View source for User talk:Joe6Pack

== Welcome! ==

Hello, Joe6Pack, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Joe6Pack|your contributions]]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
* [[Help:Getting started|Getting started]]
* [[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction to Wikipedia]]
* [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]]
* [[Help:Editing|How to edit a page]] and [[Wikipedia:Article development|How to develop articles]]
* [[Wikipedia:Your first article|How to create your first article]] 
* [[Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style|Simplified Manual of Style]]
Please remember to [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign]] your messages on [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]]s by typing four [[tilde]]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place '''{{Tlc|Help me}}''' before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 22:11, 15 May 2014 (UTC).

==May 2014==
You need to stop pleading Rick Delano's cause on Wikipedia, as you did at [[Kate Mulgrew]], [[Lawrence Krauss]] and [[The Principle]]. Wikipedia is not a platform from which to push your agenda. Please be especially cautious of adding negative and/or irrelevant material to [[WP:biographies of living people|biographies of living people]] (please click on the policy link and read), and about living people in other articles. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 22:14, 15 May 2014 (UTC).

I am just adding facts. The agenda thing works for everybody.[[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 04:57, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:The Principle]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]].  In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 05:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Release form for Lawrence Krauss to interview for The Principle Documentary.png==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">'''[[Image:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|left|⚠|link=]]'''</span> Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Release form for Lawrence Krauss to interview for The Principle Documentary.png]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 14:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

== Latest revert ==

Hi Joe. I noticed you [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=The_Principle&oldid=prev&diff=632955099 reverted] my removal of the NYCMovieGuru review on [[The Principle]]. I did this because the source of the review doesn't seem all that great - the review has all number of spelling mistakes and poor grammar, and appears to be one person's review blog. I brought the issue up on the [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Are_Rotten_Tomatoes_reviewers_automatically_reliable_sources.2Freviews.3F|Reliable Sources Noticeboard]] where a consensus - as I read it - formed that NYCMovieGuru shouldn't be included as, though it's on Rotten Tomatoes, it's not aggregated into their score. As such, I'm going to revert again - based on the previously linked [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]]. [[User:Samwalton9|'''S'''am '''W'''alton]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9|talk]]) 17:12, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
==License tagging for File:BigJoe.jpg==
Thanks for uploading [[:File:BigJoe.jpg]].  You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image.  Wikipedia uses a set of [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|image copyright tags]] to indicate this information. 

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/All|this list]], click on [[:File:BigJoe.jpg|this link]], then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description.  If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]].  Thank you for your cooperation.<!-- User:OrphanBot/untagged-new --> --[[User:ImageTaggingBot|ImageTaggingBot]] ([[User talk:ImageTaggingBot|talk]]) 00:30, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
:I have deleted the article. Notoriety is not [[WP:notability|notability]]. If you truly think that there is notability, then please look to start the article using the process for articles in the draft: namespace. — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 07:34, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

== February 2017 ==
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Milo Yiannopoulos]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:Arkhaminsanity|Arkhaminsanity]] ([[User talk:Arkhaminsanity|talk]]) 16:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

::One man's disruptive edit is another's illumination. I will not make any additional unreferenced edits. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 16:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
:::Joe, There was nothing illuminating about that edit, which I have redacted. Just so we are clear, if you ever post anything of that nature on Wikipedia again, you will be indefinitely blocked. Your above response to the warning posted by Arkhaminsanity has raised serious doubts in my mind as to whether or not you are [[WP:HERE]]. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 16:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

== Discretionary sanctions ==

{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia.  It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

'''Please carefully read this information:'''

The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[pseudoscience]] and [[fringe science]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience|here]].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics.  This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.&nbsp;[[User:Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]]) 17:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->
:I have no issue with the pseudoscience angle. WP:BLP overrides practically any other issue. The article as it was written appears to be very defamatory. I will work with you on the geocentrism issue; just use valid sources. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 18:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

== February 2017 ==
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Robert Sungenis]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]].  In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. 

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 17:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
:Please read [[WP:BRD]] you were bold you were reverted, now you need to discuss and NOT edit war. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 17:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

==Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion==
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:FTN-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]]) 17:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

== February 2017 ==

[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]]. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at [[:WP:BLPN]], is considered [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Editing comments|bad practice]], even if you meant well.  Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting.  Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tpv1 --> [[User:Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]]) 17:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Editing comments|delete or edit]] legitimate talk page comments, as you did at [[:WP:BLP]].  Such edits are disruptive and appear to be [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tpv2 --> [[User:Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]]) 17:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

:The article is clearly defamatory. Please start with my template. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 17:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

