User talk:TheStrayCat: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 10:20, 14 January 2021

/Archive1

Thanks!

Thanks for this edit! — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 17:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) --Microcell (talk) 16:06, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Prague Metro

Hi -- The thing about Mustek comes from a plaque in the station itself. A picture of the medieval bridge is at [1].

The fact about the elevator is from the page linked to. I timed the 2.5 minutes myself (this was before that kind of thing was banned as "original research").

For Andel, this page shows the opening date of the "Prague" station in Moscow. It actually shows it as a few days later than Wikipedia's opening date for Andel. I don't know if that's because the two sites are using two different types of opening days or if the tour book I used (forgot the name) was incorrect. The murals I've seen myself, and pictures of them can easily be found online. -- Mwalcoff (talk) 23:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clear, thanks! As I ascertained, there indeed was a 4-day gap between openings. --Microcell (talk) 11:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tarkhankut

Is there anything in particular you want me to look at? I could copyedit it a bit, but in general it's OK for a Start-class article.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 19, 2011; 14:23 (UTC)

If I knew where it needs correcting, I'd somehow do it on my own. :) Sometimes it annoys when reading an article supposed to be quality and correct you find mistakes or awkwardness of any kind. That's why I don't intend to enrich the project with such one, although sometimes have a desire to represent a familiar topic here. Just fix to make it look OK, please, that's all. Thanks! --Microcell (talk) 19:16, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did a quick copyedit, and will give the article another look in a couple of days. Also, there are two inline comments I've inserted where I was not sure about the meaning of the sentences (my Ukrainian is not that good, I'm afraid :)). If you could address those, it'd help. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 19, 2011; 20:43 (UTC)

Thanks for the revision! I've fixed one word which wasn't suitable enough in the context. Probably, I was too quick making the translation and didn't ponder much over about how to put it better. As for the second remark, the original source gives that questionable sentence as "Кроме того, с установкой телеграфной и метеорологической станции необходимо было держать связь с проходящими мимо кораблями." Maybe, something like "Additionally, after telegraph and meteorological stations were set up, the need to communicate with passing ships arose." is better? --Microcell (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. Regarding the telegraph, do you think that sentence should even be there? To me it seems the necessity to communicate with the ships using the telegraph is rather obvious, especially after the appropriate facilities have been installed. The sentence just doesn't answer the question of why it was important (apart from obvious reasons). What do you think?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 20, 2011; 13:37 (UTC)

As you wish, this detail is not so important. --Microcell (talk) 09:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad ISO 15924 User boxes

I selfreverted one edit [2]. It looks like that solved it (needs purge for checking etc.). I´ll keep an eye on it, see if the bug returns. If there is anything else in this, I'd like you to let me know. -DePiep (talk) 21:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you, I don't see any problems either. Not that I'm eager now to search for possible glitches on purpose, but will inform you when I notice something out of order. --Microcell (talk) 21:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After some looking around, my current guess is that indeed the wp-name template required a #default option in the #switch (which I had taken out and just now reverted). Interestingly, the userbox template enters the word Default, (writing |{{{1|Default}}}), so the template should at least return some text (a red link text is better than no text at all, creating the error we saw). Using |#default not |Default is a catch all, so better than the single-word catch.

Also, I noticed that you too were editing while I did research. Especially the not telling you were busy could be devastating for such a debugging process. We could have messed it up by the squares!

Anyway, now that it's quiet, indeed you could try to get rid of the double redirects (both of them). In the sandbox, sir. -DePiep (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for a close look, I have cleared the sandbox of the boxes. I don't see myself as a template master, thus when trying to fix them at first look over the code and tend to use the preview button when necessary. Regarding that edit, it really appeared to be the cause and as preview for obvious reasons would've been fruitless I only saved it for a while to see what it would change. My apologies if it was needless. --Microcell (talk) 08:51, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AWB note in IRC

You popped into IRC, mentioned something about AWB being broken, or similar, then disappeared without explaining more. What issue are you seeing? We can be a bit slow to answer questions in #autowikibrowser. — billinghurst sDrewth 20:18, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for reacting, unfortunately it was not the first time I heard no response over IRC, so I gave up quite soon. The problem is, after I granted a user local AWB access per his request, he complained the system fails to recognise the account (see uk:Обговорення користувача:Microcell#AWB with a short talk). Looking through the system requirements, according to him, the only possible incompatibility can be with the .NET Framework version, however, for what it's worth, the FAQ says about a different message posted in this case. It's just that we don't want to waste time picking random causes and testing them, therefore your help is desirable. Thanks again and sorry for bothering you. --Microcell (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, it's OK now. --Microcell (talk) 20:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lipița culture images

Hi! I noticed you are listed as an Ukrainian translator. I wonder if you can help us elucidating the source and the age of some Talk:Lipiţa culture#Lipița culture images. Thanks a lot and best regards.--Codrin.B (talk) 18:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'll see to it, not now though. Are you wondering only about the images linked there or about all suggested by Google? The latter is quite a pointless task, I guess we'd need them only to find a link between books and pics. Also, I'm not sure about my full knowledge of local licensing policies for some lack of experience, is there anything you know about the status of those images, that is, what age here is sufficient to comply with the policy? Thanks, --Microcell (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply. I moved the conversation to the Talk:Lipiţa culture#Lipița culture images so others can pitch in. I also added answers and clarifications.--Codrin.B (talk) 22:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. I'm chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who make and use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I'm scouring user pages looking for inspiring, motivating and interesting stories of how Wikipedia has affected the lives of people. I'm asking questions like "How has Wikipedia changed your life?", "What's the most interesting story you have about Wikipedia?" and "Has Wikipedia ever surprised you?"

Last year, we used the annual fundraiser as a way to show the world who it is who actually writes Wikipedia. We featured editors from Brazil, Ukraine, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, India, United States and England. This campaign was a huge success, resulting in the most financially successful fundraising campaign ever. It was also a campaign that stayed true to the spirit of Wikipedia, educating the public that this free top-5 website is created by volunteers like you and I.

This year we want to highlight more Russian-language Wikipedia editors, so I am in the process of planning a trip to Russia to interview editors.

If you or someone you know (or have heard about) has been positively affected by Wikipedia, or have something interesting to say about Wikipedia I'd very much like to hear about it!

Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project, or if you know someone else with whom I should speak.

Of course, if you have any questions or concerns, please ask! I will answer as soon as I can. I apologize for any poor translation of this letter, I am using Google-translate. I hope it makes you laugh :)

Thank you for your time,

Victor Grigas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Putin khuilo!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TheStrayCat. You have new messages at Lost on Belmont's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lost on Belmont ^3200N_1000W (talk) 20:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TheStrayCat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please monitor and protect the Mangalore article from Vandalism

I request you to give protection to the Mangalore article and monitor it, regarding vandalism.
No Administrator is protecting this article and it could be delisted (removed) from the list of Featured Articles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_review#Mangalore 223.186.38.187 (talk) 08:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TheStrayCat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TheStrayCat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject:Ukraine

	Have a good day!
	Thank you for your contributions to the project! In case you ever come back editing, please know, that it is appreciated -- Ата ^(talk) 10:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]