Jump to content

Overcompleteness: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

13 February 2024

12 December 2023

29 November 2023

28 August 2022

31 October 2021

13 October 2021

3 November 2019

10 July 2019

25 April 2019

7 September 2017

15 July 2017

24 May 2017

4 March 2017

15 January 2017

20 February 2016

14 February 2016

17 December 2015

14 September 2015

7 July 2015

23 January 2015

26 May 2014

24 April 2013

20 February 2013

24 October 2012

18 April 2012

21 March 2012

11 March 2012

17 January 2012

19 October 2011

18 October 2011

  • curprev 14:4314:43, 18 October 2011 131.220.135.67 talk 13,059 bytes +270 One may (and people certainly do) speak of overcomplete systems which are not frames, merely complete systems. Furthermore "greater in number" is meaningless in infinite dimensional spaces. undo
  • curprev 14:2614:26, 18 October 2011 131.220.135.67 talk 12,789 bytes −132 The system presented in Gabor's classical paper is *not* a frame (as a Gabor system with a Gaussian window sampled over a lattice with density 1). They are overcomplete systems, but frame theory did *not* originate in the Gabor paper. undo Tag: references removed

3 May 2011

5 April 2011

13 November 2010

30 August 2010

17 June 2010

31 March 2010

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)