*Joe6Pack, you removed Tgeorgescu's comments at [[:WP:BLPN]] twice, [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard&diff=764565745&oldid=764565669 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard&diff=764566764&oldid=764566744 here]. I thought it might have been an accident — two accidents, rather — since the timestamps were quite close together in both cases. But when I see you don't even bother to address Tgeorgescu's complaints above, or, I presume, look at the page history to see what he means, it makes me wonder. Would you like to explain yourself? [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 18:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC).
:I am not intentionally removing any comments. I think you can see I responded to his comments. I will try and be more careful in the case taht I actually did so. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 18:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
::"In the case that" you did so? Are you saying you can't be bothered to click on the two links I provided, which ''show'' you did so? [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 18:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC).
:::I am looking at them (in your link), but it is not clear how I am deleting his comments. I am attempting to reply to him. Again, I will be more careful. Can we restore his comments? Are you sure I am doing this? Could he be deleting his own comments or someone else? [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 18:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
:::In fact, I still see the comments that you show as deleted in the original location. Did you restore them, or were they never gone? [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 18:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
::::Tgeorgescu restored them himself. He didn't revert you (which would have been easier, but would have removed ''your'' comments), but merely restored his own, twice, with angry edit summaries. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard&action=history the page history]. Do you have difficulty reading it?  [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 18:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC).
:::::Ok. I see that. I still do not know how I could have deleted his comments, but certainly had no intention of doing so, and will be very careful going forward. First, I am responding to them, and second I realize the record persists (and third- it is not the way I work). [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 18:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
::::::I may be able to offer an explanation (I have done it myself), if you find you cannot save an edit because another was made after you started to type (bit before saving) you may well be going back and trying to save the edit again. This will remove the material added after your first attempt.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 18:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
:::::::Ok. That did happen to me, I think. Thanks. Is there a way to avoid this? I cannot know if there was an edit until I try and save. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 18:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
::::::::Not as far as I know beyond starting all over from scratch.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 18:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

==Discretionary sanctions for BLPs==
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia.  It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

'''Please carefully read this information:'''

The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics.  This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.&nbsp; [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 18:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC).
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->

== February 2017 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Robert Sungenis]].  Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. &nbsp;[[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 21:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->

{{unblock reviewed | 1=let me continue my WP:BLP appeal | decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that 
*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, <u>or</u>
*the block is no longer necessary because you
*#understand what you have been blocked for,
*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
*#will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color:Navy;">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<span style="color:Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup>  21:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)}}
{{UTRS-unblock-user|17499|Feb 09, 2017 21:51:02|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 21:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

:I understand what I have been blocked for. Those who do not want to deal with WP:BLP want me to be out of action. Please unblock me. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 21:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
::No, and your block has been extended to 72 hours for attempted to evade it. [[User:Someguy1221|Someguy1221]] ([[User talk:Someguy1221|talk]]) 22:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

::Best you learn the rules of Wikipedia. Reporting your blocking administrator to ANI, via [[WP:EVADE|evading]] your own block with an IP account (i.e signed out), is a big no no. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 22:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

:::Fine- but give me the ability to edit on the WP:BLP page and the Robert Sungenis user talk page. I think a review of WP:BLP abuses will show massive abuse. You are blocking the worng person. Robert Sungenis has many enemies and they constantly use Wikipedia to discredit him. Please review the 5 archives on his page. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 22:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
::::Socking and making personal attacks [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ABiographies_of_living_persons%2FNoticeboard&type=revision&diff=764606626&oldid=764604101] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ABiographies_of_living_persons%2FNoticeboard&type=revision&diff=764607077&oldid=764606626] while you are blocked is not a good way to get unblocked. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 22:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

:::::I am not socking! I did not touch the article. I identified myself as I pleaded to get unblocked. Please allow me to edit on my WP:BLP appeal. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 22:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
::::::You used an IP to continue the discussion on the BLP board, and to post to ANI. When you are blocked you are not allowed to edit anything, using any account or IP. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 22:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
:::::::I am allowed to edit here. It is hard to just sit back, and it is not clear what I cannot do it I am blocked. I do not intend to edit THE ARTICLE outside my account. I will cease editing anywhere but here. Please give me permission to continue my BP:WLP appeal. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 22:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
::::::::You are allowed to edit here to request an unblock (which you have done, repeatedly) but only that. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 22:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Please allow me to selectively edit my WP:BLP appeal for Robert Sungenis [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 22:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC) | decline = This does not address the reason for your block. [[User:5 albert square|5 albert square]] ([[User talk:5 albert square|talk]]) 22:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)}}

:Hi Joe6Pack,

:If you want to stand any chance of being unblocked, you must pay attention to what {{u|Ponyo}} has advised above.  In order for any unblock review to be considered, you must convince the reviewing administrator that you understand what you have been blocked for and you will not continue to cause damage or disruption.  In other words, you need to understand that you have been blocked for edit warring and you need to convince them that you will not continue with this behaviour.  From everything I have seen on this page so far, you are giving indications that you will continue with this behaviour if you are unblocked and that is unacceptable.  You are not addressing the reason for your block both on the unblock requests you have requested on here and on the one you sent to the UTRS system.  If you carry on using your talk page in this manner then you may find that your access to it is revoked for the remainder of your block.--[[User:5 albert square|5 albert square]] ([[User talk:5 albert square|talk]]) 23:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

::Hi 5 albert,

I am pretty happy with the article as it stands now and is developing. It appears that my message regarding WP:BLP has been noticed and the editors are sourcing properly, etc. If I am unblocked, I will work cooperatively on the article as it is developing. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 23:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

*I would <u>strongly</u> recommend that you not resume edit-warring on this article.  If you revert <u>once</u> more, I will report you to [[WP:3RRN]].  [[User:Nomoskedasticity|Nomoskedasticity]] ([[User talk:Nomoskedasticity|talk]]) 17:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

I am not edit warring. I am editing. I have invited you to discuss on the Talk page. [[User:Joe6Pack|Joe6Pack]] ([[User talk:Joe6Pack#top|talk]]) 17:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   <!--Template:ANI-notice-->  [[User:9SGjOSfyHJaQVsEmy9NS|jps]] ([[User talk:9SGjOSfyHJaQVsEmy9NS|talk]]) 16:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Robert Sungenis]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]].  In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. 

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 16:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for persistent [[WP:POV|pushing of your point-of-view]] and a general disregard for basic content policies.   If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 21:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef -->