View source for Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethiopia/Climate and environment/Assessments

 {| align="right" border="0"
|-
| align="right" |{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Climate and environment of Ethiopia articles by quality statistics}}
|-
|}
==[[Image:Featured article star.svg|20px|FA]] Featured articles==
*[[Image:Featured article star.svg|20px|FA]] [[Giraffe]]
<noinclude>
==Featured content candidates==
*None.
</noinclude>
==[[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|22px|GA]] Good articles==
*[[Common eland]]
<noinclude>

==Good article candidates==
*None.
</noinclude>
==Did You Know...==
*None.

<!-- 
==Formerly recognized content==
===Former featured articles===
*None. 

===Former good articles===
*None.
-->
<!-- ==[[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team]] selections==
These articles have been selected by the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team for one or more release versions of Wikipedia. Please help ensure that these articles remain of the highest possible quality.
*None. --><br/><noinclude>

==Quality scale==
{| class="wikitable"
|+ '''Article progress grading scheme'''
|-
! Label
! Criteria
! Reader's experience
! Editor's experience
! Example
|-
| {{FA-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|FA-Class}}</small>
| Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "[[Wikipedia:Featured articles|Featured article]]" status after [[Wikipedia:Peer Review|peer review]], and meet the current criteria for featured articles.
| Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information.
| No further editing necessary, unless new published information has come to light.
| NA
|-
| {{A-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|A-Class}}</small>
| Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in [[Wikipedia:How to write a great article|How to write a great article]]. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from the "hard" ([[Peer review|peer-reviewed]] where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article|featured article]] status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard.  
| Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject.  A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting.  May miss a few relevant points.
| Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert.  In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work.  [[Wikipedia:Peer review|Peer-review]] would be helpful at this stage.
| [[Aksumite currency]]
|-
| {{GA-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|GA-Class}}</small>
| The article has passed through the [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|Good article nomination process]] and been granted GA status, meeting the [[WP:WIAGA|good article standards]]. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but being a [[Wikipedia:Good article|Good article]] is not a requirement for A-Class. 
| Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject.  No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job.
| Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully [[:Category:Articles_that_need_to_be_wikified|wikified]], now is the time.
| [[Ethiopia]]
|-
| {{B-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|B-Class}}</small>
| Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a ''majority'' of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, NPOV or NOR.  With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the [[WP:WIAGA|Good article criteria]] should be B- or Start-class articles.
| Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work.
| Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which [[Wikipedia:cleanup|cleanup]] is needed will typically have this designation to start with.
| [[Ahmad ibn Ibrihim al-Ghazi]]
|-
| {{Start-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|Start-Class}}</small>
| The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a table. For example an article on Queen Elizabeth might cover her personality well, but be weak on back story. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any '''one''' of the following: 
*a particularly useful picture or graphic
*multiple links that help explain  or illustrate the topic
*a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic 
*multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article 
| Not useless. Some readers will find what they are looking for, but most will not. Most articles in this category have the look of an article "under construction" and a reader genuinely interested in the topic is likely to seek additional information elsewhere.
| Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added.  This article usually isn't even good enough for a [[Wikipedia:Cleanup|cleanup]] tag: it still needs to be built.
| [[Zagwe dynasty]]
|-
| {{Stub-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|Stub-Class}}</small>
| The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level.  It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.
| May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term.  Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant.  At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. 
| Any editing or additional material can be helpful.  
| [[Battle of Magdala]]
|-
| {{Needed-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|Needed-Class}}</small>
| The article does not exist and needs to be created.
| &nbsp;
| &nbsp; 
| &nbsp;
|}

==Importance scale==

'''Importance must be regarded as a ''relative'' term.'''  If importance values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance ''to this project''.  An article judged to be "Top-Class" in one context may  be only "Mid-Class" in another. The criteria used for rating article importance are '''not''' meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is.  Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the ''average'' reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it).   

<!--
Consider a hierarchy such as History -> History of Africa -> History of Ethiopia-> Ethiopian kings and queens.  An article labeled as "Top-Class" for the subject of history would probably warrant inclusion in V0.5, V1.0 and other releases.  A "Top-Class" article for the history of Ethiopiawould be a reasonable candidate for inclusion, but most "Top-Class" articles on Polish kings & queens would probably not be included in early releases.  Nevertheless such ranking ''within'' a subject area is very helpful in deciding which articles are included first as the scope of the [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team|Wikipedia 1.0 project]] expands.  Quality articles which are not considered to be on topics important enough for inclusion on V0.5 will be held in a [[Wikipedia:Version 0.5 Nomination/Held nominations|held nominations]] page, ready for inclusion as the scope expands.
-->

{| class="wikitable"
|+ '''Article importance grading scheme'''
|-
! Label
! Criteria 
| {{chembox header}} colspan = 1 width = "25%" | Examples
|-
| {{Top-Class}} 
| High probability that non-Ethiopians and Ethiopisants would look this up. Limited to about 20-50 articles, with core articles being limited to 5 central articles. See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethiopia/Key articles|/key articles]]; includes major languages and ethnic groups.
| [[Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia]]
|-
| {{High-Class}} 
| Must have had a large impact on Ethiopian history or culture or plays an important role today, and/or had importance outside of Ethiopia or the ''Orbicus Aethiopicus'' ([[Horn of Africa]]). 
| [[Amda Seyon I]]
|-
| {{Mid-Class}} 
| Significant impact on Ethiopia's history or culture, or high regional importance; includes most zones (excepting those with special importance).
| [[Abba Jifar I]]
|-
| {{Low-Class}} 
| Low notability. Local importance or of high importance for a small group; includes most [[woreda]]s (excepting those with special importance).
| [[Bingham Academy]]
|}

[[Category:WikiProject assessments|Ethiopia]]
[[Category:WikiProject Ethiopia/Assessment| Climate and environment]]
</noinclude>