Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joakim Hagabakken: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Fenix down (talk | contribs) →Joakim Hagabakken: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
⚫ | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Fenix down|Fenix down]] ([[User talk:Fenix down|talk]]) 22:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|Joakim Hagabakken}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joakim Hagabakken|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 8#{{anchorencode:Joakim Hagabakken}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
:{{la|Joakim Hagabakken}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joakim Hagabakken|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 8#{{anchorencode:Joakim Hagabakken}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
Line 9: | Line 14: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Football|list of Football-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Football|list of Football-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Norway|list of Norway-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Norway|list of Norway-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small>Note: This discussion has been included in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Nominations for deletion and page moves|WikiProject Football]]'s list of association football-related deletions. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 22:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
|||
'''Weak keep''' Valeranga one of the strongest and most definitely professional teams in a professional league. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 03:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::The issue is that it doesn't look like he got any game time for Vålerenga [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 09:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one (or two) appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively. If sources are found which demonstrate GNG then please ping me. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 11:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' a total and complete failure of both GNG and football notability.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 20:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' - only bare minimum 'database' coverage found in searches; some of the clubs that he played for are indeed notable but there is nothing to suggest that Hagabakken is a notable enough individual to pass [[WP:GNG]] in his own right [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 17:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 22:08, 15 February 2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 22:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joakim Hagabakken (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Technically passes WP:NFOOTBALL due to two brief substitute appearances in the 2001 Tippeligaen, which is currently on our list of 'fully professional leagues' (despite not being fully professional at the time). Fails WP:GNG. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Weak keep Valeranga one of the strongest and most definitely professional teams in a professional league. Abcmaxx (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- The issue is that it doesn't look like he got any game time for Vålerenga Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one (or two) appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively. If sources are found which demonstrate GNG then please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete a total and complete failure of both GNG and football notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - only bare minimum 'database' coverage found in searches; some of the clubs that he played for are indeed notable but there is nothing to suggest that Hagabakken is a notable enough individual to pass WP:GNG in his own right Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.