Talk:Bertrand paradox (probability): Revision history

9 April 2024

• curprev 04:5804:58, 9 April 2024 SineBot talk contribs m 38,326 bytes +285 Signing comment by 140.253.50.106 - "suggested adjustments to Classical Solution paragraph" undo
• curprev 04:5704:57, 9 April 2024 140.253.50.106 talk 38,041 bytes +1,366 suggested adjustments to Classical Solution paragraph undo

28 January 2024

• curprev 03:2903:29, 28 January 2024 2601:200:c082:2ea0:c15b:4ceb:1894:404c talk 36,675 bytes −193 →POV undo
• curprev 03:2803:28, 28 January 2024 2601:200:c082:2ea0:c15b:4ceb:1894:404c talk 36,868 bytes +474 →POV: Reply undo Tag: Reply

14 January 2024

• curprev 23:2323:23, 14 January 2024 Cewbot talk contribs m 36,394 bytes +3 Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{Maths rating}}, {{WikiProject Statistics}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field. undo

27 October 2023

• curprev 05:3805:38, 27 October 2023 99.190.32.88 talk 36,391 bytes +1,179 →Jaynes' Solution: Reply undo Tag: Reply

26 October 2023

• curprev 22:3222:32, 26 October 2023 99.190.32.88 talk 35,212 bytes +279 →Possibly easier way to explain Jayne's result?: Reply undo Tag: Reply
• curprev 21:5121:51, 26 October 2023 99.190.32.88 talk 34,933 bytes +967 →Unique Solution: Reply undo Tag: Reply
• curprev 21:3521:35, 26 October 2023 99.190.32.88 talk 33,966 bytes +522 →Possibly easier way to explain Jayne's result?: Reply undo Tag: Reply
• curprev 21:1421:14, 26 October 2023 99.190.32.88 talk 33,444 bytes +261 →Flies and molasses: Reply undo Tag: Reply
• curprev 21:0921:09, 26 October 2023 99.190.32.88 talk 33,183 bytes +1,001 →False claim about midpoints identifying chords: Reply undo Tag: Reply
• curprev 20:5420:54, 26 October 2023 99.190.32.88 talk 32,182 bytes +2,769 →Jaynes' Solution: Reply undo Tag: Reply
• curprev 20:0920:09, 26 October 2023 99.190.32.88 talk 29,413 bytes +477 →POV: Reply undo Tag: Reply
• curprev 20:0320:03, 26 October 2023 99.190.32.88 talk 28,936 bytes +923 →Ramifications of the Paradox: Reply undo Tag: Reply

23 October 2023

• curprev 20:5420:54, 23 October 2023 99.190.32.88 talk 28,013 bytes +273 →Reference to Tissler is wrong. The name should be Tissier: new section undo Tag: New topic

16 July 2023

• curprev 23:2523:25, 16 July 2023 DanTilkin talk contribs 27,740 bytes +311 →False claim about midpoints identifying chords: Reply undo Tag: Reply

19 May 2023

• curprev 01:4301:43, 19 May 2023 Eggsyntax talk contribs 27,429 bytes +347 →Mathematical error: Reply undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
• curprev 00:5200:52, 19 May 2023 AlteredDesk talk contribs 27,082 bytes +1,363 →Mathematical error: Reply undo Tag: Reply

17 May 2023

• curprev 01:3601:36, 17 May 2023 Eggsyntax talk contribs 25,719 bytes +36 →Mathematical error: Updating my own Talk comment undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

2 May 2023

• curprev 01:5601:56, 2 May 2023 Eggsyntax talk contribs 25,683 bytes +755 →Mathematical error: new section undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topic

28 February 2023

• curprev 03:2703:27, 28 February 2023 StrawberryLetter22 talk contribs 24,928 bytes +522 →I'm not a mathematician, but it seems like this article doesn't mention the most important point: Reply undo Tag: Reply

1 February 2023

• curprev 05:0305:03, 1 February 2023 FRuDIxAFLG talk contribs 24,406 bytes +161 →Have you read this?: Reply undo Tag: Reply

