 || 2.6 || 24.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 16, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Political-Package-2019-08-16-Website-FR-with-tabs.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 16, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31.8''' || 23.9 || 7.5 || 1.7 || 8.4 || 2.5 || 24.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 9, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Political-Package-2019-08-09-Website-FR-with-tabs.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 9, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31.4''' || 25 || 7 || 1.8 || 8.5 || 1.9 || 24.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''6.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 2, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Political-Package-2019-08-02-FR-NON-SUBSCRIBER-with-tabs.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 2, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.8''' || 24.4 || 6.8 || 1.8 || 9.2 || 1.6 || 22.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.4'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|July 28, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/6908c129-a20c-4ac7-8d29-c352f8312f95Best%20on%20Env%20Econ%20PM.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=July 28, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''28''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''28''' || 7 || - || 14 || - || 23 || ±3 pp || '''0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 26, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Political-Package-2019-07-26-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 26, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32.5''' || 24.1 || 7.7 || 2.5 || 9.1 || 1.6 || 22.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.4'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|July 23, 2019}} || <ref name="auto109"/> || 23 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''24''' || 7 || || 9 || 4 || 20 || ±2.5 pp || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 19, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Political-Package-2019-07-19.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 19, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32.8''' || 24.0 || 8.0 || 2.3 || 8.8 || 1.8 || 22.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.8'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|July 17, 2019}} || <ref name="auto97"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 31 || 13 || || 14 || 6 || || ±2.6 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''5'''
|-
| [[Ipsos-Reid|Ipsos]] || {{dts|July 15, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url= https://globalnews.ca/news/5502690/andrew-scheer-justin-trudeau-prime-minister-ipsos-poll/ |title=poll |publisher=}}</ref> || 32 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''36''' || 13 || 2 || 17 || || || ±3.5 pp || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''4'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|July 12, 2019}} || <ref name="auto70"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24''' || 20 || 7 || 1 || 9 || 3 || 21 || ±2.3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 12, 2019}} || <ref name="auto114"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32.9''' || 23.1 || 8.9 || 1.8 || 7.9 || 2.2 || 23.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 21, 2019}} || <ref name="auto93"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27.9''' || 24.0 || 9.7 || 1.6 || 7.7 || 2.1 || 27.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 14, 2019}} || <ref name="auto52"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27.0''' || 24.9 || 9.9 || 1.5 || 9.4 || 1.8 || 25.6 || ±2.3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2.1'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|June 9, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/Deadlock-continues-as-the-Green-Party-closes-in-on-the-NDP |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=June 9, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24''' || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''24''' || 7 || 1 || 9 || 4 || 17 || ±2.6 pp || '''0'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|June 1, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/liberals-and-conservatives-neck-and-neck-as-greens-rise-to-12/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=June 1, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || 30 || 12 || || 19 || 6 || || ±2.6 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 31, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Political-Package-2019-05-31-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 31, 2019 }}{{Dead link|date=March 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> || 26.5 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''26.7''' || 8.9 || 1.7 || 9.6 || 1.6 || 24.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 17, 2019}} || <ref name="auto4"/> || 27.9 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''28.6''' || 6.8 || 1.5 || 10.0 || 1.8 || 23.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''0.8'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|May 3, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/conservatives-lead-as-2015-liberal-coalition-splinters/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=May 3, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || 33 || 14 || || 14 || 6 || || ±1.5 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|April 22, 2019}} || <ref name="auto22"/> || 20 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''25''' || 7 || || 8 || 3 || 21 || ±2.5 pp || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''5'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|March 20, 2019}} || <ref name="auto37"/> || 24 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''25''' || 8 || || 7 || 4 || 19 || ±2.51 pp || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 15, 2019}} || <ref name="auto61"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''30.3''' || 27.3 || 8.9 || 1.7 || 7.2 || 2.8 || 21.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3.0'''
|-
| Abacus Data || {{dts|March 10, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/tracking-the-impact-of-the-snc-lavalin-controvery-sunday-update/ |title=poll |publisher=Abacus Data |date=March 10, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 31 || 10 || || 13 || 7 || || ±3.3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|March 10, 2019}} || <ref name="auto63"/> || 23 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''24''' || 7 || 1 || 8 || || 19 || ±2.5 pp || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|March 6, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://abacusdata.ca/has-the-snc-lavalin-wilson-raybould-controversy-impacted-public-opinion/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Abacus Data]] |date=March 6, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 33 || 13 || || 13 || 7 || || ±3.3 pp (final) || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 1, 2019}} || <ref name="auto44"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.2''' || 25.0 || 6.2 || 1.8 || 7.3 || 2.1 || 22.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 15, 2019}} || <ref name="auto16"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.7''' || 23.4 || 5.3 || 1.6 || 7.7 || 2.7 || 22.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12.3'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|February 11, 2019}} || <ref name="auto55"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''28''' || 25 || 4 || 6 || 1 || || 17 || ±2.5 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 8, 2019}} || <ref name="auto53"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.5''' || 24.9 || 5.9 || 1.4 || 6.4 || 3.8 || 22.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.6'''
|}

=== September 2018–February 2019 ===
{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Andrew Scheer]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Jagmeet Singh]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Mario Beaulieu]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Maxime Bernier]]
! rowspan="2" |Unsure
