View source for Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources

{{shortcut|WP:A/S|WP:ALBUM/SOURCE|WP:ALBUMS/SOURCES|WP:ALBUM/SOURCES|WP:ALBUMS/SOURCE|WP:MUSIC/SOURCE|WP:MUSIC/SOURCES}}

The following list consists of recommended sources for expanding articles that primarily or exclusively cover musical topics. This list is merely a collection of suggestions, and other good sources may exist. Many of these sources include reviews or links to reviews that can be used to source critical reception sections in album articles, and to add ratings to the {{tl|Music ratings}} template. 

''This list is not exhaustive''. Additional websites and print sources may also be used, provided they meet the criteria at [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] and [[WP:MOSALBUM#Critical reception]]. Specifically, reviews should be written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs), and must be from a [[WP:Independent sources|source that is independent]] of the artist, record company, etc.

The Music WikiProject maintains a [https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=daa9115e8db82687a Music Reliable Source Search Engine]. The customizable search engine searches for sources that are listed in the [[WP:MUSICRS]] list.

'''Note''': While help in expanding this list is welcome, please be cautious and discuss possible additions on the talk page first. Take a look at the project archives for examples of how it has been done in the past; for example, see the discussions about adding ''[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review site: The A.V. Club|The A.V. Club]]'', ''[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review site: MusicOMH|MusicOMH]]'', and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review publications: Rock Sound, Spin, Metal Hammer, Vibe, Mojo, Kerrang! and Q|various magazines]].

==Reliable sources==
===Generally reliable sources===
{{shortcut|WP:RSMUSIC|WP:MUSICRS}}

These sources are generally considered reliable for use in music-related articles on Wikipedia. Check the far right column for past discussions on the source and any limitations or warnings on a source's particular use. 

This list is largely limited to music-centric sources, but well established general sources (such as ''[[The New York Times]]'', [[ABC News Radio]], or ''[[The Atlantic]]'') are generally considered reliable for music too. For a list of reliable general sources, see [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources|Wikipedia: Perennial sources]].

Note that site-operators and publishers, by nature of their role, are presumed to not be subject to the usual editorial process and thus are regarded as [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. They are still reliable as experts in their field but should not be used for controversial statements and cannot be used for ''any'' claims about [[WP:BLP|living people]] other than themselves. When citing an article or other online published work, check if the author is the site operator or publisher.

{| class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders"
|+Generally reliable sources for album-related information
!scope="col"| Publication
!scope="col"| Primary focus
!scope="col"| Rating system
!scope="col"| Country
!scope="col"| Website/Archives
!scope="col"| Discussions/Limitations
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[AbsolutePunk]]''
| Rock, alternative, indie
| Percentage scale: 93%
| US
| {{url|https://archive.ph/2015.08.01-201831/http://absolutepunk.net/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#Absolute Punk|2018 Discussion]]. Only use staff reviews. Defunct as of 2016.
|-
!scope="row"| [[AllHipHop]]
| Hip hop
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| US
| {{url|allhiphop.com/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 26|2008 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| [[AllMusic]]
| All genres
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}<br>Note that these are assigned by the editorial team, ''not'' the reviewer
| US
| {{url|allmusic.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 52#AllMusic|2015 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 54#"Sources_to_avoid" section|2017 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 331#AllMusic (allmusic.com): summary of previous AllMusic and/or "All Music" discussions|2021 Discussion]] – Biography/staff reviews are reliable, but do not use sidebar, as it may be user-generated or otherwise separately sourced from the prose.
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Alternative Addiction]]''
| Rock, independent
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|https://web.archive.org/web/20201123160504/https://www.alternativeaddiction.com/|Website}}
| Defunct as of 2020.
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Alternative Press (magazine)|Alternative Press]]''
| Rock
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|altpress.com|Website}}, [https://www.altpress.com/magazine/ Archives]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 43|2012 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[American Songwriter]]''
| Singer-songwriter
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|americansongwriter.com/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Theatre Communications Group|American Theatre]]''
| Theater
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|www.americantheatre.org|Website}}, [https://www.americantheatre.org/archive/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[AnyDecentMusic?]]
| All genres
| X.Y out of 10
| UK
| {{url|www.anydecentmusic.com|Website}}
| [[Template talk:Album ratings/Archive 2#Add AnyDecentMusic? to aggregate reviewers option?|2016 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The A.V. Club]]''
| Popular music
| Letter grade: B +/–
| US
| {{url|avclub.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review site: The A.V. Club|2009 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''The AU Review''
| Rock, alternative, indie
| No formal scale
| Australia
| {{url|theaureview.com|Website}}, [http://music.theaureview.com/ Archives]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 59#The AU Review|2019 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Bach (journal)|Bach]]''
| Baroque, [[Johann Sebastian Bach|Bach]] compositions
| Not applicable
| US
| {{url|bw.edu/academics/libraries/bach/journal/|Website}}, [https://www.bw.edu/academics/libraries/bach/journal/toc/ Archives],
[http://www.jstor.org/journals/00053600.html JSTOR access]
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[BBC Music]]
| All genres
| No formal scale
| UK
| {{url|bbc.co.uk/music|Website}}
| Do not use mirrors of Wikipedia
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[BBC Music Magazine]]''
| Classical, jazz, world
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3|5}}
| UK
| {{url|classical-music.com|Website}}, [https://www.classical-music.com/magazine/past-issues/bbc-music-magazine Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Big Cheese (magazine)|Big Cheese]]''
| Rock, alternative, punk
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| UK
| {{url|https://www.bigcheesemagazine.com/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 49#Big Cheese and Rock Hard magazine|2014 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard]]''
| Popular music
| Older (1970s–2000s): various categories such as "Spotlight", "Recommended", "Pick", "Four Star", "Critics' Choice" and "Vital Reissue", as defined in the reviews key<br />Newer: 5-star scale: {{rating|3|5}}, scores out of 100 before 2014
| US
| {{url|billboard.com|Website}}, [https://www.billboard.com/magazine-archive Magazine archives], [http://www.americanradiohistory.com/Billboard-Magazine.htm Scanned archives].
| [[Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon/Archive 6#RfC: Is Billboard magazine a reliable source?|2015 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Blabbermouth.net]]
| Hard rock, heavy metal
| 10-point scale: 7.5/10
| US
| {{url|blabbermouth.net|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 36#Another review site for consideration|2010 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 91#Blabbermouth.net|2011 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 151#Blabbermouth.net|2013 Discussion]] – Exercise caution with any controversial claims, especially for [[WP:BLP|BLP statements]].
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Blender (magazine)|Blender]]''
| Popular music
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}} 
| US
| {{url|blender.com|Website}} [https://secure.palmcoastd.com/pcd/einit?iKey=0815BA Archives]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32|2009 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Bluegrass Unlimited]]''
| Bluegrass, old-time
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|bluegrassmusic.com/content/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Blurt (magazine)|Blurt]]''
| Popular music
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|blurtonline.com/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 50#Harp Magazine|2014 Discussion]] Created out of ''[[Harp (magazine)|Harp]]'' staff after dissolution.
|-
!scope="row"| ''The Boombox''
| Hip hop, R&B
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|theboombox.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Boston Globe]]''
| Popular music
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|bostonglobe.com/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Business Insider]]''
| Popular music
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| US
| {{url|businessinsider.com/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 349#RfC: Business Insider music coverage|2021 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Canoe.com]]
| All genres
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| Canada
| {{url|jam.canoe.ca|Website}}
| Portal for [[Sun Media]] newspapers in [[Canada]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[CCM Magazine]]''
| Christian – CCM, gospel, rock, {{nowrap|heavy metal}}, {{nowrap|hip hop}}, urban
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3|5}}, older reviews letter grade: {{nowrap|B +/–}}
| US
| {{url|ccmmagazine.com|Website}}, [https://www.ccmmagazine.com/magazines/ Achives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Chart Attack|Chart/Chart Attack]]''
| Rock, alternative, indie, some pop and hip hop
| No formal rating system
| Canada
| {{url|https://web.archive.org/web/20180522025206/http://www.chartattack.com/|Website}}
| Defunct as of 2018.
|-
!scope="row"| [[Chronicles of Chaos (webzine)|Chronicles of Chaos]]
| Metal, rock
| Ten-point scale: 7.5/10
| Canada/International
| {{url|chroniclesofchaos.com/|Website}}
|Defunct as of 2015.<br>Site owner: Gino Filicetti
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Clash (magazine)|Clash]]''
| Popular music
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| UK
| {{url|clashmusic.com|Website}}, [https://www.clashmusic.com/tags/issue Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Classical Music (magazine)|Classical Music]]''
| Classical
| Not applicable
| UK
| {{url|www.rhinegold.co.uk/rhinegold-publishing/magazines/classical-music/|Website}}, [https://rhinegold.subscribeonline.co.uk/Back-Issues/classical-music Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| Classical Net
| Classical
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|classical.net|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Classical Recordings Quarterly]]''
| Classical
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|crq.org.uk/index.php|Website}}, [https://www.crq.org.uk/archive.php Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Classic Rock (magazine)|Classic Rock]]''
| Rock
| 10-point scale: 7/10, although the magazine's website omits the review score
| UK
| {{url|https://classicrock.teamrock.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 52#The Times and FHM|2016 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| [[CMJ]]
| Popular music
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|cmj.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 49|2014 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Complex (magazine)|Complex]]''
| Hip hop, R&B, pop, electronic, rock
| 5-star scale: {{rating|3|5}}<br>no formal scale before 2014
| US
| {{url|complex.com/music/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Consumable Online''
| Popular music
| N/A
| US
| {{url|https://web.archive.org/web/20000817202530/http://westnet.com:80/consumable/Consumable.html|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_65#Consumable_Online|2022 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Consequence (publication)|Consequence]]'' (previously titled ''Consequence of Sound'')
| Popular music
| Letter grade: B +/–
| US
| {{url|consequenceofsound.net|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 43#Consequence of Sound|2012 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 256#Is Consequence Of Sound a reliable source?|2019 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Country Standard Time]]''
| Country
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|countrystandardtime.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 46#Addition|2013 Discussion]] Originally a print magazine from 1995–2009 as well.
|-
!scope="row"| ''Country Universe''
| Country
| Letter grade B +/–; no formal scale on earliest reviews
| US
| {{url|countryuniverse.net|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_76#h-Recommendations_for_additions_to_this_list-20240807053900|2024 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Country Weekly]]''
| Country
| Letter grade B +/–<br>reviews from 2003 to 2012 use a 5-star scale {{rating|3.5|5}}, no formal scale before then.<br>Some online archives of reviews omit the rating designation.
| US
| {{url|countryweekly.com|Website}}, [https://www.countryweekly.com/magazine/covers-archive Archive]
| Defunct since 2016; was later revived by [[Cumulus Media]] as a news-only site at nashcountrydaily.com, which has since gone defunct as well
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Crawdaddy (magazine)|Crawdaddy]]''
| Rock
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|pastemagazine.com/blogs/crawdaddy/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Czech Music Quarterly''
| Classical, particularly Czech classical
| No formal rating system
| Czech Republic
| {{url|www.czech-music.net/en|Website}}, [https://www.czech-music.net/en/archive Archives] and [http://www.czech-music.net/en/issues Magazine archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Dazed]]'' (previously titled ''Dazed & Confused'')
| Fashion, alternative culture
| Not applicable
| UK
| {{URL|www.dazeddigital.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_335#Vice_and_Dazed|2021 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 76#Source discussion: Dazed|2024 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''Dead Press!''
| Rock
| 10-"thunderbolt" scale, 7/10
| UK
| {{url|deadpress.co.uk/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 56#The use of Dead Press! as a source|2018 Discussion]] Only [http://www.deadpress.co.uk/staff/ staff] reviews.
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Decibel (magazine)|Decibel]]''
| Heavy metal
| 10-star scale: {{Rating|8.5|10}}
| US
| {{url|decibelmagazine.com|Website}}, [https://www.decibelmagazine.com/magazine/ Archives]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 50|2015 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Diapason (magazine)|Diapason]]''
| Classical, hi-fi recording
| 
| France
| {{url|www.diapasonmag.fr/|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Diffuser.fm]]''
| Rock
| 
| US
| {{url|diffuser.fm|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 77#Diffuser.fm|2024 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"|''Distorted Sound Mag''
|Rock
|
|US
| {{url|www.distortedsoundmag.com/|Website}}
|[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_70#Possible_reliable_source_to_add? 2023 Discussion]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[DIY (magazine)|DIY]]'' (previously titled ''This Is Fake DIY'')
| Popular music, indie
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| UK
| {{url|https://diymag.com/|Website}} [http://www.thisisfakediy.co.uk/magazine/archive/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[DJ Mag]]''
| EDM
| 
| UK
| {{url|djmag.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 231#Record label sources|2017 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''DMY'' (previously titled ''Dummy'')
| Electronic music
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| UK
| {{url|https://dmy.co/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 48#Dummy|2014 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#More source questions|2018 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Dotdash]] (previously titled About.com)
| All genres
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|about.com/entertainment/#s6|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 48#About.com|2014 Discussion]] – Only cite authors approved [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources/About.com Critics Table|here]].
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[DownBeat]]''
| Jazz, blues, R&B
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}, online reviews have no formal scale
| US
| {{url|downbeat.com|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Drowned in Sound]]''
| Rock, independent
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| UK
| {{url|drownedinsound.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 31#Review Sites|2009 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 44#Drowned in Sound|2012 Discussion]]. Only use staff reviews. Note that the site is defunct and has become a newsletter on [[Substack]]. Use of its Substack content falls under [[WP:EXPERTSPS]], and should conform to that policy. https://drownedinsound.substack.com/
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Early Music (journal)|Early Music]]''
| Early music
| Not applicable
| UK
| {{url|em.oxfordjournals.org|Website}}, [https://www.jstor.org/journals/03061078.html JSTOR access]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Early Music Today''
| Early music
| Not applicable
| UK
| {{url|www.rhinegold.co.uk/rhinegold-publishing/magazines/early-music-today/|Website}}, [https://shop.rhinegold.co.uk/collections/early-music-today Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]''
| All genres
| Letter grade: B +/–
| US
| {{url|ew.com/ew/music/|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Exclaim!]]''
| All genres
| 10-point scale: 7/10 or no formal scale
| Canada
| {{url|exclaim.ca|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 31#Suggested review site|2009 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[ExploreMusic]]''
| All genres
| No formal rating system
| Canada
| {{url|exploremusic.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Fact (UK magazine)|Fact]]''
| Popular music
| 5-disc scale, 3.5/5
| UK
| {{url|factmag.com/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Fader]]''
| Popular music, folk, experimental
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|thefader.com|Website}}, [https://www.thefader.com/category/magazine/back-issues/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Filter (magazine)|Filter]]''
