Jump to content

User:CharlesGillingham/Todo: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
 
(72 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
FIX WIKILINKS:
TEST.{{User:CharlesGillingham/Harvfn|1|McCorduck|2004}}
[[Hawaiian Language]]
[[Totonacan languages]]
[[Austronesian languages]]


;Pages
;Pages
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixindex&from=User%3ACharlesGillingham%2F&namespace=0 My user pages]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixindex&from=User%3ACharlesGillingham%2F&namespace=0 My user pages]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist/edit Articles I am editing]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist/edit Articles I am editing]

* {{McCorduck 2004}}


;Templates
;Templates
Line 13: Line 14:
;Info
;Info
*How many times was a particular Wikipedia article viewed in a particular month? Find out from [http://stats.grok.se this site].
*How many times was a particular Wikipedia article viewed in a particular month? Find out from [http://stats.grok.se this site].

== High priority ==
Edit major wikipedia articles for FA
* Artificial intelligence
* Philosophy of artificial intelligence
* Chinese Room
* AI winter
* Turing test
Collect notes on my computer and add them online here.


== Artificial Intelligence ==
== Artificial Intelligence ==
=== [[Artificial intelligence]]===
=== [[Artificial intelligence]]===
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/AI}}
;To
#Fix "naive searches" (see talk page)
#Make a big pass through to shorten. Figure out how many pages each section should be, and make it fit. Don't forget there will be illustrations in the FA version.
#rewrite "expert systems paragraph"; mention Alvey, Fifth Gen., [[economic bubble]].
#re add brain illustration: fix comment to mention "scanning".
#re add Galatea illustration
#Top of "Problem"s Add a little bit about the turing test and how it helps us to proceed with a working assumption of what intelligence is... turing test is down below.
#I am a little concerned that "qualification problem" is misdefined.
#Tell the fellows that I think the applications section should actually be about page.
#Find a source that says "the problem of unconscious reasoning is mostly unsolved."
#Consider these edits on July 31, 08: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Artificial_intelligence&curid=1164&diff=229054759&oldid=228677271. Revert? Move down?

Page sketch:
#INTRO TOC
#Speculation
#History
#Philosophy 1/2 Problems
#Problems
#more probs
#Approaches
#more approaches
#Tools
# more tools
#Applications

;Towards real comprehensiveness (these won't come up)
#Could use a tiny section on symbolic learning methods, such as explanation based learning, relevance based learning, inductive logic programming, case based reasoning.
#Could use a tiny section on knowledge representation tools, like semantic nets, frames, etc.
#Control theory could use a little filling out with other tools used for [[robotic]]s.
#Need a section on raw computing power and intractability.
#Look into ways to make the applications section comprehensive, rather than scattershot. I think we need an article [[applications of AI technology]] that contains a complete, huge list of all AI's successes. The section in this article should just highlight the various categories.
#Does the article completely answer the question "why no HAL 9000?" See [[User:CharlesGillingham/More/Strong AI]]

=== [[Unsolved problems of artificial intelligence]] ===
I think this material needs to be touched on in AI winter, History of AI (which it is), Strong AI and artificial intelligence. Notes in
[[User:CharlesGillingham/More/Strong AI]]. I think it would be good to collect this all in one place.


=== [[List of basic artificial intelligence topics]]===
=== [[List of basic artificial intelligence topics]]===
copy these out from textbook survey
copy these out from textbook survey
=== [[knowlege based AI]]===
This currently redirects to expert systems, which doesn't seem right to me. There should be a singe article, giving the history of the concept. (As mid-70s movement in AI)

=== [[logic programming]]===
Provide a down-to-earth example in the second paragraph.




=== [[Neats vs. scruffies]] ===
=== [[Neats vs. scruffies]] ===
#This could use some copy editing.
#This could use some copy editing.
#Crevier, p. 254: The society of mind as scruffy. Great quote from Dennett about the essence of "scruffiness."
#Add more historical information: notably the victory of neats with the work of Judea Pearl and the agent model
#Crevier, p. 254: The scoiecty of mind as scruffy. Great quote from Dennett about the essence of "scruffiness."


=== {{Cat|Game artificial intelligence}} ===
===[[Game artificial intelligence]] and {{Cat|Game artificial intelligence}} ===
Do we also need an article with the the title "[[Adversarial search]]"?

Add summary article on the use of artificial intelligence for games.
Do we also need an article with the the title "adversarial search"?
Retitle existing article. (To what?)

=== [[Knowledge representation]] ===

Fix factual errors, check for completeness, footnote to sources.


=== [[Commonsense knowledge]] ===
=== [[Commonsense knowledge]] ===
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/Commonsense reasoning}}
#Find a reference
#Write article
=== [[Computational intelligence]] ===
#Tie this to the definitions given in the textbook you bought.


=== [[AI effect]]===
===[[Cognitive simulation]]===
''If this ever becomes an article'':
#Another source: Kurzweil pg. 265
#Also, add the bits I've collected in History of AI and AI winter


<blockquote>
=== [[Chatterbot]] ===
Human beings use symbolic processes to solve problems, reason, speak and write, learn and invent. Over the past 45 years, cognitive psychology has built and tested empirical models of these processes as they are used to perform simple tasks and then more complex ones. The models take the form of computer programs that simulate human behaviour,” Herbert A Simon, who is considered the father of AI, has said.[http://www.financialexpress.com/news/Take-The-Right-Business-Decision-With-The-Help-Of-AI/85640/ The Financial Express, ''Take The Right Business Decision With The Help Of AI'', posted 15 July 2007, retrieved 17 Aug 2007.]</blockquote>


Fix weird section mentioning "Strong AI".
Rename it '''Chatterbots and the Turing Test'''
And create another '''Applications of chatterbots'''
=== Merges ===
=== Merges ===

====[[Concept mining]] -- [[Information extraction]] ====
====[[Concept mining]] -- [[Information extraction]] ====
If these truly are the same thing.
If these truly are the same thing.
====[[Behavior based robotics]] -- [[Nouvelle AI]] -- [[situated]] ====
====[[Software agent]]-- [[Intelligent agent]] --[[rational agent]] ====
#See [[User:CharlesGillingham/Drafts/Agent artcles proposal]]
#Merge in "agent environment".
#Merge [[rational agent]] with the one from economics.

====[[Cognitive simulation]]====
''If this ever becomes an article'':

<blockquote>
Human beings use symbolic processes to solve problems, reason, speak and write, learn and invent. Over the past 45 years, cognitive psychology has built and tested empirical models of these processes as they are used to perform simple tasks and then more complex ones. The models take the form of computer programs that simulate human behaviour,” Herbert A Simon, who is considered the father of AI, has said.[http://www.financialexpress.com/news/Take-The-Right-Business-Decision-With-The-Help-Of-AI/85640/ The Financial Express, ''Take The Right Business Decision With The Help Of AI'', posted 15 July 2007, retrieved 17 Aug 2007.]</blockquote>


== Future of AI, Ethics of AI, Strong AI, AI in fiction ==
== Future of AI, Ethics of AI, Strong AI, AI in fiction ==
# Read last two section of R&N
# Read last two section of R&N
# Gather sources on these subjects from other textbooks
# Read Kurzweil and Hawkins


=== [[Strong AI]]===
=== [[Strong AI]]===
See [[User:CharlesGillingham/More/Strong AI]]
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/Strong AI}}

=== [[Moore's Law]] ===
#Re-Add the illustration.
#Moving turing's estimate to the top of the history section.
#Comment at the top of "formulations of the law" probably belongs under "futurists and moore's law."
#Need an opening graphic that shows transistor density but ''not'' on a log-log graph. There is data at [[instructions per second]].
#Add section on Sociological and Historical Impact of increasing computer power.
#Make a graph showing transportation speeds, engine horsepower, etc., for comparison.
#Shouldn't it list a larger and more logical set of [[exponential]] trends?


=== [[HAL 9000]] ===
=== [[HAL 9000]] ===
Line 132: Line 63:


===[[Ethics of AI]]===
===[[Ethics of AI]]===
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/Ethics of AI}}
# Research and write this article based on central sources.




