Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Brick Bronze: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Pokémon Brick Bronze: Closed as merge (XFDcloser) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
⚫ | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|G}} |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''merge''' to [[Roblox#Popular games]]. The analysis of the sourcing in the discussion suggests that serious doubt exists over whether it meets SIGCOV. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] ([[User talk:Daniel|talk]]) 08:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|Pokémon Brick Bronze}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Brick Bronze|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February |
:{{la|Pokémon Brick Bronze}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Brick Bronze|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 25#{{anchorencode:Pokémon Brick Bronze}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Pokémon Brick Bronze}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Pokémon Brick Bronze}}) |
||
Non notable article. Even though this had some contreversy due to its deletion, it has never reached the popularity of the current top roblox games. This article doesn't have that much information. Either delete or merge the article with [[Roblox]]. [[User:Darubrub|Darubrub]] ([[User talk:Darubrub|talk]]) 16:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
Non notable article. Even though this had some contreversy due to its deletion, it has never reached the popularity of the current top roblox games. This article doesn't have that much information. Either delete or merge the article with [[Roblox]]. [[User:Darubrub|Darubrub]] ([[User talk:Darubrub|talk]]) 16:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
*'''Comment''' {{u|Devonian Wombat}} "With a massive world to explore, bonafide turn-based combat that is quite honestly ripped straight from the handheld games you know and love, and enough original ideas to occupy several days of your time, Pokemon Brick Bronze is far and away the best Pokemon game on Roblox. It’s not even a contest. In fact, it may be one of the best Roblox games period with more than 388 million players." in PC Gamer isn't SIGCOV, and relying the notability on sources with questionable reliability like Heavy and Player.One (currently inconclusive on [[WP:VG/RS]] + after thoroughly reading the article, it gives the game a pitiful coverage) is a no-no imo. [[User:Jovanmilic97|Jovanmilic97]] ([[User talk:Jovanmilic97|talk]]) 21:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' {{u|Devonian Wombat}} "With a massive world to explore, bonafide turn-based combat that is quite honestly ripped straight from the handheld games you know and love, and enough original ideas to occupy several days of your time, Pokemon Brick Bronze is far and away the best Pokemon game on Roblox. It’s not even a contest. In fact, it may be one of the best Roblox games period with more than 388 million players." in PC Gamer isn't SIGCOV, and relying the notability on sources with questionable reliability like Heavy and Player.One (currently inconclusive on [[WP:VG/RS]] + after thoroughly reading the article, it gives the game a pitiful coverage) is a no-no imo. [[User:Jovanmilic97|Jovanmilic97]] ([[User talk:Jovanmilic97|talk]]) 21:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per [[User:Devonian Wombat|Devonian Wombat]]. [[User:ROBLOXGamingDavid|ROBLOXGamingDavid]] ([[User talk:ROBLOXGamingDavid|talk]]) 06:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per [[User:Devonian Wombat|Devonian Wombat]]. [[User:ROBLOXGamingDavid|ROBLOXGamingDavid]] ([[User talk:ROBLOXGamingDavid|talk]]) 06:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' As per available resources. Passes GNG. [[User:Timberlack|Timberlack]] ([[User talk:Timberlack|talk]]) 11:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
*{{strike|'''Keep''' As per available resources. Passes GNG. [[User:Timberlack|Timberlack]] ([[User talk:Timberlack|talk]]) 11:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)}}<small>— [[User:Timberlack|Timberlack]] ([[User talk:Timberlack|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Timberlack|contribs]]) is a confirmed [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Niceguylucky|sock puppet]] of [[User:Niceguylucky|Niceguylucky]] ([[User talk:Niceguylucky|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Niceguylucky|contribs]]). </small> |
||
*'''Comment''' {{u|Devonian Wombat}} Heavy has no consensus on its reliability on [[WP:RSP]] and Player-One is not found in there too. [[User:Darubrub|Darubrub]] ([[User talk:Darubrub|talk]]) 14:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' {{u|Devonian Wombat}} Heavy has no consensus on its reliability on [[WP:RSP]] and Player-One is not found in there too. [[User:Darubrub|Darubrub]] ([[User talk:Darubrub|talk]]) 14:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Merge''' with [[Roblox]] per Jovanmilic97. None of the sources brought up here offer significant coverage. [[User:Namcokid47|<span style="color: #009999">Namcokid</span>]][[User talk:Namcokid47|<span style="color: #cc0000">47</span>]] 15:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Merge''' with [[Roblox]] per Jovanmilic97. None of the sources brought up here offer significant coverage. [[User:Namcokid47|<span style="color: #009999">Namcokid</span>]][[User talk:Namcokid47|<span style="color: #cc0000">47</span>]] 15:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
:*The Kotaku is pretty in-depth. The others do have various shortcomings though, true. [[User:Sergecross73|<span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<span style="color:teal">msg me</span>]] 17:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