| Popular music
| 100-percent scale: 75%
| US
| {{url|filtermagazine.com/|Website}}, [https://filtermagazine.com/index.php/magazine/ Magazine archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Fly (magazine)|The Fly]]''
| Popular music
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| UK
| {{url|mamacolive.com/thefly/|Website}}, [https://mamacolive.com/thefly/magazine/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''The Forty-Five''
| Popular music
| Not applicable
| UK
| {{url|https://thefortyfive.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 76#Source discussion: The Forty-Five|2024 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Gavin Report]]''
| All genres
| No formal scale
| US
| [https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Gavin-Report-Page-Range-Guide.htm Archives] 
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[General Music Today]]''
| All genres, classical focus
| Not applicable
| US
| {{url|gmt.sagepub.com/|Website}}, [http://gmt.sagepub.com/content/by/year Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Gleaner (newspaper)|The Gleaner]]''
| Jamaican
| 
| Jamaica
| {{url|https://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/ent/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Goldmine (magazine)|Goldmine]]''
| All genres
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3|5}}; or letter-grade scale for reviews posted on staff blogs
| US
| {{url|https://www.goldminemag.com/reviews/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 51#Goldmine magazine|2015 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Gramophone (magazine)|Gramophone]]''
| Classical
| No formal scale
| UK
| {{url|gramophone.co.uk|Website}}, [http://www.themagazineshop.com/back-issues/gramophone-back-issues Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Harp (magazine)|Harp]]''
| Adult album alternative
| 
| UK
| {{url|https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://harpmagazine.com/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 50#Harp Magazine|2014 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Hindu]]''
| Indian – all genres
| No formal scale
| India
| {{url|http://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Hip Hop Connection]]''
| Hip hop
| 5-point scale: 4/5
| UK
| 
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[HipHopDX]]''
| Hip hop
| 5-point scale: 4/5 (Converted from X's)
| US
| {{url|hiphopdx.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#hiphopdx.com|2009 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 40#HipHopDX.com|2011 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[HM (magazine)|HM]]''
| Christian – rock, heavy metal
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}, some older reviews 10-point scale or no formal scale
| US
| {{url|hmmagazine.com/|Website}}, [http://hmmagazine.com/blog/issue Archives]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#HM Magazine|2018 Discussion]].<br>Owner and operator: Doug Van Pelt
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[HotNewHipHop]]''
| Hip hop, R&B
| Percentage scale: 93%
| US
| {{url|https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 59#Is HotNewHipHop a reliable source?|2019 Discussion]]. Owner: Saro D. Editor-in-chief: Alexander Cole
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[HuffPost]]'' (previously titled ''The Huffington Post'')
| Popular music
| No formal rating scale
| US
| {{url|huffingtonpost.com/news/music/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[Idolator (website)|Idolator]]
| Popular music
| 10-star scale: {{Rating|6|10}}
| US
| {{url|idolator.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Independent]]''
| All genres
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| UK
| {{url|independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 345#RFC: The Independent|2021 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[InRock]]''
| Popular music, primarily rock music
| 
| Russia
| {{url|www.inrock.ru/english|Website}}, [http://www.inrock.ru/archieve Archives]
| In Russian, with option for an English main page.
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Jamaica Observer]]''
| Jamaican
| 
| Jamaica
| {{url|https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/category/music/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Jazz Hot]]''
| Jazz
| 
| French
| {{url|www.jazzhot.net/|Website}}, [http://www.jazzhot.net/PBSearch.asp?CCode=2 Archives]
| In French.
|-
!scope="row"| ''Jazzed Magazine''
| Jazz
| Not applicable
|
| {{url|www.jazzedmagazine.com/|Website}}, [http://www.jazzedmagazine.com/archives/monthly-archives/ Magazine archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Jazz Journal]]''
| Jazz
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3|5}}
| UK
| {{url|jazzjournal.co.uk|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Jazz Magazine]]''
| Jazz
| 
| France
| {{url|www.jazzmagazine.com|Website}}, [http://www.jazzmagazine.com/le-magazine/ Magazine archives]
| French language.
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Jazzman (magazine)|Jazzman]]''
| Jazz
| 
| France
| {{url|www.jazzman.fr|Website}}, [http://www.jazzman.fr/archives-jazzman.html Archives]
| Defunct since 2009. French language.
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[JazzTimes]]''
| Jazz
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|jazztimes.com/|Website}}, [http://jazztimes.com/issues/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| Jesus Freak Hideout
| Christian – popular music
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|jesusfreakhideout.com/default.aspx|Website}}
| Avoid user reviews (distinguished as yellow stars instead of red)<br>Owner and operator: John DiBiase
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Juice (skateboarding magazine)|Juice]]''
| Rock, heavy metal, surf and skate music
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|juicemagazine.com/home/category/music-2/|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Kerrang!]]''
| Rock, heavy metal
| 5-"K" scale, 4/5
| UK
| {{url|kerrang.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review publications: Rock Sound, Spin, Metal Hammer, Vibe, Mojo, Kerrang! and Q|2009 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Kludge (magazine)|Kludge]]''
| Popular music, independent
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| US
| {{url|http://web.archive.org/web/20061016231327/http://www.kludgemagazine.com/reviews/|Website}}, {{url|https://web.archive.org/web/20020525150645/http://www.ekmag.com:80/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Krugozor]]''
| Classical music, popular music
| 
| Soviet Union
| {{url|/www.krugozor-kolobok.ru/|Website}}, [http://journal-club.ru/?q=image/tid/860 Archives]
| Defunct. In Russian.
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Latin Beat Magazine]]''
| Latin
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|latinbeatmagazine.com|Website}}, [http://www.latinbeatmagazine.com/e-back_issues.html Archives]
| Defunct since November 2015. Website usurped. Multi-language source.
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Le Guide musical]]''
| Classical
| No formal scale
| France and Belgium
| [https://www.worldcat.org/title/guide-musical-revue-hebdomadaire-des-nouvelles-musicales-de-la-belgique-et-de-letranger/oclc/503770634&referer=brief_results WorldCat listing]<br>[https://www.worldcat.org/title/guide-musical-revue-internationale-de-la-musique-et-des-theatres/oclc/405116856&referer=brief_results WorldCat listing]
| French language publication that ran from 1855 until [[World War I]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Le Ménestrel]]''
| Classical
| No formal scale
| France
| [http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb344939836/date.r=Le%20M%C3%A9nestrel.langEN Archives]
| French language publication that ran from 1833 until [[World War II]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Les Inrockuptibles]]''
| Rock, indie
| 
| France
| {{url|www.lesinrocks.com/|Website}}, [http://mon-compte.lesinrocks.com/bibliotheque Archives]
| French language
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Limelight (magazine)|Limelight]]''
| Classical, jazz, pop
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| Australia
| {{url|limelightmagazine.com.au|Website}}, [http://www.limelightmagazine.com.au/Magazine/Archive.aspx Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Line of Best Fit]]''
| Popular music
| 10-star scale: {{Rating|7.5|10}}
| UK
| {{url|thelineofbestfit.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Living Blues]]''
| Blues
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|livingblues.com|Website}}, [http://livingblues.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=35:backissues&Itemid=37&layout=default Archives] 
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Lost at Sea''
| All genres
| 10-point scale: 7.5/10
| US
| {{url|lostatsea.net|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Loud and Quiet]]''
| Popular music
| 10-point scale: 7/10 or no formal scale
| UK
| {{url|loudandquiet.com|Website}}, [http://www.loudandquiet.com/category/back-issues/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Loudwire]]''
| Rock, heavy metal
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3|5}}
| US
| {{url|loudwire.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 48#Swapping Loudwire for Metal Storm & Punknews.org|2014 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#Loudwire|2018 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Magic (music magazine)|Magic]]''
| Popular music
| 
| France
| {{url|magicrpm.com|Website}}, [http://shop.magicrpm.com/en/37-magazine Archives]
| French language. Many back issue are out of stock. 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Magnet (magazine)|Magnet]]''
| Rock
| 10-star scale: {{Rating|7.5|10}}
| US
| {{url|magnetmagazine.com/|Website}}, [http://store.magnetmagazine.com/collections/back-issues Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[Melodic (magazine)|Melodic]]
| Rock, independent
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| International
| {{url|melodic.net|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Metal Forces]]''
| Heavy metal
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| UK
| {{url|www.metalforcesmagazine.com|Website}} [http://www.metalforcesmagazine.com/site/album-ep-reviews/ Reviews archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Metal Hammer]]''
| Heavy metal
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| UK
| {{url|metalhammer.co.uk|Website}}, [http://www.myfavouritemagazines.co.uk/music/metalhammer-magazine-back-issues/ Archives]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review publications: Rock Sound, Spin, Metal Hammer, Vibe, Mojo, Kerrang! and Q|2009 Discussion]]. Includes Louder (formerly known as [[Team Rock]])
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Metal Injection]]''
| Heavy metal
| 
| 
| {{url|http://www.metalinjection.net/|Website}}
|[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#Reliable and unreliable sources list|2018 Discussion]]<br>Operator and co-founder: Frank Godla<br>Co-founder: Robert Pasbani
|-
!scope="row"| [[Metal Storm (webzine)|Metal Storm]]
| Heavy metal
| 10-point scale: 7.6/10.0 or
no formal scale
| Estonia
| {{url|metalstorm.net/pub/reviews.php|Website}}
|[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 40#Review site: Metal Storm|2011 Discussion]] – Only staff review from 2009 onward are usable, don't use guest reviews [http://www.metalstorm.net/pub/review.php?review_id=8949 recognizable by a tag], which fail [[WP:SELFPUB]] [https://metalstorm.net/pub/article.php?article_id=718 see criteria here]
|-
!scope="row"| [[MetalSucks]]
| Heavy metal
| 5-point scale: {{rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|metalsucks.net|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 50#MetalSucks - reliable?|2015 Discussion]]. Generally reliable, but don't use overly satirical work, [http://www.metalsucks.net/2013/04/01/devices-device-the-metalsucks-device-review/ like this]. Owners: Axl Rosenberg and Vince Neilstein
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Mixmag]]''
| EDM, Synthpop
| 5-"headphones" scale
| UK
| {{url|mixmag.net|Website}}, [http://mixmag.subscribeonline.co.uk/back-issues/mixmag Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Mojo (magazine)|Mojo]]''
| Rock, popular music
| 5-star scale (from 2003 onwards): {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| UK
| {{url|mojo4music.com|Website}}, [http://www.mojo4music.com/blog/backIssue.html Archives]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review publications: Rock Sound, Spin, Metal Hammer, Vibe, Mojo, Kerrang! and Q|2009 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| [[MTV]]
| Popular music
| No formal rating system
| US
| {{url|mtv.com|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Musical Opinion]]''
| Classical music
| No formal scale
| UK
| {{url|www.musicalopinion.com/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Musical Quarterly]]''
| All genres, classical focus
| Not applicable
| US
| {{url|http://mq.oxfordjournals.org/|Website}}, [http://www.jstor.org/journals/00274631.html JSTOR access]
|
|-
!scope="row"| Musical Theatre Magazine
| Theater
| 
| US
| {{url|www.musicaltheatremagazine.com/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Musical Times]]''
| Classical
| Not applicable
| UK
| [http://www.jstor.org/journals/00274666.html JSTOR access]
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[MusicMight]]
| Rock
| Not applicable
| NZ
| {{url|musicmight.com|Website}} and {{url|rockdetector.com|Website}}
| Only use content attributed to Garry Sharpe-Young (user Taniwha)
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[MusicOMH]]''
| All genres
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}} or no formal scale
| UK
| {{url|musicomh.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review site: MusicOMH|2009 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Music Story]]
| All genres
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| France
| [https://web.archive.org/web/ Archives]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 56#Music Story as a reliable source|2018 Discussion]] – Current website has no past reviews; link to offsite archived reviews with author if available, rather than star rating only
|-
!scope="row"| Music Times
| Popular music
| No formal rating system
| US
| {{url|musictimes.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 52#Music Times|2016 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[MusicRow]]''
| Country music
| No formal rating system
| US
| {{url|musicrow.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Recommendations_for_additions_to_this_list|2024 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''NH7''
| Indian – Indie, alternative
| Letter grade
| India
| {{url|nh7.in|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[NME]]''
| Rock, popular music
| Until September 2015: 10-point scale: 7/10<br>From October 2015 to September 2016: 5-point scale: 4/5<br>From October 2016: 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| UK
| {{url|nme.com|Website}}, [http://gb.zinio.com/browse/publications/single-issues.jsp?productId=67156525&amp;rf=tx-ipc-180510&amp;pss=1 Archives] 
|
|-
!scope="row"| No Ripcord
| Popular music
| 10-point scale: 7.5/10
| UK
| {{url|noripcord.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_65#No_Ripcord|2022 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Noisecreep]]
| Hard rock, heavy metal
| No formal rating system
| US
| {{url|noisecreep.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_65#Noisecreep_reliable?|2022 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Nothing but Hope and Passion]]''
| Popular music
| No formal scale
| Germany
| {{url|nbhap.com/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Now (newspaper)|Now]]''
| All genres
| 5-"N" scale, 4/5
| Canada
| {{url|nowtoronto.com/music|Website}}, [http://nowtoronto.com/archive/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[NPR Music]]
| All genres
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|npr.org/music/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Opera (British magazine)|Opera]]''
| Opera
