High-IQ society: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 03:3703:37, 9 November 2024 Squeakachu talk contribs m 8,486 bytes −2 Rollback edit(s) by 184.162.61.107 (talk): non-constructive (RW 16.1) undo Tags: RW Rollback
curprev 01:3601:36, 9 November 2024 184.162.61.107 talk 8,488 bytes +2 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 08:3608:36, 28 October 2024 K-trivial talk contribs m 8,486 bytes −25 rem. wikilink in the →See also: section that is irrelevant to the topic. undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 23:4023:40, 26 October 2024 2601:1c2:4200:2840:216f:9393:656b:6948 talk 8,511 bytes +446 Do not remove sources (in this case Scientific American). Per the Content Removal guideline, information that is sourced and relevant should remain in an article unless there’s consensus for removal. If there’s a particular issue with the sources, it should be discussed and removed only if a consensus among editors is reached. Thanks -- Robin undo Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 21:4121:41, 26 October 2024 CAVincent talk contribs 8,065 bytes −446 not sourced, appears self-promoting, and the whole idea of a 1 in a million IQ test is absurd - it's time to just remove this undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 19:1419:14, 26 October 2024 2601:1c2:4200:2840:7df6:b86d:dfaa:6da4 talk 8,511 bytes 0 →Societies: Updated number of members undo

curprev 03:0503:05, 19 October 2024 CAVincent talk contribs 8,251 bytes −137 not even a remotely legit source; it may be time to take "Mega Society" out of the article undo Tag: Manual revert
curprev 01:2101:21, 19 October 2024 2601:1c2:4200:2840:a8ec:fe1c:c8d7:ad3d talk 8,388 bytes +137 →Societies: Added source undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 02:4002:40, 23 August 2024 MusikBot II talk contribs m 8,792 bytes −17 Removing protection templates from unprotected page (more info) undo

curprev 11:5411:54, 28 July 2024 Knitsey talk contribs 8,774 bytes −17 Reverted 1 edit by Skyespry (talk) undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 11:4011:40, 28 July 2024 Skyespry talk contribs 8,791 bytes +17 →See also: Sam Vaknin undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 22:3122:31, 11 January 2024 M11th talk contribs m 8,778 bytes 0 Undid revision 1194888038 by CAVincent (talk) __ That IQ is not static is evidently beside the point of which score corresponds with which rarity. Why would we aim to avoid offering the valid approximation for Mensa eligibility in favour of a sloppy one? A 130 score will not qualify for Mensa, whilst a 131 will. What's the point of the table column other than offering the information it claims to? undo Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 07:2007:20, 11 January 2024 CAVincent talk contribs 8,778 bytes 0 Undid revision 1194760538 by M11th (talk) fine the way it was; as IQ averages aren't static anyhow, splitting hairs on SD and tiny percentage differences isn't helpful undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 16:2716:27, 10 January 2024 M11th talk contribs m 8,778 bytes 0 At a SD of 15, 130 is at the 97.7th percentile (at 1 in 44), which doe not meet the Mensa threshold of 1 in 50; 131 falls just above the 98th percentile (at 1 in 52), which is a better approximation. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit