Duct tape occlusion therapy: Revision history

5 May 2015

• curprev 19:5419:54, 5 May 2015 74.77.99.181 talk 8,902 bytes +6 No edit summary undo

28 September 2014

• curprev 17:4817:48, 28 September 2014 Donner60 talk contribs m 8,896 bytes −1,548 Reverted edits by Sculver7 (talk) (HG) undo
• curprev 17:4817:48, 28 September 2014 Sculver7 talk contribs 10,444 bytes +1,548 No edit summary undo Tag: gettingstarted edit
• curprev 17:4517:45, 28 September 2014 ClueBot NG talk contribs m 8,896 bytes −1,564 Reverting possible vandalism by Sculver7 to version by Rjwilmsi. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1970141) (Bot) undo
• curprev 17:4517:45, 28 September 2014 Sculver7 talk contribs 10,460 bytes +1,564 No edit summary undo Tag: gettingstarted edit

12 August 2014

• curprev 09:4109:41, 12 August 2014 Rjwilmsi talk contribs m 8,896 bytes +33 →Evidence: Journal cites, Added 1 doi to a journal cite using AWB (10365) undo

16 April 2014

• curprev 11:0711:07, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,863 bytes +11 ce lead undo
• curprev 11:0311:03, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,852 bytes 0 →Evidence undo
• curprev 10:2710:27, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,852 bytes +15 ce undo
• curprev 10:2410:24, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,837 bytes −2 →Evidence: ce undo
• curprev 10:2110:21, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,839 bytes +5 ce undo
• curprev 10:2010:20, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,834 bytes −18 →Evidence: ce undo
• curprev 10:1810:18, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,852 bytes 0 rearrange lead undo
• curprev 10:1710:17, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,852 bytes −16 →Evidence: rm unreliable source tag on Litt paper. It is a landmark paper (first to describe the treatment), and hence notable for inclusion undo
• curprev 10:1610:16, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,868 bytes +300 more complete quote of Litt abstract undo
• curprev 10:1110:11, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,568 bytes −83 →Evidence: rm orphaned ref undo
• curprev 10:1010:10, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,651 bytes 0 wikilink first instance of a term undo
• curprev 10:0810:08, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,651 bytes −69 some of these sources specifically state not to use tape for veruccas, all of them also state there is mixed or no evidence. Reword to be less misleading, Rm http://legacy.jyi.org/volumes/volume7/issue5/features/demichele.html, an "undergraduate journal" undo
• curprev 09:4609:46, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,720 bytes −2 →Evidence undo
• curprev 09:0009:00, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,722 bytes +4 No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:5908:59, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,718 bytes −1 No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:5508:55, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,719 bytes +13 No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:4608:46, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,706 bytes +9 No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:4408:44, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,697 bytes 0 →Evidence undo
• curprev 08:3908:39, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,697 bytes +3 →References undo
• curprev 08:3708:37, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,694 bytes +1 rearrange lead undo
• curprev 08:3508:35, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,693 bytes −1 subst ref in lead undo
• curprev 08:3408:34, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,694 bytes −296 rm http://detroitfootpain.com/verruca-duct-tape-removal-treatment-method/ Deadlink undo
• curprev 08:3208:32, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 8,990 bytes −416 rm short para about quality of evidence in RCTs about viral warts... off topic undo
• curprev 08:2908:29, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 9,406 bytes −2,843 Trimmed OR, Wikified discussion of evidence, removed "conclusion" section (this is an encyclopedia not a medical journal...) undo
• curprev 08:0108:01, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 12,249 bytes +109 Lead follows most reliable source (latest cochrane review), paraphrase what the sources are saying, don't talk about the sources themselves so much undo
• curprev 07:5407:54, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 12,140 bytes +280 No edit summary undo
• curprev 07:1807:18, 16 April 2014 Lesion talk contribs 11,860 bytes −690 rm names of researchers undo

15 April 2014

• curprev 19:2919:29, 15 April 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 12,550 bytes +32 Dating maintenance tags: {{Medrs}} undo
• curprev 17:2817:28, 15 April 2014 Grantmidnight talk contribs 12,518 bytes +9 →History: is this a secondary source?, a review? undo
• curprev 17:2617:26, 15 April 2014 71.195.56.140 talk 12,509 bytes +9 No edit summary undo

14 April 2014

• curprev 23:3423:34, 14 April 2014 TJRC talk contribs 12,500 bytes +28 →Effectiveness: (not otherwise specified in the study) undo
• curprev 23:3023:30, 14 April 2014 Grantmidnight talk contribs 12,472 bytes +13 →Follow-up studies used different duct tape: clarify undo
• curprev 23:2423:24, 14 April 2014 Grantmidnight talk contribs 12,459 bytes +11 →Effectiveness: What is the technical standard referenced here? Duct tapes are not alike. undo
• curprev 23:2323:23, 14 April 2014 TJRC talk contribs 12,448 bytes −11 Reverted good faith edits by Grantmidnight (talk): See talk; not in the literature, we as Wikipedia editors cannot research it. (TW) undo
• curprev 23:2023:20, 14 April 2014 Grantmidnight talk contribs 12,459 bytes +11 Duct tape can be a wide variety of products. Which one is used for warts? Please use Talk page undo
• curprev 23:2023:20, 14 April 2014 TJRC talk contribs m 12,448 bytes +1 →Effectiveness undo
• curprev 23:2023:20, 14 April 2014 TJRC talk contribs 12,447 bytes +92 remove the "how-to"; integratr it into section on study, indicating procedure that was followed, not a procedure *to* follow. (and Focht never says "rubber based adhesive" undo
• curprev 23:0723:07, 14 April 2014 TJRC talk contribs 12,355 bytes −2 →Effectiveness: close-up refs undo
• curprev 23:0623:06, 14 April 2014 TJRC talk contribs 12,357 bytes −1 →Effectiveness: revert to actual title of the article undo
• curprev 23:0423:04, 14 April 2014 TJRC talk contribs 12,358 bytes −516 →Follow-up studies used different duct tape: rm parag that has nothing to do with subject undo
• curprev 23:0423:04, 14 April 2014 TJRC talk contribs 12,874 bytes −59 →Follow-up studies used different duct tape: rm opinion in sentence undo
• curprev 23:0323:03, 14 April 2014 TJRC talk contribs 12,933 bytes −52 →Follow-up studies used different duct tape: rv more good-faith edits; we need to stick to what's reported undo
• curprev 22:5922:59, 14 April 2014 TJRC talk contribs 12,985 bytes −27 →top: good-faith, but "brand not reported", http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=411864 we can't WP:OR that undo
• curprev 18:2518:25, 14 April 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 13,012 bytes +112 Dating maintenance tags: {{Reliable source}} {{Opinion}} {{Specify}} {{How to}} {{Clarify}} undo