Digitally controlled oscillator: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 10:1410:14, 3 June 2024 Kku talk contribs m 5,802 bytes +4 link frequency divider undo

curprev 23:0823:08, 6 December 2023 Me, Myself, and I are Here talk contribs 5,798 bytes 0 LQ undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 23:0523:05, 6 December 2023 Me, Myself, and I are Here talk contribs 5,798 bytes 0 →See also: alpha undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 09:4909:49, 8 September 2020 31.124.58.130 talk 5,796 bytes −96 No citation given or reasonable basis for stating that a DCO makes a synth "digital". The waveform heard by the listener is analog, from an analog oscillator, which is only stabilised to stop it going out of tune by a digital component. This does not make the sound generation digital, as it is generated by analogue circuitry. undo

curprev 01:1801:18, 28 August 2020 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 5,892 bytes +51 Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation needed}} {{Why?}} undo

curprev 23:1823:18, 27 August 2020 Makrom talk contribs m 5,841 bytes +49 Added Citation needed remarks undo

curprev 19:2919:29, 26 July 2020 2605:e000:1609:e2:f561:83d9:506:d5c8 talk 5,842 bytes −4 Corrected typo to ensure accurate information. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 22:0822:08, 29 July 2019 2601:449:8400:3c60:a8a4:47ef:98d3:87d4 talk 5,834 bytes +52 →Confusion over terminology: Added another well known and largely used synthesizer as an additional example on this article. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 06:2306:23, 25 May 2019 145.133.134.220 talk 5,782 bytes −24 The use of the word "hybrid" for a DCO is not correct and causes confusion. A DCO does not make a synth digital or hybrid. A hybrid synth is referring to a synth with digital OSC, followed by an analogue filter. A DCO is NOT the same as a digital OSC. undo

curprev 19:3819:38, 17 October 2018 Josvebot talk contribs m 5,783 bytes −3 v2.0b - WP:WCW project (Unicode control characters) undo Tag: WPCleaner

curprev 23:4323:43, 15 October 2018 Cyberpeter talk contribs m 5,772 bytes +9 added juno-6 as DCO featured also undo

curprev 08:1708:17, 28 September 2017 TheresNoTime talk contribs m 5,733 bytes +1,580 Reverted edits by 82.137.255.68 (talk) to last version by The 10th Doctor undo
curprev 08:1608:16, 28 September 2017 82.137.255.68 talk 4,153 bytes −813 No edit summary undo Tag: section blanking
curprev 08:1608:16, 28 September 2017 82.137.255.68 talk 4,966 bytes −767 No edit summary undo

curprev 02:3502:35, 7 August 2017 64.253.14.89 talk 5,677 bytes −31 →Confusion over terminology: Poly-800 does not use the type of DCO mentioned. It is strictly digital and does not charge a capacitor at the core. undo

curprev 23:5123:51, 15 May 2017 MacroMyco talk contribs 5,721 bytes +30 VCO is, in practice, synonymous with DCO and DCO is the more general term, so DCO uses should include the uses for VCO. Added software-defined radio. undo
curprev 23:4423:44, 15 May 2017 MacroMyco talk contribs 5,691 bytes +25 There is nothing about a DCO that is related to synthesizers other than the history, it is used in all sorts of circuits that have hardware digital timing that can be changed in software at runtime. An example on my desk is MSP432 mCU from TI undo