User:CharlesGillingham/Todo: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* Turing test |
* Turing test |
||
Collect notes on my computer and add them online here. |
Collect notes on my computer and add them online here. |
||
== Citation cleanup == |
|||
=== Harvard citation templates === |
|||
#Archive and merge talk pages. Collect issues; there may be a few more. |
|||
#Format the code in {{tl2|sfn}} so it looks like {{tl2|harv}}. Does this work? |
|||
#Blanks. Fixed in {{tl2|sfn}}. Not fixed in {{tl2|harv}} (and who else?) |
|||
#Use <nowiki><includeonly></nowiki> so we don't see "CITEREF" |
|||
#Is {{tl2|sfn}} sufficiently different to deserve it's own doc page? ---- [[User:CharlesGillingham|CharlesGillingham]] ([[User talk:CharlesGillingham|talk]]) 12:17, 22 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
#Add "fix" parameter, for future robotic use. |
|||
=== Areas to look at === |
|||
These are areas with quirky or outdated citation styles. They tend to have multiple errors and broken plumbing. These can usually be converted to a more standard style without controversy. |
|||
#{{tl|Harvrefcol}}. 100 articles. (Follow "what links here") |
|||
#<nowiki>{{cite * | ref= </nowiki> How do you find these? This includes the articles that were broken when {{para|ref|harv}} was introduced. |
|||
#{{tl|Ibid}} (Follow "what links here") 3,000 articles. |
|||
#<nowiki><cite></nowiki> 2,000 articles. See [[User:Gadget850/dbsearch/cite_2010-Feb-03]]. |
|||
#{{tl|wikicite}} 100 articles. All of these are used "correctly" now, although I could ask people if they want to change over. |
|||
#{{tl|ref}} 9772 articles. Many of these are "correctly" used in tables. |
|||
== Artificial Intelligence == |
== Artificial Intelligence == |
||
| Line 48: | Line 30: | ||
=== [[List of basic artificial intelligence topics]]=== |
=== [[List of basic artificial intelligence topics]]=== |
||
copy these out from textbook survey |
copy these out from textbook survey |
||
=== [[logic programming]]=== |
|||
Provide a down-to-earth example in the second paragraph. |
|||
=== [[Neats vs. scruffies]] === |
=== [[Neats vs. scruffies]] === |
||
| Line 61: | Line 40: | ||
=== [[Commonsense knowledge]] === |
=== [[Commonsense knowledge]] === |
||
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/Commonsense reasoning}} |
{{See also|User:CharlesGillingham/More/Commonsense reasoning}} |
||
=== [[Computational intelligence]] === |
|||
#Tie this to the definitions given in the textbook you bought. |
|||
===[[Cognitive simulation]]=== |
===[[Cognitive simulation]]=== |
||
| Line 114: | Line 90: | ||
=== [[Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence]] === |
=== [[Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence]] === |
||
Done |
Done |
||
=== [[Chinese Room]] === |
|||
#The introduction (especially the second half) is disorganized. |
|||
#Need a footnote that says that some sources believe the room is not Turing complete, but clearly Searle thinks it is, because of such and such quote. |
|||
#Need a footnote that says "strong AI" is hard to construe and that some think it has bearing on the Dartmouth proposal. Who are they? Cole, for one. |
|||
#Thought experiment is plagiarized from [http://philosophy.uwaterloo.ca/MindDict/chineseroom.html here]; rewrite. |
|||
#Find page number for "syntax is insufficient for semantics" |
|||
#Look at Hauser 97, p. 1, Hauser 05 p. 8, and Harnad 97 p.1 for more (and better) quotes for the history section. |
|||
#Find reference where Searle talks about the "background". (May have to read a lot of Searle to find this ... ) |
|||
#Check Kurzweil references |
|||
===[[Turing Test]]=== |
===[[Turing Test]]=== |
||
| Line 158: | Line 124: | ||
#Find a source that indicates the general importance of this idea in the history of computer science. |
#Find a source that indicates the general importance of this idea in the history of computer science. |
||
=== [[Intractability]] === |
=== [[Intractability (complexity)|Intractability]] === |
||
# Write layman's introduction to the implications of NP-Completeness. This could go in Moore's Law, or in Combinatorial explosion or both. |
# Write layman's introduction to the implications of NP-Completeness. This could go in Moore's Law, or in Combinatorial explosion or both. |
||
== MOJO Project == |
|||
Read articles in all the old Mojos and randomly fix up music articles. |
|||
== Innovation and technological change == |
== Innovation and technological change == |
||
| Line 187: | Line 150: | ||
* Jon Doyle (1983) "A Society of Mind", ''[[Carnegie Mellon University|CMU]] Department of Computer Science Tech. Report #127''. |
* Jon Doyle (1983) "A Society of Mind", ''[[Carnegie Mellon University|CMU]] Department of Computer Science Tech. Report #127''. |
||
*John Markoff, "Brainy Robots Start Stepping Into Daily Life", ''The New York Times'' July 18, 2006, Section A, Page 1 |
*John Markoff, "Brainy Robots Start Stepping Into Daily Life", ''The New York Times'' July 18, 2006, Section A, Page 1 |
||
*Harvey Newquist, ''The Brain Makers'', Sams Publishing, 1994. ISBN |
*Harvey Newquist, ''The Brain Makers'', Sams Publishing, 1994. {{ISBN|0-672-30412-0}} |
||
Latest revision as of 22:27, 28 May 2021
FIX WIKILINKS: Hawaiian Language Totonacan languages Austronesian languages
- Pages
- Templates
- Info
- How many times was a particular Wikipedia article viewed in a particular month? Find out from this site.
