Wikipedia:Peer review/2019 UEFA Champions League Final/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) ←Created page with '{{subst:PR/subst}} {{Peer review page|topic=everydaylife}} I've listed this article for peer review because I believe that it can easily become a GA, but there a...' |
Archive expired peer review. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/PeerReviewArchiver |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:April 2021 peer reviews]]</noinclude> |
<noinclude>[[Category:April 2021 peer reviews]]</noinclude> |
||
<!-- Please add all peer review discussions below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 or 3 headers (==...== and ===...===) below to break up the review. Use level 4 (====...====) and so on.--> |
<!-- Please add all peer review discussions below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 or 3 headers (==...== and ===...===) below to break up the review. Use level 4 (====...====) and so on.--> |
||
{{ |
{{Closed peer review page}} |
||
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe that it can easily become a GA, but there are some issues with it which might hinder it from becoming one. Please review the article and leave any suggestions for how to fix it. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe that it can easily become a GA, but there are some issues with it which might hinder it from becoming one. Please review the article and leave any suggestions for how to fix it. |
||
Thanks, [[User:KingSkyLord|KingSkyLord]] ([[User talk:KingSkyLord|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/KingSkyLord|contribs]]) 16:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks, [[User:KingSkyLord|KingSkyLord]] ([[User talk:KingSkyLord|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/KingSkyLord|contribs]]) 16:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
:Hey, KSL. I'd like to see the citations that are in the lead moved out. Everything in the lead should be covered and cited in the sections, so you shouldn't need those citations in the lead (possible exception for anything that is so controversial that it would be constantly questioned.) [[User:Valereee|—valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 17:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:42, 23 June 2021
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe that it can easily become a GA, but there are some issues with it which might hinder it from becoming one. Please review the article and leave any suggestions for how to fix it.
Thanks, KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 16:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hey, KSL. I'd like to see the citations that are in the lead moved out. Everything in the lead should be covered and cited in the sections, so you shouldn't need those citations in the lead (possible exception for anything that is so controversial that it would be constantly questioned.) —valereee (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)