Jump to content

User:CharlesGillingham/Todo: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
FIX WIKILINKS:
⚫
TEST.{{User:CharlesGillingham/Harvfn|McCorduck|2004}}
[[Hawaiian Language]]
[[Totonacan languages]]
[[Austronesian languages]]


;Pages
;Pages
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixindex&from=User%3ACharlesGillingham%2F&namespace=0 My user pages]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixindex&from=User%3ACharlesGillingham%2F&namespace=0 My user pages]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist/edit Articles I am editing]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist/edit Articles I am editing]

* {{McCorduck 2004}}


;Templates
;Templates
Line 13: Line 14:
;Info
;Info
*How many times was a particular Wikipedia article viewed in a particular month? Find out from [http://stats.grok.se this site].
*How many times was a particular Wikipedia article viewed in a particular month? Find out from [http://stats.grok.se this site].

== High priority ==
Edit major wikipedia articles for FA
* Artificial intelligence
* Philosophy of artificial intelligence
⚫
* Chinese Room
* AI winter
* Turing test
Collect notes on my computer and add them online here.


== Artificial Intelligence ==
== Artificial Intelligence ==
=== [[Artificial intelligence]]===
=== [[Artificial intelligence]]===
See [[User:CharlesGillingham/More/AI]]
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/AI}}


=== [[List of basic artificial intelligence topics]]===
=== [[List of basic artificial intelligence topics]]===
copy these out from textbook survey
copy these out from textbook survey

=== [[logic programming]]===
Provide a down-to-earth example in the second paragraph.


=== [[Neats vs. scruffies]] ===
=== [[Neats vs. scruffies]] ===
#This could use some copy editing.
#This could use some copy editing.
⚫
#Crevier, p. 254: The society of mind as scruffy. Great quote from Dennett about the essence of "scruffiness."
#Add more historical information: notably the victory of neats with the work of Judea Pearl and the agent model
⚫
#Crevier, p. 254: The scoiecty of mind as scruffy. Great quote from Dennett about the essence of "scruffiness."


===[[Game artificial intelligence]] and {{Cat|Game artificial intelligence}} ===
===[[Game artificial intelligence]] and {{Cat|Game artificial intelligence}} ===
Line 33: Line 39:


=== [[Commonsense knowledge]] ===
=== [[Commonsense knowledge]] ===
⚫
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/Commonsense reasoning}}
#Find a reference
#Write article

=== [[Computational intelligence]] ===
#Tie this to the definitions given in the textbook you bought.

=== [[AI effect]]===
See [[User:CharlesGillingham/AI effect]]

=== [[Chatterbot]] ===
Fix weird section mentioning "Strong AI".
Rename it '''Chatterbots and the Turing Test'''
And create another '''Applications of chatterbots'''


===[[Cognitive simulation]]===
===[[Cognitive simulation]]===
Line 92: Line 86:
==Philosophy of artificial intelligence==
==Philosophy of artificial intelligence==
=== [[Philosophy of artificial intelligence]] ===
=== [[Philosophy of artificial intelligence]] ===
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/Philosophy of artificial intelligence}}
# Add section on simulated intelligence vs. real intelligence.
# Add Church-Turing, and call Lucas a refutation of ''that''. Use Von Neumann's quote that's in the [[timeline of artificial intelligence]].
# Add Kurzweil references. Check Kurzweil's date that machines can simulate a brain.
# Give me a better "intelligent agent" definition
# Add my new "working definition"
# Mention winograd and flores.
# Find some legitimate criticism of brain simulation
# Mention that "strong AI" is hard to construe and that some think it has bearing on the Dartmouth proposal.
# Undo this change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_artificial_intelligence&curid=2958015&diff=173903203&oldid=173762950]
# Additional references (read and use, if you like)
* {{Citation|last=Minsky|first=Marvin|year=1982|title=Why People Think Computers Can't|magazine=AI Magazine|volume=3|number=4|date= Fall 1982|url=http://psych.utoronto.ca/users/reingold/courses/ai/cache/ComputersCantThink.txt|author-link=Marvin Minsky}}
* {{Citation | last = Dreyfus | first = Hubert | last2 = Dreyfus | first2 = Stuart | year = 2004 | title =From Socrates to Expert Systems: The Limits and Dangers of Calculative Rationality | url=http://socrates.berkeley.edu/%7Ehdreyfus/html/paper_socrates.html| publisher=University of California, Berkeley | authorlink = Hubert Dreyfus }}
* {{Citation | last=Reingold | first=Eyal | year=2007 | title=Artificial Intelligence Tutorial Review| url=http://psych.utoronto.ca/users/reingold/courses/ai/ }}
* {{Citation | last=Macro VU|title=Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think?|url=http://www.macrovu.com/CCTGeneralInfo.html}} ''This thing is awesome!''




