Independent review: Revision history

18 March 2013

• curprev 15:2515:25, 18 March 2013 DoctorKubla talk contribs 25 bytes −5,963 Redirecting to peer review – there was a strong consensus on the talk page, and here, to merge these articles, but I can't see anything worth merging that isn't already covered in the target article undo

21 March 2012

• curprev 13:0513:05, 21 March 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 5,988 bytes +1,150 Filling in 6 references using Reflinks undo

26 January 2012

• curprev 07:0907:09, 26 January 2012 Sanya3 talk contribs m 4,838 bytes +50 No edit summary undo

13 May 2011

• curprev 16:5416:54, 13 May 2011 Vsmith talk contribs 4,788 bytes −1,815 this isn't wikiquote - remove quote section undo
• curprev 16:4916:49, 13 May 2011 Vsmith talk contribs 6,603 bytes −254 →Fringe science: don't need subheader, remove supposed examples from mid 1800s and early 1900s undo

31 January 2011

• curprev 09:1309:13, 31 January 2011 Abyssinia H talk contribs m 6,857 bytes +22 WPCleaner 0.99 - Repairing link to disambiguation page - (You can help) - Conservation undo

23 October 2010

• curprev 05:3505:35, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 6,835 bytes +64 add ref undo
• curprev 05:2505:25, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 6,771 bytes +64 add ref from a different field undo
• curprev 05:2105:21, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 6,707 bytes +90 →References: see also undo
• curprev 05:1605:16, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 6,617 bytes +206 and another undo
• curprev 05:1205:12, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 6,411 bytes +14 better ref for this undo
• curprev 04:1504:15, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 6,397 bytes +336 perhaps undo
• curprev 01:5801:58, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 6,061 bytes +50 →Clinical practice: mains undo
• curprev 00:5900:59, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 6,011 bytes +135 No edit summary undo
• curprev 00:5200:52, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 5,876 bytes +19 add undo
• curprev 00:5100:51, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 5,857 bytes +366 made more general undo
• curprev 00:4300:43, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 5,491 bytes +22 make section undo
• curprev 00:4300:43, 23 October 2010 Tijfo098 talk contribs 5,469 bytes +5 appears to have been unduly generalized undo

27 September 2010

• curprev 11:2711:27, 27 September 2010 SmackBot talk contribs m 5,464 bytes +32 Date maintenance tags and general fixes: build 550: undo

3 September 2010

• curprev 23:2623:26, 3 September 2010 Guillaume2303 talk contribs m 5,432 bytes +2 Removed Category:Academic journals; Adding category Category:Academic publishing (using HotCat) undo

31 August 2010

• curprev 21:3621:36, 31 August 2010 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 5,430 bytes −136 revert, this is not about "independent review", it is about "a" particular review. Are we going to link to each and every "independent" review ever done? undo
• curprev 21:1021:10, 31 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 5,566 bytes +136 Example of independent review, criticizing peer-reviewed research that has already been published undo

17 August 2010

• curprev 18:3618:36, 17 August 2010 SmackBot talk contribs m 5,430 bytes +27 Date maintenance tags and general fixes: build 444:, removed stub tag undo
• curprev 16:3116:31, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 5,403 bytes +34 Government agencies in USA undo
• curprev 16:3016:30, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 5,369 bytes +141 a couple of headings ... I could really use some help with arranging all this material undo
• curprev 16:2616:26, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs m 5,228 bytes +1 No edit summary undo
• curprev 16:1516:15, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs m 5,227 bytes 0 move ref to end of the sentence it refers to undo
• curprev 16:1516:15, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs m 5,227 bytes 0 No edit summary undo
• curprev 16:1416:14, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 5,227 bytes +254 there's a need for independent review, because the peer review process is broken, says one doctor undo
• curprev 14:5814:58, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 4,973 bytes +11 link -> ref undo
• curprev 14:0614:06, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 4,962 bytes +619 financial interests affect research results - British Medical Journal confirms this undo
• curprev 13:5513:55, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 4,343 bytes +27 similar to peer review, but much less related to whether a journal editor will publish an article undo
• curprev 13:5413:54, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 4,316 bytes −32 too many references ... now, will someone PLEASE help me write this WELL-REFERENCED article? undo
• curprev 13:5313:53, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 4,348 bytes +546 Helps the public keep an eye on conservation undo
• curprev 13:3413:34, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 3,802 bytes +274 The Office of Research Integrity employs independent reviewers to guard against scientific misconduct undo
• curprev 13:2613:26, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 3,528 bytes +766 Independent review is needed, because peer review is not enough undo
• curprev 13:2313:23, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs m 2,762 bytes +1 No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:2313:23, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 2,761 bytes +22 access to one's own data and methods (see data sharing undo
• curprev 13:2213:22, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 2,739 bytes +46 See also Independent medical review undo
• curprev 13:1913:19, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 2,693 bytes +588 This is a longer quote which should be summarized undo
• curprev 13:1713:17, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 2,105 bytes +194 2nd quote from same source - independent review protects study participants undo
• curprev 13:1513:15, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 1,911 bytes +11 ref undo
• curprev 13:1513:15, 17 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 1,900 bytes +390 The best means for assessing risks and benefits is through independent review of the proposed research by individuals who have no direct vested interest in its outcome undo

16 August 2010

• curprev 23:1823:18, 16 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 1,510 bytes −4 anonymous peer review is one sort of review undo
• curprev 23:1823:18, 16 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 1,514 bytes +22 Please merge to peer review undo
• curprev 23:1723:17, 16 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 1,492 bytes +25 Category:Peer_review undo
• curprev 23:1723:17, 16 August 2010 Ed Poor talk contribs 1,467 bytes +1,442 undo redirect because no merge was done yet undo

29 July 2010

• curprev 00:5500:55, 29 July 2010 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 25 bytes −1,442 redirecting, see talk undo

22 July 2010

• curprev 14:3814:38, 22 July 2010 Scientizzle talk contribs 1,467 bytes +19 some minor wordsmithing undo
• curprev 14:3414:34, 22 July 2010 Scientizzle talk contribs m 1,448 bytes −1 spelling undo