| No formal scale
| UK
| {{url|opera.co.uk|Website}}, [https://opera.escosubs.co.uk/back-issues.htm Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Opera Canada]]''
| Opera
| 
| Canada
| {{url|operacanada.ca|Website}}, [http://magazinescanada.zinio.com/browse/publications/index.jsp?productId=500247506&pss=1 Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Opera News]]''
| Opera
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|operanews.com|Website}}, [http://www.operanews.com/operanews/templates/archives.aspx Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Opera Now''
| Opera
| No formal scale
| UK
| {{url|www.rhinegold.co.uk/rhinegold-publishing/magazines/opera-now/|Website}}, [http://rhinegold.subscribeonline.co.uk/Back-Issues/opera-now Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Orchestra''
| Orchestral music, theater music
| No formal scale
| Serbia
| {{url|www.orchestra-magazine.com/index-eng.html|Website}}, [http://www.orchestra-magazine.com/archives.html Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Organ (magazine)|Organ]]''
| Popular music, especially independent, alternative, and underground music
| No formal scale
| UK
| {{url|organart.com|Website}}<br>{{url|www.organart.demon.co.uk|Website}} (no longer updated)
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Ox-Fanzine]]''
| Rock music, especially punk and heavy metal
| 10-point scale: {{rating|5|10}}
| Germany
| {{url|www.ox-fanzine.de/|website}}
| German language
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Paper (magazine)|Paper]]''
|All genres
|Not applicable 
|US
|[https://www.papermag.com/ Website]
|[[Special:PermanentLink/1232375560#Paper magazine|2024 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Paste (magazine)|Paste]]''
| Rock
| 10-point scale: 7.6/10
| US
| {{url|pastemagazine.com|Website}}, [http://www.pastemagazine.com/store/category/BI/paste_back_issues Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Perfect Sound Forever (magazine)|Perfect Sound Forever]]''
| Alternative, electronic and experimental music
| No formal scale, reviews are only included in overviews of musicians careers
| US
| {{url|http://www.furious.com/perfect/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 49#Perfect Sound Forever|2014 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''Pianist''
| Classical, piano music
| 5-point written scale (4 stars) or no formal scale
| UK
| {{url|www.pianistmagazine.com/|Website}}, {{url|www.pianistdigital.com|Website}}, [https://www.pianistmagazine.com/store/back-issues/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Pitchfork (website)|Pitchfork]]''
| Popular music, independent
| 10-point scale: 7.6/10.0
| US
| {{url|pitchfork.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[Playlouder]]
| Popular music, independent
| 5-point scale: {{rating|3.5|5}}
| UK
| {{url|https://web.archive.org/web/20061124000906/http://www.playlouder.com/review/|Reviews archive}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[PopMatters]]''
| Popular music
| Before May 2015: 10-point scale: 7/10<br>May 2015–Jan 2021: 10-star scale: {{rating|7|10}}<br>From Jan 2021: 10-point scale: 7/10
| International
| {{url|popmatters.com|Website}}
| No formal rating for reviews published before 2005
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Punk (magazine)|Punk]]''
| Punk
| 
| US
| {{url|punkmagazine.com|Website}}, [http://punkmagazine.com/vault/vault-main.html Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Punk Globe]]''
| Punk, rock
| 
| US
| {{URL|https://punkglobe.com/|Website}}, {{URL|https://punkglobe.com/index1.php|Index}}
| Per a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 246#Is Punk Globe a reliable source?|2018 discussion]], it is acceptable for interviews as well as uncontroversial claims and basic facts, such as that band {{var|X}} released album {{var|Y}} in year {{var|Z}} or played {{var|A}} on date {{var|B}} at venue {{var|C}}. Especially given it's a [[fanzine]] (specifically a [[punk zine]]), however, it generally shouldn't be used for controversial or sensitive biographic claims.
|-
!scope="row"| Punknews.org
| Punk, heavy metal, independent
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|punknews.org|Website}}
| Use staff reviews only, [http://www.punknews.org/review/8008 recognizable by a tag]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Q (magazine)|Q]]''
| Popular music
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| UK
| {{url|qthemusic.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review publications: Rock Sound, Spin, Metal Hammer, Vibe, Mojo, Kerrang! and Q|2009 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Quietus]]''
| Popular music
| No formal scale
| UK
| {{url|http://thequietus.com/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Radio & Records]]'' (R&R)
| All genres
| No formal scale
| US
| [https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Radio_and_Records.htm Archives] 
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''RapReviews''
| Hip hop
| 10 point scale: 6/10
| US
| {{url|http://www.rapreviews.com/|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Rap-Up]]''
| Urban, popular music
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|rap-up.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Record Collector]]''
| All genres
| Older: no formal scale, then 4-star scale: {{Rating|3|4}}<br />Newer: 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| UK
| {{url|recordcollectormag.com|Website}}, [http://recordcollectormag.com/issues-list Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Reggae Report]]''
| Reggae, Caribbean, African, hip hop
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|reggaereport.com/|Website}}, [http://issuu.com/reggaereport/docs Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Relix]]''
| [[Jam band]]s and various rock and roots music, as well as live performances
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|http://www.relix.com/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Proposing_Relix_as_a_reliable_source_for_rock_and_jam_band_news_and_reviews|2022 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Renowned for Sound]]''
| All genres
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}} or no formal scale
| International
| {{url|renownedforsound.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Resident Advisor]]''
| Electronic
| 5 point scale: 3/5
| Global
| {{url|ra.co|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Revolver (magazine)|Revolver]]''
| Heavy metal
| 5-point scale: 3/5
| US
| {{url|revolvermag.com|Website}}, [http://www.revolvermag.com/magazine/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[Robert Christgau]]
| Rock, popular music
| {{tl|Rating-Christgau}}: {{Rating-Christgau|C+}}, {{Rating-Christgau|hm2}} or {{Rating-Christgau|dud}}
| US
| {{url|robertchristgau.com|Website}} 
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 47#Robert Christgau as a source for "hard or heavy" music?|2014 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Rock & Folk]]''
| Rock music
| 
| France
| {{url|http://www.rocknfolk.com/site/accueil.php|Website}}, [http://boutique.editions-lariviere.fr/site/liste-anciens-numeros-musique-7-2.html Archives]
| French language
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Rock Hard (magazine)|Rock Hard]]''
| Heavy metal
| 10-point scale: 7.5/10
| Germany
| {{url|rockhard.de|Website}}, [http://www.rockhard.de/megazine/heftarchiv.html Magazine archives]
| German language
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Rock Sound]]''
| Rock
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| UK
| {{url|rocksound.tv|Website}}, [http://www.rocksound.tv/magazine/back-issues Archives]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review publications: Rock Sound, Spin, Metal Hammer, Vibe, Mojo, Kerrang! and Q|2009 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Rock Street Journal]]''
| Indian – rock
| Letter grade
| India
| {{url|rsjonline.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Rolling Stone]]''
| Rock, popular music
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}} (for several decades, converted to prose-only in 2022<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/rolling-stone-new-website-1398501/ |title=Welcome to the New ''Rolling Stone'' |date=2022-08-18 |accessdate=2022-11-15 |last=Shachtman |first=Noah |work=[[Rolling Stone]] |lang=en-US}}</ref> and then back again)
| US
| {{url|rollingstone.com|Website}}, [https://m1.buysub.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10951&storeId=10951&categoryId=253639&langId=-1 Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[RPM (magazine)|RPM]]''
| All genres
| No formal scale
| Canada
| [https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/RPM.htm Archives] 
|
|-
!scope="row"| Roots Archives
| Jamaican and Reggae
| Not applicable
|
| {{url|http://www.roots-archives.com/|Website}}
| A discography database
|-
!scope="row"| Roughstock
| Country
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|roughstock.com|Website}}
| Defunct as of 2024.
|-
!scope="row"| ''SB&O''
| Band and orchestral music
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|sbomagazine.com/|Website}}, [http://sbo.magserv.com/cgi-bin/subscribe?qt=new&Keyed_effort=WEBNP Archives] (subscription required)
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Select (magazine)|Select]]''
| Popular music
| 5-point scale: 4/5
| UK
| 
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Skinny (magazine)|The Skinny]]''
| All genres
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| UK
| {{url|theskinny.co.uk/music/|Website}}, [http://theskinny.co.uk/about/archive Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Slant Magazine]]''
| Popular music
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|slantmagazine.com/music|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Sonic Seducer]]''
| Dark culture
| 10-point scale or no formal scale
| Germany
| {{url|sonic-seducer.de|Website}}, [https://web.archive.org/web/20100515044714/http://www.sonic-seducer.de/Back_Issues/View_all_products.html Archived link to back issues], [https://web.archive.org/web/20140228131513*/http://www.sonic-seducer.de/index.php/component/option,com_reviews/Itemid,162 archive.org Reviews archive]
| German language. 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Source]]''
| Hip hop
| 5-"microphone" scale
| US
| {{url|thesource.com|Website}} 
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Spill Magazine''
| Independent music
| 10-point scale
| Canada
| {{url|http://spillmagazine.com/|Website}}, [http://spillmagazine.com/about-us/ About Us]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 61#Spill Magazine as a reliable source|2020 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Spin (magazine)|Spin]]''
| Rock, hip hop, alternative
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| US
| {{url|spin.com|Website}}, [http://www.spin.com/archive Archives]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review publications: Rock Sound, Spin, Metal Hammer, Vibe, Mojo, Kerrang! and Q|2009 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Spinner (website)|Spinner]]
| Rock
| No formal rating system
| US
| {{url|spinner.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[Sputnikmusic]]
| All genres
| 5-point scale: 3.5/5
| US
| {{url|sputnikmusic.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 54#Sputnik reviews|2017 Discussion]] – Use staff and emeritus reviews only, recognizable by tag
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Sruti (magazine)|Sruti]]''
| Indian
| No formal scale
| India
| {{url|sruti.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Stereogum]]''
| All genres
| No formal scale
| 
| {{url|stereogum.com|Website}} 
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 64#Stereogum|2021 discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 63#Stereogum|2021 discussion (ditto)]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Stylus Magazine]]''
| Popular music
| Letter grade: B +/-
| US
| {{url|stylusmagazine.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[League of American Orchestras|Symphony]]''
| Classical music, orchestral music
| No formal scale
| US
| {{url|www.americanorchestras.org/symphony-magazine.html|Website}}, [http://www.americanorchestras.org/symphony-magazine/archive.html Archive]
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[Taste of Country]]
| Country
| 5-star scale {{rating|3.5|5}}; some old reviews use 10-point scale (7.5/10)
| US
| {{url|tasteofcountry.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Recommendations_for_additions_to_this_list|2024 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| Thrash Hits
| Heavy metal
| 6-point scale: 4.5/5
| US
| {{url|www.thrashhits.com/|Website}} [https://web.archive.org/web/20190401082154/http://www.thrashhits.com/ Archived url]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 52#Thrash Hits - revisited|2015 Discussion]]<br>Operator: Raziq Rauf
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Tiny Mix Tapes]]''
| Popular music, independent/underground music, avant-garde/experimental
| 5-point scale: {{rating|3.5|5}} or {{Rating|3.5|5|full=U+25CF.svg|half=U+25D0.svg|empty=U+25CB.svg|rating=mark}}
| US
| {{url|https://www.tinymixtapes.com/|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 58#Tiny Mix Tapes should be considered reliable (in certain contexts)|2018 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Triple J]]
| Popular music
| No formal scale
| Australia
| {{url|abc.net.au/triplej/default.htm|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[Ultimate Guitar]]
| Rock, heavy metal
| 10-point scale: 7/10
| International
| {{url|www.ultimate-guitar.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 51#Ultimate Guitar|2015 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#Ultimate-guitar.com|2018 Discussion]]. Only cite articles written by the "[https://web.archive.org/web/20190116175232/http://groups.ultimate-guitar.com/ugteam/ UG Team]" ([https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/ug_news/meet_the_ug_writers_team.html list of staff writers]) or any writer with reliable credentials elsewhere. 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Uncut (magazine)|Uncut]]''
| Popular music 
| Older: 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}<br />From April 2012: 10-point scale: 7/10
| UK
| {{url|uncut.co.uk/music|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Under the Radar (magazine)|Under the Radar]]''
| Indie
| 10-star scale: {{Rating|7.5|10}}
| US
| {{url|undertheradarmag.com/|Website}}, [http://www.undertheradarmag.com/issues/ Archives]
| [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_65#Under_the_Radar|2022 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[URB (magazine)|URB]]''
| Electronic, urban
| No formal scale
| UK
| {{url|urb.com|Website}} 
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[VH1]]
| Popular music
| No formal rating system
| US
| {{url|vh1.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Vibe (magazine)|Vibe]]''
| R&B, hip hop
| 5-star scale: {{Rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|vibe.com|Website}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 32#Review publications: Rock Sound, Spin, Metal Hammer, Vibe, Mojo, Kerrang! and Q|2009 Discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Welsh Music History]]''
| Welsh music
| Not applicable
| UK
| [http://welshjournals.llgc.org.uk/browse/listissues/llgc-id:1175725 Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Wire (magazine)|The Wire]]''
| Avant-garde, modern classical, jazz, hip hop, electronic
| No formal scale
| UK
| {{url|thewire.co.uk|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[eMusic|Wondering Sound]]
| All genres
| 5-star rating: {{rating|3.5|5}}
| US
| {{url|wonderingsound.com/|Website}}
| Reviews before 2014 are unrated.
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[XXL (magazine)|XXL]]''
| Hip hop
| System based on clothing sizes; scale of small ("S") to extra-extra large ("XXL")
| US
| {{url|xxlmag.com|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Yearbook for Traditional Music]]''
| Traditional, traditional dance
| Not applicable
| UK
| {{url|ictmusic.org/publications/yearbook-for-traditional-music|Website}}, [http://www.jstor.org/journals/07401558.html JSTOR access]
|
|}