High priority
[edit]Edit major wikipedia articles for FA
- Artificial intelligence
- Philosophy of artificial intelligence
- Chinese Room
- AI winter
- Turing test
Collect notes on my computer and add them online here.
Artificial Intelligence
[edit]copy these out from textbook survey
- This could use some copy editing.
- Crevier, p. 254: The society of mind as scruffy. Great quote from Dennett about the essence of "scruffiness."
Do we also need an article with the the title "Adversarial search"?
If this ever becomes an article:
Human beings use symbolic processes to solve problems, reason, speak and write, learn and invent. Over the past 45 years, cognitive psychology has built and tested empirical models of these processes as they are used to perform simple tasks and then more complex ones. The models take the form of computer programs that simulate human behaviour,” Herbert A Simon, who is considered the father of AI, has said.The Financial Express, Take The Right Business Decision With The Help Of AI, posted 15 July 2007, retrieved 17 Aug 2007.
Merges
[edit]If these truly are the same thing.
Future of AI, Ethics of AI, Strong AI, AI in fiction
[edit]- Read last two section of R&N
- Poole and Bowman discuss 'Strong AI vs. Weak AI"
- Hal plays chess; this was an important test of AI technology
- The computer graphics were from the MIT lab.
See notes at Talk:artificial brain
- Add this to Singularity
- In an interview on C-Net, John McCarthy dismissed Kurzweil's singularity as "nonsense" and added "I don't think Kurzweil has any ideas that have any potential to do that."[1] McCarthy has been a leader in artificial intelligence since it's inception, but unlike many of his contemporaries, has been reluctant to make predicitions.
History of artificial intelligence
[edit]- Add (referenced) events from History of artificial intelligence
- Add other events from crevier and McCorduck
- Reference existing events
Philosophy of artificial intelligence
[edit]Done
- Variations on the test: Define "restricted" vs. "unrestricted".
- There are two broken or missing citations. Research is needed.
- The sections that describe various colloquia read like press releases. They don't establish the historical significance of these events. I recommend we cut them.
- Add philosophical background from Haugaland and Dreyfus
- Write empty sections
- Rewrite replies that don't read well.
- Section on Turing's speculations; should include the fact that this is still called the "Turing Method" in England; find a sourcd on that.
Cognitive science
[edit]- Use my references and examples -- fill it out, make it clear.
Embodiment articles
[edit]General references:
- "Embodied Cognition" in the internet encyclopedia of philosophy
- Six Views of Embodied Cognition
- Interview with Lakoff
- Seems to be about artificial life
- Boston Globe
- Embodied Cognitive Science (Pfeifer's definition)
- Embodied Cognition: a field guide
- How to study the mind: An introduction to embodied cognition Michael L. Anderson
Theory of computation
[edit]- Mark as needing references.
- Add text about algorithms that experience combinatorial explosions. Disambiguate and expand.
- Find a source that indicates the general importance of this idea in the history of computer science.
- Write layman's introduction to the implications of NP-Completeness. This could go in Moore's Law, or in Combinatorial explosion or both.
Innovation and technological change
[edit]Read all articles in these categories:
- Category:Technological change Move down into Innovation
- Category:Science and technology studies Check if any of these belong in Innovation
- Category:Philosophy of technology Check if any of these belong in innovation
- Category:Technology in society ditto
- Category:History of technology
You want to wind up with a reading list based on the sources of these articles.
- Re-Add the illustration from Gordon Moore's notes.
- Need an opening graphic that shows transistor density but not on a log-log graph. There is data at instructions per second.
- Add section on Sociological and Historical Impact of increasing computer power.
- Make a graph showing transportation speeds, engine horsepower, etc., for comparison.
Unused References
[edit]- Campbell, Jeremy (1989). The Improbable Machine. Simon and Schuster.
- Feigenbaum, Edward A. (1983). The Fifth Generation: Artificial Intelligence and Japan's Computer Challenge to the World. Michael Joseph.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|code=ignored (help) - Jon Doyle (1983) "A Society of Mind", CMU Department of Computer Science Tech. Report #127.
- John Markoff, "Brainy Robots Start Stepping Into Daily Life", The New York Times July 18, 2006, Section A, Page 1
- Harvey Newquist, The Brain Makers, Sams Publishing, 1994. ISBN 0-672-30412-0