Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhanya Ananya: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m sig |
→Dhanya Ananya: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
⚫ | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] ([[User talk:Daniel|talk]]) 10:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|Dhanya Ananya}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhanya Ananya|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 18#{{anchorencode:Dhanya Ananya}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
:{{la|Dhanya Ananya}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhanya Ananya|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 18#{{anchorencode:Dhanya Ananya}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''': My [[WP:BEFORE]] gave me 79 results only in Google News, several mentions in Times of India, Film Critics etc., meets [[WP:GNG]] [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford|talk]]) 06:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''': My [[WP:BEFORE]] gave me 79 results only in Google News, several mentions in Times of India, Film Critics etc., meets [[WP:GNG]] [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford|talk]]) 06:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
::*'''Comment''' — @{{u|CommanderWaterford}}, please see [[WP:SIGN]] & do so each time you make a comment for the sake of clarity(please do so immediately) Furthermore, I’m afraid your knowledge of policy pertaining to [[WP:N|''notability'']] might be inadequate & I do not believe you possess sufficient knowledge on [[WP:GNG]]. The number of sources google news popped up isn’t relevant but what matters is the quality of those sources. Mere mentions do not satisfy [[WP:SIGCOV]] thus such sources are of zero relevance to [[WP:GNG]] which requires in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore per [[WP:NACTOR]] she doesn’t meet the threshold as no criterion is satisfied as she is yet to be featured in lead roles neither has she won |
::*'''Comment''' — @{{u|CommanderWaterford}}, please see [[WP:SIGN]] & do so each time you make a comment for the sake of clarity(please do so immediately) Furthermore, I’m afraid your knowledge of policy pertaining to [[WP:N|''notability'']] might be inadequate & I do not believe you possess sufficient knowledge on [[WP:GNG]]. The number of sources google news popped up isn’t relevant but what matters is the quality of those sources. Mere mentions do not satisfy [[WP:SIGCOV]] thus such sources are of zero relevance to [[WP:GNG]] which requires in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore per [[WP:NACTOR]] she doesn’t meet the threshold as no criterion is satisfied as she is yet to be featured in lead roles neither has she won prestigious awards for actors. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 23:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' non notable actor with no major roles. There is no significant coverage in RS.[[User:Ruqayya ansari|Ruqayya ansari]] ([[User talk:Ruqayya ansari|talk]]) 12:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' fails the threshold of multiple significant roles in notable productions.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 13:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' - lacks significant coverage from reliable sources addressing her directly and in depth, does not meet [[WP:GNG]]; Celestina is correct [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 19:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 10:50, 28 February 2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 10:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dhanya Ananya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable actor who doesn’t satisfy WP:NACTOR as she hasn’t won any prestigious awards neither has she taken up significant roles in the movies she has featured in, generally, a before search shows she lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her, thus this is also a GNG fail Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: My WP:BEFORE gave me 79 results only in Google News, several mentions in Times of India, Film Critics etc., meets WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 06:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment — @CommanderWaterford, please see WP:SIGN & do so each time you make a comment for the sake of clarity(please do so immediately) Furthermore, I’m afraid your knowledge of policy pertaining to notability might be inadequate & I do not believe you possess sufficient knowledge on WP:GNG. The number of sources google news popped up isn’t relevant but what matters is the quality of those sources. Mere mentions do not satisfy WP:SIGCOV thus such sources are of zero relevance to WP:GNG which requires in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore per WP:NACTOR she doesn’t meet the threshold as no criterion is satisfied as she is yet to be featured in lead roles neither has she won prestigious awards for actors. Celestina007 (talk) 23:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete non notable actor with no major roles. There is no significant coverage in RS.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 12:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete fails the threshold of multiple significant roles in notable productions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - lacks significant coverage from reliable sources addressing her directly and in depth, does not meet WP:GNG; Celestina is correct Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.