:*The Kotaku is pretty in-depth. The others do have various shortcomings though, true. [[User:Sergecross73|<span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<span style="color:teal">msg me</span>]] 17:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''': passes gng. could use some work but doesn't require deletion. [[User:VersaceSpace|<span style="background:#4C516D; color:white; padding:2px;">versacespace</span>]][[User talk:VersaceSpace|<span style="background:#B9CFF0; color:black; padding:2px;">talk to me</span>]] 15:11, 22 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Merge''' to [[Roblox#Popular games]]. The [[WP:GNG|GNG]] requires more than a single source (Kotaku) with [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]]. The other sources are weak or unreliable, per above. I'd support a split for the aforementioned section to its own article, based on the amount of coverage [[Roblox games]] have received as an entity. But this singular title does not have enough coverage to warrant a full/separate article. Indeed most of the sources cover Brick Bronze among other Roblox titles. <span style="background:#F3F3F3; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#871E8D'>czar</span>]]</span> 06:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Keep or merge?<br /> |
|||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Etzedek24|Etzedek24]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Etzedek24|I'll talk at ya]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Etzedek24|Check my track record]])</small></sup> 01:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div> |
|||
*'''Comment''': Any chances this can be used? <ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-08-14|title=Endlich gibt es ein Pokémon-MMORPG und so sieht es aus|url=https://www.giga.de/spiele/pokemon-sonne-und-mond/news/pokemon-brick-bronze-fanprojekt-soll-traum-vom-poke-mmo-erfuellen/|access-date=2021-02-25|website=GIGA|language=de}}</ref> [[User:VersaceSpace|<span style="background:#4C516D; color:white; padding:2px;">versacespace</span>]][[User talk:VersaceSpace|<span style="background:#B9CFF0; color:black; padding:2px;">talk to me</span>]] 02:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Merge''' most of its coverage is around Roblox and not really as an independent game. It has more coverage than a lot of illegal mods but still not more than a few sentences which would fit sufficiently at another target. [[User:Archrogue|Archrogue]] ([[User talk:Archrogue|talk]]) 18:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 08:29, 4 March 2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Roblox#Popular games. The analysis of the sourcing in the discussion suggests that serious doubt exists over whether it meets SIGCOV. Daniel (talk) 08:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pokémon Brick Bronze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable article. Even though this had some contreversy due to its deletion, it has never reached the popularity of the current top roblox games. This article doesn't have that much information. Either delete or merge the article with Roblox. Darubrub (talk) 16:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 16. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Merge with Roblox, where few popular games that appeared on the platform are mentioned. Only the cited Kotaku reference is actually talking about the game in some greater detail, the rest (and what I found in my searches) is all in passing mentions or brief coverage. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, article passes WP:GNG, with SIGCOV in Kotaku, and PC Magazine, which are listed as reliable sources according to WP:VG/RS, and also SIGCOV in Player-One, and an article in Heavy, which is listed in WP:RSP as marginally reliable. Remember, an article need not solely be about a topic in order for it to provide SIGCOV. Devonian Wombat (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Devonian Wombat "With a massive world to explore, bonafide turn-based combat that is quite honestly ripped straight from the handheld games you know and love, and enough original ideas to occupy several days of your time, Pokemon Brick Bronze is far and away the best Pokemon game on Roblox. It’s not even a contest. In fact, it may be one of the best Roblox games period with more than 388 million players." in PC Gamer isn't SIGCOV, and relying the notability on sources with questionable reliability like Heavy and Player.One (currently inconclusive on WP:VG/RS + after thoroughly reading the article, it gives the game a pitiful coverage) is a no-no imo. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Devonian Wombat. ROBLOXGamingDavid (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep As per available resources. Passes GNG. Timberlack (talk) 11:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)— Timberlack (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Niceguylucky (talk • contribs).- Comment Devonian Wombat Heavy has no consensus on its reliability on WP:RSP and Player-One is not found in there too. Darubrub (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Merge with Roblox per Jovanmilic97. None of the sources brought up here offer significant coverage. Namcokid47 15:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Kotaku is pretty in-depth. The others do have various shortcomings though, true. Sergecross73 msg me 17:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: passes gng. could use some work but doesn't require deletion. versacespacetalk to me 15:11, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Merge to Roblox#Popular games. The GNG requires more than a single source (Kotaku) with significant coverage. The other sources are weak or unreliable, per above. I'd support a split for the aforementioned section to its own article, based on the amount of coverage Roblox games have received as an entity. But this singular title does not have enough coverage to warrant a full/separate article. Indeed most of the sources cover Brick Bronze among other Roblox titles. czar 06:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 01:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 01:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Any chances this can be used? [1] versacespacetalk to me 02:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Merge most of its coverage is around Roblox and not really as an independent game. It has more coverage than a lot of illegal mods but still not more than a few sentences which would fit sufficiently at another target. Archrogue (talk) 18:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- ^ "Endlich gibt es ein Pokémon-MMORPG und so sieht es aus". GIGA (in German). 2017-08-14. Retrieved 2021-02-25.