View source for Talk:Robeson County, North Carolina/GA1

==GA Review==
{{atopg
| status = 
| result = Passed. [[User:Asheiou|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:#00ff00;0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;background:black">> '''Asheiou '''</span>]][[User talk:Asheiou|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:#00ff00;0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;background:black">(they/them • talk)</span>]] 16:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Robeson County, North Carolina/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Robeson County, North Carolina/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>

'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Asheiou|Asheiou]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Asheiou|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Asheiou|contribs]]) 

<!-- Below is a review template with inline instructions. If you wish to use a different review format, delete everything below this line. -->
===Criteria===
<!-- Template:GAHybrid -->
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">
  <div style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; border: 1px solid #aaa">[[WP:GA|Good Article Status]] - Review Criteria  </div>
  <div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:left">
                <div style="text-align:center">'''<small>{{see|WP:WIAGA}}</small>'''</div>
		A [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] is&mdash;
		<ol>
		<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:</li>
: (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1a}}; and
: (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1b}}.<ref> Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style mainpage]] or subpages of the guides listed, is ''not'' required for good articles.</ref>
		<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:</li>
: (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2a}};
: (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2b}};<ref>Either [[Parenthetical referencing|parenthetical references]] or [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (footnotes)|footnotes]] can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.</ref> 
: (c) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2c}}; and
: (d) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2d}}.
		<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:</li>
: (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3a}};<ref>This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of [[Wikipedia:Featured articles|featured articles]]; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.</ref> and
: (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3b}}.
		<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.</li>
		<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.</li><ref>Vandalism reversions, ''proposals'' to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as [[copy editing]]), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.</ref>
		<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:</li><ref>Other media, such as video and [[Wikipedia:Music samples|sound clips]], are also covered by this criterion.</ref>
: (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6a}}; and
: (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6b}}.<ref>The presence of images is ''not'', in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status ''are'' appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.</ref>
		</ol>
  </div>
</div>

===Review===
<ol>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:</li>
: 
{| class="wikitable"
|-  <!-- Well-written: -->
! Criteria !! Notes !! Result
|-
| '''(a)''' (prose) || Prose had a couple of minor grammatical errors, but I've just gone ahead and fixed them. Overall, quite readable. || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|-
| '''(b)''' (MoS) || No MoS issues that I can see. || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|}
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:</li>
: 
{| class="wikitable"
|-  <!-- Factually accurate and verifiable: -->
! Criteria !! Notes !! Result
|-
| '''(a)''' (references) || Reference section exists and is in the correct format. || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|-
| '''(b)''' (citations to reliable sources) || Extensive citations to books, local news, and a local encyclopædia. Every claim made is backed up by a citation. || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|-
| '''(c)''' (original research) || As I live in the [[UK]], I have the [[GDPR]] to contend with in fact-checking sources, especially with sites such as nrcolumbus.com simply blocking my access. With other sources being books, I cannot easily access them either. I spotchecked several sources that I could access and everything I can see is backed up correctly. || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|-
| '''(d)''' (copyvio and plagiarism) || Couldn't find any copyvio from my own readthrough and [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1158849082&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 Earwig's Copyvio Detector.] || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|}
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:</li>
: 
{| class="wikitable"
|-  <!-- Broad in its coverage: -->
! Criteria !! Notes !! Result
|- 
| '''(a)''' (major aspects) || The article covers everything you'd expect from an article of its nature. It covers the history of the county in great detail. || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|-
| '''(b)''' (focused) || Everything mentioned is relevant and the article does not get sidetracked. || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|}
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.</li>
: 
{| class="wikitable"
|-  <!-- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each. -->
!  Notes !! Result
|-
| Article seems neutral to me. || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|}
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.</li>
:
{| class="wikitable"
|-  <!-- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. -->
!  Notes !! Result
|-
| The only thing I can see even remotely resembling an edit war in the recent edit history was just a civil disagreement that followed the [[WP:3RR]]. || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|}
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:</li>
: 
{| class="wikitable"
|-  <!-- Illustrated, if possible, by images: -->
! Criteria !! Notes !! Result
|-
| '''(a)''' (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) || Images are all fair use, public domain, or [[copyleft]].
|| {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|-  
| '''(b)''' (appropriate use with suitable captions) || Images all seem relevant and are captioned correctly. || {{GAHybrid/item|y}}
|}
</ol>

====Result====
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!  Result !! Notes
|-
| {{GAHybrid/item|y}} || All seems good to me! This is a very comprehensive article covering history, demography, economy, culture, and everything else you would expect from an article in an encyclopædia. [[User:Asheiou|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:#00ff00;0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;background:black">> '''Asheiou '''</span>]][[User talk:Asheiou|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:#00ff00;0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;background:black">(they/them • talk)</span>]] 16:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
|}

====Discussion====
{{abot}}