Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salil Singhal (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 15:01, 4 March 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salil Singhal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Timberlack (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Timberlack (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Timberlack (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Timberlack (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being rich, receiving awards and representing an organisation doesn't establish nobility. RationalPuff (talk) 22:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Nominator has been blocked as a UPE sock. Blablubbs|talk 20:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. Hulatam (talk) 12:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
keep has some major wp:rs economic times, business today. Article is written poorly needs rewriting.ImNotAnEntrepreneur (talk) 02:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— ImNotAnEntrepreneur (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The account was created shortly before adding this vote. RationalPuff (talk) 09:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

comment: @RationalPuff:, has some reliable sources like economic times, bloomberg,search over google would demonstrate more sources. It can be edited and improved. Per wp:atd if it can be edited it shouldn’t be deleted. this is not a SPA. ImNotAnEntrepreneur (talk) 12:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. The sources are woeful hence the delete. scope_creep^Talk 12:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] ([[User talk:Daniel|talk]]) 15:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 ===[[:Salil Singhal]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 <div class="infobox" style="width:33%">AfDs for this article:
 {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salil Singhal}}
 </div>
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
-:{{la|Salil Singhal}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salil Singhal (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 16#{{anchorencode:Salil Singhal}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
+:{{la|Salil Singhal}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salil Singhal (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 24#{{anchorencode:Salil Singhal}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
 :({{Find sources AFD|title=Salil Singhal}})
 references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. [[User:Timberlack|Timberlack]] ([[User talk:Timberlack|talk]]) 06:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
@@ Line 13: / Line 19: @@
 *'''Delete''' being rich, receiving awards and representing an organisation doesn't establish nobility. [[User:RationalPuff|RationalPuff]] ([[User talk:RationalPuff|talk]]) 22:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 *{{a note}} Nominator has been [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Niceguylucky|blocked as a UPE sock]]. [[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]] 20:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
+<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
+<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 19:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div>
+*'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Hulatam|Hulatam]] ([[User talk:Hulatam|talk]]) 12:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
+*'''keep''' has some major [[wp:rs]] economic times, business today. Article is written poorly needs rewriting.[[User:ImNotAnEntrepreneur|ImNotAnEntrepreneur]] ([[User talk:ImNotAnEntrepreneur|talk]]) 02:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
+:<small>— [[User:ImNotAnEntrepreneur|ImNotAnEntrepreneur]] ([[User talk:ImNotAnEntrepreneur|talk]]&#32;• [[Special:Contributions/ImNotAnEntrepreneur|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> The account was created shortly before adding this vote. [[User:RationalPuff|RationalPuff]] ([[User talk:RationalPuff|talk]]) 09:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
+:* '''comment''': {{re|RationalPuff}}, has some reliable sources like economic times, bloomberg,search over google would demonstrate more sources. It can be edited and improved. Per [[wp:atd]] if it can be edited it shouldn’t be deleted. this is not a SPA. [[User:ImNotAnEntrepreneur|ImNotAnEntrepreneur]] ([[User talk:ImNotAnEntrepreneur|talk]]) 12:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Non-notable. The sources are woeful hence the delete.  '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">[[User:scope_creep|<span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:scope_creep#top|Talk]]</sup></span>''' 12:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>