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|PPC}} | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 1, 2019}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Political-Package-2019-02-01-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 1, 2019}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.1''' || 24.9 || 6.8 || 1.2 || 6.7 || 5.2 || 21.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 25, 2019}} || <ref name="auto51"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.5''' || 26.1 || 7.5 || 1.2 || 6.7 || 4.9 || 20.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''7.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 18, 2019}} || <ref name="auto100"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.6''' || 24.8 || 7.5 || 1.1 || 6.7 || 4.4 || 20.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 11, 2019}} || <ref name="auto85"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.4''' || 23.9 || 6.8 || 1.3 || 6.2 || 4.5 || 20.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 4, 2019}} || <ref name="auto91"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.3''' || 23.5 || 6.5 || 1.2 || 5.4 || 3.9 || 20.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 28, 2018}} || <ref name="auto34"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.1''' || 23.7 || 5.0 || 1.0 || 5.7 || 4.2 || 21.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 21, 2018}} || <ref name="auto8"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.3''' || 24.8 || 5.0 || 0.9 || 5.8 || 4.1 || 21.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13.5'''
|-
| [[Abacus Data]] || {{dts|December 18, 2018}} || <ref name="auto113"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45''' || 29 || 10 || || 10 || 5 || || ±2.5 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|December 18, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/federal-issues-dec2018/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] |date=December 18, 2018}}</ref> || 27 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''33''' || 6 || || 7 || || 26 || ±2.5 pp || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 14, 2018}} || <ref name="auto89"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.4''' || 25.6 || 6.3 || 0.7 || 5.4 || 2.6 || 22.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.8'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|December 13, 2018}} || <ref name="auto79"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32''' || 22 || 5 || 1 || 7 || || 17 || ±2.5 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 7, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Political-Package-2018-12-07-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 7, 2018 |access-date=January 2, 2019 |archive-date=January 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190103055804/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Political-Package-2018-12-07-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.8''' || 25.0 || 5.6 || 0.6 || 6.0 || 2.1 || 25.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 30, 2018}} || <ref name="auto33"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.5''' || 23.4 || 5.7 || 0.6 || 5.5 || 2.5 || 24.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14.1'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|November 29, 2018}} || <ref name="auto21"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || 32 || 6 || || 8 || || 22 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 23, 2018}} || <ref name="auto81"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.2''' || 21.9 || 5.8 || 0.9 || 5.7 || 2.3 || 25.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16.3'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|November 20, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://leger360.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Politique-federale-final-novembre-2018.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=November 20, 2018}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33''' || 22 || 5 || || 6 || 5 || || ±2.51 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 16, 2018}} || <ref name="auto7"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.5''' || 20.2 || 7.7 || 0.7 || 5.5 || 2.2 || 24.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19.3'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|November 9, 2018}} || <ref name="auto82"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32''' || 22 || 6 || || 6 || || 17 || ±2.5 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 9, 2018}} || <ref name="auto107"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.7''' || 20.0 || 8.6 || 1.0 || 5.5 || 2.6 || 20.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''21.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 2, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Political-Package-2018-11-02-FR.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 2, 2018 |access-date=January 2, 2019 |archive-date=January 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190103055714/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Political-Package-2018-11-02-FR.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.2''' || 20.3 || 8.2 || 1.2 || 6.3 || 2.4 || 20.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 26, 2018}} || <ref name="auto6"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.8''' || 21.3 || 8.0 || 1.6 || 5.5 || 2.7 || 20.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 19, 2018}} || <ref name="auto115"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.9''' || 22.9 || 7.5 || 1.6 || 6.2 || 2.5 || 21.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 12, 2018}} || <ref name="auto3"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.1''' || 23.4 || 7.1 || 1.0 || 5.5 || 3.1 || 20.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15.7'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|October 1, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://innovativeresearch.ca/2018-paac-keynote-presentation/ |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=October 1, 2018}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47''' || 29 || 9 || 2 || 8 || || || n/a || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18'''
|-
| [[Pollara]] || {{dts|September 20, 2018}} || <ref name="auto96"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 27 || 8 || || || 5 || 21 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12'''
|-
|}

=== August–September 2018 ===
{{clear}}
{|class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Andrew Scheer]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Jagmeet Singh]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Mario Beaulieu]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}} | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 28, 2018}} || <ref name="auto50"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.4''' || 24.7 || 7.8 || 0.5 || 5.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 21, 2018}} || <ref name="auto30"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.1''' || 25.0 || 7.5 || 0.8 || 5.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18.1'''
|-
| [[Pollara]] || {{dts|September 20, 2018}} || <ref name="auto96"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 27 || 8 || — || 5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|September 14, 2018}} || <ref name="auto102"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32''' || 22 || 5 || 5 || || ±2.5 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 31, 2018}} || <ref name="auto17"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.2''' || 24.3 || 6.8 || 1.0 || 6.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 24, 2018}} || <ref name="auto77"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.1''' || 25.4 || 7.7 || 1.3 || 5.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 17, 2018}} || <ref name="auto66"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.6''' || 25.2 || 8.2 || 1.2 || 4.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14.4'''
|-
|}

=== October 2017–July 2018 ===