===Aggregates===
[https://anydecentmusic.com AnyDecentMusic?] and [https://www.metacritic.com/ Metacritic] can be used to give an aggregate score of an album's reception. However, avoid citing the review excerpts listed below the aggregate score; instead, seek out the reviews in full and cite them individually. {{tl|Album ratings}} has the {{code|ADM}} and {{code|MC}} parameters respectively that can be used to display the aggregate scores for an album. When describing the score in prose, be sure to note that the score is an aggregate and how many reviews it is based on. For example:

{{Album ratings
| MC = 46/100<ref name="metacritic"/>
}}
{{blockquote|''[[The Devil's Rain (album)|The Devil's Rain]]'' received mixed reviews from critics. At [[Metacritic]], the album has an [[Weighted arithmetic mean|average]] score of 46 out of 100, which indicates "mixed or average reviews" based on 11 reviews.<ref name="metacritic">{{cite web |title=''The Devil's Rain''{{nbsp}}– Misfits |publisher=[[Metacritic]] |url=http://www.metacritic.com/music/the-devils-rain/critic-reviews |accessdate=2012-07-03 |language=en-US}}</ref><br />{{Reflist}}}}

You may use the {{tl|Metacritic album prose}} template to standardize this language.

===Music charts===
For information on what charts to use or avoid, see [[WP:GOODCHARTS]] and [[WP:BADCHARTS]].

===Instrument-specific===
{{shortcut|WP:RSINSTRUMENT|WP:RSINSTRUMENTS}}
Note that these publications may not only include information pertinent to the instrument or instruments to which they are dedicated, but also news coverage and reviews of performances and recordings featuring those instruments.

See [http://www.muzines.co.uk/ mu:zines] for an online archive of music magazines.

{|class="wikitable plainrowheaders"
|+Instrument-specific sources
!scope="col"| Publication
!scope="col"| Instrument
!scope="col"| Country
!scope="col"| Website/Archives
!scope="col"| Discussions/Limitations
|-
!scope="row"| ''Attack Magazine''
| Synthesizer, production equipment
| UK
| {{url|https://www.attackmagazine.com/|Website}}
|[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 60#Attack Magazine|2020 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Acoustic Guitar (magazine)|Acoustic Guitar]]''
| Acoustic guitar
| US
| {{url|acousticguitar.com/|Website}}, [https://store.acousticguitar.com/collections/back-issues Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Bass Guitar (magazine)|Bass Guitar]]''
| Bass guitar
| UK
| {{url|bassguitarmagazine.com/|Website}}, [https://www.pocketmags.com/viewmagazine.aspx?titleid=1144&title=Bass+Guitar Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Bass Player (magazine)|Bass Player]]''
| Bass guitar
| US
| {{url|bassplayer.com/home|Website}}, [https://guitarworld.myshopify.com/collections/bassplayer/back-issues Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Bass Quarterly]]''
| Bass guitar
| Germany
| {{url|bassquarterly.de|Website}}, [https://www.bassquarterly.de/archiv.html Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[International Clarinet Association|The Clarinet Journal]]''
| Clarinet
| US
| {{url|clarinet.org/the-clarinet-journal/|Website}}, [http://clarinet.org/back-issues/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Clarinet & Saxophone''
| Clarinet and saxophone
| UK
| {{url|www.cassgb.org/magazine/|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''Clavier Companion''
| Piano and keyboard
| US
| {{url|www.keyboardcompanion.com/|Website}}, [http://www.keyboardcompanion.com/subscriptions/digital Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Choir & Organ''
| Voice, organ
| UK
| {{url|www.rhinegold.co.uk/rhinegold-publishing/magazines/choir-organ/|Website}}, [http://rhinegold.subscribeonline.co.uk/Back-Issues/choir-organ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''CSO Sounds & Stories''
| Orchestra
| US
| {{url|csosoundsandstories.org/|Website}}, [http://csosoundsandstories.org/archive/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Diapason (magazine)|The Diapason]]''
| Organ
| US
| {{url|www.thediapason.com|Website}}, [http://www.thediapason.com/archive Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[DRUM! Magazine]]''
| Drum kit
| US
| {{url|drummagazine.com|Website}}, [https://www.entermusicstore.biz/drum-magazine.html Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Electronic Musician]]''
| Synthesizer, production equipment
| US
| {{url|emusician.com/home|Website}}, [https://guitarworld.myshopify.com/collections/electronic-musician/back-issues Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Flute Talk''
| Flute
| US
| {{url|theinstrumentalist.com/current-issue/FluteTalk/|Website}}, [http://theinstrumentalist.com/issues/FluteTalk/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''The Flute View''
| Flute
| US
| {{url|thefluteview.com|Website}}, [http://thefluteview.com/single-issues/download-issues/ Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''The Flutist Quarterly''
| Flute
| US
| {{url|www.nfaonline.org/Publications/The-Flutist-Quarterly/|Website}}, [http://www.nfaonline.org/Publications/The-Flutist-Quarterly/Past-Issues.aspx Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Guitarist (magazine)|Guitarist]]''
| Guitar
| UK
| {{url|musicradar.com/guitarist|Website}}, [https://www.musicradar.com/guitarist/category/issues Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Guitar Player]]''
| Guitar
| US
| {{url|guitarplayer.com/index|Website}}, [https://guitarworld.myshopify.com/collections/guitarplayer/back-issues Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Guitar World]]''
| Guitar
| US
| {{url|guitarworld.com|Website}}, [https://guitarworld.myshopify.com/collections/guitar-world/back-issues Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''International Piano''
| Piano
| UK
| {{url|www.rhinegold.co.uk/rhinegold-publishing/magazines/international-piano/|Website}}, [http://rhinegold.subscribeonline.co.uk/Back-Issues/international-piano Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Journal of the [[American Viola Society]]''
| Viola
| US
| {{url|www.americanviolasociety.org/Journal/Journal.php|Website}}, [https://www.americanviolasociety.org/Journal/Archives-Members.php Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Keyboard (magazine)|Keyboard]]''
| Keyboard
| US
| {{url|keyboardmag.com|Website}}, [https://guitarworld.myshopify.com/collections/keyboard/back-issues Archives]
|-
!scope="row"| ''Mixdown''
| Production and recording equipment
| US
| {{url|https://mixdownmag.com.au/|Website}}
|[[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_446#h-Mixdown_(music_website)-20240727122600|2024 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Modern Drummer]]''
| Percussion
| US
| {{url|www.moderndrummer.com/|Website}}, [https://www.moderndrummer.com/site/category/issues/#.VMJ5nS5RKDk Archives]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Music Radar]]''
| Production and recording equipment
| UK
| {{url|https://www.musicradar.com/|Website}}
|[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 62#Electronic instruments and production gear sources|2020 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[MusicTech]]''
| Production and recording equipment
| UK
| {{url|https://www.musictech.net/|Website}}
|[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 62#Electronic instruments and production gear sources|2020 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Organ (magazine)|The Organ]]''
| Pipe organ
| UK
| {{url|www.theorganmag.com/|Website}}, [http://www.theorganmag.com/issues.html Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Pan''
| Flute
| UK
| {{url|bfs.org.uk/flute-journal.php|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Percussive Notes]]''
| Percussion
| US
| {{url|www.pas.org/publications/percussive-notes|Website}}
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Recording''
| Audio and recording equipment
| US
| {{url|www.recordingmag.com/issues.html|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| [[Red Bull Music Academy]]
| Production and recording equipment
| US
| {{url|daily.redbullmusicacademy.com/|Website}}
|[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 57#Red Bull Music Academy|2018 discussion]]
|-
!scope="row"| ''Saxophone Life''
| Saxophone
| UK
| {{url|www.saxophonelife.com/|Website}}
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''Saxophone Today''
| Saxophone
| US
| {{url|www.saxophonetoday.com|Website}}, [http://www.saxophonetoday.com/category-s/1857.htm Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Sound on Sound]]''
| Production and recording equipment
| UK
| {{url|www.soundonsound.com/|Website}}, [http://www.soundonsound.com/magazine/2016-10 Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[The Strad]]''
| String
| UK
| {{url|thestrad.com|Website}}, [https://shop.nqsm.com/thestrad/category,back-issues-the-strad_44.htm Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''Strings'' and ''Teen Strings''
| String
| US
| {{url|stringsmagazine.com/|Website}}, [http://store.stringsmagazine.com/collections/back-issues Archives],
[http://store.stringsmagazine.com/collections/teen-strings-magazine Archives]
|
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Tape Op]]''
| Production and recording equipment
| US
| {{url|tapeop.com/|Website}}, [http://tapeop.com/issues/ Archives]
| 
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Vintage Guitar (magazine)|Vintage Guitar]]''
| Guitar
| US
| {{url|http://vintageguitar.com/|Website}}
| 
|}