=== [[Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence]] ===
=== [[Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence]] ===
Done
#Reread and finish "psychological assumption". Plough through this book, asshole, so I can finish this article.

⚫
=== [[Chinese Room]] ===
#Thought experiment is plagiarized from [http://philosophy.uwaterloo.ca/MindDict/chineseroom.html here]; rewrite.
#Mention that "strong AI" is hard to construe and that some think it has bearing on the Dartmouth proposal.
#Find page number for "syntax is insufficient for semantics"
#Look at Hauser 97, p. 1, Hauser 05 p. 8, and Harnad 97 p.1 for more (and better) quotes for the history section.
#Find reference where Searle talks about the "background". (May have to read a lot of Searle to find this ... )
#Check Kurzweil references


===[[Turing Test]]===
===[[Turing Test]]===
How many of these still apply?
#Variations on the test: Define "restricted" vs. "unrestricted".
#Variations on the test: Define "restricted" vs. "unrestricted".
#There are two broken or missing citations. Research is needed.
#More "strengths"
#The sections that describe various colloquia read like press releases. They don't establish the historical significance of these events. I recommend we cut them.
#* it shelves philosophical discussions.
#* WHAT WAS MY OTHER ONE???
#More "weaknesses"
#*Naive interrogators. The fact that we see humans everywhere. need for experts. I think Steiner is your source here.
#Read up on it: especially Stanford encyclopedia. (I can't believe so many people don't get the ''spirit'' of the test. They take it way to seriously.)


===[[Physical symbol system]]===
===[[Physical symbol system]]===
Line 154: Line 120:
== Theory of computation ==
== Theory of computation ==
===[[Combinatorial explosion]] ===
===[[Combinatorial explosion]] ===
#Talk page: isn't this really a concept that has solely to do with algorithms, named by Lighthill? Is this really a mathematical concept, or a property of certain algorithms. A reference would be nice.
#Mark as needing references.
#Mark as needing references.
#Add text about algorithms that experience combinatorial explosions. Disambiguate and expand.
#Add text about algorithms that experience combinatorial explosions. Disambiguate and expand.
#Find a source that indicates the general importance of this idea in the history of computer science.


=== [[Intractability]] ===
=== [[Intractability (complexity)|Intractability]] ===
# Write layman's introduction to the implications of NP-Completeness. This could go in Moore's Law, or in Combinatorial explosion or both.
# Write layman's introduction to the implications of NP-Completeness. This could go in Moore's Law, or in Combinatorial explosion or both.

== MOJO Project ==
Read articles in all the old Mojos and randomly fix up music articles.


== Innovation and technological change ==
== Innovation and technological change ==
Line 177: Line 140:


=== [[Moore's Law]] ===
=== [[Moore's Law]] ===
#Re-Add the illustration.
#Re-Add the illustration from Gordon Moore's notes.
#Comment at the top of "formulations of the law" probably belongs under "futurists and moore's law."
#Need an opening graphic that shows transistor density but ''not'' on a log-log graph. There is data at [[instructions per second]].
#Need an opening graphic that shows transistor density but ''not'' on a log-log graph. There is data at [[instructions per second]].
#Add section on Sociological and Historical Impact of increasing computer power.
#Add section on Sociological and Historical Impact of increasing computer power.
#Make a graph showing transportation speeds, engine horsepower, etc., for comparison.
#Make a graph showing transportation speeds, engine horsepower, etc., for comparison.
#Shouldn't it list a larger and more logical set of [[exponential]] trends?


== Unused References ==
== Unused References ==
Line 189: Line 150:
* Jon Doyle (1983) "A Society of Mind", ''[[Carnegie Mellon University|CMU]] Department of Computer Science Tech. Report #127''.
* Jon Doyle (1983) "A Society of Mind", ''[[Carnegie Mellon University|CMU]] Department of Computer Science Tech. Report #127''.
*John Markoff, "Brainy Robots Start Stepping Into Daily Life", ''The New York Times'' July 18, 2006, Section A, Page 1
*John Markoff, "Brainy Robots Start Stepping Into Daily Life", ''The New York Times'' July 18, 2006, Section A, Page 1
*Harvey Newquist, ''The Brain Makers'', Sams Publishing, 1994. ISBN 0-672-30412-0
*Harvey Newquist, ''The Brain Makers'', Sams Publishing, 1994. {{ISBN|0-672-30412-0}}

Latest revision as of 22:27, 28 May 2021

FIX WIKILINKS: Hawaiian Language Totonacan languages Austronesian languages

Pages
Templates
Info
  • How many times was a particular Wikipedia article viewed in a particular month? Find out from this site.

High priority

[edit]

Edit major wikipedia articles for FA

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Philosophy of artificial intelligence
  • Chinese Room
  • AI winter
  • Turing test

Collect notes on my computer and add them online here.