{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Andrew Scheer]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Jagmeet Singh]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Martine Ouellet]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:40px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}} | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 27, 2018}} || <ref name="auto11"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.4''' || 24.5 || 6.5 || 1.2 || 5.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 20, 2018}} || <ref name="auto80"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.5''' || 25.2 || 6.3 || 1.3 || 5.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''15.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 6, 2018}} || <ref name="auto116"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.6''' || 24.4 || 7.1 || 0.9 || 6.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 22, 2018}} || <ref name="auto28"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.3''' || 24.8 || 8.2 || 1.1 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 15, 2018}} || <ref name="auto49"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.7''' || 25.4 || 8.8 || 0.8 || 4.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13.3'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|June 14, 2018}} || <ref name="auto46"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 22 || 7 || – || 6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''13'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 1, 2018}} || <ref name="auto71"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.3''' || 25.6 || 10.0 || 1.2 || 5.7 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''8.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 25, 2018}} || <ref name="auto117"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.0''' || 25.2 || 9.3 || 1.3 || 6.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''10.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 18, 2018}} || <ref name="auto14"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.2''' || 22.4 || 8.1 || 1.3 || 6.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 11, 2018}} || <ref name="auto58"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.6''' || 20.9 || 8.1 || 0.9 || 7.7 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18.7'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|April 20, 2018}} || <ref name="auto78"/> || 24 || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''25''' || 8 || 3 || 12 || ±2 pp || {{Party shading/Conservative (Canada)}} | '''1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 23, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-2018-03-23.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 23, 2018 |access-date=March 26, 2018 |archive-date=March 27, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180327084518/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-2018-03-23.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.5''' || 26.5 || 8.9 || 1.9 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''12.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 16, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-2018-03-16.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 16, 2018 |access-date=March 20, 2018 |archive-date=March 20, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180320105544/http://www.nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Political-Package-2018-03-16.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.5''' || 25.9 || 9.0 || 2.4 || 5.7 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''11.6'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid (market research)|Angus Reid]] || {{dts|March 15, 2018}} || <ref name="auto27"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''26''' || 22 || 7 || – || – || ±2 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 9, 2018}} || <ref name="auto19"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.2''' || 23.2 || 9.4 || 2.6 || 5.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''16.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 2, 2018}} || <ref name="auto62"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.4''' || 22.8 || 8.6 || 1.8 || 6.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 23, 2018}} || <ref name="auto60"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.4''' || 22.1 || 9.5 || 1.9 || 5.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 16, 2018}} || <ref name="auto"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.0''' || 21.9 || 9.3 || 1.5 || 5.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20.1'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|February 10, 2018}} || <ref name="auto92"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 15 || 7 || 2 || 5 || ±2.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 26, 2018}} || <ref name="auto59"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.8''' || 22.1 || 8.3 || 2.3 || 5.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 12, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20180112%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 12, 2018 |access-date=January 18, 2018 |archive-date=January 16, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180116193333/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20180112%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.7''' || 22.3 || 8.1 || 1.8 || 5.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 5, 2018}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20180105%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 5, 2018 |access-date=January 18, 2018 |archive-date=January 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180110054711/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20180105%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.6''' || 20.3 || 9.0 || 1.4 || 4.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''25.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 29, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171229%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 29, 2017 |access-date=January 18, 2018 |archive-date=January 3, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180103193539/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171229%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.9''' || 21.5 || 9.1 || 1.0 || 3.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''25.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 22, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171222%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 22, 2017 |access-date=January 18, 2018 |archive-date=February 5, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180205064102/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171222%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''48.3''' || 22.0 || 7.9 || 0.8 || 4.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''26.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 15, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171215%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 15, 2017 |access-date=January 18, 2018 |archive-date=December 22, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171222051029/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171215%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.8''' || 21.9 || 8.2 || 1.0 || 5.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24.9'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|December 14, 2017}} || <ref name="auto108"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''30''' || 21 || 9 || 5 || 10 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 8, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171208%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 8, 2017 |access-date=December 12, 2017 |archive-date=December 13, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171213010047/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171208%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.4''' || 23.5 || 8.0 || 1.3 || 6.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''21.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 1, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171201%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 1, 2017 |access-date=December 6, 2017 |archive-date=December 5, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171205194749/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171201%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.6''' || 22.8 || 6.6 || 2.0 || 6.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''22.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 24, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171124%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 24, 2017 |access-date=November 29, 2017 |archive-date=December 1, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201030708/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171124%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44.1''' || 22.8 || 7.2 || 1.6 || 5.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''21.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 17, 2017}} || <ref name="auto94"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44.8''' || 22.4 || 7.7 || 1.6 || 4.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''22.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 10, 2017}} || <ref name="auto112"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.0''' || 21.1 || 8.8 || 1.4 || 5.