===[[Artificial brain]]===
===[[Artificial brain]]===
Line 144: Line 73:


==History of artificial intelligence==
==History of artificial intelligence==
===[[History of artificial intelligence]]===
=== [[History of AI]] ===
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/History of artificial intelligence}}
#Rewrite pitts/mccullough paragraph. Capture the milieu as McCorduck does.
#Drop two pages!! You got to be kidding me.
#Add references from Pamela McCorduck.
#Possible new version of final paragraph.
:[[Marvin Minsky]] asks "So the question is, where is HAL 9000?" For Minsky, the answer is that too little research has focussed on [[commonsense reasoning]]<ref>ETC</ref> For [[Han Moravec]] and [[Ray Kurzweill]] the problem is raw computer power.<ref>ETC</ref> For [[Jeff Hawkins]], it is lack of interest in finding out how real brains work.<ref>{{Harvnb
Hawkins|2002|p=what?}} check ddate </ref> [[John McCarthy (computer scientist)|John McCarthy]] still blaims the [[frame problem|frame]] and [[qualifcation problem|qualification]] problems.<ref>Same as minsky</ref>

; Additional references needed
#Could use a reference on computer power in the 50s for [[History of artificial intelligence#Birth of artificial intelligence 1943-1956]].
#Use the NRC report as additional references for '''The money''' (did I do this?)
#Use more references for '''AI behind the scenes'''. Check out [[AI Winter|AI Now]]) and also try [http://library.thinkquest.org/05aug/01158/uses.html|this] and [http://www.aaai.org/AITopics/html/aieffect.html|this] and Kurzweil 2005, link to
; Skippable things
#A sentence linking to [[embodied philosophy]] in the section on [[Rodney Brooks]]
#Consider adding back in other influences (Chomsky, Game Theory, etc.) with Buchanan and/or Russell & Norvig as a source
; Peacocks, weasals, etc
Potential [[WP:PEA]]
#[[#The first AI Winter 1974-1980]]: "devastating" -- shown later in article.
Potential [[WP:AWW]]
#[[#Birth of AI]]: "widely considered" -- shown in footnote
#[[#The Golden Years]]: "astonishing to most people" --- fixed with reference, but we need to find a great 60s era hype quote from the mainstream media.
#[[#AI Underground]]: "many researchers" -- shown in the following quote.
#[[#Intelligent agents]]: "widely" -- shown by references

=== {{cat|History of artificial intelligence}} ===
Read through each article. Add info from Crevier & McCorduck


=== [[Timeline of artificial intelligence]] ===
=== [[Timeline of artificial intelligence]] ===

#Add (referenced) events from [[History of artificial intelligence]]
#Add (referenced) events from [[History of artificial intelligence]]
#Add other events from crevier
#Add other events from crevier and McCorduck
#Reference existing events
#Reference existing events


=== [[AI Winter]] ===
=== [[AI Winter]] ===
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/AI Winter}}
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/AI Winter}}

===[[Frank Rosenblatt]]===
#Add information and sources from Crevier and McCorduck
#Remove "disputed" tag.



==Philosophy of artificial intelligence==
==Philosophy of artificial intelligence==
=== [[Philosophy of artificial intelligence]] ===
=== [[Philosophy of artificial intelligence]] ===
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/Philosophy of artificial intelligence}}
# Add section on simulated intelligence vs. real intelligence.
# Add Church-Turing, and call Lucas a refutation of ''that''. Use Von Neumann's quote that's in the [[timeline of artificial intelligence]].
# Add Kurzweil references. Check Kurzweil's date that machines can simulate a brain.
# Give me a better "intelligent agent" definition
# Add my new "working definition"
# Mention winograd and flores.
# Find some legitimate criticism of brain simulation
# Mention that "strong AI" is hard to construe and that some think it has bearing on the Dartmouth proposal.
# Undo this change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_artificial_intelligence&curid=2958015&diff=173903203&oldid=173762950]
# Additional references (read and use, if you like)
* {{Citation|last=Minsky|first=Marvin|year=1982|title=Why People Think Computers Can't|magazine=AI Magazine|volume=3|number=4|date= Fall 1982|url=http://psych.utoronto.ca/users/reingold/courses/ai/cache/ComputersCantThink.txt|author-link=Marvin Minsky}}
* {{Citation | last = Dreyfus | first = Hubert | last2 = Dreyfus | first2 = Stuart | year = 2004 | title =From Socrates to Expert Systems: The Limits and Dangers of Calculative Rationality | url=http://socrates.berkeley.edu/%7Ehdreyfus/html/paper_socrates.html| publisher=University of California, Berkeley | authorlink = Hubert Dreyfus }}
* {{Citation | last=Reingold | first=Eyal | year=2007 | title=Artificial Intelligence Tutorial Review| url=http://psych.utoronto.ca/users/reingold/courses/ai/ }}
* {{Citation | last=Macro VU|title=Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think?|url=http://www.macrovu.com/CCTGeneralInfo.html}} ''This thing is awesome!''

