View source for Talk:Strategic bombing

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Military history|class= Start |B1=n|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Aviation=y|WWI=y|WWII=y|Science=y|Weaponry=y}}
}}
{{Archives|age=90|bot=ClueBot III}}
<!--2160/24 = 90 days -->
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
| age=2160
| archiveprefix=Talk:Strategic bombing/Archive
| numberstart=1
| maxarchsize=75000
| header={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minkeepthreads=5
| minarchthreads=1
| format= %%i
}}



==Methods used to deliver ordnance==
There are three basic methods used to deliver [[Aircraft ordnance|ordnance]] onto targets in a strategic bombing campaign. The first is by gravity-dropping large numbers of [[gravity bomb|iron bombs]] or "dumb bombs", using strategic bombers. The second is through the use of more precise ordnance, [[precision-guided munition]]s (so-called [[smart bombs]]); [[cruise missile]]s fall into this category, though they are not always air-launched. The third method involves the use of [[nuclear weapons]], either onto a battlefield in a method similar to [[carpet bombing]], or onto a strategic target, as with iron bombs in World War II.

Although the deployment of nuclear weapons from aircraft falls into the category of strategic bombing, and likely represents the ultimate form of both strategic and terror bombing, the term strategic bombing is generally used in reference to the release of non-nuclear air-ground ordnance from strategic aircraft.

Area attack by multiple bombers is based upon detailed calculations of the intended Damage Expectancy or "DE" directed by the Air Tasking Order (ATO) used in a military strategy. To achieve a particular DE, planners select a bomb type based on that particular weapon's damage mechanism—blast/[[Fragmentation (weaponry)|fragmentation]] or [[Incendiary device|incendiary]], for example. Planners then calculate the Single Sortie Probability of Damage (SSPD) and extrapolate from there, adding sorties until the probability of damage meets or exceeds the required DE.

As weapons have grown more precise, the need for mass formations dropping masses of bombs has decreased, and it is now possible for a single bomb to accomplish what in the past took many bombers. In fact, one [[B-52]] can now drop a single bomb from many miles away that can be programmed to strike a target as small as a window or doorway from a chosen direction and at a preselected angle. This can focus the blast in a given direction and can dramatically reduce the risk of [[collateral damage]] to other buildings and consequent unintended [[civilian casualties]].

Strategic bombing by multiple modern strategic bombers like the B-52 can be likened to an hour during the [[Battle of the Somme]] bottled into a thirty-second time period. However, some believe this delivery method has been rather ineffective in attacking an enemy nation's war making capability, due to the imprecise nature of the attack. Others cite the destruction of enemy infrastructure, resources expended on [[civil defense]] and physical protection of sites, and the reallocation of military resources away from the battlefield in order to staff response and air and ground [[anti-aircraft]] assets as proof of its efficacy. In either case, the unintended mass civilian casualties, terror caused, and ethical questions raised draws adverse long-term attention to the morality of strategic bombing.

Carpet bombing, often confused with strategic bombing, is the use of strategic air assets for operational objectives in support of ground forces. Its use during [[Operation Cobra]] is the best-known example. Carpet bombing is viewed ambivalently by ground forces, due to the  inevitable [[friendly fire|friendly casualties]] caused by bombers dropping their ordnance short of the aiming point, either through error or "[[creepback|bomb creep]]".{{sfn|Boyne|1994|pp=343,344}}

The use of "smart" weapons is preferred by some nations for two reasons. First, it can be less devastating. Due to the greater accuracy (the smaller [[Circular Error Probable|CEP]]) of precision guided weapons, there is less risk of civilian casualties. The second reason is the more-focused damage associated with precision weapons. Strategic bombing can destroy an entire block, but miss the vital components of a factory. Precision weapons can attack precise components of designated targets, increasing the likelihood of a successful attack. However, the 'shock' value of precision bombing is less severe than of area bombing. Unless multiple precision weapons are used, the enemy may seek cover or disperse to different parts of the targeted area. Additionally, [[area bombing]] can have an initial significant psychological effect, as the bombing of cities early in World War II terrified their citizens.

{{Anchor|Terror bombing}}
{{reflist talk}}
}}
{{hab}}

== Use of gas in Mesopotamia  ==

"The Trenchard School theories were successfully put into action in Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq) where RAF bombers used high-explosive bombs, gas bombs, and strafing against guerrilla forces."

The use of gas appears to be a myth. It is discussed here...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleged_British_use_of_chemical_weapons_in_Mesopotamia_in_1920

So I'm going to delete it. [[User:Cheezypeaz|Cheezypeaz]] ([[User talk:Cheezypeaz|talk]]) 16:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

==Wiki Education assignment: Cold War Science==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Oklahoma/Cold_War_Science_(Spring_2022) | assignments = [[User:Stick2000|Stick2000]] | start_date = 2022-01-18 | end_date = 2022-05-06 }}

== Evolution of Strategic Bombing in the Ukraine ==

The following draft was rejected (which is ok) but what is going on in the Ukraine is similar to strategic bombing in some ways.   I did not thing the content was appropriate for this entry; nevertheless it needs to be mentioned somewhere.   At this time I would request comments and ideas.. [[User:Flibbertigibbets|Flibbertigibbets]] ([[User talk:Flibbertigibbets|talk]]) 23:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

[[Draft:Russian Strategic Targeting of the Ukraine]] [[User:Flibbertigibbets|Flibbertigibbets]] ([[User talk:Flibbertigibbets|talk]]) 23:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
:As with your recent edit to this article, this AFC draft is full of [[WP:OR|original research]]. The purpose of Wikipedia is not to add your own conjecture and beliefs on a subject, but to summarise what is mentioned in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. [[User:Loafiewa|Loafiewa]] ([[User talk:Loafiewa|talk]]) 00:29, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
::I have no beliefs on the subject; "strategic bombing" or "strategic targeting" is factually occurring and it is being reported in the press from many reliable sources.  There is absolutely  no shortage of reliable sources that explicitly mention "strategic bombing" (just do a google search of news with "strategic bombing" in quotes).
::Supporting Sources could include Washington Post, ABC news,  CNBC,  The Times, CNN, Foreign Affairs, Daily Express, Real clear defense, et al.. 

:::''"do not actually know what the purpose of the bombing is"  <-it is occurring - it is widely reported -- Russia does not have to say why'' -- nobody can predict a result or effect

::If I am not presenting this topic well; I would challenge anyone to address the concern of this major factual omission.   

::[[User:Flibbertigibbets|Flibbertigibbets]] ([[User talk:Flibbertigibbets|talk]]) 01:14, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

==Wiki Education assignment: Cold War Science==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Oklahoma/Cold_War_Science_(Spring_2023) | assignments = [[User:Lucipheric|Lucipheric]] | start_date = 2023-01-17 | end_date = 2023-05-11 }}

<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Lucipheric|Lucipheric]] ([[User talk:Lucipheric|talk]]) 01:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)</span>