Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breanne McGhee: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 20:55, 17 June 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Breanne McGhee

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. No effective references. scope_creep^Talk 22:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. PR flim-flam. No pass of WP:Prof or WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. She's had her OD for just 5 years (but is apparently both a full-time optometrist and a PhD student?), has no Scopus- or WoS-indexed publications, and apparently supports FRINGE treatments (vision therapy). No evidence she's actually notable through either NPROF or GNG. This is one of several UW WikiEd BIPOC bios that have strongly failed notability...JoelleJay (talk) 04:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Assistant prof, no indication of passing WP:NPROF, awards seem early career, and not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, maybe way way TOOSOON. Fails WP:NPROF, all awards are student / early career awards. --hroest 13:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: coverage is weak and reliable sources not found. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 14:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NPROF, and I was unable to find adequate coverage in independent sources to argue that the subject passes WP:GNG at the moment. If the article was more neutral in tone I'd have argued for draftify as it might just be a bit WP:TOOSOON. Watchlisting this in case new sources are identified. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:24, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Breanne McGhee]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''. &spades;[[User:Premeditated Chaos|PMC]]&spades; [[User_talk:Premeditated Chaos|(talk)]] 20:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
+===[[:Breanne McGhee]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|Breanne McGhee}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breanne McGhee|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 10#{{anchorencode:Breanne McGhee}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
@@ Line 8: / Line 13: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators|list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 22:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women|list of Women-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 22:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Delete'''. PR flim-flam. No pass of [[WP:Prof]] or [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 22:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC).
+*'''Delete'''. She's had her OD for just 5 years (but is apparently both a full-time optometrist and a PhD student?), has no Scopus- or WoS-indexed publications, and apparently supports FRINGE treatments (vision therapy). No evidence she's actually notable through either NPROF or GNG. This is one of several UW WikiEd BIPOC bios that have strongly failed notability...[[User:JoelleJay|JoelleJay]] ([[User talk:JoelleJay|talk]]) 04:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Assistant prof, no indication of passing [[WP:NPROF]], awards seem early career, and not enough coverage to meet [[WP:GNG]]. -[[User:Kj cheetham|Kj cheetham]] ([[User talk:Kj cheetham|talk]]) 12:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per above, maybe way way TOOSOON. Fails [[WP:NPROF]], all awards are student / early career awards. --[[user:Hannes Röst|hroest]] 13:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''': coverage is weak and reliable sources not found. Fails GNG. [[User:TheDreamBoat|TheDreamBoat]] ([[User talk:TheDreamBoat|talk]]) 14:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' fails [[WP:NPROF]], and I was unable to find adequate coverage in independent sources to argue that the subject passes [[WP:GNG]] at the moment. If the article was more neutral in tone I'd have argued for draftify as it might just be a bit [[WP:TOOSOON]]. Watchlisting this in case new sources are identified. [[User:BennyOnTheLoose|BennyOnTheLoose]] ([[User talk:BennyOnTheLoose|talk]]) 12:24, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>