Artificial Intelligence

[edit]

Artificial intelligence

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/AI

List of basic artificial intelligence topics

[edit]

copy these out from textbook survey

Neats vs. scruffies

[edit]
  1. This could use some copy editing.
  2. Crevier, p. 254: The society of mind as scruffy. Great quote from Dennett about the essence of "scruffiness."

Game artificial intelligence and Category:Game artificial intelligence

[edit]

Do we also need an article with the the title "Adversarial search"?

Commonsense knowledge

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/Commonsense reasoning

Cognitive simulation

[edit]

If this ever becomes an article:

Human beings use symbolic processes to solve problems, reason, speak and write, learn and invent. Over the past 45 years, cognitive psychology has built and tested empirical models of these processes as they are used to perform simple tasks and then more complex ones. The models take the form of computer programs that simulate human behaviour,” Herbert A Simon, who is considered the father of AI, has said.The Financial Express, Take The Right Business Decision With The Help Of AI, posted 15 July 2007, retrieved 17 Aug 2007.

Merges

[edit]

Concept mining -- Information extraction

[edit]

If these truly are the same thing.

Future of AI, Ethics of AI, Strong AI, AI in fiction

[edit]
  1. Read last two section of R&N

Strong AI

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/Strong AI

HAL 9000

[edit]
  1. Poole and Bowman discuss 'Strong AI vs. Weak AI"
  2. Hal plays chess; this was an important test of AI technology
  3. The computer graphics were from the MIT lab.

Ethics of AI

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/Ethics of AI

Artificial brain

[edit]

See notes at Talk:artificial brain

Singularity

[edit]
  1. Add this to Singularity
In an interview on C-Net, John McCarthy dismissed Kurzweil's singularity as "nonsense" and added "I don't think Kurzweil has any ideas that have any potential to do that."[1] McCarthy has been a leader in artificial intelligence since it's inception, but unlike many of his contemporaries, has been reluctant to make predicitions.

History of artificial intelligence

[edit]

History of AI

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/History of artificial intelligence

Timeline of artificial intelligence

[edit]
  1. Add (referenced) events from History of artificial intelligence
  2. Add other events from crevier and McCorduck
  3. Reference existing events

AI Winter

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/AI Winter

Philosophy of artificial intelligence

[edit]

Philosophy of artificial intelligence

[edit]
See also: User:CharlesGillingham/More/Philosophy of artificial intelligence

Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence

[edit]

Done

Turing Test

[edit]
  1. Variations on the test: Define "restricted" vs. "unrestricted".
  2. There are two broken or missing citations. Research is needed.
  3. The sections that describe various colloquia read like press releases. They don't establish the historical significance of these events. I recommend we cut them.

Physical symbol system

[edit]
  1. Add philosophical background from Haugaland and Dreyfus
  2. Write empty sections

Computing Machinery and Intelligence

[edit]
  1. Rewrite replies that don't read well.
  2. Section on Turing's speculations; should include the fact that this is still called the "Turing Method" in England; find a sourcd on that.

Cognitive science

[edit]

Conceptual metaphor

[edit]
  1. Use my references and examples -- fill it out, make it clear.

Embodiment articles

[edit]

General references:

Theory of computation

[edit]

Combinatorial explosion

[edit]
  1. Mark as needing references.
  2. Add text about algorithms that experience combinatorial explosions. Disambiguate and expand.
  3. Find a source that indicates the general importance of this idea in the history of computer science.

Intractability

[edit]
  1. Write layman's introduction to the implications of NP-Completeness. This could go in Moore's Law, or in Combinatorial explosion or both.

Innovation and technological change

[edit]

Read all articles in these categories:

You want to wind up with a reading list based on the sources of these articles.

Moore's Law

[edit]
  1. Re-Add the illustration from Gordon Moore's notes.
  2. Need an opening graphic that shows transistor density but not on a log-log graph. There is data at instructions per second.
  3. Add section on Sociological and Historical Impact of increasing computer power.
  4. Make a graph showing transportation speeds, engine horsepower, etc., for comparison.

Unused References

[edit]
  • Campbell, Jeremy (1989). The Improbable Machine. Simon and Schuster.
  • Feigenbaum, Edward A. (1983). The Fifth Generation: Artificial Intelligence and Japan's Computer Challenge to the World. Michael Joseph. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |code= ignored (help)
  • Jon Doyle (1983) "A Society of Mind", CMU Department of Computer Science Tech. Report #127.
  • John Markoff, "Brainy Robots Start Stepping Into Daily Life", The New York Times July 18, 2006, Section A, Page 1
  • Harvey Newquist, The Brain Makers, Sams Publishing, 1994. ISBN 0-672-30412-0
  1. ^ See Getting Machines to Think Like Us
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:CharlesGillingham/Todo&oldid=1025678920"