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''23.9'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|November 9, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PPA-u-PKnWfdOlEpmt7oNwrP59QsHmGW/view |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=November 9, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35''' || 15 || 7 || 5 || 5 || ±2.2 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20''' 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 3, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171103%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 3, 2017 |access-date=November 10, 2017 |archive-date=November 7, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171107165800/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20171103%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.8''' || 21.0 || 8.5 || 1.9 || 5.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''22.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 27, 2017}} || <ref name="auto29"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44.3''' || 20.8 || 9.2 || 2.3 || 5.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''23.5'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|October 11, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B10dvu4CoRILLWo0RmUtbG1GVzA/view |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=October 11, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36''' || 14 || 6 || 1 || 5 || ±2.2 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''22''' 
|-
|}

===October 2017===
{{clear}}
{|class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:left;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Andrew Scheer]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Jagmeet Singh]]/<br />[[Thomas Mulcair]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Martine Ouellet]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}} | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 20, 2017}} || <ref name="auto41"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42.2''' || 22.4 || 9.5 || 2.0 || 5.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 13, 2017}} || <ref name="auto87"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.9''' || 22.5 || 8.7 || 1.6 || 5.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 6, 2017}} || <ref name="auto2"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.9''' || 21.7 || 9.3 || 1.2 || 4.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''22.2'''
|-
|}

=== June–September 2017 ===
{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Andrew Scheer]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Thomas Mulcair]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Martine Ouellet]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}} | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 29, 2017}} || <ref name="auto65"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.9''' || 20.3 || 9.7 || 1.3 || 4.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''23.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 22, 2017}} || <ref name="auto69"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.3''' || 21.2 || 9.4 || 1.5 || 4.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 15, 2017}} || <ref name="auto118"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.3''' || 19.7 || 10.1 || 1.5 || 4.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''26.6'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|September 14, 2017}} || <ref name="auto38"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34''' || 20 || 12 || 4 || 5 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''14'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|September 11, 2017}} || <ref name="auto83"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''42''' || 13 || 8 || 2 || 6 || ±2.3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''29''' 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 8, 2017}} || <ref name="auto36"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47.8''' || 19.7 || 9.7 || 1.3 || 3.7 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''28.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 1, 2017}} || <ref name="auto10"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.2''' || 21.7 || 9.8 || 1.6 || 4.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 25, 2017}} || <ref name="auto74"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''48.0''' || 20.4 || 9.0 || 1.3 || 4.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 18, 2017}} || <ref name="auto67"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47.5''' || 21.6 || 8.4 || 1.1 || 4.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''25.9'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|August 17, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/09e4ca9e-5b70-4e58-bc06-d037378ea6e8FOLM%20Fed%20Horserace%20Aug.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Forum Research]] |date=August 17, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 18 || 10 || 2 || 8 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''21'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 11, 2017}} || <ref name="auto56"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47.1''' || 21.3 || 9.2 || 1.4 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''25.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 4, 2017}} || <ref name="auto110"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.1''' || 21.8 || 9.8 || 1.7 || 5.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 28, 2017}} || <ref name="auto40"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44.0''' || 21.5 || 9.7 || 1.6 || 6.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''22.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 21, 2017}} || <ref name="auto99"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.4''' || 20.8 || 10.1 || 1.4 || 5.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 14, 2017}} || <ref name="auto88"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.9''' || 21.9 || 9.8 || 1.4 || 5.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''22.0'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|July 10, 2017}} || <ref name="auto103"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 17 || 8 || 1 || 4 || ±2 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''21'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 7, 2017}} || <ref name="auto43"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.6''' || 21.4 || 8.1 || 0.7 || 5.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 30, 2017}} || <ref name="auto35"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.9''' || 21.5 || 7.9 || 1.1 || 4.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''25.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 23, 2017}} || <ref name="auto48"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.3''' || 21.2 || 8.4 || 1.0 || 4.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''25.1'''
|-
| [[Angus Reid]] || {{dts|June 12, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://angusreid.org/federal-issues-june-2017/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Angus Reid]] |date=June 12, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37''' || 19 || 10 || || || ±2 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''18'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|June 8, 2017}} || <ref name="auto54"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39''' || 20 || 9 || 3 || 8 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''19'''
|-
|}

===June 2017===
{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Rona Ambrose]]/<br />[[Andrew Scheer]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Thomas Mulcair]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Martine Ouellet]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}} | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 16, 2017}} || <ref name="auto13"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.8''' || 19.8 || 8.5 || 1.2 || 5.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''26.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 9, 2017}} || <ref name="auto119"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43.6''' || 19.2 || 9.1 || 1.3 || 5.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''24.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 2, 2017}} || <ref name="auto1"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.9''' || 18.5 || 8.9 || 1.5 || 5.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27.4'''
|-
|}

=== April–May 2017 ===
