Jump to content

Template:Gender and sexual identities: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

3 October 2020

6 September 2020

16 July 2020

1 June 2020

15 May 2020

14 December 2019

27 November 2019

8 October 2019

18 August 2019

17 August 2019

7 August 2019

3 July 2019

30 June 2019

20 June 2019

  • curprev 05:1405:14, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,201 bytes +38 no need for the alias 'monogamous', just link straight to the article which is a noun 'monogamy' like the noun 'non-monogamy' listed right after it. otoh, for consistency with other orientations, like 'bisexual' and 'lesbian' and 'non-heterosexual' and 'ex-ex-gay' which are all adjectives, make pan and poly adjectives undo
  • curprev 05:1105:11, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,163 bytes +4 why are the sexual orientation subfield names plural but the gender subfield/list names singular, although they list multiple items? undo
  • curprev 05:1005:10, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,159 bytes +5 fix numbering - apparently at some point in the distant(?) past there was one more leftmost category between 'Gender identities' and 'Sexual orientation identities' which was group2= undo
  • curprev 05:0605:06, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,154 bytes −47 fail to see in what sense 'Heteroflexibility' classifies as an 'alternative label' as distinct from a 'non-binary category' but 'bi-curious' classifies as a 'non-binary label' as distinct from an 'alternative label'... likewise for 'queer' vs 'non-heterosexual'... hence, could ditch this whole poorly defined field. undo
  • curprev 05:0305:03, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,201 bytes −34 rmv two redundant entries which are already in the field immediately above undo
  • curprev 04:5404:54, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,235 bytes −19 on the grounds that the other categories/fields here link to their main titular page via the groupN= parameter and don't contain themselves as an entry in the field, rmv this redundant link to the page which the group2= param already links to undo
  • curprev 04:5104:51, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,254 bytes −44 as brought up on talk, this article does not discuss itself as a gender at all... undo
  • curprev 04:5004:50, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,298 bytes −39 rmv redundant - these (and some others which have not been removed yet) are already listed in the section immediately above this. a sign of how poorly defined/scoped these categories/fields are. undo
  • curprev 04:4504:45, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,337 bytes +32 as brought up on talk - is this list intended to contain all notable-&-RSable third genders? or all that we have articles on? well, adding two that have articles. undo
  • curprev 04:4004:40, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,305 bytes +49 as brought up on talk, why link to two Bugis gender articles (which are just redirects to the main article) but not the third? this template is messy and its contents and format are somewhat haphazard and messy. undo
  • curprev 04:3604:36, 20 June 2019 -sche talk contribs 3,256 bytes −1 I'm actually going to move this back - it was boldly moved recently into the 'sexual orientation' field, but our article on the topic and the references on the topic discuss it as mostly a gender category rather than a sexuality category. if the issue is that it encompasses both, like some other terms such as 'LGBT' also do, then perhaps, like those terms, it simply shouldn't be listed... undo

30 May 2019

20 May 2019

17 February 2019

15 February 2019

14 February 2019

12 January 2019

4 January 2019

27 December 2018

4 December 2018

17 November 2018

27 October 2018

29 August 2018

18 August 2018

17 August 2018

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)