Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct Ferries: Revision history

30 January 2022

• curprev 16:2616:26, 30 January 2022 MalnadachBot talk contribs m 44,657 bytes +2 Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12) undo Tag: AWB

9 March 2019

• curprev 16:0616:06, 9 March 2019 Frietjes talk contribs 44,655 bytes +1 No edit summary undo

9 December 2015

• curprev 07:3307:33, 9 December 2015 Hazard-Bot talk contribs m 44,654 bytes −48 Bot: Removing closed AfD from Category:Relisted AfD debates undo

15 January 2015

• curprev 20:2620:26, 15 January 2015 Xaradnam talk contribs m 44,702 bytes −274 Undid revision 642650341 by Xaradnam (talk) undo
• curprev 20:2620:26, 15 January 2015 Xaradnam talk contribs 44,976 bytes +274 Test undo
• curprev 11:1811:18, 15 January 2015 Mrjulesd talk contribs 44,702 bytes −421 Reverted good faith edits by Mrjulesd (talk): Test ended. (TW) undo
• curprev 10:5610:56, 15 January 2015 Mrjulesd talk contribs 45,123 bytes +421 test edit, please leave here for a little while undo

1 January 2015

• curprev 16:1416:14, 1 January 2015 Randykitty talk contribs 44,702 bytes +1,519 Closing debate, result was no consensus undo

31 December 2014

• curprev 08:4308:43, 31 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs 43,183 bytes +231 Yes there is definitely an argument for covering the individuals not the company. undo

30 December 2014

• curprev 22:4422:44, 30 December 2014 DGG talk contribs 42,952 bytes +180 No edit summary undo
• curprev 12:5912:59, 30 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs 42,772 bytes +1,521 The Sunday Times article is not direct coverage of the topic of the article at all. We need to be aware of that. undo

29 December 2014

• curprev 23:5123:51, 29 December 2014 Davey2010 talk contribs 41,251 bytes −41 →Direct Ferries: Amended indents (I hope no one minds it just looks like the reply's to me.), Cheers undo
• curprev 23:2823:28, 29 December 2014 DGG talk contribs 41,292 bytes +724 →Direct Ferries undo

27 December 2014

• curprev 14:3914:39, 27 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs 40,568 bytes +3,746 Arguing my case. I think we should stick to WP guidelines about companies. These are specific and targeted. Other companies do get in depth coverage - not PR or passing mentions - so why should this one be different? undo

26 December 2014

• curprev 14:4114:41, 26 December 2014 Ritchie333 talk contribs 36,822 bytes +139 add undo
• curprev 14:3714:37, 26 December 2014 Ritchie333 talk contribs 36,683 bytes +1,849 cmt on notability and redirects undo
• curprev 13:0313:03, 26 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs m 34,834 bytes +24 rephrase to hopefully sound less antagonistic. undo
• curprev 12:5712:57, 26 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs m 34,810 bytes +105 Forgot to add signature. undo
• curprev 12:5212:52, 26 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs 34,705 bytes +4,287 Going through new references provided. They are mostly a few sentences. Every company probably has these kinds of mentions. It doesn't show notability. In addition, one is a list and one I would suspect exists for SEO purposes - possibly paid. undo

25 December 2014

• curprev 04:5404:54, 25 December 2014 DGG talk contribs 30,418 bytes −1 No edit summary undo
• curprev 04:5304:53, 25 December 2014 DGG talk contribs 30,419 bytes +126 No edit summary undo

24 December 2014

• curprev 18:2118:21, 24 December 2014 Davey2010 talk contribs 30,293 bytes +499 →Direct Ferries: k undo
• curprev 04:4604:46, 24 December 2014 Slakr talk contribs 29,794 bytes +613 Relisting debate undo