===Other sources===
*Newspapers, periodicals, journals, and other online and print media publications often include coverage of music and its performers, and recordings. They can be excellent sources.
*A physical album's liner notes are generally a good place to find writing and production credits for a personnel section. Some records are also released with additional writing that may be helpful with an article's recording and/or composing section. The album notes can be properly sourced with the {{tl|Cite album-notes}} template.
*As long as the information being contributed is not overly promotional, unduly self-serving or biased, the artist or record label's website may be acceptable sources. These sites often provide detailed information about an artist's discography. However, since many band websites are recreated entirely upon the release of a new studio album, URL's or information may be moved or deleted, and articles are left with the phenomenon known as [[WP:ROT|link rot]]. To avoid this, try to find a different source with the same information, or a [[web archive]] of the original source. For assistance with web archiving, see [[Wikipedia:Using the Wayback Machine]].
*Statements given in interviews with an artist, producer, or any other music personnel are reliable for statements about the person themselves and the work they are involved in, such as their band, compositions, etc. However, they are not reliable for statements about other living persons. Any statements about another person should be supported by the individual in question or else a reliable source.
*If the artist in question was subject to any form of ''recorded'' audio or video in the possible form of a television documentary or an informational DVD/VHS, this may be an acceptable source of information. To cite information from a source like this, use either {{tl|cite video}} or {{tl|cite episode}}, whichever is most applicable.
*If an artist or recording act has existed for a significant period of time and/or has made a great impact on their scene or music in general, it's likely that someone has written a book on the topic. An easy way to search through books is with a quick [http://books.google.com/ Google Books] search. Google Books will provide links of several possible locations to obtain a copy, and will sometimes provide select passages of the book for previewing. To cite a book as a source, use the {{tl|cite books}} template.
*Books published by [[Joel Whitburn]]'s Record Research compile chart data from ''Billboard'' and relevant facts about songs and artists. These may be helpful for indicating performances of singles and albums on the ''Billboard'' charts, as well as other facts about individual songs, such as writers and B-sides.

===Non-English sources===
:''For more, see [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Non-English sources]]''
English-language sources are preferred, as this is an English-language encyclopedia and languages other than English are not understood by a large number of readers. However, if few sources exist, those in languages other than English may be included, especially if the language is especially relevant to the subject in question. Sources in ''any'' language must meet the above guidelines, including [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] and [[WP:ALBUMS#Reception]].

===Christian music===
For sources pertaining primarily or specifically to [[Christian music]] of all genres, see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian music/Sources]].

===Korean music and K-pop===
For sources that deal with South Korean culture, including [[K-pop]] and other forms of [[Korean music]], see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources]].

===Latin music===
For sources that focus on [[Latin music]] and its subgenres, see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin music/Resources]].

==Unreliable sources==
{{shortcut|WP:NOTRSMUSIC|WP:ALBUMAVOID|WP:ALBUM/AVOID}}

There are a number of types of sources to generally avoid using on Wikipedia. Some examples include:
*Per [[WP:USERG|Wikipedia's guideline on user-generated sources]], websites with user-generated content are generally unacceptable as sources since they have little or no editorial oversight. This may include other general wiki-style sites such as [[Fandom (website)|Fandom]], and product-related sites such as 45cat.com, [[Discogs]], [[Rate Your Music]] or [[Last.fm]]. It is also important to be cautious of websites that publish user-submitted album reviews. For sites such as [[AbsolutePunk]], [[AllMusic]], Jesus Freak Hideout, and [[Sputnikmusic]], be sure to select only the staff-written reviews.
*[[WP:SELFPUBLISH|Self-published sources]] are generally unacceptable as references on Wikipedia. An artist's social networking site, such as [[Facebook]] or [[Twitter]], in addition to personal blogs and forum posts, should largely be avoided. If the information being added from one of these websites is truly important enough for inclusion, a publication will likely report about it.<ref>On December 11, 2010, [[Rise Against]] [https://twitter.com/#!/riseagainst/status/14146355572244480 tweeted] that they were almost finished recording their new album. A day later, ''Alternative Press'' ([https://www.altpress.com/news/rise_against_wrapping_up_new_album/ source]) and PunkNews.org ([https://www.punknews.org/article/40901/rise-against-in-final-stages-of-new-album source]) published this as news citing Rise Against's tweet as their source.</ref><ref>Following the death of their bassist, [[Paul Gray (American musician)|Paul Gray]], heavy metal group [[Slipknot (band)|Slipknot]] were unsure if they would continue as a band. A series of tweets from their lead singer [[Corey Taylor]] were posted about his feelings on the matter, and published shortly thereafter by Blabbermouth.net, Noisecreep, Gun Shy Assassin and ''Chart''.[http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=150353][http://www.noisecreep.com/2010/12/10/slipknot-announce-first-shows-since-bassist-paul-grays-death/][http://gunshyassassin.com/news/corey-taylor-once-again-reiterates-no-new-slipknot/][http://www.chartattack.com/news/2010/dec/03/slipknot-return-to-stage]</ref>
*Online retailers such as [[iTunes]] and [[Amazon (company)|Amazon]] should also be [[WP:AFFILIATE|avoided]]. It can be seen as inappropriate to directly link to a site where one can purchase the subject in question. Wikipedia's role should not be used to advance the sale of an album nor to promote one retailer over another. Generally speaking, all of the information found on online retailers can be found in other sources.  Songwriters, track listings and lengths, producers, record label, etc., may be sourced directly from the actual album covers and liner notes. [[:Template:Cite AV media notes]] is "used to create citations for print liner notes from albums, DVDs, CDs and similar audio-visual media". If [[AllMusic]] is used for dates, then check that the dates given are not contradictory – such as recording and release dates being the same – and consider finding another source for dates for pre-internet-era releases.
*AllMusic's summary should be avoided. Previous discussions at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 36#Allmusic.27s genre sidebar|WP:ALBUMS]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 130#Sidebox.|RSN]] have evinced that genres can be incongruous with the reviewer's prose, which should take precedent over the summary ([http://www.allmusic.com/album/rhythm-killers-mw0000191861 e.g.] AllMusic's summary classifies ''[[Rhythm Killers]]'' as "reggae", while the reviewer observes "no reggae in sight"; likewise, AllMusic's summary says that ''[[Staind (album)|Staind]]'' includes the post-grunge genre while the reviewer says that the band [http://www.allmusic.com/album/staind-mw0002191522 "no longer sound like post-grungers..."]).