=== {{cat|Philosophy of artificial intelligence}}===
{{Done}} Create and populate


=== [[Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence]] ===
=== [[Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence]] ===
Done
#Reread and finish "psychological assumption". Plough through this book, asshole, so I can finish this article.

=== [[Chinese Room]] ===
#Thought experiment is plagiarized from [http://philosophy.uwaterloo.ca/MindDict/chineseroom.html here]; rewrite.
#Mention that "strong AI" is hard to construe and that some think it has bearing on the Dartmouth proposal.
#Find page number for "syntax is insufficient for semantics"
#Look at Hauser 97, p. 1, Hauser 05 p. 8, and Harnad 97 p.1 for more (and better) quotes for the history section.
#Find reference where Searle talks about the "background". (May have to read a lot of Searle to find this ... )
#Check Kurzweil references


===[[Turing Test]]===
===[[Turing Test]]===
#Variations on the test: Define "restricted" vs. "unrestricted".
#Rework this todo list based on Bilby's changes (see [[Talk:Turing test]] for what I told Bilby)
#There are two broken or missing citations. Research is needed.
#Move material on A.J.Ayer up to the top.
#The sections that describe various colloquia read like press releases. They don't establish the historical significance of these events. I recommend we cut them.
#A user made an interesting criticism (right after the section where I complimented Bilby)
#There is an off topic paragraph under "Real intelligence vs. Simulated intelligence".

How many of these still apply?
#Add '''Turing's description of the test'''
#Under "strengths of the test" add a section that it ''shelves'' the discussion of philosophical issues, and allows us to get directly to work.
#Make penrose a harvard reference
#Page number on Turing 1952 seems to be wrong; also author list appears to be wrong.
#There is one link with no title. It appears to be the source code for Jabberwocky?
#Check if there are author links to be made.
#Title of "intelligent machinery" seems to be wrong in a footnote.
#Add '''Purpose of the test''' use the stuff you had from Norvig, earlier.
#Read up on it: especially Stanford encyclopedia. (I can't believe so many people don't get the ''spirit'' of the test. They take it way to seriously.)
#Could use some editing and reorganization


===[[Physical symbol system]]===
===[[Physical symbol system]]===
#Add philosophical background from Haugaland and Dreyfus
#Add philosophical background from Haugaland and Dreyfus
#Write empty sections
#Write empty sections


=== [[Moravec's paradox]] ===
#Desperately need a second source!!
#Need a concise, clear statement of the concept: Moravec's quote doesn't cut it.
#Add a first section '''The Hierarchy of Human Faculties'''. Quote Shakespeare or Locke about the "highness" of reason. This gives a better idea of what's at stake here. The lead needs rewriting.
#Link in and out of [[embodied philosophy]] or [[embodiment]] or whatever is the key article there.


=== [[Computing Machinery and Intelligence]] ===
=== [[Computing Machinery and Intelligence]] ===
#Write section about Turing test (1 para.)
#Write section about digital machines (1 para.)
#Rewrite replies that don't read well.
#Rewrite replies that don't read well.
#Section on Turing's speculations; should include the fact that this is still called the "Turing Method" in England; find a sourcd on that.

== Cognitive science ==
== Cognitive science ==
=== [[Conceptual metaphor]] ===
=== [[Conceptual metaphor]] ===
#Use my references and examples -- fill it out, make it clear.
#Use my references and examples -- fill it out, make it clear.
=== [[Functionalism (psychology)]] ===
#Merge into [[functionalism (philosophy of mind)]]
=== Embodiment articles ===
=== Embodiment articles ===
See [[Talk:Embodied philosophy]]

General references:
General references:
* [http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/embodcog.htm "Embodied Cognition" in the internet encyclopedia of philosophy]
* [http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/embodcog.htm "Embodied Cognition" in the internet encyclopedia of philosophy]
Line 269: Line 120:
== Theory of computation ==
== Theory of computation ==
===[[Combinatorial explosion]] ===
===[[Combinatorial explosion]] ===
#Talk page: isn't this really a concept that has solely to do with algorithms, named by Lighthill? Is this really a mathematical concept, or a property of certain algorithms. A reference would be nice.
#Mark as needing references.
#Mark as needing references.
#Add text about algorithms that experience combinatorial explosions. Disambiguate and expand.
#Add text about algorithms that experience combinatorial explosions. Disambiguate and expand.
#Find a source that indicates the general importance of this idea in the history of computer science.


=== [[Intractability]] ===
=== [[Intractability (complexity)|Intractability]] ===
# Write layman's introduction to the implications of NP-Completeness. This could go in Moore's Law, or in Combinatorial explosion or both.
# Write layman's introduction to the implications of NP-Completeness. This could go in Moore's Law, or in Combinatorial explosion or both.


== Innovation and technological change ==
== MOJO Project ==

Read articles in all the old Mojos and randomly fix up music articles.
Read all articles in these categories:
* {{Cat|Technological change}} ''Move down into Innovation''
** {{Cat|Innovation}}
* {{cat|Science and technology studies}} ''Check if any of these belong in Innovation''
* {{cat|Philosophy of technology}} ''Check if any of these belong in innovation''
* {{cat|Technology in society}} ''ditto''
* {{cat|History of technology}}
** {{cat|Sociocultural evolution}}
You want to wind up with a reading list based on the sources of these articles.

=== [[Moore's Law]] ===
#Re-Add the illustration from Gordon Moore's notes.
#Need an opening graphic that shows transistor density but ''not'' on a log-log graph. There is data at [[instructions per second]].
#Add section on Sociological and Historical Impact of increasing computer power.
#Make a graph showing transportation speeds, engine horsepower, etc., for comparison.


== Unused References ==
== Unused References ==
Line 284: Line 150:
* Jon Doyle (1983) "A Society of Mind", ''[[Carnegie Mellon University|CMU]] Department of Computer Science Tech. Report #127''.
* Jon Doyle (1983) "A Society of Mind", ''[[Carnegie Mellon University|CMU]] Department of Computer Science Tech. Report #127''.
*John Markoff, "Brainy Robots Start Stepping Into Daily Life", ''The New York Times'' July 18, 2006, Section A, Page 1
*John Markoff, "Brainy Robots Start Stepping Into Daily Life", ''The New York Times'' July 18, 2006, Section A, Page 1
*Harvey Newquist, ''The Brain Makers'', Sams Publishing, 1994. ISBN 0-672-30412-0
*Harvey Newquist, ''The Brain Makers'', Sams Publishing, 1994. {{ISBN|0-672-30412-0}}

Latest revision as of 22:27, 28 May 2021

FIX WIKILINKS: Hawaiian Language Totonacan languages Austronesian languages

Pages
Templates
Info
  • How many times was a particular Wikipedia article viewed in a particular month? Find out from this site.

High priority

[edit]

Edit major wikipedia articles for FA

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Philosophy of artificial intelligence
  • Chinese Room
  • AI winter
  • Turing test

Collect notes on my computer and add them online here.

Artificial Intelligence

[edit]

Artificial intelligence

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/AI

List of basic artificial intelligence topics

[edit]

copy these out from textbook survey

Neats vs. scruffies

[edit]
  1. This could use some copy editing.
  2. Crevier, p. 254: The society of mind as scruffy. Great quote from Dennett about the essence of "scruffiness."

Game artificial intelligence and Category:Game artificial intelligence

[edit]

Do we also need an article with the the title "Adversarial search"?

