Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Rouff: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Brian Rouff: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Brian Rouff]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. <span style="background:#F3F3F3; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#871E8D'>czar</span>]]</span> 05:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
===[[:Brian Rouff]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|Brian Rouff}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Rouff|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 16#{{anchorencode:Brian Rouff}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:{{la|Brian Rouff}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Rouff|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 16#{{anchorencode:Brian Rouff}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
Line 12: Line 17:
*'''Delete''' - how surprising. A public relations guru has an entirely undue article on Wikipedia. Fails [[WP:ANYBIO]]. [[Special:Contributions/174.254.192.137|174.254.192.137]] ([[User talk:174.254.192.137|talk]]) 01:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - how surprising. A public relations guru has an entirely undue article on Wikipedia. Fails [[WP:ANYBIO]]. [[Special:Contributions/174.254.192.137|174.254.192.137]] ([[User talk:174.254.192.137|talk]]) 01:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' He's written some articles for magazines and self-published a book. Not notable. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 15:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' He's written some articles for magazines and self-published a book. Not notable. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 15:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' a non-notable person in the advertising industry.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 17:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - A Google search turned up reliable sources, which I have added to the article. A search also found that the subject has written three books, two of which were released by traditional publishing houses, he won a state award, and he contributed to a fourth book, a collection of short stories co-written with authors in the US and UK. The subject and his books have been featured in multiple articles, including in the ''Las Vegas Review-Journal'', and he regularly appears on Nevada public radio. I cleaned up the article, removed puffery, and added content with reliable sources to show notability. Clearly passes [[WP:GNG]] and meets [[WP:BIO]]. -[[User:AuthorAuthor|AuthorAuthor]] ([[User talk:AuthorAuthor|talk]]) 09:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. -[[User:AuthorAuthor|AuthorAuthor]] ([[User talk:AuthorAuthor|talk]]) 20:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. All the coverage added is either local to him or an interview or both, so it fails [[WP:N]], which demands sources that are independent (interviews fail here) and which indicate interest from the world at large (local-only sources fail here). &spades;[[User:Premeditated Chaos|PMC]]&spades; [[User_talk:Premeditated Chaos|(talk)]] 21:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 05:41, 24 February 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Rouff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any evidence he's notable for his marketing/comms work, nor as an author. There are event listings for author talks/signings, but the only in depth pieces I've found are interviews/blurbs so they don't work. Mollifiednow did some updating and source hunting late last year but was similarly unable to take this article further. StarM 01:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. StarM 01:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. StarM 01:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. StarM 01:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 20:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. All the coverage added is either local to him or an interview or both, so it fails WP:N, which demands sources that are independent (interviews fail here) and which indicate interest from the world at large (local-only sources fail here). ♠PMC(talk) 21:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.