{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Rona Ambrose]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Thomas Mulcair]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Martine Ouellet]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}} | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 26, 2017}} || <ref name="auto104"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.7''' || 18.4 || 9.1 || 0.2 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 19, 2017}} || <ref name="auto26"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.3''' || 18.4 || 9.2 || 1.9 || 5.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 12, 2017}} || <ref name="auto32"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47.8''' || 19.4 || 10.3 || 2.0 || 5.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''28.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 5, 2017}} || <ref name="auto75"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.9''' || 18.7 || 10.7 || 2.0 || 5.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''28.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 28, 2017}} || <ref name="auto25"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''48.2''' || 18.4 || 9.4 || 1.6 || 5.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''29.8'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|April 24, 2017}} || <ref name="auto45"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32''' || 12 || 10 || 2 || 8 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''20'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 21, 2017}} || <ref name="auto111"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47.8''' || 18.6 || 9.2 || 0.2 || 5.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''29.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 13, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170413%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 13, 2017 |access-date=April 18, 2017 |archive-date=April 19, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170419101236/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170413%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.5''' || 19.4 || 8.7 || 1.7 || 5.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27.1'''
|-
|}

=== March–April 2017 ===
{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Rona Ambrose]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Thomas Mulcair]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Rhéal Fortin]]/<br />[[Martine Ouellet]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}} | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 7, 2017}} || <ref name="auto76"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47.0''' || 19.3 || 10.5 || 1.3 || 4.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 31, 2017}} || <ref name="auto98"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47.2''' || 18.1 || 11.6 || 1.5 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''29.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 24, 2017}} || <ref name="auto101"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''48.7''' || 18.1 || 10.7 || 0.9 || 5.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''30.6'''
|-
|}

=== December 2015–March 2017 ===
{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Rona Ambrose]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Thomas Mulcair]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Rhéal Fortin]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}} | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}} | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 17, 2017}} || <ref name="auto105"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49.7''' || 17.3 || 10.6 || 0.8 || 4.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 10, 2017}} || <ref name="auto72"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''48.7''' || 17.0 || 10.8 || 0.8 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 3, 2017}} || <ref name="auto15"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47.0''' || 17.4 || 10.2 || 0.9 || 5.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''29.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 24, 2017}} || <ref name="auto86"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.3''' || 18.3 || 9.9 || 0.9 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''28.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 17, 2017}} || <ref name="auto90"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.1''' || 17.3 || 10.9 || 1.2 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''28.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 10, 2017}} || <ref name="auto64"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.4''' || 19.1 || 9.6 || 1.0 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27.3'''
|-
| Campaign Research || {{dts|February 6, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hilltimes.com/2017/02/09/liberals-conservatives-tied-nationwide-poll/95816 |title=poll |publisher=Campaign Research |date=February 6, 2017}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31''' || 14 || 11 || || || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''17'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 3, 2017}} || <ref name="auto68"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45.4''' || 20.0 || 10.2 || 1.2 || 5.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''25.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 27, 2017}} || <ref name="auto39"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.7''' || 19.9 || 10.7 || 1.1 || 4.7 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''26.8'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|January 21, 2017}} || <ref name="auto106"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38''' || 11 || 9 || 2 || 6 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 20, 2017}} || <ref name="auto57"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.6''' || 20.3 || 10.2 || 0.9 || 5.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''26.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 13, 2017}} || <ref name="auto9"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46.7''' || 18.8 || 11.1 || 0.8 || 5.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''27.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 6, 2017}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170106%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 6, 2017 |access-date=January 24, 2017 |archive-date=January 30, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170130085258/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20170106%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49.3''' || 18.1 || 10.0 || 0.5 || 4.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 30, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20161230%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 30, 2016 |access-date=January 4, 2017 |archive-date=January 4, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170104164826/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20161230%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49.0''' || 17.7 || 9.6 || 0.8 || 4.7 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 23, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20161230%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 23, 2016 |access-date=January 4, 2017 |archive-date=January 4, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170104164826/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20161230%20Political%20Package%20Eng.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50.6''' || 17.1 || 8.8 || 0.9 || 4.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 9, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/20161125-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 9, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''54.1''' || 15.8 || 7.4 || 1.0 || 5.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 2, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/20161202-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 2, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''54.0''' || 15.5 || 8.5 || 1.1 || 5.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.5'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|December 7, 2016}} || <ref name="auto5"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40''' || 14 || 12 || 2 || 6 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''26'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 25, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/20161125-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 25, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''54.2''' || 15.7 || 8.7 || 0.7 || 5.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 18, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/20161118-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 18, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.2''' || 17.1 || 8.3 || 0.5 || 5.