Commonsense knowledge

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/Commonsense reasoning

Cognitive simulation

[edit]

If this ever becomes an article:

Human beings use symbolic processes to solve problems, reason, speak and write, learn and invent. Over the past 45 years, cognitive psychology has built and tested empirical models of these processes as they are used to perform simple tasks and then more complex ones. The models take the form of computer programs that simulate human behaviour,” Herbert A Simon, who is considered the father of AI, has said.The Financial Express, Take The Right Business Decision With The Help Of AI, posted 15 July 2007, retrieved 17 Aug 2007.

Merges

[edit]

Concept mining -- Information extraction

[edit]

If these truly are the same thing.

Future of AI, Ethics of AI, Strong AI, AI in fiction

[edit]
  1. Read last two section of R&N

Strong AI

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/Strong AI

HAL 9000

[edit]
  1. Poole and Bowman discuss 'Strong AI vs. Weak AI"
  2. Hal plays chess; this was an important test of AI technology
  3. The computer graphics were from the MIT lab.

Ethics of AI

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/Ethics of AI

Artificial brain

[edit]

See notes at Talk:artificial brain

Singularity

[edit]
  1. Add this to Singularity
In an interview on C-Net, John McCarthy dismissed Kurzweil's singularity as "nonsense" and added "I don't think Kurzweil has any ideas that have any potential to do that."[1] McCarthy has been a leader in artificial intelligence since it's inception, but unlike many of his contemporaries, has been reluctant to make predicitions.

History of artificial intelligence

[edit]

History of AI

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/History of artificial intelligence

Timeline of artificial intelligence

[edit]
  1. Add (referenced) events from History of artificial intelligence
  2. Add other events from crevier and McCorduck
  3. Reference existing events

AI Winter

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/AI Winter

Philosophy of artificial intelligence

[edit]

Philosophy of artificial intelligence

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/Philosophy of artificial intelligence

Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence

[edit]

Done

Turing Test

[edit]
  1. Variations on the test: Define "restricted" vs. "unrestricted".
  2. There are two broken or missing citations. Research is needed.
  3. The sections that describe various colloquia read like press releases. They don't establish the historical significance of these events. I recommend we cut them.

Physical symbol system

[edit]
  1. Add philosophical background from Haugaland and Dreyfus
  2. Write empty sections

Computing Machinery and Intelligence

[edit]
  1. Rewrite replies that don't read well.
  2. Section on Turing's speculations; should include the fact that this is still called the "Turing Method" in England; find a sourcd on that.

Cognitive science

[edit]

Conceptual metaphor

[edit]
  1. Use my references and examples -- fill it out, make it clear.

Embodiment articles

[edit]

General references:

Theory of computation

[edit]

Combinatorial explosion

[edit]
  1. Mark as needing references.
  2. Add text about algorithms that experience combinatorial explosions. Disambiguate and expand.
  3. Find a source that indicates the general importance of this idea in the history of computer science.

Intractability

[edit]
  1. Write layman's introduction to the implications of NP-Completeness. This could go in Moore's Law, or in Combinatorial explosion or both.

Innovation and technological change

[edit]

Read all articles in these categories:

You want to wind up with a reading list based on the sources of these articles.

Moore's Law

[edit]
  1. Re-Add the illustration from Gordon Moore's notes.
  2. Need an opening graphic that shows transistor density but not on a log-log graph. There is data at instructions per second.
  3. Add section on Sociological and Historical Impact of increasing computer power.
  4. Make a graph showing transportation speeds, engine horsepower, etc., for comparison.

Unused References

[edit]
  • Campbell, Jeremy (1989). The Improbable Machine. Simon and Schuster.
  • Feigenbaum, Edward A. (1983). The Fifth Generation: Artificial Intelligence and Japan's Computer Challenge to the World. Michael Joseph. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |code= ignored (help)
  • Jon Doyle (1983) "A Society of Mind", CMU Department of Computer Science Tech. Report #127.
  • John Markoff, "Brainy Robots Start Stepping Into Daily Life", The New York Times July 18, 2006, Section A, Page 1
  • Harvey Newquist, The Brain Makers, Sams Publishing, 1994. ISBN 0-672-30412-0
  1. ^ See Getting Machines to Think Like Us
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:CharlesGillingham/Todo&oldid=1025678920"