22 December 2014

• curprev 13:3213:32, 22 December 2014 Ritchie333 talk contribs 29,181 bytes +27 not quite true undo
• curprev 09:4409:44, 22 December 2014 Ritchie333 talk contribs 29,154 bytes +35 add undo
• curprev 09:1809:18, 22 December 2014 Ritchie333 talk contribs 29,119 bytes +1,275 keep undo

19 December 2014

• curprev 10:1810:18, 19 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs 27,844 bytes +1,576 I think it's time to let people decide. I think all arguments are now on the table. undo

18 December 2014

• curprev 18:1718:17, 18 December 2014 ThaddeusB talk contribs 26,268 bytes +1,310 re undo
• curprev 18:0518:05, 18 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs m 24,958 bytes +7 Correcting an ambiguous "their" undo
• curprev 18:0218:02, 18 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs 24,951 bytes +2,215 Arguing my case about Fast Track - I think the fundamental point is there are 750 companies featured per year. And it's one paragraph. Also regarding SEO companies do get to appear bigger than they are with a WP entry. It does help indirectly. undo
• curprev 16:5616:56, 18 December 2014 ThaddeusB talk contribs 22,736 bytes +497 re: SEO undo
• curprev 16:5216:52, 18 December 2014 LaMona talk contribs 22,239 bytes +773 No edit summary undo
• curprev 16:4516:45, 18 December 2014 ThaddeusB talk contribs 21,466 bytes +1,276 re undo

17 December 2014

• curprev 23:4923:49, 17 December 2014 DGG talk contribs 20,190 bytes +210 No edit summary undo
• curprev 17:0817:08, 17 December 2014 ThaddeusB talk contribs 19,980 bytes +1,031 re undo
• curprev 16:2616:26, 17 December 2014 LaMona talk contribs 18,949 bytes +1,702 →Direct Ferries: comment undo
• curprev 15:1415:14, 17 December 2014 ThaddeusB talk contribs m 17,247 bytes +1 clarify undo
• curprev 15:1315:13, 17 December 2014 ThaddeusB talk contribs 17,246 bytes +240 re undo
• curprev 11:1811:18, 17 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs 17,006 bytes +376 "We are just going to have to agree to disagree." Agreed! :) undo
• curprev 00:1400:14, 17 December 2014 LaMona talk contribs 16,630 bytes +386 →Direct Ferries undo

16 December 2014

• curprev 22:3522:35, 16 December 2014 ThaddeusB talk contribs 16,244 bytes +1,086 agree to disagree undo
• curprev 20:2020:20, 16 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs m 15,158 bytes −33 Cleaning up undo
• curprev 20:1120:11, 16 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs m 15,191 bytes −64 Removing some comments that may appear antagonistic. I don't want to give that impression. And it's very easy online! :) undo
• curprev 20:0820:08, 16 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs m 15,255 bytes −219 Adding bullet point + Forgot to sign my edit. undo
• curprev 20:0320:03, 16 December 2014 SineBot talk contribs m 15,474 bytes +320 Signing comment by Marksterdam - "Adding a quote. Fast Track is not about "winners". It's basically a list. You tell them your sales figures and if they want, they include you. No mention of fact checking or checking sales is given... undo
• curprev 20:0220:02, 16 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs 15,154 bytes +320 Adding a quote. Fast Track is not about "winners". It's basically a list. You tell them your sales figures and if they want, they include you. No mention of fact checking or checking sales is given on the website. Sticking to the facts. undo
• curprev 19:5219:52, 16 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs 14,834 bytes +2,511 Continuing to argue my case undo
• curprev 18:3818:38, 16 December 2014 ThaddeusB talk contribs 12,323 bytes +389 re:profit undo
• curprev 18:3518:35, 16 December 2014 ThaddeusB talk contribs 11,934 bytes +1,143 re undo
• curprev 17:3717:37, 16 December 2014 Marksterdam talk contribs 10,791 bytes +1,589 Explaining that Fast Track is self reported and questioning whether we can really view fluff PR interviews as reliable independent sources. undo