===Generally unreliable sources===
{| class="wikitable plainrowheaders"
|+Generally unreliable sources
|-
!scope="col"| Website
!scope="col"| Discussion
!scope="col"| Note
!URL<ref>The external links in this column are used by a user script that highlights these sources red.</ref>
|-
!scope="row"| 45cat.com
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#Discogs and 45cat.com should be acceptable sources when Allmusic has gaps|2017 Discussion]] || Info is user-submitted/uploaded and fails [[WP:USERG]].
|[http://www.45cat.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Acclaimed Music]]
| [[Special:Permalink/1123596992#Reliability_of_acclaimedmusic.net|2022 Discussion]]
| Self-published (the about page states "my" repeatedly, referring to the site's methodology) list aggregation site with little transparency and no apparent oversight
| [http://acclaimedmusic.net]
|-
!scope="row"| Album of the Year
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 316#Album of the Year|2020 Discussion]] || No clear editorial discretion between sources, including several amateur critics alongside otherwise reliable/professional ones.
|[https://www.albumoftheyear.org/]
|-
!scope="row"| Alternative Nation (GrungeReport)
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#Reliable and unreliable sources list|2018 Discussion]] || Reported issues of [[clickbait]] and truth-bending, [[WP:OR]] type reports. Still usable as a [[WP:PRIMARY]] source for interviews, or when covered by other reliable sources (though it is preferred if you use the other reference that covers said content).
|[http://www.alternativenation.net/grunge-report/]
|-
!scope="row"| Alternative Vision
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 271#Alternative Vision|2019 Discussion]] || Issues with reliability and neutrality of the team, particularly due to a lack of editorial control for the earlier reviews
|[http://www.alternativevision.co.uk/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Amazon (company)|Amazon.com]]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 26#What constitutes a professional review.3F|2008 Discussion]] || Amazon's reviews are all user-generated, failing [[WP:USERG]]. Retailers in general often have placeholder info or release dates prior to release.
|[https://www.amazon.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Audiopinions.net
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 110#Is http:.2F.2Faudiopinions.net reliable.3F|2011 Discussion]] || Self-published [[Wordpress]] blog
|[https://audiopinions.net/]
|-
!scope="row"| Bestsellingalbums.org
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 64#bestsellingalbums.org|2022 Discussion]] || Unclear sources and unknown editorial oversight. Also suspect copyvio.
|[https://bestsellingalbums.org/]
|-
!scope="row"| Bnrmetal.com
| – || –
|[http://www.bnrmetal.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| chartmasters.org
| [[Wikipedia talk:Record charts/Archive 14#chartmasters.org|2018 Discussion]] || Self-published website that gives no viable basis for claims
|[http://chartmasters.org/]
|-
!scope="row"| Cryptic Rock
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#Reliable and unreliable sources list|2018 Discussion]] || Reported issues of errors and questionable content. Still usable as a [[WP:PRIMARY]] source for interviews.
|[https://crypticrock.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Daily Mail]]''
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 220#Daily Mail RfC|2017 Discussion]] || Per linked discussion, a general, Wikipedia-wide discussion was held, and it was found unreliable to be used in any content areas. 
|[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Daily Star (United Kingdom)|''Daily Star'' (UK)]]
| See the following [[WP:RSN]] discussions: {{rsnl|37|reliable sources for music sales and chart positions|1}} {{rsnl|90|Daily Star|2}} {{rsnl|210|Daily Mail|3}} {{rsnl|251|Daily Star (United Kingdom)|4}} || Per [[WP:DAILYSTAR]], The ''Daily Star'' is a [[Tabloid journalism|tabloid]] that is generally considered less reliable than the ''[[Daily Mail]]''. 
|[https://www.dailystar.co.uk/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Discogs]]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#Discogs and 45cat.com should be acceptable sources when Allmusic has gaps|2017 Discussion]] || Info is user-submitted/uploaded and fails [[WP:USERG]]. Album jackets should be sourced directly using the {{tl|Cite AV media notes}} template.
|[https://www.discogs.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| DJBooth
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 70#DJbooth.net|2010 Discussion]] || No editorial oversight.
|[https://djbooth.net/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Encyclopaedia Metallum]] (metal-archives.com)
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 52#Genres and User-Contributed Sources|2015 Discussion]] || Much of the content is user-generated, editorial review is limited. Fails [[WP:USERG]] and [[WP:RS]].
|[https://www.metal-archives.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Epinions]]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 9#Epinions|2006 Discussion]] || [[WP:USERG]], no editorial oversight. Possibly defunct.
|[http://www.epinions.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Equipboard
||| [[WP:USERG]], no editorial oversight.
|[http://www.equipboard.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Forbes.com]] contributors
| See the following [[WP:RSN]] discussions of Forbes.com contributors: {{rsnl|96|Is a Forbes invited contributor a reliable source for whether the War on Terror may be over etc|1}} {{rsnl|138|Scientists in Forbes article|2}} {{rsnl|159|Forbes/Forbes.com|3}} {{rsnl|176|Forbes.com blogs|4}} {{rsnl|207|Forbes article by credible contributor|5}} {{rsnl|214|Has anyone written up something referenceable on the problem with Forbes blogs?|6}} {{rsnl|221|Forbes.com|7}} {{rsnl|246|Forbes.com|8}} {{rsnl|256|Determining importance of Forbes contributors and their opinions|9}} {{rsnl|278|(My opinion) Forbes is an unreliable source.|10}} {{rsnl|284|Climate Feedback and similar blog sources being treated differently?|11}} || [[WP:FORBESCON]], Most content on Forbes.com is written by contributors with minimal editorial oversight, and is generally unreliable. Editors show consensus for treating Forbes.com contributor articles as [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]], unless the article was written by a [[WP:EXPERTSOURCE|subject-matter expert]]. Forbes.com contributor articles should never be used for third-party claims about [[WP:BLPSPS|living persons]]. Articles that have also been published in the print edition of ''[[Forbes]]'' are excluded, and are considered [[WP:GREL|generally reliable]]. Check the [[byline]] to determine whether an article is written by "[[#Forbes|Forbes Staff]]" or a "Contributor", and check underneath the byline to see whether it was published in a print issue of ''Forbes''. Previously, Forbes.com contributor articles could have been identified by their [[URL]] beginning in "forbes.com/sites"; the URL no longer distinguishes them, as ''Forbes'' staff articles have also been moved under "/sites"
|[https://www.forbes.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Grande-rock.com
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 136#Grande Rock|2012 Discussion]] || Self-published website, no writer credentials.
|[https://www.grande-rock.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Headline Planet
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 62#Headline Planet|2020 Discussion]] || Site claims to have an editorial team but majority of content is written by the same person (company founder/site owner) with few exceptions ([[WP:RSSELF]]). Editor consensus holds the site to be generally unreliable and [[WP: QUESTIONABLE]]. Reliable secondary sources can be found that offer the same information if not better.
|[https://headlineplanet.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[HuffPost#Contributors|''HuffPost'' contributors]]
| See the following [[WP:RSN]] discussions of ''HuffPost'' contributors:{{rsnl|16|Huffington Post, Gawker and About.com|1}} {{rsnl|17|Is the Huffington Post a reliable source?|2}} {{rsnl|19|Huffington Post, AJC, & E&P|3}} {{rsnl|35|The Huffington Post Again|4}} {{rsnl|50|Michael Savage (commentator) & Huffington Post article|5}} {{rsnl|51|Media Matters for America, Huffington Post, and NewsHounds|6}} {{rsnl|113|Question regarding Huffington Post and relability|7}} {{rsnl|129|The Huffington Post|8}} {{rsnl|165|Huffington Post|9}} {{rsnl|181|Huffington Post and Vox and WP:BLP|10}} {{rsnl|191|Huffington Post HuffPost Green blog by Travis Walter Donovan per WP:NEWSBLOG|11}} {{rsnl|193|The Huffington Post|12}} {{rsnl|202|Is the Huffington Post (original content) a reliable source? (2016)|13}} {{rsnl|208|Is the Huffington Post a RS?|14}} {{rsnl|218|Huffington Post article|15}} {{rsnl|234|Huffington Post's "contributor platform"|16}} {{rsnl|236|Huffington Post and BuzzFeed|17}} || Per [[WP:HUFFPOCON]], ''HuffPost'' includes content written by contributors with minimal editorial oversight. These contributors generally do not have a reputation for fact-checking, and most editors criticize the quality of their content. Editors show consensus for treating ''HuffPost'' contributor articles as [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]], unless the article was written by a [[WP:EXPERTSOURCE|subject-matter expert]]. [https://web.archive.org/web/20180922014732/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/18/business/media/huffpost-unpaid-contributors.html In 2018, ''HuffPost'' discontinued its contributor platform, but old contributor articles are still online.] Check the [[byline]] to determine whether an article is written by a [[#HuffPost|staff member]] or a "Contributor" (also referred to as an "Editorial Partner").
|[https://www.huffpost.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[IMDb]]
| See the following [[WP:RSN]] discussions of IMDb: {{rsnl|3|IMDb Publicity|1}} {{rsnl|5|IMDB|2}} {{rsnl|16|IMDB|3}} {{rsnl|17|IMDb – is there any common result if IMDb is reliable or not?|4}} {{rsnl|17|The Internet Movie Database Bio Pages|5}} {{rsnl|20|Are IMDB and personal websites reliable sources|6}} {{rsnl|22|IMDb|7}} {{rsnl|23|IMDB.com for plot synopsis|8}} {{rsnl|24|Is IMDb an unreliable source?|9}} {{rsnl|37|IMDB|10}} {{rsnl|40|IMDB, again|11}} {{rsnl|47|IMDB?|12}} {{rsnl|50|TV.com and IMDB|13}} {{rsnl|58|IMDB as a source; List of documentary films|14}} {{rsnl|68|IMDB lacking corroboration|15}} {{rsnl|77|Max's of Manila – a number of source issues including IMDB as a source for BLP|16}} {{rsnl|96|IMDB|17}} {{rsnl|105|IMDB and a sex tape|18}} {{rsnl|117|Awarding body using IMDB's "past winners" lists as their own|19}} {{rsnl|164|IMDB reliable source for awards?|20}} {{rsnl|188|Is IMDb reliable for filmography credits?|21}} {{rsnl|201|IMDB for some things, but not for others?|22}} {{rsnl|266|imdb|23}} {{rsnl|272|IMDb|24}} {{rsnl|276|The mystery of Street Fighter II: The World Warrior's release date|25}} {{rsnl|287|Limited reliable use for IMDB – DoB and DoD|26}} || Per [[WP:IMDB]], the content on IMDb is [[WP:UGC|user-generated]], and the site is considered unreliable by a majority of editors. [[WP:Citing IMDb]] describes two exceptions, both of which do not require [[WP:CS|citations]] because the film itself is implied to be the primary source. Although certain content on the site is reviewed by staff, editors criticize the quality of IMDb's fact-checking. A number of editors have pointed out that IMDb content has been copied from other sites, including Wikipedia, and that there have been a number of notable hoaxes in the past. The use of IMDb as an external link is generally considered appropriate (see [[WP:ELP]]).
|[https://www.imdb.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[International Business Times]]''
| See the following [[WP:RSN]] discussions: {{rsnl|83|Times and IBTimes RS?|1}} {{rsnl|104|International Business Times|2}} {{rsnl|195|Slate, WGN, International Business Times|3}} {{rsnl|218|International Business Times as a reliable source?|4}} {{rsnl|222|International Business Times|5}} {{rsnl|262|International Business Times|6}} {{rsnl|262|Use of blogs for sourcing height in BLPs|7}} || Per [[WP:IBTIMES]]: There is consensus that the ''International Business Times'' is generally unreliable. Editors note that the publication's editorial practices have been criticized by other reliable sources, and point to the inconsistent quality of the site's articles. The site's [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated content]], which may not be clearly marked, should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher.
|[https://www.ibtimes.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| ''[[Jezebel (website)|Jezebel]]''
| See the following [[WP:RSN]] discussions:{{rsnl|149|FetLife|1}} {{rsnl|207|Dispute over sourcing at Columbia University Rape Controversy|2}} {{rsnl|209|Is Jezebel.com (online news magazine) an RS?|3}} || Per [[WP:JEZEBEL]], there is consensus that ''Jezebel'' should generally be avoided as a source, especially on [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]]. Many editors consider ''Jezebel'' to inappropriately blur news reporting and opinion. Some editors say that ''Jezebel'' is [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated.]]
|[https://jezebel.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Josepvinaixa.com
| – || Blogger, also called "Ultimate Music"
|[https://www.josepvinaixa.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Kworb.net