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 11, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/20161111-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 11, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50.3''' || 16.7 || 8.7 || 0.7 || 5.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 4, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/20161104-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 4, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49.5''' || 16.2 || 8.3 || 0.5 || 5.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 28, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/20161028-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 28, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49.6''' || 16.0 || 8.2 || 0.5 || 5.7 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 21, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/20161021-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 21, 2016 }}{{Dead link|date=March 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50.4''' || 14.6 || 8.4 || 0.6 || 6.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 14, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/20161014-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 14, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.2''' || 14.7 || 8.6 || 0.7 || 5.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|October 7, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/20161007-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=October 7, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''55.9''' || 14.5 || 7.7 || 0.6 || 4.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 30, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/20160930-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 30, 2016 }}{{Dead link|date=March 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''56.0''' || 14.1 || 7.4 || 0.6 || 4.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 23, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/20160923-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 23, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''55.9''' || 15.0 || 7.9 || 1.1 || 3.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.9'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|September 21, 2016}} || <ref name="auto42"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''44''' || 13 || 8 || 2 || 7 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''31'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 16, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/20160916-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 16, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.9''' || 15.6 || 8.3 || 1.3 || 3.7 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 9, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/20160909-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 9, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.7''' || 16.7 || 8.0 || 1.5 || 3.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.0'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|September 7, 2016}} || <ref name="auto18"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''46''' || 13 || 8 || 1 || 7 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|September 2, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/20160902-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=September 2, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''54.1''' || 16.5 || 7.9 || 1.8 || 3.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 26, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/20160826-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 26, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''54.4''' || 16.7 || 9.3 || 1.5 || 3.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 19, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/20160819-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 19, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''56.3''' || 16.3 || 9.0 || 1.2 || 3.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 12, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/20160812-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 12, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''55.6''' || 14.5 || 9.2 || 1.3 || 4.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''41.1'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|August 6, 2016}} || <ref name="auto24"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50''' || 12 || 8 || 1 || 7 || ±3.0 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|August 5, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/20160805-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=August 5, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''55.4''' || 15.1 || 9.2 || 1.0 || 4.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.3'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 29, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160729%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 29, 2016 |access-date=August 3, 2016 |archive-date=September 22, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160922155159/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160729%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''54.1''' || 14.9 || 9.2 || 0.6 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 22, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160722%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 22, 2016 |access-date=July 27, 2016 |archive-date=September 21, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921215709/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160722%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.3''' || 15.9 || 9.2 || 0.5 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 15, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160715%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 15, 2016 |access-date=July 21, 2016 |archive-date=August 4, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160804130457/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160715%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.7''' || 17.0 || 9.0 || 0.2 || 4.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|July 8, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160708%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=July 8, 2016 |access-date=July 13, 2016 |archive-date=September 21, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921215720/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160708%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.3''' || 16.7 || 9.8 || 0.7 || 4.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.6'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|July 5, 2016}} || <ref name="auto47"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''49''' || 13 || 9 || 1 || 7 || ±2 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 30, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160630%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 30, 2016 |access-date=July 5, 2016 |archive-date=September 21, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921215921/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160630%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.5''' || 17.6 || 8.5 || 1.3 || 4.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.9'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 24, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160624%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 24, 2016 |access-date=June 29, 2016 |archive-date=September 21, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921204525/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160624%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.4''' || 15.9 || 8.8 || 1.5 || 5.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 17, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160617%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 17, 2016 |access-date=June 23, 2016 |archive-date=September 21, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921125732/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160617%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.6''' || 15.1 || 8.3 || 1.4 || 5.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 10, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160610%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 10, 2016 |access-date=June 14, 2016 |archive-date=September 21, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921065142/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160610%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.6''' || 15.8 || 8.0 || 1.3 || 5.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.8'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|June 7, 2016}} || <ref name="auto12"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''45''' || 11 || 9 || 2 || 6 || ±2 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|June 3, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160603%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=June 3, 2016 |access-date=June 7, 2016 |archive-date=September 21, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921032125/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160603%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.5''' || 14.5 || 8.6 || 1.0 || 4.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 27, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160527%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 27, 2016 |access-date=May 31, 2016 |archive-date=September 21, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921021915/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160527%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.7''' || 15.5 || 8.2 || 1.0 || 3.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 20, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/20160520-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 20, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.8''' || 15.6 || 9.0 || 1.2 || 3.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 13, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160513%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 13, 2016 |access-date=May 22, 2016 |archive-date=June 16, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160616084800/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160513%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.0''' || 15.8 || 10.1 || 1.3 || 3.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.2'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|May 11, 2016}} || <ref name="auto73"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47''' || 13 || 10 || 2 || 6 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|May 6, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160506%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=May 6, 2016 |access-date=May 15, 2016 |archive-date=September 20, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160920111127/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160506%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51.9''' || 15.3 || 10.3 || 1.2 || 5.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 29, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160429%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 29, 2016 |access-date=May 3, 2016 |archive-date=September 20, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160920030811/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160429%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51.6''' || 15.2 || 10.7 || 0.8 || 5.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 22, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160422%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 22, 2016 |access-date=April 30, 2016 |archive-date=September 18, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160918091012/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160422%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50.4''' || 16.7 || 10.6 || 0.7 || 5.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.7'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 15, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160415%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 15, 2016 |access-date=April 30, 2016 |archive-date=September 18, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160918082948/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160415%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51.1''' || 16.6 || 9.7 || 0.5 || 6.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 8, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160408%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 8, 2016 |access-date=April 12, 2016 |archive-date=August 8, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160808152742/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160408%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.3''' || 16.9 || 10.6 || 0.5 || 4.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.4'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|April 5, 2016}} || <ref name="auto31"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47''' || 11 || 10 || 1 || 7 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|April 1, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160401%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=April 1, 2016 |access-date=April 9, 2016 |archive-date=August 7, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160807172550/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160401%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51.3''' || 17.5 || 11.6 || 0.8 || 3.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''33.8'''
|-
| Innovative Research || {{dts|March 30, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.innovativeresearch.ca/sites/default/files/pdf%2C%20doc%2C%20docx%2C%20jpg%2C%20png%2C%20xls%2C%20xlsx/160308_CTM1603_Federal_Budget_Deck.pdf |title=poll |publisher=Innovative Research |date=March 30, 2016 |access-date=April 8, 2016 |archive-date=April 22, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160422062543/http://www.innovativeresearch.ca/sites/default/files/pdf%2C%20doc%2C%20docx%2C%20jpg%2C%20png%2C%20xls%2C%20xlsx/160308_CTM1603_Federal_Budget_Deck.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''60.0''' || 21.0 || 12.0 || 1.0 || 6.0 || n/a || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 24, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160324%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 24, 2016 |access-date=March 31, 2016 |archive-date=August 3, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160803135740/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160324%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51.4''' || 17.0 || 11.6 || 1.1 || 3.9 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 18, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160318%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 18, 2016 |access-date=March 23, 2016 |archive-date=June 29, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160629172311/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160318%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.8''' || 14.9 || 12.7 || 0.6 || 4.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.9'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|March 15, 2016}} || <ref name="auto84"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''43''' || 13 || 10 || 1 || 5 || ±2 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''30'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 11, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160311%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 11, 2016 |access-date=March 18, 2016 |archive-date=April 18, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160418020212/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160311%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.7''' || 14.6 || 12.8 || 0.7 || 4.7 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''38.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|March 4, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160304%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=March 4, 2016 |access-date=March 10, 2016 |archive-date=March 11, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160311025802/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160304%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.7''' || 14.2 || 11.3 || 0.9 || 5.3 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 26, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160226%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 26, 2016 |access-date=March 1, 2016 |archive-date=August 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827163800/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160226%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.5''' || 13.9 || 10.9 || 0.9 || 5.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 19, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160219%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 19, 2016 |access-date=February 26, 2016 |archive-date=March 8, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308072452/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160219%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51.4''' || 14.9 || 11.4 || 1.0 || 4.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.5'''