29 January 2023

• curprev 15:1715:17, 29 January 2023 77.85.215.165 talk 24,245 bytes +188 →Have you read this? undo
• curprev 15:1315:13, 29 January 2023 77.85.215.165 talk 24,057 bytes −181 →Have you read this? undo
• curprev 15:1115:11, 29 January 2023 77.85.215.165 talk 24,238 bytes +1 →Have you read this? undo
• curprev 15:0915:09, 29 January 2023 77.85.215.165 talk 24,237 bytes +517 →Have you read this? undo
• curprev 14:5614:56, 29 January 2023 77.85.215.165 talk 23,720 bytes +75 →Have you read this? undo
• curprev 14:5314:53, 29 January 2023 77.85.215.165 talk 23,645 bytes −47 →Have you read this? undo
• curprev 14:4114:41, 29 January 2023 77.85.215.165 talk 23,692 bytes +95 →Have you read this? undo
• curprev 14:3614:36, 29 January 2023 77.85.215.165 talk 23,597 bytes +313 No edit summary undo

11 December 2022

• curprev 06:0706:07, 11 December 2022 FRuDIxAFLG talk contribs 23,284 bytes +891 →"Solving the hard problem of Bertrand’s paradox" is mistaken: new section undo Tag: New topic

25 November 2022

• curprev 17:2417:24, 25 November 2022 62.73.72.17 talk 22,393 bytes −4,536 →It's not Mathematical paradox, this is an example of incorrect conclusions in mathematical reasoning undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 06:3006:30, 25 November 2022 Enchev Emil talk contribs 26,929 bytes +519 →It's not Mathematical paradox, this is an example of incorrect conclusions in mathematical reasoning undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 06:1006:10, 25 November 2022 Enchev Emil talk contribs 26,410 bytes 0 →It's not Mathematical paradox, this is an example of incorrect conclusions in mathematical reasoning undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 06:0806:08, 25 November 2022 Enchev Emil talk contribs 26,410 bytes 0 →It's not Mathematical paradox, this is an example of incorrect conclusions in mathematical reasoning undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 06:0506:05, 25 November 2022 Enchev Emil talk contribs 26,410 bytes +174 →It's not Mathematical paradox, this is an example of incorrect conclusions in mathematical reasoning undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 05:4105:41, 25 November 2022 Enchev Emil talk contribs 26,236 bytes +3,843 No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

16 September 2022

• curprev 08:4908:49, 16 September 2022 Qube0 talk contribs 22,393 bytes +514 →Is there a lower or upper bound?: Reply undo Tag: Reply

22 December 2021

• curprev 08:3108:31, 22 December 2021 Bubba73 talk contribs 21,879 bytes −8 this is much better than a start undo

30 July 2021

• curprev 18:3818:38, 30 July 2021 Frank MacCrory talk contribs 21,887 bytes +101 →False claim about midpoints identifying chords: Oops, added signature. undo
• curprev 18:3718:37, 30 July 2021 Frank MacCrory talk contribs 21,786 bytes +492 →False claim about midpoints identifying chords: At what ANGLE is the chord? undo

6 July 2021

• curprev 01:3201:32, 6 July 2021 69.113.166.178 talk 21,294 bytes +94 →I'm not a mathematician, but it seems like this article doesn't mention the most important point undo
• curprev 01:3101:31, 6 July 2021 69.113.166.178 talk 21,200 bytes 0 →I'm not a mathematician, but it seems like this article doesn't mention the most important point undo
• curprev 01:3101:31, 6 July 2021 69.113.166.178 talk 21,200 bytes −1 →I'm not a mathematician, but it seems like this article doesn't mention the most important point undo
• curprev 01:3101:31, 6 July 2021 69.113.166.178 talk 21,201 bytes +40 →I'm not a mathematician, but it seems like this article doesn't mention the most important point undo
• curprev 01:3001:30, 6 July 2021 69.113.166.178 talk 21,161 bytes +664 →I'm not a mathematician, but it seems like this article doesn't mention the most important point: new section undo

24 October 2020

• curprev 21:5521:55, 24 October 2020 Vaughan Pratt talk contribs 20,497 bytes +710 →How is relevant evidence absent here?: new section undo

24 December 2019

• curprev 17:4617:46, 24 December 2019 JayBeeEll talk contribs 19,787 bytes +115 →How precisely: for some reason this was also brought over to WT:WPM, but the answer might as well be left here as well undo
• curprev 16:3716:37, 24 December 2019 2601:246:c700:9b0:e5e5:b1ae:733f:db51 talk 19,672 bytes +39 →How precisely undo
• curprev 16:2716:27, 24 December 2019 2601:246:c700:9b0:e5e5:b1ae:733f:db51 talk 19,633 bytes +9 →How precisely undo