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 241#Kworb.net|2018 Discussion]] || Personal blog with no editorial oversight.
|[https://kworb.net/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Medium (website)|Medium]]
| See the following [[WP:RSN]] discussions:{{rsnl|192|Article by established journalist in Medium publication with editorial staff|1}} {{rsnl|232|Medium as a reference|2}} {{rsnl|260|Bob Pitt at Medium sourced for Jeremy Corbyn|3}} || Per [[WP:MEDIUM]], Medium is a blog hosting service. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]], it is considered generally unreliable and should be avoided unless the author is a subject-matter expert or the blog is used for uncontroversial self-descriptions. Medium should never be used as a secondary source for living persons.
|[https://medium.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Metalheadzone.com
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 58#Source review - Metal Head Zone|2019 Discussion]] || Similar to Alternative Nation – no credentials, history of misleading and inaccurate reports.
|[https://metalheadzone.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Metalmusicarchives.com
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 110#www.metalmusicarchives.com|2011 Discussion]] || Fails [[WP:USERG]]. Possibly defunct.
|[http://metalmusicarchives.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Metal-observer.com
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 31#Non-professional reviews, re: Metal Observer|2009 Discussion]] || Staff/writers lack professional credentials.
|
|-
!scope="row"| Metalwani.com
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable%20sources/Noticeboard/Archive 137#metalwani.com|2012 Discussion]] || Despite providing a list of staff, appears to be a blog. 
|
|-
!scope="row"| [[MetroLyrics]]
| [[Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 17#MetroLyrics songwriters miscredits|2016 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 53#Proposed addition to List of unreliable sources|2016 Discussion (2)]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/Archive 18#MetroLyrics|2017 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/Archive 20#MetroLyrics lyrics pages now often link to unverified/unclear Musixmatch lyrics pages|2019 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 20#Template:MetroLyrics song|2021 Discussion]] || Songwriter credits are unreliable; site has been offline since 6/2021
|[https://www.metrolyrics.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Musician Guide
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_58#Musician_Guide|2010 discussion]] || No evidence of editorial oversight; may have been constructed as a promotional site. Most content is compiled from other sources such as ''Billboard'' which should be used in its stead. See also [[Talk:Crystal Gayle/GA1]], where a quote from Musician Guide could not be independently verified.
|[http://www.musicianguide.com]
|-
!scope="row"| [[MusicMight]]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 52#MusicMight|2016 Discussion]] || Any content not attributed to Garry Sharpe-Young (user Taniwha) is unreliable. Defunct.
|[http://www.rockdetector.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Musixmatch]]
| [[Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 22#Musixmatch lyrics pages – user generated with minimal oversight?|2019 Discussion]] || Any content that does not indicate "Lyrics verified by Musixmatch" or "Lyrics verified by [NAME] Curator" (must scroll down to "Last activities" on the lyrics page to find this notation).
|[https://www.musixmatch.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[The Needle Drop]]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 50#The Needle Drop|2014 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 54#Anthony Fantano responded with his take on the debate if his reviews on The Needle Drop are "professional" or not|2017 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 228#The Needle Drop|2017 Discussion (2)]], [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 326#RfC: The Needle Drop|2021 Discussion]], [[Special:PermanentLink/1250481692#The Needle Drop: news section|2024 discussion]] || Editors have achieved a consensus that '''additional considerations apply''' when considering whether the use of ''[[The Needle Drop]]'' as a source is appropriate. '''Strong consensus''' was reached that [[Anthony Fantano]]'s reviews that are published via ''The Needle Drop'' constitute [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. '''Rough consensus''' among editors was reached that Fantano is considered to be an established subject-matter expert as it pertains to music reviews and that that these reviews may be used in an article as ''attributed opinion''. However, per Wikipedia policy regarding self-published sources, these reviews should '''never''' be used as third-party sources about living people. Furthermore, there is a '''rough consensus''' that Fantano's reviews do not always constitute [[WP:DUE|due weight]] and that discretion should be applied on a case-by-case basis when determining if content from ''The Needle Drop'' is appropriate to include in a given article. News articles hosted on the website are unreliable due to a lack of an editorial policy.
|[https://www.theneedledrop.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[No Clean Singing]]
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Are_any_or_all_of_these_metal-oriented_music_journalism_sites_reliable?_No_Clean_Singing,_Teeth_of_the_Divine,_Metal_Underground,_The_Metal_Onslaught?|2024 Discussion]]. || While the blog is notable and has a reputation in other reliable media, the consensus was that there is a lack of proper editorial oversight to distinguish the site from a group blog.
| [https://www.nocleansinging.com]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Perez Hilton]]
| – || Gossip blogger
|[https://perezhilton.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Piero Scaruffi]]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 46#Piero Scaruffi - Final Verdict on using him as a source in reviews|2014 Discussion]] || Non-professional, self-published content. Even his books were self-published, and are thus unreliable.
|[https://www.scaruffi.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[PopCrush]]
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 131#Is PopCrush a reliable source?|2012 Discussion]] || Editors did not find evidence of editorial oversight or writer credentials
|[https://popcrush.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Prog Archives]]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 42#ProgArchives ratings in ratings-box|2011 Discussion]] || Non-professional review website, fails [[WP:USERG]]
|[http://www.progarchives.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| PropertyOfZack.com
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 43#Add PropertyOfZack.com as a legitimate album review and music news site|2012 Discussion]] || Relatively new without much in the way of reputation or credentials as of time of review.
|[https://propertyofzack.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[Rate Your Music]]
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 33#Rate Your Music|2009 Discussion]] || Fails [[WP:USERG]]
|[https://rateyourmusic.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| RockOnTheNet
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 141#rock on the net|2013 Discussion]] || Editors found it to be unreliable. Content often has no writers listed, and no prose or context, just lists.
|[http://www.rockonthenet.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| Saving Country Music
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_362#Saving_Country_Music|2021 discussion]] || Self-published one-person blog with no editorial oversight and sometimes polemicizing content
|[http://www.savingcountrymusic.com]
|-
!scope="row"| Seaoftranquility.org
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 49#Sea of Tranquliity|2014 Discussion]] || Lack of writers with any professional credentials.
|[https://www.seaoftranquility.org/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[SecondHandSongs]]
| [[:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums#https://secondhandsongs.com/|2021 discussion]] || Fails [[:WP:USERG]]
|[https://secondhandsongs.com/page/FAQ]
|-
!scope="row"| Setlist.FM
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 56#The use of Setlist.fm|2018 Discussion]] || Fails [[WP:USERG]]
|[https://www.setlist.fm/]
|-
!scope="row"| Scott Floman
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 56#Scott Floman as a reliable source|2018 Discussion]] || Reviews on his website & archives and his self-published ''The Story of Rock and Soul Music: Album Reviews and Lists 1960–2016'' fail [[WP:SELFPUBLISH]]; only his reviews published in reliable third-party publications are usable. Possibly defunct.
|[https://sfloman.com]
|-
!scope="row"| Songfacts.com
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 27#Songfacts|2008 discussion]] || Content is user-generated, so fails [[WP:USERG]].
|[https://www.songfacts.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[SongMeanings]]
| [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_65#SongMeanings|2022 discussion]] || Content is user-generated, so fails [[WP:USERG]].
|[https://www.songmeanings.com]
|-
!scope="row"| Soundofmetal.se
| – || Self-published website with unknown editorial oversight
|[http://soundofmetal.se/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[The Sun (United Kingdom)|''The Sun'' (UK)]]
| See the following [[WP:RSN]] discussions of ''The Sun'' (UK): {{rsnl|8|Amy Winehouse/The Sun & British tabloids|1}} {{rsnl|26|The Sun/Matt Smith|2}} {{rsnl|53|The Sun|3}} {{rsnl|85|Tabloid Newspapers|4}} {{rsnl|100|Query|5}} {{rsnl|134|Is the British tabloid newspaper "The Sun" a reliable source?|6}} {{rsnl|156|tabloids|7}} {{rsnl|226|The Sun RfC|8}} {{rsnl|277|Regional editions of The Sun|9}} {{rsnl|277|The Sun being used for content on living people again|10}} {{rsnl|278|Correct action when someone persistently adds back a deprecated source?|11}} {{rsnl|280|Use of The Sun in Team Trees article|12}} {{rsnl|284|RfC on The Sun|13}} {{rsnl|288|The Sun on BLPs|14}} || As per [[WP:THESUN]], ''The Sun'' was deprecated in the 2019 RfC. There is consensus that ''The Sun'' is generally unreliable. [[WP:CITE|References]] from ''The Sun'' are actively discouraged from being used in any article and they should not be used for determining the [[WP:N|notability]] of any subject. The RfC does not override [[WP:ABOUTSELF]], which allows the use of ''The Sun'' for uncontroversial self-descriptions. Some editors consider ''The Sun'' usable for uncontroversial sports reporting, although more reliable sources are recommended.
|[https://www.thesun.co.uk/]
|-
!scope="row" | [[Tunefind]]
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 131#TuneFind|2012 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253#Tunefind|2019 Discussion]] || Fails [[WP:USERG]]
|[http://tunefind.com]
|- 
!scope="row"| UnderTheGunReview.net
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 165#Is 'Under The Gun Review' reliable?|2014 Discussion]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 55#Reliable and unreliable sources list|2018 Discussion]] || Editors deemed it unprofessional – writers without credentials and often gets spammed on Wikipedia.
|[http://underthegunreview.net/]
|- 
!scope="row"| Vintage Synth Explorer
| [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_59#Vintage_Synth|2019 discussion]]|| Appears to be a personal blog
|[http://www.vintagesynth.com/]
|- 
!scope="row"| We Are the Pit
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 77#Wearethepit.com|2024 Discussion]] || History of [[clickbait]] and sensationalism, negatively compared to Alternative Nation, Cryptic Rock, and Metalheadzone.
|[https://www.wearethepit.com/]
|- 
!scope="row"| [[WhoSampled]]
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120#whosampled.com|2012 Discussion]] || Fails [[WP:USERG]]
|[https://www.whosampled.com/]
|-
!scope="row"| [[YouTube]]
| [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 359#Should the text that appears alongside YouTube videos be considered reliable?|2021 Discussion]] || Text, such as recording personnel and dates, that appears on a YouTube video page is from unknown sources and added without fact-checking or editorial oversight
| [https://www.youtube.com/]
|}

Reviews and ratings which only summarize other reviews and ratings should not be included either, such as [[Artistdirect]]'s reviews from [[AllMusic]].

===About.com===
Some of [[About.com]]'s writers have expertise in music criticism, some do not. Please consult the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources/About.com Critics Table|Table of critics]] to see if a particular writer is reliable. Do not cite critics that are marked as "No" in the discussion.

==See also==
* [[Wikipedia:Advanced source searching]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Article body]]
* [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]]
* [[Wikipedia:Offline sources]] – an essay in support of print media as sources on Wikipedia
* [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Shared Resources#Music|Shared Resources#Music]] – list of reliable offline music sources offered by WikiProject Resource Exchange
* [[Wikipedia:Record_charts]]

==Footnotes==
{{Reflist}}

{{WikiProject Albums navbox}}

[[Category:WikiProject Music|Albums/Sources]]
[[Category:WikiProject Albums|Sources]]
[[Category:WikiProject lists of reliable sources|Albums]]