|-
| [[Forum Research]] || {{dts|February 17, 2016}} || <ref name="auto23"/> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''47''' || 12 || 8 || 1 || 7 || ±3 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 12, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160212%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 12, 2016 |access-date=February 17, 2016 |archive-date=March 7, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307052422/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160212%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51.4''' || 15.1 || 10.7 || 1.0 || 4.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.3'''
|-
| [[Léger Marketing|Leger]] || {{dts|February 9, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ledevoir.com/documents/pdf/sondage020916_complet_pol.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Léger Marketing|Leger]] |date=February 9, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40''' || 9 || 10 || || 4 || ±2.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''30'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|February 5, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160205%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=February 5, 2016 |access-date=February 10, 2016 |archive-date=February 20, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160220180734/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160205%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51.0''' || 14.8 || 12.2 || 0.9 || 4.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 29, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160129%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 29, 2016 |access-date=February 4, 2016 |archive-date=February 7, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160207235706/http://www.nanosresearch.com/tickers/PDF/20160129%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50.0''' || 14.9 || 13.0 || 0.7 || 4.4 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''35.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 22, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/20160122-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 22, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.2''' || 14.6 || 11.5 || 0.9 || 3.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 15, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.voiceonline.com/in-spite-of-continuous-attacks-by-conservatives-trudeau-still-enjoys-40-point-lead-over-other-party-leaders/ |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 15, 2016 |access-date=January 26, 2016 |archive-date=February 3, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160203055815/http://www.voiceonline.com/in-spite-of-continuous-attacks-by-conservatives-trudeau-still-enjoys-40-point-lead-over-other-party-leaders/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.5''' || 13.7 || 10.6 || 1.0 || 4.5 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''39.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 8, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/20160108-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 8, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.2''' || 13.2 || 10.3 || 1.1 || 4.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.0'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|January 2, 2016}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/20160102-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=January 2, 2016}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''52.6''' || 12.1 || 11.6 || 1.2 || 4.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.5'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 25, 2015}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/20151225-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 25, 2015}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.1''' || 11.3 || 12.7 || 1.2 || 5.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.4'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 18, 2015}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/20151218-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 18, 2015}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50.2''' || 12.9 || 13.0 || 1.3 || 5.1 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.2'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 11, 2015}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/20151211-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 11, 2015}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''51.5''' || 13.7 || 12.8 || 1.2 || 5.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''37.8'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|December 4, 2015}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://assets.nationalnewswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/20151204-Leadership-TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=December 4, 2015}}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.7''' || 13.7 || 12.0 || 1.4 || 4.2 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''40.0'''
|-
|}

===November 2015===
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px;"
! rowspan="2" |Polling firm
! rowspan="2" |Last date<br />of polling
! rowspan="2" |Link
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Justin Trudeau]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Stephen Harper]]/<br />[[Rona Ambrose]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Thomas Mulcair]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Rhéal Fortin]]
! class="unsortable" style="width:70px;"|[[Elizabeth May]]
! rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|Margin<br />of error}}{{ref label|MOE|1|1}}
! rowspan="2" |Lead
|- style="background:#e9e9e9;"
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}};" data-sort-type="number" | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Conservative}};" data-sort-type="number" | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|NDP}};" data-sort-type="number" | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|BQ}};" data-sort-type="number" | 
! style="background-color:{{Canadian party colour|CA|Green}};" data-sort-type="number" | 
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 27, 2015}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/20151127%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 27, 2015 |access-date=December 9, 2015 |archive-date=December 22, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222163719/http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/20151127%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50.9''' || 16.3 || 12.3 || 1.6 || 4.8 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''34.6'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 20, 2015}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/20151120%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 20, 2015 |access-date=November 25, 2015 |archive-date=December 8, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151208122647/http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/20151120%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''53.3''' || 17.2 || 11.6 || 1.2 || 4.6 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''36.1'''
|-
| [[Nanos Research]] || {{dts|November 13, 2015}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/20151113%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |title=poll |publisher=[[Nanos Research]] |date=November 13, 2015 |access-date=December 9, 2015 |archive-date=December 22, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222173239/http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/20151113%20Leadership%20TrackingE.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''50.9''' || 18.4 || 13.0 || 1.3 || 5.0 || ±3.1 pp || {{Party shading/Liberal}} | '''32.5'''
|}

==See also==
* [[Opinion polling for the 2021 Canadian federal election]]
* [[Opinion polling for the 2019 Canadian federal election, by constituency]]
* [[Opinion polling for the 2015 Canadian federal election]]
* [[Opinion polling for the 2011 Canadian federal election]]
* [[Opinion polling for the 2008 Canadian federal election]]
* [[Opinion polling for the 2006 Canadian federal election]]

== References ==
{{Reflist}}

{{Canadian federal election, 2019A}}
[[Category:Opinion polling for elections in Canada|2019]]
[[Category:2019 Canadian federal election]]